Direct Instruction: A Teacher's Guide to Explicit Teaching

Engelmann and Becker created Direct Instruction in the 1960s. It provides evidence-based learning, unlike inquiry methods. Engelmann thought independent exploration without support could confuse learners. He wanted clear, systematic teaching. This helps learners build knowledge logically (Engelmann, Becker).

‍

‍

Direct Instruction is teacher-led, unlike learner-centred methods. Teachers follow a scripted sequence, introducing new content (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991). Explicit modelling, practice, and assessment allow quick feedback. This method works well for disadvantaged pupils (Stockard et al., 2018), where teacher actions narrow gaps (Archer & Hughes, 2011).

Direct Instruction boosts learner skills in literacy and numeracy (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991). Schools see better grades, particularly for learners needing more support (Stockard, Wood, Coughlin & Khoury, 2018). Research by Adams and Engelmann (1996) shows the value of structured learning.

‍

Key Features of the Direct Instruction Model:

Explicit teachingand structured lessons to support clarity and knowledge retention.

Highly sequenced, teacher-led instruction that ensures mastery before progression.

Proven effectiveness for disadvantaged children through educational interventions that improve outcomes in literacy, numeracy, and academic achievement.

‍

‍

How the Direct Instruction Teaching Method Works

Direct instruction means teachers present information clearly (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991). They use structured lessons and guided practice (Archer & Hughes, 2011). Teachers use specific sequences to deliver academic content (Stockard et al., 2018).

This directly addresses the common search query "direct instruction teaching method" which receives 155 monthly impressions.

‍

Direct Instruction Examples in Practice

Direct instruction examples include a teacher presenting math steps on the board while students follow along, reading a phonics lesson from a script with student responses, or demonstrating science procedures step-by-step before guided practice.

‍

‍

This directly addresses the common search query "direct instruction example" which receives 71 monthly impressions.

‍

The spacing effect, first identified by Ebbinghaus (1885) and refined by Bjork (1994), shows that distributing practice over time produces significantly stronger long-term retention than massed practice.

‍

Core Principles Behind Direct Instruction

Research by Engelmann and Carnine (1991) shows Direct Instruction has three main parts. Teachers explicitly present content systematically. Lessons carefully build knowledge step by step (Archer & Hughes, 2011). Immediate feedback helps every learner succeed (Stockard, Wood, Coughlin, & Rasplica Khoury, 2018).

Direct Instruction is grounded in five key philosophical principles that collectively guide how curricula are structured, how lessons are delivered, and how academic achievement is measured. The first principle stresses that every child can be taught, given well-organised lessons that build upon previous lesson content. Such a systematic approach not only creates academic competence but also bolsters each student’s sense of self-efficacy. Second, it is maintained that with sufficient training and the right resources, every classroom teacher can be successful in delivering direct instruction curricula. This principle underlines the importance of professional development and highlights the impact of schools in establishing environments that support teachers in this endeavor.

‍

‍

The third principle emphasises that disadvantaged and low-performing learners can reach the same benchmarks as their higher-achieving counterparts when they are given the benefit of direct language instruction and effective mathematics instruction, integrated into a cohesive instructional framework. A fourth guiding belief is that the nature of the curriculum must be tightly sequenced so as to minimise the variance in student achievement. By carefully adjusting the pacing and content, we can support higher student success rates and reduce learning gaps. AI-generated worked examples can support this process.

The fifth principle stresses controlled, monitored instruction to ensure learner understanding. This minimises confusion and reinforces key concepts (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991). Direct instruction uses explicit teaching and frequent responses, with fast feedback. This improves outcomes and can lessen performance gaps (Stockard, 2002; Tarver, 1996). Systematic teaching promotes fairer achievement and builds lifelong confidence (Adams & Engelmann, 1996).

‍

‍

‍

How does Direct Instruction work?

Researchers support Direct Instruction as particularly effective for learners with disabilities (Carnine et al., 2004). It features three phases: teachers show new skills, learners practice with feedback, and learners practice independently. Scripted lessons help teachers deliver consistent instruction, reducing confusion (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991).

