Gifted and Talented: A Teacher's guide
Discover why labelling pupils 'gifted' may harm achievement and learn practical strategies to challenge all learners effectively in your classroom.


Discover why labelling pupils 'gifted' may harm achievement and learn practical strategies to challenge all learners effectively in your classroom.
In the UK, schools historically defined gifted students as being in the top 5% for intellectual abilities. It is equally as important to cater for these students as it is to cater for the other 95%.
The issues associated with the concept of gifted and talented children, whether differentiation and enriched programs of study are fit for purpose, and practical ways that we can ensure all students are making excellent academic progress.
'How do you cater for your most able students?'
If you are a teacher, I expect you have been asked this question many times in every year of your career. There is probably a box dedicated to it on the lesson plan proforma that comes out each time you are observed.
Note that giftedness doesn't just refer to intellectual abilities, but also encompasses talents in other areas such as music, art, and athletics. Talented learners may not necessarily excel academically, but they have a natural aptitude and passion for a particular skill or subject.
As a teacher, recognise and nurture these talents as well, providing opportunities for these students to explore and develop their skills. By acknowledging and supporting gifted and talented learners, we can create a more inclusive and enriching learning environment for all students.
Common approaches to a gifted and talented education in schools, colleges and universities include:
There is a lot of pressure on secondary schools and colleges to cater for their brightest students, but some of the strategies employed to do this can unintentionally jeopardize the academic successof those students not identified as gifted and talented.
In the UK, schools have traditionally identified gifted students students as being in the top 5% for intellectual abilities. It is equally as important to cater for these students as it is to cater for the other 95%. the issues associated with the concept of gifted and talented children, whether differentiation and enriched programs of study are fit for purpose, and practical ways that we can ensure all students are making excellent academic progress.
Historically in the UK, schools categorized gifted pupils students as those in the top 5% for intellectual abilities, while talented refers to students with exceptional abilities in areas like music, art, or athletics. This distinction helps teachers identify different types of high-ability learners who may need specialised support. Understanding these terms is crucial for creating appropriate educational provisions for these students.
Shakespeare wrote: a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. This is not always the case!
There are so many terms used for students who have a particularly high academic aptitude according to baseline cognitive ability tests:
Would a gifted and talented student by any other name achieve as much? Probably not. Research suggests that they would actually achieve more without any label.
Mueller and Dweck (1998) found that performance on future tasks improves when teachers praise students' effort rather than their ability. Labels such as 'gifted and talented' emphasise the role of innate or natural talent, which can be interpreted by pupils as diminishing the importance of effort. This connects to growth mindset research, which shows these labels can decrease future academic success if pupils are aware of them.

However, the reverse is true when the labels are only made available to teachers. Rosenthal and Jacobson (1966) found that when teachers were told that they had a class of high achievers, the pupils made significantly more progress over a year compared to a control group with the same baseline data.
What can we learn from these two studies?

Schools typically use a combination of standardised test scores, teacher observations, and performance data to identify gifted and talented students. Academic assessments focus on intellectual abilities, while talent identification looks at specific skills in creative or physical domains. Multiple measures are recommended rather than relying on a single test or assessment method.
We should be cautious about using tests to measure academic aptitude. They may only consider one aspect of intelligence or not reflect the wide range of cognitive abilities. Effective identification often requires formative assessment approaches that can capture students' higher-order thinking skills and their ability to engage in critical thinking. Teachers should also consider students' metacognition abilities when identifying those who may benefit from advanced learning opportunities. Additionally, using adaptive teaching methods can help identify students who consistently exceed expectations, while ensuring all learners receive appropriate support regardless of their identified status.expectations.
Differentiation, the tailoring of instruction to meet individual needs, is a cornerstone of effective teaching. However, when it comes to gifted and talented students, differentiation alone might not suffice. While provide varied tasks and resources, the depth and complexity of the content must also be carefully considered.
