Mastery in Maths: A teacher's guide

What is Mastery in Maths?

Mastery in Maths is an approach to teaching and learning that aims for children to develop a deep understanding of Maths rather than memorising key concepts or resorting to rote learning.

The main objective and expectation are for all children (with rare exceptions) to have acquired the fundamental concepts and facts of maths for their key stage such that by the end of the unit they have attained mastery in the maths they have been studying. At this point, they must be ready to move confidently on to their more advanced level of Maths.

Maths Mastery is a concept that means pupils can use their conceptual understanding to solve unfamiliar maths problems and show , using the relevant mathematical vocabulary.

Mastery in Maths is not a quick fix to mathematical knowledge, but a journey of learning that the pupils and teacher go on with one another, with frequent diagnostic assessments to check the children's understanding of Maths and direct instruction that teaches to any learning gaps.

‍

What is teaching for mastery?

Teaching for mastery means the teachers (mostly with the support of school) must organise the classroom resources and classroom time in such a way that their students can experience mathematics mastery with them. Another concept that has been proven very popular for teachers in mathematics is the concrete, pictorial, abstract model. These teacher strategies enable primary pupils and secondary school pupils to experience mathematical concepts with their hands. The idea behind the concept is to make abstract ideas more concrete using simple physical and visual tools.

‍

Mastery Mathematics Lesson Structure

One such tool is the bar methodthat originates from Singapore. Another framework that can be used within teacher planning for mastery is the Universal Thinking Framework. This taxonomy helps educators cover the curriculum for mathematics at deeper levels. These types of mastery learning approaches enable pupil s to really think through concepts before moving on to more complex ideas.

‍

What are the core elements of the Teaching for Mastery model?

The Teaching for Mastery model in mathematics education is a comprehensive approach that integrates six core elements to enhance student understanding and performance. These elements, as identified by Mark McCourt, are:

1. Diagnostic Pre-assessment with Pre-teaching: This involves carefully planned assessments to identify and address any misconceptions students may have before introducing a new topic. The goal is to ensure students have the foundational knowledge necessary to grasp upcoming concepts. Pre-teaching is then implemented based on student outcomes.
2. High-Quality Group-Based Initial Instruction: This element emphasises the importance of engaging all students throughdevelopmentally appropriate, high-quality, research-based teaching. This approach maximises the chance of academic success for all students and requires understanding of memory processes and differentiation strategies.
3. Regular Formative Assessment to Monitor Progress: Regular assessments are carried out to ensure students understand the mathematical ideas that have been taught. Immediate feedback is provided as necessary.
4. High-Quality Corrective Instruction: If a student does not understand a concept, the teacher uses their pedagogical knowledge to instruct the concept in a different way. This may involve using real-life situations, evidence-based approaches, or a variety of mathematical procedures.
5. Second, Parallel Formative Assessment: This involves continuing teaching and checking for student understanding as a result of the new teaching strategy introduced in the fourth element. This requires teachers to develop metacognition skills in their students.
6. Enrichment Activities/Extension Activities: The final element involves offering challenging enrichment activities that provide valuable learning experiences without introducing new mathematical concepts. These activities can incorporate active learning strategies and may need adaptation for students with SEND.

As one expert puts it, "The mastery approach is not about moving on when a concept is understood, but rather when it is mastered. This means that students have the opportunity to fully grasp a concept before adding another layer of complexity".

For example, a teacher might introduce the concept of multiplication by first ensuring that students have a secure understanding of addition. They might then use a variety of maths activities, such as arrays or grouping objects, to demonstrate multiplication in different ways. This approach can also incorporate inquiry-based methods to deepen understanding.

This approach ensures that students have a solid foundational knowledge of multiplication and can apply it in different contexts, leading to a deeper understanding of the concept.

Key insights and important facts:

• The Teaching for Mastery model involves a comprehensive approach that integrates six core elements.
• Regular formative assessments and high-quality corrective instruction are key aspects of this model.
• Enrichment activities provide valuable learning experiences without introducing new mathematical concepts.

‍

">

‍

‍

‍

What are the benefits of teaching for mastery?

The benefits of teaching for mastery are extensive. By allowing the pupils to embed their knowledge of key mathematical concepts it allows them to access them in other areas of maths and further down the line in life. Here are some key benefits:

• Deepened Understanding
• Increased Confidence
• Improved Problem-Solving Skills
• Greater Engagement
• Long-Term Retention

‍

‍

Research evidence demonstrates significant benefits of mastery teaching approaches. Studies from the Education Endowment Foundation show that pupils taught through mastery methods demonstrate improved mathematical reasoning and problem-solving abilities. When teachers focus on deep understanding rather than procedural fluency alone, pupils develop stronger conceptual foundations that support their mathematical learning across all topics. Particularly notable is the positive impact on pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds, with research showing that teaching for mastery helps to close attainment gaps by ensuring all pupils achieve secure understanding before going forward.