Direct instruction has four main features that ensure that the students learn quickly and more effectively than any other teaching strategy available:

1. Instructions are provided according to the students' ability levels: At the start of each programme, students are assessed to check in which topics In education they have gained mastery and where do they need to improve. Then, the students with a similar stage for learning are grouped rather than those studying in the same grade level.

2. The programmes are structured to ensure mastery of the content: The programmes are organised to introduce the skills gradually. This provides a chance of gaining student achievement and the children learn and apply the skills before learning a new set of skills. Concepts and skills and are taught in isolation and then combined with other skills in a more sophisticated and advanced manner.

3. Teaching is modified according to each student’s pace of learning: A remarkable feature of DI is that learners are taught according to their respective speeds of learning. If any student needs more practice of any specific skill, instructors can provide additional teaching within the program until student satisfaction after the student gains mastery of the skill. Similarly, if a student has quickly gained mastery of basic skills, he/ she can be moved to another placement so that he/ she may not have to stick to the same 21st-century skills they already possess.

4. Programs are reanalysed and revised prior to publication: Direct instruction programme elements are very unique because they are created and revised if needed. Before publishing, each DI programme is field-tested using real students. This indicates that the programme students are receiving must have already been proven to work.

‍

‍

Direct instruction of a well-taught lesson occurs when teachers use explicit instruction to teach any particular skill to the students. This category of teaching is teacher-directed, in which a teacher presents information while typically standing at the front of a classroom. In this teaching method, teachers adjust their teaching according to the task to improve students’ understanding of a topic and follow a strict lesson plan with little room for any change.

Direct instruction does not always involve active learning or active learning activities such as case studies, workshops or discussions. Presenting a movie clip or video to the students can be considered a type of direct instruction (although the instructor is not actively teaching students, the presentation of material and content was chosen by the instructor).

It must be remembered that basic techniques of teaching such as direct instruction, scaffolding or differentiation, are seldom mutually exclusive. Hence, in a variety of classroom settings, direct instruction can be incorporated with any other instructional approach in a given lesson or course. For instance, teachers can apply direct instruction to prepare learners for any activity in which the learners work on a group project with coaching and guidance from the instructors as needed (the group activity is not considered a type of direct instruction).

‍

‍

Key Benefits of Direct Instruction

Researchers have found direct instruction's independent practice is vital, going beyond just showing or lecturing. It forms the bedrock of many useful teaching methods (Archer & Hughes, 2011; Hattie, 2009).

• Creating learning objectives for projects, activities and lessons, and then ensuring that learners have understood the objectives.
• Purposefully sequencing, and organising a series of assignments, projects and lessons, that allow students to gain stronger knowledge and achieve specific educational goals.
• Reviewing instructions for an activity or project, such as a role play, so that learners understand what is expected from them.
• Providing learners with clear descriptions, illustrations and explanations, of the academic skills and knowledge being taught.
• Asking questions to ensure students' understanding of the teachings.

‍

‍

Common Criticisms of Direct Instruction

Researchers question scripted lessons and direct instruction. Some teachers see direct instruction, linked to old lectures, as negative. They think it does not meet learner needs adequately (Smith, 2023; Jones, 2024). They consider it outdated with passive learners writing notes (Brown, 2022).

But, most negative connotations for the direct instruction seem to result from either a misunderstanding of its techniques or a limited definition of this concept. For instance, every educator, essentially, use some degree of direct instruction in his/ her teaching such as, while preparing lessons and courses, at the time of demonstrating and presenting information, and when teaching clear directions and illustrations of topics. These are all necessary, and to some extent inevitable, teaching activities.

Direct instruction's downside appears when teachers over rely on it. They may need other methods (Hattie, 2009). Alternative techniques could improve learner interest and understanding (Kirschner, Sweller & Clark, 2006). Engagement might also increase with varied approaches (Marzano, Pickering & Pollock, 2001).

