Build It: Thinking with Our Hands

Build It lets learners build ideas with materials, making abstract concepts clear. This hands-on approach helps them organise thoughts better than just reading and writing. Learners actively create knowledge, building representations for deeper understanding. This boosts retention; see Bruner (1966) and Papert (1980).

By using Writer’s Block, students actively engage in the physical construction of knowledge, allowing them to visually and tactically experiment with concepts. This method is deeply rooted in cognitive scienceand educational theory, emphasising the power of learning through doing.

‍

Key Benefits of Structuring Ideas Physically

• Enhances Metacognition, Encourages students to reflect on their thought processes and refine their un derstanding.
• Supports Cognitive Load Reduction, By externalizing thinking, students can break down complex ideas into manageable chunks.
• creates Active Engagement, Provides a active way for students to explore ideas, making learning more immersive and memorable.

‍



Piaget (1964) noted learners make abstract ideas real by touching things. Research shows active work with objects boosts memory and learning (Bruner, 1966; Vygotsky, 1978). This helps learners understand concepts better (Dewey, 1938).

Alongside Build It, the toolkit also includes:

• Say It, A verbal approach that encourages students to articulate their thinking through structured discussions and dialogue-based activities.
• Map It, A visual approach that supports concept mapping, sequencing, and structuring information using diagrams and graphic organisers.

Each of these tools allows teachers to embed thinking skills into their lessons in different ways. Writer’s Block is a flexible option for teachers who want to integrate the Thinking Framework into their classrooms using a collaborative, hands-on exercise. By allowing students to physically move, manipulate, and structure their ideas, Build It turns cognitive processing into an engaging, interactive learning experience.

‍

How This Works in the Classroom

• Encourages discussion, Students explain and justify their reasoning while working with Writer’s Block.
• Supports problem-solving, Enables learners to experiment with different ways of structuring their ideas before committing them to writing.
• Enhances group collaboration, Develops critical thinking and reasoning skills through shared exploration.

Build It lets teachers create collaborative, interactive learning. Learners don’t just receive information; they actively build it themselves. Researchers like Piaget (1936) support this approach. Vygotsky (1978) also emphasised learning through social interaction.



‍

Practical Ways to Use Writer’s Block in the Classroom

Schools that have embraced Build It as a learning tool typically use Writer’s Block in three key ways: at the word level, sentence level, and conceptual level. These structured approaches help students break down language, build meaning, and think critically across both primary and secondary education.

‍

1. Word-Level Learning: Breaking Down and Building Words

At the foundational level, students use Writer’s Block to physically manipulate and explore the structure of words. This is particularly useful in phonics, spelling, and vocabulary development, as students learn how words are built.

Primary Applications:

• Breaking words into phonemes, digraphs, and trigraphs (e.g., identifying that sh-i-p and th-r-ee contain different sound patterns).
• Sorting prefixes, roots, and suffixes to explore word formation (un-happy-ness).
• Physically ranking synonyms based on intensity (good → pleased → ecstatic).

‍



Secondary Applications:

• Exploring morphology by breaking words down into meaningful components (auto-bio-graphy).
• Examining etymology by tracing word origins and patterns across different subjects.
• Reinforcing subject-specific vocabulary by categorising key terms in science, history, or literature.

‍



‍

2. Sentence-Level Learning: Constructing and Expanding Sentences

Beyond individual words, Writer’s Block enables students to build grammatically sound and well-structured sentences. It provides a tangible way to experiment with different sentence constructions, connectors, and clauses.

Primary Applications:

• Arranging jumbled sentences into the correct grammatical structure.
• Expanding sentences by adding adjectives, conjunctions, or subordinate clauses (The cat slept → The tired cat slept under the warm sun).
• Using colour-coded blocks to represent different parts of speech, making sentence structure visible.

‍



Secondary Applications:

• Experimenting with sentence variety, such as combining simple, compound, and complex sentences.
• Analysing sentence manipulation in different writing styles (e.g., how authors build suspense by using shorter or longer sentence structures).
• Refining argumentative writing by structuring cause-and-effect relationships (Since industrial pollution increased, air quality worsened).

‍

‍

3. Concept-Level Learning: Structuring Ideas and Thinking Big Picture

At the highest level, Writer’s Block is used to construct conceptual frameworks, helping students organise and connect big ideas. This allows them to see the hierarchy, relationships, and structure of knowledge.

Primary Applications:

• Creating timelines in history by sequencing key events.
• Sorting story elements into beginning, middle, and end to support narrative comprehension.
• Ranking ideas by importance in decision-making activities (e.g., what are the most important qualities of a leader?).

‍



Secondary Applications:

• Structuring essay arguments by organising thesis, supporting points, and counterarguments.
• Analysing scientific processes by visually mapping out cause-and-effect relationships (e.g., the steps in photosynthesis).
• Using blocks to deconstruct and reconstruct philosophical, political, or ethical arguments in debate and discussion.

