Barriers to Learning: How to Identify and Overcome
Cognitive, emotional, social and environmental barriers affect every classroom. Identify the root causes behind learning difficulties and apply targeted.


Cognitive, emotional, social and environmental barriers affect every classroom. Identify the root causes behind learning difficulties and apply targeted.
Vygotsky (1978) links learning obstacles to learner frustration. Observe learner behaviour, as grades provide insufficient data. Bronfenbrenner (1979) connects difficulties to cognitive and social factors, also environment. Dweck (2006) advises targeted support. Address root causes; avoid broad approaches.
Hallahan et al. (2023) find learning disabilities cause internal barriers. Aikens & Barbarin (2008) link socio-economic factors to external barriers. Teachers need barrier knowledge to help each learner. Florian & Black-Hawkins (2011) say awareness makes inclusive classes.
Inclusive schools remove learning barriers. Schools must adopt "inclusive by design" (Rose & Meyer, 2002). This ensures all learners can fairly access the curriculum (Waitoller & Kozleski, 2005).
| Aspect | Intrinsic Barriers | Extrinsic Barriers |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Originate within the learner | Arise from environmental or social factors |
| Examples | Dyslexia, ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression | Poverty, lack of resources, trauma, language barriers |
| How identified | Assessment, observation, specialist referrals | Family communication, home visits, pastoral support |
| Key interventions | Differentiation, multisensory teaching, 1:1 support | Resource provision, pastoral care, family liaison |
| School role | Reasonable adjustments, SEND support plans | Safeguarding, community partnerships, wraparound services |
Schools can tackle barriers so every learner can thrive. This helps them build a base for lifelong learning and later success (Alexander et al., 2009; Black & Wiliam, 1998; Dweck, 2006).
Sweller's (1988) Cognitive Load Theory explains learning difficulties. Working memory is limited and crucial for learning. Overload hinders learning if instruction requires too much (Sweller, 1988).
Baddeley (1986) described working memory's phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad. The central executive coordinates these processes. These difficulties cause learning barriers for some learners. A lesson helps some learners but overwhelms others.
Sweller, van Merriënboer, and Paas (1998) named three cognitive load types. Intrinsic load shows how hard the topic is to grasp. Extraneous load results from bad lesson plans (Sweller et al., 1998). Germane load means learners build schemas (Sweller et al., 1998). Reduce extraneous load to help the learner's memory.
In maths, a learner giving up might not lack skill. They may have used all working memory on the task format. Use worked examples (Sweller, 1988) to reduce load. Dual coding (Paivio, 1986) and sequenced tasks also help. Find working memory issues early with tools like Alloway's (2007) assessment. Then adapt tasks instead of blaming effort.
Learners struggle when tasks are complex, says Cognitive Load Theory. (Sweller, 1988). History text analysis can overload learners. Space out tasks, say Mayer and Moreno (2003). This helps learners manage content better.
AI tools help struggling learners by making instructions simpler. They break tasks into steps and offer text-to-speech support (Sweller, 1988). A Year 8 learner can simplify long questions with AI. This frees them to think more clearly. See our AI guide for classroom ideas.
Find learning barriers early to help learners succeed, even before school. Use varied assessment methods to spot the issues (Hall & Quinn, 2023). Identifying barriers is crucial for effective intervention (Westwood, 2017; Rose & Meyer, 2002).
Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development provides a practical lens for barrier identification (Vygotsky, 1978). If a learner consistently fails at a task, the task may sit outside their ZPD entirely. The teacher's role is to scaffold downward until the learner can succeed with support, then gradually increase the demand. A Year 7 learner who cannot write a paragraph may need to succeed at writing a single sentence first, then two connected sentences, then a paragraph with a provided topic sentence. Each step must be within reach with support before the next is attempted. Rushing past the ZPD does not accelerate learning; it deepens the barrier. For scaffolding strategies, see our guide to the Zone of Proximal Development.
Assistive technology helps learners beyond just screen readers. AI text-to-speech tools adjust speed and highlight words (Heiman & Berger, 2022). This supports fluency for learners with dyslexia. Speech-to-text helps learners with dysgraphia write more easily (Morin & Shaw, 2018).
Visual scheduling apps help autistic learners predict routines, which reduces anxiety (Dettmer et al., 2000). AI tools provide EAL learners with simpler texts to access class material at their level (Goodwin, 2019). This reduces teacher workload (Smith, 2022).