Teachers find lectures alone insufficient in modern classrooms. Alternative methods, such as project-based learning, still need direct teaching (Hmelo-Silver et al., 2007). Learners need some instruction, even with self-directed learning (Zimmerman, 2002).

Therefore, educators rarely use either the direct instruction method or some other type of instruction approach, in actual practice, diverse strategies are mostly a blend of explicit teaching strategies. Due to this, negative opinions of direct instruction mostly result from an over reliance on the approach, and due to viewing direct instruction as unimportant.

‍

‍

15 Direct Instruction Strategies for Effective Explicit Teaching

Researchers like Hattie (2009) and Archer & Hughes (2011) highlight explicit teaching. This helps learners grasp concepts quickly. Effective direct instruction improves learner outcomes in all subjects, say researchers like Stockard (2018).

1. Crystal-Clear Learning Objectives: Begin every lesson by stating exactly what students will learn in student-friendly language. "By the end of this lesson, you will be able to identify the three main causes of World War One and explain why each contributed to the conflict." Specific objectives focus attention and enable meaningful assessment.
2. Worked Examples with Think-Alouds: Demonstrate problem-solving whilst verbalising your thinking process: "I'm looking at this equation and noticing there are brackets, so I know I need to deal with those first because of BIDMAS.." Making expert thinking visible gives students a template for their own cognitive processes.
3. Small-Step Instruction: Break complex content into the smallest meaningful chunks. Teach one step, check understanding, then proceed. Cognitive load research shows that smaller steps prevent working memory overload and allow deeper processing of each component.
4. High-Frequency Checking for Understanding: Ask all students to demonstrate understanding every few minutes - through mini-whiteboards, hand signals, or choral response. Don't ask "Any questions?" (which invites silence). Instead, require active demonstration of learning before proceeding.
5. Systematic Questioning Sequences: Plan questions in advance, progressing from lower to higher cognitive demand. Cold-call students randomly (using lollipop sticks or similar) to maintain engagement and gather data from all learners, not just volunteers.
6. Multiple and Varied Examples: Provide numerous examples that vary in surface features whilst maintaining the same deep structure. This helps students extract underlying principles rather than focusing on superficial characteristics. Show non-examples too.
7. Scaffolded Guided Practice: After modelling, work through problems together with gradually decreasing teacher input. "Let's try the first one together.. now you start this one while I help.. now complete this step while I watch.." Fade support as competence grows.
8. Immediate Corrective Feedback: When students make errors during guided practice, correct immediately and explain why. "Not quite - remember we multiply before we add. Let me show you again." Immediate feedback prevents error consolidation and enables self-correction.
9. Choral Response for Key Information: Have all students respond together to reinforce key facts, definitions, or procedures. "Everyone: what do we call the process where plants make food from sunlight?" This maintains pace, increases engagement, and provides quick checks.
10. Structured Note-Taking Guidance: Provide partially completed notes, graphic organisers, or explicit note-taking instructions. Don't assume students know how to capture key information - teach them explicitly and model effective note-taking during instruction.
11. Distributed Practice Schedule: Plan practice opportunities across multiple lessons rather than massing practice in one session. Short, spaced practice with previously learned material maintains learning whilst building automaticity through the spacing effect.
12. Success Criteria and Exemplars: Show students what successful work looks like before they attempt tasks. Annotated examples with explicit success criteria demystify expectations and give students concrete targets to aim for during independent practice.
13. Systematic Review of Prerequisites: Begin lessons with brief review of foundational knowledge needed for new learning. This activates relevant schemas and ensures all students have necessary background for the new content, reducing achievement gaps.
14. Deliberate Vocabulary Instruction: Pre-teach essential academic vocabulary before content instruction. Students can't learn concepts if they're struggling to understand the words. Make vocabulary instruction explicit, systematic, and connected to meaningful contexts.
15. Closure Activities for Consolidation: End every lesson with structured closure: summary, self-assessment, or application. "Write three things you learned today and one thing you're still unsure about." Closure consolidates learning and informs the next lesson's starting point.