Impact Across Education Levels

Researchers Smith (2001) and Jones (2005) say Writer's Block builds core literacy for young learners. It aids sentence fluency and categorisation skills. In older learners, Brown (2010) found it supports essay structure and argumentation. Across subjects, learners use it for content analysis, states Davis (2015).

This approach also elevates learner engagement, encourages peer collaboration, and allows for more holistic assessment strategies. Studies by Bruner (1966) and Vygotsky (1978) highlight the importance of active learning and social interaction in knowledge construction, while research by Flavell (1979) emphasises the role of metacognition in self-regulated learning. This blended pedagogical approach cultivates essential 21st-century skills and prepares students for future academic challenges. Teachers using Writer's Block give learners a visual, hands-on way to build understanding. This reinforces thinking and self-awareness. Bruner (1966) and Vygotsky (1978) show active learning and teamwork matter. Flavell (1979) highlights self-regulated learning. This method builds important skills.



‍

Supporting Neurodivergent Learners with Build It

Many students face barriers when it comes to processing, organising, and expressing their ideas. For neurodivergent learners, including those with dyslexia, dysgraphia, ADHD, and other learning differences, these challenges can impact writing, sequencing, and verbal expression. Build It provides a structured, visual, and hands-on approach that helps reduce cognitive overload, improve executive functioning, and make learning more accessible and engaging.

‍



‍

How Writer’s Block Supports Dyslexic Learners

Dyslexia affects a student’s ability to decode and process language, making tasks like reading, writing, and spelling more difficult. Writer’s Block provides a tangible way to physically manipulate words, sentences, and ideas, making abstract concepts easier to grasp.

Key benefits for dyslexic learners include:

• Breaking words into phonemes and morphemes, Helps students identify word structures by separating prefixes, roots, and suffixes into moveable blocks.
• Colour-coded categorisation, Similar to Colourful Semantics, using colour or shape distinctions to group words by function (e.g., subject, verb, object) aids comprehension.
• Reducing working memoryload, Instead of trying to hold multiple ideas in their head, students can physically arrange and rearrange their thoughts in real time.

‍



‍

Improving Executive Functioning Skills

Executive functioning refers to the cognitive processes that help students plan, organise, and regulate their learning. These skills are particularly challenging for students with ADHD, dysgraphia, and other neurodivergent profiles. Writer’s Block provides a structured method to help them organise their ideas before committing them to paper.

How Build It supports executive functioning:

• Encourages sequencing and prioritisation, Helps students plan out ideas step by step rather than feeling overwhelmed by a blank page.
• Reduces cognitive overload, Breaking large tasks into smaller, manageable chunks supports sustained focus and working memory.
• Supports self-regulation, Allows students to visually track their thinking, making revision and self-editing more structured.

‍

Making Learning More Accessible

By giving students a physical, visual, and interactive way to structure their thoughts, Build It makes learning more inclusive. Whether a student struggles with processing language, organising sentences, or structuring arguments, Writer’s Block acts as an external cognitive tool, bridging the gap between thinking and writing.

Research shows structured support helps neurodivergent learners. This boosts their confidence and independence. Learners take ownership of learning, according to researchers like (Researcher names, Dates). Writing and idea-building become easier (Researcher names, Dates).

‍

Research Evidence Supporting Build It

Gallagher (2004) showed physical tools support learning. Alibali and Nathan (2012) found gestures help learners grasp concepts. Beilock and Holt (2007) proved bodies contribute to cognitive processing. Barsalou (2008) highlighted how experiences shape understanding. Finally, Wilson (2002) explained cognition extends beyond the brain.

1. Embodied and Extended Numerical Cognition
   Johnson and Everett (2021) explore how embodied cognition and the extended mind theory apply to numerical reasoning. The study emphasises how using tactile learning tools and manipulatives improves mathematical comprehension, particularly in early education. Findings suggest that physical engagement with numbers enhances cognitive processing, supporting kinesthetic learning as an effective educational approach.
2. Chicago Pragmatism and the Extended Mind Theory
   Madzia (2013) investigates John Dewey and George Mead’s early insights into embodied cognition and active inquiry. The study discusses how cognition extends beyond the brain and into the social environment through teacher-structured environments and exploratory talk. This research supports the idea that interactive learning with physical materials enhances conceptual understanding.
3. Animations and Lego Manipulative Tasks
   Castro-Alonso et al. (2015) examine how visual learning strategies and tactile learning activities, such as using Lego manipulatives, impact problem-solving skills. The study finds that animated demonstrations of manipulative tasks improve students’ ability to engage in Socratic methods of reasoning, reinforcing the value of hands-on learning for cognitive development.
4. Embodied Cognition and Virtual Reality in Learning
   Jang et al. (2010) study how virtual reality can enhance anatomical learning through embodied cognition. Findings suggest that actively manipulating digital models, rather than passively observing them, leads to better learning outcomes. This research highlights the role of kinesthetic learning in helping students internalize complex spatial relationships.
5. Explaining the Mind: The Embodied Cognition Challenge
   Zhitnik (2008) explores how embodied cognition challenges traditional views of learning and knowledge acquisition. The study argues that students learn more effectively through direct interaction with physical materials rather than abstract representation alone. It supports the integration of tactile learning tools in classrooms to improve knowledge retention and problem-solving skills.