In classroom practice, teachers report that mastery approaches create more inclusive learning environments where pupils work collaboratively to explore mathematical concepts. Rather than dividing classes by perceived ability, all pupils engage with the same rich mathematical content, with variation provided through different representations and reasoning opportunities. This approach reduces the stigma often associated with mathematics learning and helps pupils develop positive attitudes towards the subject.

Long-term benefits extend beyond individual lessons. When pupils develop deep understanding of mathematical concepts, they demonstrate greater retention and can apply their knowledge flexibly to new contexts. Research shows that pupils taught through mastery methods are better equipped to tackle unfamiliar problems and make connections between different areas of mathematics, building the mathematical thinking skills essential for future learning and real-world application.

‍

How to Implement Teaching for Mastery in Your Classroom

Implementing teaching for mastery begins with restructuring your lesson planning around small steps and deliberate practice. Rather than rushing through topics to cover the curriculum, focus on fewer concepts explored in greater depth. John Sweller's cognitive load theory demonstrates that pupils develop deeper understanding when new information is introduced gradually, allowing working memory to process and transfer knowledge effectively to long-term memory.

Create classroom routines that prioritise mathematical reasoning over procedural fluency alone. Begin each lesson with low-threshold, high-ceiling problems that allow all pupils to access the mathematics whilst providing opportunities for extension. Research shows that when pupils explain their thinking regularly, they strengthen neural pathways and identify misconceptions before they become embedded. Implement structured talk opportunities where pupils articulate their mathematical reasoning to partners.

Assessment becomes formative and continuous in mastery classrooms. Use mini-whiteboards, exit tickets, and strategic questioning to gauge understanding throughout lessons rather than relying solely on end-of-unit tests. When pupils struggle with a concept, resist the urge to move them to simpler work. Instead, provide additional scaffolding and varied representations of the same mathematical ideas, ensuring every child masters foundational concepts before progressing.

‍

Assessment Strategies for Mastery Teaching

Assessment in mastery teaching shifts from traditional testing towards continuous, diagnostic evaluation that informs immediate instructional decisions. Rather than waiting until the end of a unit to discover misconceptions, effective mastery assessment happens moment by moment throughout each lesson. Dylan Wiliam's research on formative assessment demonstrates that when teachers regularly check understanding and adjust their teaching accordingly, pupils develop deeper mathematical concepts and achieve significantly better outcomes.

Mini-plenaries serve as crucial assessment checkpoints, allowing teachers to pause instruction and gauge whether all pupils have grasped key ideas before progressing. These brief, strategic stops might involve asking pupils to explain their reasoning to a partner, complete a quick diagnostic question, or demonstrate their understanding using manipulatives. The key principle is that no pupil moves forward until the foundational concept is secure, ensuring that learning builds systematically without gaps.

Practical classroom strategies include using exit tickets with carefully crafted questions, employing whole-class response systems like mini whiteboards, and implementing structured peer discussions where pupils articulate their mathematical thinking. Research shows that when teachers consistently use these formative assessment techniques, they can identify and address misconceptions immediately, preventing the accumulation of mathematical errors that often derail later learning in traditional approaches.

‍

Supporting All Learners in a Mastery Classroom

Supporting all learners in a mastery classroom begins with recognising that same-age, different-stage is the reality in every mathematics classroom. Research shows that maintaining whole-class teaching whilst addressing varied ability levels requires strategic scaffolding rather than differentiated tasks. Jo Boaler's work demonstrates that when pupils tackle the same rich mathematical concepts together, with appropriate support structures, all learners can access deep understanding regardless of their starting point.

The key lies in intelligent questioning and responsive teaching. Rather than preparing separate worksheets, effective mastery teachers use carefully crafted questions that allow multiple entry points into the same problem. For instance, when exploring fractions, one pupil might work with halves and quarters using concrete manipulatives, whilst another tackles equivalent fractions algebraically. Both engage with the fundamental concept, but at their appropriate level of abstraction.

Practical classroom strategies include using think-pair-share to allow processing time, employing teaching assistants to provide targeted support during independent practice, and creating opportunities for peer explanation. When pupils develop mathematical reasoning through discussion, stronger learners consolidate their understanding by articulating their thinking, whilst those who struggle benefit from hearing concepts explained in accessible language by their peers.