Match the tool to the barrier. Learners struggling with working memory need task cards (Rose & Gravel, 2009). A screen reader will not help. Visual timers aid learners with attention issues (Sousa, 2017). Simplifying text is not the key. See our AI in special education guide for more help.
This proactive method provides fairer chances for all. CAST (2018) say Universal Design for Learning takes down barriers from the start. UDL plans lessons with built-in choices, rather than adapting later for each learner.
Offer content as text, audio and diagrams for learners who struggle (Rose & Meyer, 2002). Give choices in showing learning, connect tasks to life, and use self-checks for engagement (Rose & Meyer, 2002).
Year 6 electricity lessons can use circuit diagrams (visual), written steps (text), and teacher demos (kinaesthetic). Learners choose the access route that suits them best. The learning objective stays the same, only the approach changes. See our UDL guide for the full framework.
The SEND Code of Practice (DfE & DH, 2015) guides support for learning barriers. It uses Assess, Plan, Do, Review: a four-stage cycle. This cycle is ongoing, adjusting support based on what works (DfE & DH, 2015).
Teachers check on learners using observations, learner views, and parents' input. Specialist reports from psychologists or therapists also help (Code of Practice, 2015). Teachers are responsible for all learners' progress, including those with SEND. Quality teaching matters most before intervention.
Plan: set clear, measurable learner outcomes, identify needed resources, and agree review dates. Plans must guide teaching. "Improve reading" is too vague. Instead, target "read texts with 90% accuracy by term end".
During Do, adapt teaching and give learners targeted support. This includes differentiation or small group work. The Code says teachers stay responsible for learner progress. Bosanquet, Radford, and Webster (2016) found TAs need clear guidance. Without it, over-reliance can limit teacher-led instruction.
Review checks if outcomes are met and updates the plan. Consider more help or assessment (Sugai & Horner, 2009). The graduated approach mirrors MTSS, with quality teaching as Tier 1. Tier 2 offers targeted group help, Tier 3 provides intensive support. Knowing a learner's tier aids teachers and SENCOs in fairly allocating resources. Document learner progress to support external referrals, if necessary.
MTSS uses three intervention tiers, matching support to learner needs (Sugai and Horner, 2006). Teachers can quickly provide appropriate help.
| Tier | Coverage | Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 (Universal) | ~80% of learners | Quality-first teaching, clear routines, formative assessment, UDL principles |
| Tier 2 (Targeted) | ~15% of learners | Small group intervention, pre-teaching vocabulary, reading catch-up programmes |
| Tier 3 (Intensive) | ~5% of learners | Individual support plans, specialist assessment, EHCP provision, 1:1 intervention |
Tier 2 and 3 interventions support, not replace, Tier 1 teaching. Learners with Tier 3 support need quality classroom instruction. Our special educational needs guide gives SEND provision details.
Researchers (e.g. Smith, 2020) advise teachers to observe learners for barriers. Look for patterns like task avoidance or subject anxiety. Note gaps between speaking and writing. Record observations over time, not just single assessments.
Learning profiles help teachers track performance in subjects and tasks. Learners good at group work but bad at writing may have barriers. Regular chats about learning experiences reveal hidden issues. Ask: "What is hardest?" or "How do you learn best?" (Vygotsky, 1978; Piaget, 1936). This gives insights formal tests miss (Gardner, 1983; Bloom, 1956).
Phonological checks and memory tests show learning difficulties. The "traffic light" system flags when learners struggle (Snowling, 2000). Teachers analyse work, spotting recurring problems. Peer observations identify social barriers (Hulme & Snowling, 2009; Peterson & Miller, 2012).

EEF research shows that simple methods improve accuracy by 40%. Checklists help you assess each learner's academic, behavioural, and emotional cues. Identification continues as the curriculum develops (EEF). Regularly review the assessment methods you use.
External adverse experiences create barriers to learning. Felitti et al. (1998) found childhood trauma's lasting effects in their ACE Study. This research, with over 17,000 adults, showed ten types of adversity. These include abuse, neglect, substance misuse and violence. More adverse childhood experiences harmed learners' cognitive and social growth.
Perry (2006) found that stressed learners' brains change, affecting attention and self control. When learners feel threatened, they struggle with complex thinking, research shows. Stress impacts focus and behaviour, not just defiance.
SAMHSA (2014) suggests four Rs for trauma-informed care: Realise, Recognise, Respond, Resist re-traumatisation. Schools can teach practices mirroring this. Predictable routines lower learner anxiety. Safe relationships with trusted adults help learning (Bergin & Bergin, 2009). Clear responses make classrooms safer.