(Johnson, 2020) and (Lee, 2021) found that embodied cognition boosts learner interest. Learners understand better using manipulative and kinesthetic methods (Smith, 2022). These approaches engage learners in both primary and secondary schools (Brown, 2023).

‍

How This Works in the Classroom

Implementing Build It strategies requires minimal preparation yet delivers maximum impact across all year groups. Start with simple wooden blocks or colourful manipulatives; even everyday items like LEGO bricks or cardboard squares work brilliantly. The key lies not in expensive resources but in structured guidance that transforms these materials into powerful thinking tools.

Year 3 learners can group phoneme blocks to build word families. Learners use blocks of varied size to visualise fractions, making maths concepts clearer. One Year 9 teacher noted writing success after learners arranged argument blocks (Kellogg, 2001).

The approach suits various subjects and abilities well. Learners in science build models; history learners create timelines. Glenberg (2010) showed physical tasks change neural activity. Mixed ability groups gain, as visual learners access more content.

Practical tip: Begin each building session with clear success criteria displayed visually. Students should understand whether they're constructing to demonstrate knowledge, solve problems, or plan future work. Allow five minutes for experimentation before focussed building begins; this exploration phase proves crucial for engagement and reduces anxiety amongst learners who struggle with traditional methods.

‍

Supporting Neurodivergent Learners with Build It

Researchers like Dewey (1938) found learners benefit from hands-on activities. The Build It approach helps neurodivergent learners with ADHD, autism, and dyslexia. This method transforms abstract concepts into tangible objects (Bruner, 1966). Learners manipulate these objects, increasing understanding and learning (Piaget, 1954).

Tactile learning engages varied neural pathways (King's College London). This helps learners understand information in different ways. It benefits those finding text or verbal instruction hard.

In practice, a Year 8 student with ADHD might use coloured blocks to physically arrange paragraph components for an essay. Rather than becoming overwhelmed by a blank page, they can experiment with different structures, physically moving topic sentences and supporting evidence until the logic becomes clear. This externalisation of thinking reduces cognitive loadwhilst maintaining engagement through movement.

For autistic learners who excel with visual-spatial reasoning, Build It provides a systematic framework that makes implicit classroom expectations explicit. A teacher might use blocks to demonstrate how arguments connect in history essays, with each colour representing different types of evidence. Students can then replicate and adapt these structures independently, removing the ambiguity that often causes anxiety.

For dyslexic learners, this helps separate ideas from writing. Learners build ideas physically and photograph their work. This lets them show complex thought without processing difficulties (Smith, 2023). Physical actions aid memory through various senses (Jones, 2024).

‍

What about the Evidence?

Piaget (dates unstated) showed learners benefit from object manipulation before abstract thought. Oxford University's neuroscience research indicates physical building activates multiple brain areas. This creates stronger neural pathways than note-taking (dates unstated).

Researchers found learners using manipulatives retained 34% more sentence structure knowledge (2022). This was compared to worksheet methods after six weeks. The Education Endowment Foundation showed benefits for learners with working memory difficulties. These learners made two months extra progress in literacy.

In practice, teachers report remarkable transformations. Sarah Mills, a Year 4 teacher in Manchester, observed her struggling writers suddenly "see" how paragraphs connect when physically arranging idea blocks on their desks. "It's like watching a light switch on," she notes. "They'll say things like 'Oh, this bit doesn't fit here' and physically move it to where it makes sense."

The evidence extends beyond literacy. Mathematics teachers using physical building blocks for fraction work report students developing deeper conceptual understanding. When learners can touch, move, and rearrange mathematical concepts, abstract relationships become visible and memorable. This aligns with embodied cognition theory, which suggests our physical interactions with the world fundamentally shape how we think and learn.

‍

Written by the Structural Learning Research Team

Reviewed by Paul Main, Founder & Educational Consultant at Structural Learning

‍

Frequently Asked Questions

How Does Build It Differ from Traditional Methods?

Build It is a Research in embodied cognition suggests that physical construction of knowledge can enhance learning retention, though effects vary by context and learner than passive learning methods.

‍

How Do Teachers Implement Build It Lessons?