‍

Planning for Progression in Mastery Teaching

Effective curriculum progression in mastery teaching requires careful consideration of how mathematical concepts interconnect and build upon one another. Jerome Bruner's spiral curriculum theory demonstrates that pupils develop deeper understanding when they revisit concepts at increasing levels of sophistication, rather than encountering them in isolation. This approach ensures that each new learning experience strengthens and extends previous knowledge, creating a robust foundation for more complex mathematical thinking.

Research shows that successful progression planning involves identifying the prerequisite knowledge pupils need before introducing new concepts. Teachers must map out the essential building blocks, ensuring that fundamental skills like number bonds, place value understanding, and basic operations are secure before moving to more abstract ideas. John Sweller's cognitive load theory highlights how overwhelming pupils with too many new concepts simultaneously c an hinder learning, making careful sequencing crucial for maintaining focus on deep understanding.

In classroom practice, this means regularly assessing whether pupils have truly mastered foundational concepts before progressing. When gaps emerge, effective teachers revisit and consolidate understanding rather than pushing forward with the curriculum. Planning should include deliberate connections between topics, helping pupils recognise patterns and relationships across different areas of mathematics, ultimately building the conceptual framework necessary for long-term mathematical success.

‍

Overcoming Common Mastery Teaching Challenges

One of the most significant hurdles teachers encounter when implementing mastery approaches is managing the varied pace at which pupils develop understanding. Research shows that rushing pupils through mathematical concepts before they achieve fluency creates gaps that compound over time. Rather than moving slower pupils onto new topics prematurely, effective mastery teaching requires strategic differentiation that deepens understanding for all learners simultaneously.

Time constraints often pressure teachers to abandon mastery principles, particularly when facing curriculum coverage demands. However, John Sweller's cognitive load theory demonstrates that pupils learn more effectively when they thoroughly understand foundational concepts before progressing. Teachers can address this challenge by focusing on fewer topics taught more deeply, using varied representations and concrete-pictorial-abstract progressions to ensure all pupils grasp underlying mathematical structures.

Practical classroom solutions include implementing flexible grouping strategies where pupils work on the same core concept but engage with different problem complexities. This approach maintains whole-class coherence whilst allowing individual pupils to develop mastery at appropriate challenge levels, ensuring that teaching for mastery becomes sustainable within existing time frameworks.

‍

15 Mastery Mathematics Teaching Strategies

1. Use concrete-pictorial-abstract progression
2. Ensure deep understanding before moving on
3. Use variation theory to highlight key features
4. Ask probing questions to reveal thinking
5. Address misconceptions immediately
6. Use bar models for problem representation
7. Encourage mathematical talk and reasoning
8. Provide intelligent practice (not repetitive)
9. Use same-day intervention for struggling pupils
10. Challenge through depth not acceleration
11. Make connections between mathematical concepts
12. Use stem sentences to support reasoning
13. Celebrate mistakes as learning opportunities
14. Ensure procedural and conceptual balance
15. Review and consolidate regularly

‍

Conclusion

Mastery in maths is more than just rote learning; it’s about developing a deep, conceptual understanding that helps students to tackle unfamiliar problems with confidence. By adopting a mastery approach, educators can create a learning environment where every student has the opportunity to succeed and develop a genuine love for maths. The journey towards mastery requires patience, dedication, and a willingness to adapt teaching strategies to meet the diverse needs of learners.

Ultimately, the goal is to equip students with the mathematical skills and knowledge they need to thrive in an increasingly complex world. Embracing teaching for mastery is an investment in their future, laying a solid foundation for lifelong learning and success. By integrating the core elements of diagnostic pre-assessment, high-quality instruction, regular formative assessment, corrective instruction, and enrichment activities, teachers can create a powerful and effective maths education experience for all students.

‍

Research shows that establishing classroom cultures where pupils develop resilience and perseverance with mathematical concepts takes time and consistency. Teachers should begin by introducing small changes, such as encouraging students to explain their reasoning or asking 'how do you know?' questions during lessons. These simple shifts help pupils develop deeper thinking habits and move away from procedural approaches.

Practical next steps include forming professional learning communities within schools, where teachers can share experiences and challenges in implementing mastery approaches. Mathematics coordinators can support this process by providing regular opportunities for lesson observations and collaborative planning sessions. Additionally, tracking pupil progress through concept-based assessments rather than solely focusing on procedural fluency helps teachers understand whether deep understanding is truly being achieved in their classroom practice.

‍

Further Reading

• Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). *Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching*. Guilford Press.
• Boaler, J. (2016). *Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages and effective teaching*. Jossey-Bass.
• Hattie, J. (2008). *Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement*. Routledge.
• Lemov, D. (2015). *Teach like a champion 2.0: 62 techniques that put students on the path to college*. Jossey-Bass.
• Wiliam, D. (2011). *Embedded formative assessment*. Solution Tree Press.