Simply providing "more" work isn't the answer. Instead, focus on providing work that is different: tasks that challenge pupils to think critically, solve complex problems, and explore ideas in greater depth. This may involve adapting the curriculum to include more advanced concepts or providing opportunities for independent research and project-based learning. Thoughtful lesson planning, alongside assessment for learning, helps students to make academic progress.
Too often, extension tasks for gifted and talented students are simply more of the same, offering little real challenge or opportunity for growth. These tasks can become a form of busywork, failing to engage students' intellectual curiosity or develop their higher-order thinking skills.
Instead of relying on generic extension tasks, teachers should design activities that allow pupils to pursue their interests, explore complex topics, and develop their unique talents. This could involve independent research projects, creative problem-solving activities, or opportunities to mentor other pupils. The key is to provide meaningful and challenging experiences that creates intellectual growth.
In the UK, schools traditionally define gifted students as those in the top five per cent for intellectual ability. Talented refers to students who show exceptional skills in practical areas such as music, art, or physical education. This distinction helps teachers identify different types of high ability learners who require specific support.
Teachers use a combination of standardised test results, classroom observations, and ongoing assessment data. It is important to look for signs of higher order thinking and the ability to use metacognition during complex tasks. Using multiple measures ensures that a wide range of cognitive abilities is recognised across the school organisation.
Research indicates that telling a student they are gifted can lead to a fixed mindset where they fear failure. When students believe their success is due to innate talent, they may stop putting in the necessary effort to improve. It is more effective to praise the specific strategies and hard work a learner uses to solve a problem.
Teachers should focus on providing depth rather than increasing the speed of the curriculum. Using open ended questions and complex problem solving tasks allows students to apply their knowledge in new ways. This approach ensures that high ability learners remain engaged without being separated from the rest of the class.
A frequent mistake is giving students extension tasks that are simply more of the same work they have already mastered. Another error is assuming that high ability students can always work independently without teacher guidance or support. Teachers should instead plan for tasks that require critical thinking and encourage students to justify their reasoning.
Studies like the Rosenthal and Jacobson research show that high teacher expectations significantly improve student progress. When teachers believe their students are capable of high achievement, their teaching behaviour changes to provide more challenge. This positive cycle helps all learners in the classroom reach their full potential regardless of their initial starting point.
So, what are some practical strategies that teachers can use to effectively support gifted and talented learners?
Ultimately, supporting gifted and talented learners requires a shift in mindset, moving away from the idea of simply providing "more" work and towards creating learning experiences that are challenging, engaging, and meaningful. By embracing this approach, we can ensure that all students have the opportunity to reach their full potential.
The effective support of gifted and talented learners is not about labels or generic extension activities. It's about understanding individual needs, developing a growth mindset, and providing challenging, engaging learning experiences that allow all pupils to th rive. By focusing on depth over speed, encouraging effort over innate ability, and creating a supportive learning environment, teachers can helps gifted and talented students to reach their full potential, while simultaneously enriching the learning experience for all.
Remember, the goal is not to create an elite group of "gifted" students, but to cultivate a classroom environment where every pupil is challenged, supported, and inspired to achieve their best. This requires a commitment to differentiation, personalized learning, and a belief in the potential of every student, regardless of their perceived abilities. By embracing these principles, we can create a truly inclusive and enriching learning experience for all.
These peer-reviewed studies form the evidence base for gifted and talented education and its classroom applications. Each paper offers practical insights for teachers seeking to ground their practice in research.
Differentiated instruction: A guide for elementary and middle school teachers View study ↗
Coleman, M. R. (2005)
Mindset: The new psychology of success View study ↗
Dweck, C. S. (2006)
Enhancing Creative Reading through Self-Questioning and Enrichment Activities View study ↗
0 citations
Zelal Aboud (2009)
Pygmalion in the classroom View study ↗
3,017 citations
R. Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson (1968)
The Differentiated Classroom Responding To The Needs Of All Learners View study ↗
748 citations
J. Eichel (2014)
In the UK, schools historically defined gifted students as being in the top 5% for intellectual abilities. It is equally as important to cater for these students as it is to cater for the other 95%.
The issues associated with the concept of gifted and talented children, whether differentiation and enriched programs of study are fit for purpose, and practical ways that we can ensure all students are making excellent academic progress.