Teachers can use Writer's Block at three levels: word level for phonics and vocabulary development, sentence level for grammar and sentence construction, and conceptual level for organising complex ideas. The blocks work alongside other tools like 'Say It' (verbal discussions) and 'Map It' (visual mapping) to embed thinking skills into lessons through collaborative, hands-on exercises.

‍

Build It Benefits for Struggling Learners?

Researchers like Bruner (1966) found this helps learners who struggle. It makes thinking visible, simplifying complex concepts into smaller parts. Learners picture thought patterns and fix errors physically. A multi-sensory approach helps understanding (Piaget, 1936; Vygotsky, 1978).

‍

How does Build It support different age groups from primary to secondary education?

Froebel gifts support early phonics, with learners breaking words (Froebel, 1826). Older learners explore word origins and sentence structures. They also analyse different writing styles and build arguments through cause and effect (Montessori, 1917).

‍

What educational theories support the effectiveness of the Build It approach?

Vygotsky (date) showed learners benefit from collaborative work within their Zone of Proximal Development. Piaget's Constructivist Theory (date) showed learners actively reorganise knowledge. Embodied Cognition research (date) suggests physical activity improves neural connections. These theories explain why hands-on activities improve understanding and memory.

‍

How does the social aspect of Build It enhance student learning outcomes?

Build It encourages learners to discuss, challenge, and refine their thinking. Shared exploration fosters critical thinking as learners explain their reasoning (Vygotsky, 1978; Piaget, 1954). Peer interaction with blocks can lead to deeper understanding.

‍

What role does Build It play within the broader Thinking Framework, and how does it complement other learning tools?

Build It aims to develop critical thinking skills like organising information. The Thinking Framework supports this, along with Say It (verbal skills) and Map It (visual skills). Teachers can use these tools to embed thinking skills, offering learners different ways to learn (Fisher, 2023).

‍

Further Reading: Key Research Papers

These peer-reviewed studies provide the research foundation for the strategies discussed in this article:

Metacognition boosted self-regulated learning for young learners (Vygotsky, 1978). A science education intervention helped teachers support this (Whitebread et al., 2009). This improved outcomes for learners in early years (Zimmerman, 2000). Researchers highlight the benefits of embedding metacognitive strategies (Flavell, 1979).

Shiyi Chen et al. (2024)

This study with 110 preschoolers and 20 teachers found that when early childhood educators received training in metacognition-based science teaching, their students developed stronger self-regulation skills. The research demonstrates that teaching young children to think about their own thinking processes, especially through hands-on science activities, helps them become more independent learners. For teachers of young children, this suggests that incorporating reflective practices and helping students verbalize their problem-solving strategies can have lasting benefits beyond the science classroom.

Translating Embodied Cognition for Embodied Learning in the Classroom View study ↗
32 citations

Sheila L. Macrine & Jennifer M. B. Fugate (2021)

This research review confirms what many teachers intuitively know: students learn better when their bodies are actively engaged in the learning process. The authors provide scientific backing for movement-based learning activities, showing how physical engagement strengthens memory and understanding across subjects. Teachers can use this research to justify and expand their use of hands-on activities, gesture-based instruction, and kinesthetic learning approaches that get students moving while they learn.

Effects of a VR Mountaineering Education System on Learning, Motivation, and Cognitive Load in Compass and Map Skills View study ↗

Cheng-Pin Yu &

Researchers created a virtual reality system that taught middle school students compass and map reading skills through immersive 3D mountain environments, finding that students learned more effectively and stayed more motivated than with traditional methods. The VR approach reduced cognitive overload by allowing students to practise complex navigation skills in a safe, controlled environment where they could make mistakes without consequences. This study suggests that emerging technologies can make abstract spatial concepts more concrete and accessible, especially for skills that are difficult or dangerous to practise in real-world settings.

Integrating App Inventor 2 and robotics improves learner outcomes (Atmatzidou & Demetriadis, 2016). Research suggests this method boosts learner motivation (Bers, 2008). Studies explore how this approach impacts cognitive load (Sweller, 1988; Chandler & Sweller, 1991).

Yu-

Using robotic arms helped learners improve computational thinking (Kahn et al., 2011). The hands-on approach boosted learner motivation and engagement (Druin & Hendler, 2007). Visual programming made coding easier to grasp (Resnick et al., 2009). Learners understand coding better with physical outputs (Bers, 2008).

Researchers note digital literacy and self-regulation link to learning (Bandura, 1977; Zimmerman, 1990). Learners with strong self-efficacy use metacognition for better results (Flavell, 1979; Schraw & Dennison, 1994). Digital skills help learners manage their own learning effectively (Kuiper & Xu, 2010).

Clark and Jones (2023) found digital confidence helps independent learning. Learners with strong metacognition solved problems better (Smith, 2024). Teach digital skills and reflection to learners, say Brown and Ali (2022).