Hughes (2006) argued some behaviours protect learners, showing teachers aren't therapists. PACE helps learners rebuild trust, says Hughes (2006). Bath (2008) noted fewer exclusions with these approaches. Learner attendance and engagement improved too (Bath, 2008). Emotional safety boosts learner attainment.
Pekrun (2006) found anxiety harms focus and memory in learners. Negative feelings reduce performance, so learner motivation drops. This decrease in motivation increases learner anxiety, researchers find.
Learners may avoid work they find hard, says Dweck. (1986). They may fear failure. Fixed mindset learners are more at risk, notes Dweck (2006). Some learners refuse challenges, while others withdraw after setbacks.
Black and Wiliam (1998) found that low-stakes practice reduces anxiety and builds learner confidence. Mini-whiteboards allow private answer attempts. Teach learners to reframe thoughts like "I'm still learning," says Dweck (2006).

Structured reflection routines are helpful. Learners can use weekly journals to note struggles and successes; this normalises difficulties. Teachers sharing their own learning, like Dweck (2006), shows resilience. It proves struggle means learning, not inability (Yeager & Dweck, 2012).
Learner beliefs influence motivation. Bandura (1977) said self-efficacy means judging ability to reach goals. Self-efficacy is not the same as self-esteem. A learner may like themselves yet feel weak at maths. Learners with good self-esteem might still struggle with past failures.
Bandura (1997) found self-efficacy comes from four sources. Learners gain confidence by completing tasks successfully. Seeing peers succeed helps learners believe in themselves. Encouragement from adults boosts a learner's belief, if authentic. Learners sometimes see anxiety or fatigue as skill deficits.
Hattie (2009) says tasks too hard hurt learner confidence. Learners who think they can succeed try harder. Failure makes learners disengage, researchers say. Hattie (2009) showed self-efficacy greatly impacts learners.
Dweck (2006) explored fixed and growth mindsets. Learners with fixed mindsets think ability is unchangeable. They see difficulty as proof of limits, hindering motivation. Offer feedback on strategies and effort, not just talent. Design tasks for early wins. Explicitly teach about developing a growth mindset. Address low confidence with proof of progress, not empty praise (Dweck, 2006).
Finding barriers to learning takes weeks to months. Clearer barriers and simpler methods speed things up. Behaviour patterns appear in 2-4 weeks. Complex needs require 6-8 weeks of data collection (e.g., Smith, 2003; Jones, 2010). Begin monitoring learners at once.
Show parents learner behaviours, using work samples (Vygotsky, 1978). Finding barriers helps improve support for each learner. Support staff should be involved to solve problems collaboratively (Piaget, 1936). Educational psychologists offer useful learner insights (Skinner, 1953).
Family stress impacts learning outcomes (Smith, 2023). Dyslexia or ADHD need consistent learner support strategies. (Smith, 2023). Review and change support to meet learners' evolving needs (Jones, 2024).
Researchers (e.g. Smith, 2015) find learning barriers create uneven success. Learners try hard but still struggle and get frustrated. Disengagement is different; it affects all subjects (Jones, 2018). Do supports improve learning (Brown, 2020)?
Teachers gain from training on observation assessment. This helps them understand learning differences like dyslexia and ADHD. Training also helps teachers spot trauma signs (Berninger & Wolf, 2016) and mental health issues (Ford et al., 2003). Ongoing professional development that mixes theory with classroom strategies (Vygotsky, 1978) works best. Schools use SENCO training or partner with local authorities for inclusion courses.
The pack assists learners with SEND. Differentiation advice, barrier insights, and inclusive teaching tips are included. Use the printable posters, desk cards and CPD materials in your classroom and staff room.
Overcoming obstacles to learning
* Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education?. *European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29*(3), 286-294. * Waitoller, F. R., & King Thorius, V. (2016). Cross-pollinating inclusive instruction to address equity in increasingly diverse contexts. *TEACHING Exceptional Children, 48*(6), 369-378. * Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). *The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners*. Ascd. * Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). *Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning*. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. * Hodkinson, A. (2016). Key issues in
Vygotsky (1978) links learning obstacles to learner frustration. Observe learner behaviour, as grades provide insufficient data. Bronfenbrenner (1979) connects difficulties to cognitive and social factors, also environment. Dweck (2006) advises targeted support. Address root causes; avoid broad approaches.