'How do you cater for your most able students?'
If you are a teacher, I expect you have been asked this question many times in every year of your career. There is probably a box dedicated to it on the lesson plan proforma that comes out each time you are observed.
Note that giftedness doesn't just refer to intellectual abilities, but also encompasses talents in other areas such as music, art, and athletics. Talented learners may not necessarily excel academically, but they have a natural aptitude and passion for a particular skill or subject.
As a teacher, recognise and nurture these talents as well, providing opportunities for these students to explore and develop their skills. By acknowledging and supporting gifted and talented learners, we can create a more inclusive and enriching learning environment for all students.
Common approaches to a gifted and talented education in schools, colleges and universities include:
There is a lot of pressure on secondary schools and colleges to cater for their brightest students, but some of the strategies employed to do this can unintentionally jeopardize the academic successof those students not identified as gifted and talented.
In the UK, schools have traditionally identified gifted students students as being in the top 5% for intellectual abilities. It is equally as important to cater for these students as it is to cater for the other 95%. the issues associated with the concept of gifted and talented children, whether differentiation and enriched programs of study are fit for purpose, and practical ways that we can ensure all students are making excellent academic progress.
Historically in the UK, schools categorized gifted pupils students as those in the top 5% for intellectual abilities, while talented refers to students with exceptional abilities in areas like music, art, or athletics. This distinction helps teachers identify different types of high-ability learners who may need specialised support. Understanding these terms is crucial for creating appropriate educational provisions for these students.
Shakespeare wrote: a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. This is not always the case!
There are so many terms used for students who have a particularly high academic aptitude according to baseline cognitive ability tests:
Would a gifted and talented student by any other name achieve as much? Probably not. Research suggests that they would actually achieve more without any label.
Mueller and Dweck (1998) found that performance on future tasks improves when teachers praise students' effort rather than their ability. Labels such as 'gifted and talented' emphasise the role of innate or natural talent, which can be interpreted by pupils as diminishing the importance of effort. This connects to growth mindset research, which shows these labels can decrease future academic success if pupils are aware of them.

However, the reverse is true when the labels are only made available to teachers. Rosenthal and Jacobson (1966) found that when teachers were told that they had a class of high achievers, the pupils made significantly more progress over a year compared to a control group with the same baseline data.
What can we learn from these two studies?

Schools typically use a combination of standardised test scores, teacher observations, and performance data to identify gifted and talented students. Academic assessments focus on intellectual abilities, while talent identification looks at specific skills in creative or physical domains. Multiple measures are recommended rather than relying on a single test or assessment method.
We should be cautious about using tests to measure academic aptitude. They may only consider one aspect of intelligence or not reflect the wide range of cognitive abilities. Effective identification often requires formative assessment approaches that can capture students' higher-order thinking skills and their ability to engage in critical thinking. Teachers should also consider students' metacognition abilities when identifying those who may benefit from advanced learning opportunities. Additionally, using adaptive teaching methods can help identify students who consistently exceed expectations, while ensuring all learners receive appropriate support regardless of their identified status.expectations.
Differentiation, the tailoring of instruction to meet individual needs, is a cornerstone of effective teaching. However, when it comes to gifted and talented students, differentiation alone might not suffice. While provide varied tasks and resources, the depth and complexity of the content must also be carefully considered.
Simply providing "more" work isn't the answer. Instead, focus on providing work that is different: tasks that challenge pupils to think critically, solve complex problems, and explore ideas in greater depth. This may involve adapting the curriculum to include more advanced concepts or providing opportunities for independent research and project-based learning. Thoughtful lesson planning, alongside assessment for learning, helps students to make academic progress.
Too often, extension tasks for gifted and talented students are simply more of the same, offering little real challenge or opportunity for growth. These tasks can become a form of busywork, failing to engage students' intellectual curiosity or develop their higher-order thinking skills.