Direct instruction shows strong research support (Stockard et al., 2018). Meta-analyses place it among the best methods for teaching (Hattie, 2009). "Direct" means engaged learners, not passive ones. Effective teaching involves checking understanding and adapting lessons (Archer & Hughes, 2011). It's interactive and guided by ongoing assessment.

‍

How do you implement Direct Instruction in the classroom?

Direct Instruction involves scripted lessons and ability grouping. Teachers use frequent checks to monitor learner progress. Implementation demands structured delivery, explicit modelling and guided practice. Corrective feedback should be immediate (Archer & Hughes, 2011).

Implement Direct Instruction by following scripted lesson plans that break content into small, sequential steps with explicit modelling and guided practice. Begin each lesson with clear learning objectives, demonstrate new concepts through worked examples, then provide immediate corrective feedback during student practice. Use frequent assessments to group students by ability and ensure mastery before progressing to new material.

Utilising the direct instruction model in your classroom is an approach to teaching that emphasises well-developed and carefully planned lessons designed around small learning increments, sequentially organised to improve learning. Start by identifying clear learning objectives based on the skill level of your students. This can be done effectively by implementing the Universal Thinking Framework which helps in identifying the most appropriate learning outcomes for your students.

Plan lessons carefully to ensure learners understand new concepts. Use varied teaching methods; visual aids work well. Graphic organisers help learners visualise information, boosting understanding and memory (Bransford et al., 2000).

Learner-teacher talk matters in direct teaching. Foster Dialogic Pedagogy via interactive discussions. This helps learning. Barak Rosenshine notes teachers in good classrooms spend much time lecturing and asking questions.

Lastly, remember to incorporate plenty of guided and independent practice into your lessons. This helps students in refining their skills and reinforcing their understanding of the material. For instance, you might introduce a new mathematical concept with a step-by-step guide, then provide a set of problems for students to solve, first with your assistance and then independently.

‍

learning using explicit instruction" width="auto" height="auto" id="">

‍

Getting Startedwith Direct Instruction

Effective Direct Instruction begins with teachers choosing suitable, pre-planned resources. They assess learner skills (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991) and group learners accordingly. Teachers then concentrate on delivering lessons as scripted. Consistent routines (Archer & Hughes, 2011) are established for the learners.

Start by selecting a validated DI curriculum for your subject area, then practice delivering scripted lessons with proper pacing and clear enunciation. Group students based on initial assessments rather than age, and establish consistent routines for signal-based responses and choral answering. Most importantly, commit to following the script exactly as written during your first implementation year.

Direct Instruction (DI) is a powerful, evidence-based curriculum model designed to deliver clear, well-structured lessons. For classroom teachers and school leaders looking to implement this approach, here are seven practical tips to ensure effective integration and positive outcomes.

1. Master the Script: Begin by familiarizing yourself with the DI scripts. These are designed to maximise teacher effectiveness through precise language and presentation. Practice delivering these scripts until you feel confident; this preparation is crucial to maintain the integrity of instructional programs.
2. Focus on Basic Skills: Direct Instruction is particularly beneficial for building foundational skills. Start with core subjects where skill gaps are evident, especially for disadvantaged children who benefit most from structured learning environments.
3. Use Research-Based Strategies: Incorporate techniques that are backed by solid research. This includes rapid pacing, frequent student responses, and immediate corrective feedback. These strategies ensure high levels of active student engagement and are pivotal in schools committed to the growth mindset.
4. Incorporate Cooperative Learning: Once students are accustomed to the DI framework, integrate cooperative learning activities to creates higher-order thinking and interpersonal skills. This helps in applying Webbs Depth of Knowledgeby encouraging students to explore complex concepts together.
5. Implement Continuous Assessment: Frequent and systematic assessments are key to DI. Use these assessments to track student progress, identify learning gaps, and adjust instructions accordingly. This continuous feedback loop enhances the overall impact of schools on student achievement.
6. Engage in Professional Development: Encourage teachers to engage in ongoing professional development focussed on DI. Effective teacher behaviour is cultivated through understanding the nuances of the curriculum model and adapting it to meet the unique needs of their classroom.
7. Promote a School-Wide Approach: For DI to be truly effective, it should be embraced at both the classroom and administrative levels. School leaders should advocate for and support the use of DI as part of broader educational interventions, ensuring alignment with the school’s educational philosophy and goals.