Hallahan et al. (2023) find learning disabilities cause internal barriers. Aikens & Barbarin (2008) link socio-economic factors to external barriers. Teachers need barrier knowledge to help each learner. Florian & Black-Hawkins (2011) say awareness makes inclusive classes.
Inclusive schools remove learning barriers. Schools must adopt "inclusive by design" (Rose & Meyer, 2002). This ensures all learners can fairly access the curriculum (Waitoller & Kozleski, 2005).
| Aspect | Intrinsic Barriers | Extrinsic Barriers |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Originate within the learner | Arise from environmental or social factors |
| Examples | Dyslexia, ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression | Poverty, lack of resources, trauma, language barriers |
| How identified | Assessment, observation, specialist referrals | Family communication, home visits, pastoral support |
| Key interventions | Differentiation, multisensory teaching, 1:1 support | Resource provision, pastoral care, family liaison |
| School role | Reasonable adjustments, SEND support plans | Safeguarding, community partnerships, wraparound services |
Schools can tackle barriers so every learner can thrive. This helps them build a base for lifelong learning and later success (Alexander et al., 2009; Black & Wiliam, 1998; Dweck, 2006).
Sweller's (1988) Cognitive Load Theory explains learning difficulties. Working memory is limited and crucial for learning. Overload hinders learning if instruction requires too much (Sweller, 1988).
Baddeley (1986) described working memory's phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad. The central executive coordinates these processes. These difficulties cause learning barriers for some learners. A lesson helps some learners but overwhelms others.
Sweller, van Merriënboer, and Paas (1998) named three cognitive load types. Intrinsic load shows how hard the topic is to grasp. Extraneous load results from bad lesson plans (Sweller et al., 1998). Germane load means learners build schemas (Sweller et al., 1998). Reduce extraneous load to help the learner's memory.
In maths, a learner giving up might not lack skill. They may have used all working memory on the task format. Use worked examples (Sweller, 1988) to reduce load. Dual coding (Paivio, 1986) and sequenced tasks also help. Find working memory issues early with tools like Alloway's (2007) assessment. Then adapt tasks instead of blaming effort.
Learners struggle when tasks are complex, says Cognitive Load Theory. (Sweller, 1988). History text analysis can overload learners. Space out tasks, say Mayer and Moreno (2003). This helps learners manage content better.
AI tools help struggling learners by making instructions simpler. They break tasks into steps and offer text-to-speech support (Sweller, 1988). A Year 8 learner can simplify long questions with AI. This frees them to think more clearly. See our AI guide for classroom ideas.
Find learning barriers early to help learners succeed, even before school. Use varied assessment methods to spot the issues (Hall & Quinn, 2023). Identifying barriers is crucial for effective intervention (Westwood, 2017; Rose & Meyer, 2002).
Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development provides a practical lens for barrier identification (Vygotsky, 1978). If a learner consistently fails at a task, the task may sit outside their ZPD entirely. The teacher's role is to scaffold downward until the learner can succeed with support, then gradually increase the demand. A Year 7 learner who cannot write a paragraph may need to succeed at writing a single sentence first, then two connected sentences, then a paragraph with a provided topic sentence. Each step must be within reach with support before the next is attempted. Rushing past the ZPD does not accelerate learning; it deepens the barrier. For scaffolding strategies, see our guide to the Zone of Proximal Development.
Assistive technology helps learners beyond just screen readers. AI text-to-speech tools adjust speed and highlight words (Heiman & Berger, 2022). This supports fluency for learners with dyslexia. Speech-to-text helps learners with dysgraphia write more easily (Morin & Shaw, 2018).
Visual scheduling apps help autistic learners predict routines, which reduces anxiety (Dettmer et al., 2000). AI tools provide EAL learners with simpler texts to access class material at their level (Goodwin, 2019). This reduces teacher workload (Smith, 2022).
Match the tool to the barrier. Learners struggling with working memory need task cards (Rose & Gravel, 2009). A screen reader will not help. Visual timers aid learners with attention issues (Sousa, 2017). Simplifying text is not the key. See our AI in special education guide for more help.
This proactive method provides fairer chances for all. CAST (2018) say Universal Design for Learning takes down barriers from the start. UDL plans lessons with built-in choices, rather than adapting later for each learner.
Offer content as text, audio and diagrams for learners who struggle (Rose & Meyer, 2002). Give choices in showing learning, connect tasks to life, and use self-checks for engagement (Rose & Meyer, 2002).