Instead of relying on generic extension tasks, teachers should design activities that allow pupils to pursue their interests, explore complex topics, and develop their unique talents. This could involve independent research projects, creative problem-solving activities, or opportunities to mentor other pupils. The key is to provide meaningful and challenging experiences that creates intellectual growth.
In the UK, schools traditionally define gifted students as those in the top five per cent for intellectual ability. Talented refers to students who show exceptional skills in practical areas such as music, art, or physical education. This distinction helps teachers identify different types of high ability learners who require specific support.
Teachers use a combination of standardised test results, classroom observations, and ongoing assessment data. It is important to look for signs of higher order thinking and the ability to use metacognition during complex tasks. Using multiple measures ensures that a wide range of cognitive abilities is recognised across the school organisation.
Research indicates that telling a student they are gifted can lead to a fixed mindset where they fear failure. When students believe their success is due to innate talent, they may stop putting in the necessary effort to improve. It is more effective to praise the specific strategies and hard work a learner uses to solve a problem.
Teachers should focus on providing depth rather than increasing the speed of the curriculum. Using open ended questions and complex problem solving tasks allows students to apply their knowledge in new ways. This approach ensures that high ability learners remain engaged without being separated from the rest of the class.
A frequent mistake is giving students extension tasks that are simply more of the same work they have already mastered. Another error is assuming that high ability students can always work independently without teacher guidance or support. Teachers should instead plan for tasks that require critical thinking and encourage students to justify their reasoning.
Studies like the Rosenthal and Jacobson research show that high teacher expectations significantly improve student progress. When teachers believe their students are capable of high achievement, their teaching behaviour changes to provide more challenge. This positive cycle helps all learners in the classroom reach their full potential regardless of their initial starting point.
So, what are some practical strategies that teachers can use to effectively support gifted and talented learners?
Ultimately, supporting gifted and talented learners requires a shift in mindset, moving away from the idea of simply providing "more" work and towards creating learning experiences that are challenging, engaging, and meaningful. By embracing this approach, we can ensure that all students have the opportunity to reach their full potential.
The effective support of gifted and talented learners is not about labels or generic extension activities. It's about understanding individual needs, developing a growth mindset, and providing challenging, engaging learning experiences that allow all pupils to th rive. By focusing on depth over speed, encouraging effort over innate ability, and creating a supportive learning environment, teachers can helps gifted and talented students to reach their full potential, while simultaneously enriching the learning experience for all.
Remember, the goal is not to create an elite group of "gifted" students, but to cultivate a classroom environment where every pupil is challenged, supported, and inspired to achieve their best. This requires a commitment to differentiation, personalized learning, and a belief in the potential of every student, regardless of their perceived abilities. By embracing these principles, we can create a truly inclusive and enriching learning experience for all.
These peer-reviewed studies form the evidence base for gifted and talented education and its classroom applications. Each paper offers practical insights for teachers seeking to ground their practice in research.
Differentiated instruction: A guide for elementary and middle school teachers View study ↗
Coleman, M. R. (2005)
Mindset: The new psychology of success View study ↗
Dweck, C. S. (2006)
Enhancing Creative Reading through Self-Questioning and Enrichment Activities View study ↗
0 citations
Zelal Aboud (2009)
Pygmalion in the classroom View study ↗
3,017 citations
R. Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson (1968)
The Differentiated Classroom Responding To The Needs Of All Learners View study ↗
748 citations
J. Eichel (2014)
<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/gifted-and-talented-a-teachers-guide#article","headline":"Gifted and Talented: A Teacher's guide","description":"Discover why labelling pupils 'gifted' may harm achievement and learn practical strategies to challenge all learners effectively in your classroom.","datePublished":"2022-05-02T15:02:20.529Z","dateModified":"2026-03-02T11:01:26.168Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/gifted-and-talented-a-teachers-guide"},"image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409501de055d1/697107ad9e1dff86aee9d3a9_697107a7fc03c7fb964a9d79_gifted-and-talented-a-teachers-guide-illustration.webp","wordCount":1580},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/gifted-and-talented-a-teachers-guide#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Gifted and Talented: A Teacher's guide","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/gifted-and-talented-a-teachers-guide"}]}]}</script>