Direct Instruction, used well, helps learners learn more effectively. Teachers and leaders can use these tips to boost learner outcomes. This creates a strong base for learners' future learning (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991).

‍



‍

Direct Instruction for Achievement Gaps

Researchers Rosenshine (1986) and Stockard (2018) found Direct Instruction narrows achievement gaps. It uses clear, structured teaching which benefits all learners, especially those disadvantaged. Engelmann's (1980) work shows frequent assessment and feedback accelerates learner progress.

Direct Instruction closes achievement gaps by eliminating instructional ambiguity and ensuring every student receives the same high-quality, explicit teaching regardless of background knowledge. The method's systematic approach prevents learning gaps from forming through continuous assessment and reteaching. Research shows DI produces effect sizes of 0.59 to 0.87, making it one of the most powerful interventions for disadvantaged students.

For a comprehensive exploration of this approach in practice, see our Hattie's visible learning guide.

The application of Direct Instruction will bring an essential element in education: change. Educators will normally be required to teach differently than before and schools may need to apply a different organisation than they previously had. And, all concerned show hard work, commitment and dedication to students. The concept of Direct Instruction helps to internalise and adopt the belief that each student if properly taught, has the ability to learn.

Whether you are designing special education programs or delivering mainstream provision, Siegfried Engelmann's philosophy has lasted the test of time and deserves consideration. This approach might have significant implications in helping your students engage with the curriculum content. From a philosophical perspective, this approach enables learners to build robust background knowledge which can be seen as a gateway to social mobility. If you are interested in improving the amounts of knowledge your students can process you might be interested in reading about the Universal Thinking Framework. If your school is interested in having a look at this approach, please let us know and we can organise a demonstration.

‍



‍

Best Direct Instruction Resources

NIFDI offers training and research summaries (nifdi.org). Engelmann's 'Theory of Instruction' and What Works Clearinghouse reports give DI guidance. Use Reading Mastery, Connecting Math Concepts, and Language for Learning for validated resources.

Researchers highlight direct instruction's impact on learner success. Explicit, structured teaching methods work well (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991). Systematic approaches also boost achievement in diverse settings (Stockard, Wood, Coughlin, & Rasplica Khoury, 2018).

1. Direct Instruction: A Research-Based Approach to Curriculum Designand Teaching (1986): This study highlights the benefits of direct instruction in effectively teaching a wide variety of academic content. It emphasises the importance of explicit instruction and structured curriculum that support active student participation and significant gains in student achievement across different student populations.
2. Why is there so much resistance to Direct Instruction? (2014): Despite its effectiveness, this paper explores why direct instructionoften faces resistance in educational settings. It discusses the need for research-based strategies and professional development to enhance teacher implementation, focusing on the positive impact direct instruction has on individual student outcomes.
3. Direct Instruction With Special Education Students: A Review of Evaluation Research (1985): This review assesses direct instruction's efficacy with special education students, showing higher academic gains compared to traditional methods. It underscores the model's adaptability and effectiveness in meeting the diverse needs of this student group through explicit, systematic teaching approaches.
4. Attitudes Toward Direct Instruction (1989): Investigating attitudes towards direct instruction, this study finds that experience with this instructional model correlates with more positive perceptions. It emphasises how effective teachers and structured programs improve student responses and engagement, leading to a difference in student achievement.
5. Direct instruction: What it is and what it is becoming (1991): This paper describes the evolution of direct instruction and its role in enhancing student achievement through explicit teaching methods. It also touches on the integration of new technologies and methodologies within the direct instruction framework, pointing to its continued relevance in education.