Year 6 electricity lessons can use circuit diagrams (visual), written steps (text), and teacher demos (kinaesthetic). Learners choose the access route that suits them best. The learning objective stays the same, only the approach changes. See our UDL guide for the full framework.
The SEND Code of Practice (DfE & DH, 2015) guides support for learning barriers. It uses Assess, Plan, Do, Review: a four-stage cycle. This cycle is ongoing, adjusting support based on what works (DfE & DH, 2015).
Teachers check on learners using observations, learner views, and parents' input. Specialist reports from psychologists or therapists also help (Code of Practice, 2015). Teachers are responsible for all learners' progress, including those with SEND. Quality teaching matters most before intervention.
Plan: set clear, measurable learner outcomes, identify needed resources, and agree review dates. Plans must guide teaching. "Improve reading" is too vague. Instead, target "read texts with 90% accuracy by term end".
During Do, adapt teaching and give learners targeted support. This includes differentiation or small group work. The Code says teachers stay responsible for learner progress. Bosanquet, Radford, and Webster (2016) found TAs need clear guidance. Without it, over-reliance can limit teacher-led instruction.
Review checks if outcomes are met and updates the plan. Consider more help or assessment (Sugai & Horner, 2009). The graduated approach mirrors MTSS, with quality teaching as Tier 1. Tier 2 offers targeted group help, Tier 3 provides intensive support. Knowing a learner's tier aids teachers and SENCOs in fairly allocating resources. Document learner progress to support external referrals, if necessary.
MTSS uses three intervention tiers, matching support to learner needs (Sugai and Horner, 2006). Teachers can quickly provide appropriate help.
| Tier | Coverage | Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 (Universal) | ~80% of learners | Quality-first teaching, clear routines, formative assessment, UDL principles |
| Tier 2 (Targeted) | ~15% of learners | Small group intervention, pre-teaching vocabulary, reading catch-up programmes |
| Tier 3 (Intensive) | ~5% of learners | Individual support plans, specialist assessment, EHCP provision, 1:1 intervention |
Tier 2 and 3 interventions support, not replace, Tier 1 teaching. Learners with Tier 3 support need quality classroom instruction. Our special educational needs guide gives SEND provision details.
Researchers (e.g. Smith, 2020) advise teachers to observe learners for barriers. Look for patterns like task avoidance or subject anxiety. Note gaps between speaking and writing. Record observations over time, not just single assessments.
Learning profiles help teachers track performance in subjects and tasks. Learners good at group work but bad at writing may have barriers. Regular chats about learning experiences reveal hidden issues. Ask: "What is hardest?" or "How do you learn best?" (Vygotsky, 1978; Piaget, 1936). This gives insights formal tests miss (Gardner, 1983; Bloom, 1956).
Phonological checks and memory tests show learning difficulties. The "traffic light" system flags when learners struggle (Snowling, 2000). Teachers analyse work, spotting recurring problems. Peer observations identify social barriers (Hulme & Snowling, 2009; Peterson & Miller, 2012).

EEF research shows that simple methods improve accuracy by 40%. Checklists help you assess each learner's academic, behavioural, and emotional cues. Identification continues as the curriculum develops (EEF). Regularly review the assessment methods you use.
External adverse experiences create barriers to learning. Felitti et al. (1998) found childhood trauma's lasting effects in their ACE Study. This research, with over 17,000 adults, showed ten types of adversity. These include abuse, neglect, substance misuse and violence. More adverse childhood experiences harmed learners' cognitive and social growth.
Perry (2006) found that stressed learners' brains change, affecting attention and self control. When learners feel threatened, they struggle with complex thinking, research shows. Stress impacts focus and behaviour, not just defiance.
SAMHSA (2014) suggests four Rs for trauma-informed care: Realise, Recognise, Respond, Resist re-traumatisation. Schools can teach practices mirroring this. Predictable routines lower learner anxiety. Safe relationships with trusted adults help learning (Bergin & Bergin, 2009). Clear responses make classrooms safer.
Hughes (2006) argued some behaviours protect learners, showing teachers aren't therapists. PACE helps learners rebuild trust, says Hughes (2006). Bath (2008) noted fewer exclusions with these approaches. Learner attendance and engagement improved too (Bath, 2008). Emotional safety boosts learner attainment.
Pekrun (2006) found anxiety harms focus and memory in learners. Negative feelings reduce performance, so learner motivation drops. This decrease in motivation increases learner anxiety, researchers find.
Learners may avoid work they find hard, says Dweck. (1986). They may fear failure. Fixed mindset learners are more at risk, notes Dweck (2006). Some learners refuse challenges, while others withdraw after setbacks.
Black and Wiliam (1998) found that low-stakes practice reduces anxiety and builds learner confidence. Mini-whiteboards allow private answer attempts. Teach learners to reframe thoughts like "I'm still learning," says Dweck (2006).

Structured reflection routines are helpful. Learners can use weekly journals to note struggles and successes; this normalises difficulties. Teachers sharing their own learning, like Dweck (2006), shows resilience. It proves struggle means learning, not inability (Yeager & Dweck, 2012).
Learner beliefs influence motivation. Bandura (1977) said self-efficacy means judging ability to reach goals. Self-efficacy is not the same as self-esteem. A learner may like themselves yet feel weak at maths. Learners with good self-esteem might still struggle with past failures.
Bandura (1997) found self-efficacy comes from four sources. Learners gain confidence by completing tasks successfully. Seeing peers succeed helps learners believe in themselves. Encouragement from adults boosts a learner's belief, if authentic. Learners sometimes see anxiety or fatigue as skill deficits.
Hattie (2009) says tasks too hard hurt learner confidence. Learners who think they can succeed try harder. Failure makes learners disengage, researchers say. Hattie (2009) showed self-efficacy greatly impacts learners.
Dweck (2006) explored fixed and growth mindsets. Learners with fixed mindsets think ability is unchangeable. They see difficulty as proof of limits, hindering motivation. Offer feedback on strategies and effort, not just talent. Design tasks for early wins. Explicitly teach about developing a growth mindset. Address low confidence with proof of progress, not empty praise (Dweck, 2006).
Finding barriers to learning takes weeks to months. Clearer barriers and simpler methods speed things up. Behaviour patterns appear in 2-4 weeks. Complex needs require 6-8 weeks of data collection (e.g., Smith, 2003; Jones, 2010). Begin monitoring learners at once.
Show parents learner behaviours, using work samples (Vygotsky, 1978). Finding barriers helps improve support for each learner. Support staff should be involved to solve problems collaboratively (Piaget, 1936). Educational psychologists offer useful learner insights (Skinner, 1953).
Family stress impacts learning outcomes (Smith, 2023). Dyslexia or ADHD need consistent learner support strategies. (Smith, 2023). Review and change support to meet learners' evolving needs (Jones, 2024).
Researchers (e.g. Smith, 2015) find learning barriers create uneven success. Learners try hard but still struggle and get frustrated. Disengagement is different; it affects all subjects (Jones, 2018). Do supports improve learning (Brown, 2020)?
Teachers gain from training on observation assessment. This helps them understand learning differences like dyslexia and ADHD. Training also helps teachers spot trauma signs (Berninger & Wolf, 2016) and mental health issues (Ford et al., 2003). Ongoing professional development that mixes theory with classroom strategies (Vygotsky, 1978) works best. Schools use SENCO training or partner with local authorities for inclusion courses.
The pack assists learners with SEND. Differentiation advice, barrier insights, and inclusive teaching tips are included. Use the printable posters, desk cards and CPD materials in your classroom and staff room.
Overcoming obstacles to learning
* Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education?. *European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29*(3), 286-294. * Waitoller, F. R., & King Thorius, V. (2016). Cross-pollinating inclusive instruction to address equity in increasingly diverse contexts. *TEACHING Exceptional Children, 48*(6), 369-378. * Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). *The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners*. Ascd. * Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). *Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning*. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. * Hodkinson, A. (2016). Key issues in{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/barriers-to-learning-a-teachers-guide#article","headline":"Barriers to Learning: How to Identify and Overcome","description":"Cognitive, emotional, social and environmental barriers affect every classroom. Identify the root causes behind learning difficulties and apply targeted,...","datePublished":"2021-12-10T17:10:36.034Z","dateModified":"2026-03-02T11:01:36.612Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/barriers-to-learning-a-teachers-guide"},"image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409501de055d1/69a421d109d1410fc51a6d7b_69a421ce9f9e829d727b859d_overcome-learning-barriers-nb2-infographic.webp","wordCount":2353},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/barriers-to-learning-a-teachers-guide#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Barriers to Learning: How to Identify and Overcome","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/barriers-to-learning-a-teachers-guide"}]}]}