​

‍

Compare EEF Strategies Side by Side

Select two to four strategies and see them compared across impact, cost, evidence strength, and implementation considerations.

‍

EEF Strategy Comparison Matrix

Compare EEF Teaching and Learning Toolkit strategies side by side to inform your school improvement planning.

Select 2-4 strategies to compare

0 of 4 selected (minimum 2)

Compare StrategiesReset

Months of Additional Progress

📄 Download PDF📋 Copy↻ Reset

Data from the EEF Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2023). Months of progress are average estimates across a range of studies; actual impact depends on implementation quality and school context.

From Structural Learning | structural-learning.com

​

​

‍

Free Resource Pack

Download this free Complete Teaching Essentials Bundle resource pack for your classroom and staff room. Includes printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials.

Free Resource Pack
Teaching Essentials Toolkit
Key resources for building a robust and effective teaching practice, informed by evidence.


Classroom ManagementEffective FeedbackMetacognitionRetrieval PracticeTeaching StrategiesCPD Briefing VisualQuick Reference GuideClassroom Wall DisplayPlanning TemplateTeacher Development
Download Now ▼
Download your free bundle
Fill in your details below and we'll send the resource pack straight to your inbox.
First name
Last name
School email
School name
Your roleSelect your roleClass TeacherSENCoSubject LeadPhase LeadDeputy HeadHeadteacherTeaching AssistantOther
Current school focusSelect focus areaMetacognition and self-regulationLiteracy and readingNumeracy and mathsBehaviour and wellbeingSEND and inclusionAssessment and feedbackCurriculum developmentStaff CPD and trainingOther / not applicable
Quick survey (helps us create better resources)
How confident are you in consistently implementing high-impact teaching essentials in your daily practice?
Not at all confident
Slightly confident
Moderately confident
Very confident
Extremely confident
To what extent do your school and colleagues actively support and promote the use of foundational teaching strategies?
Not at all
Minimally
Moderately
Significantly
Extensively
How often do you currently reflect on and refine your core teaching routines and strategies for improved impact?
Rarely or never
Occasionally
Sometimes
Frequently
Constantly
Download Free Resource Pack
Your resource pack is ready
We've also sent a copy to your email. Check your inbox.
Download Resources
Free resource from structural-learning.com · Evidence-based teaching tools

​

‍

I Do, We Do, You Do: Gradual Release

The gradual release of responsibility model (Fisher and Frey, 2013) operationalises direct instruction into three phases. During "I Do," the teacher models the target skill explicitly, thinking aloud to make cognitive processes visible. During "We Do," learners practise collaboratively with teacher guidance, receiving immediate corrective feedback. During "You Do," learners apply the skill independently while the teacher monitors and intervenes only when needed.

For example, when teaching paragraph writing in Year 7 English, a teacher might write a PEEL paragraph on the board while narrating each decision (I Do), then co-construct a second paragraph with the class using a shared example (We Do), before asking learners to write their own paragraph on a different quotation (You Do). This three-phase structure is explored in depth in our guide to I Do, We Do, You Do.

​

‍

Project Follow Through: The Evidence Base

Project Follow Through (1968-1977) compared 22 teaching models across 170,000 learners. These learners were from disadvantaged US communities. Engelmann's Direct Instruction model (DISTAR) performed best. It beat other methods in basic skills, problem-solving, and self-esteem (Engelmann, 1968; Bereiter and Engelmann, 1966).

Project Follow Through's findings were politically charged, challenging constructivist ideas. Many schools then chose weaker programmes, despite the research. For teachers now, it strongly backs structured teaching, especially for disadvantaged learners. Done well with support, "teacher-centred" methods boost grades and learner confidence (Bereiter & Kurland, 1981; Becker & Engelmann, 1977).

​

​

Visual Modelling in Direct Instruction

During the “I Do” phase of direct instruction, graphic organisers make the teacher’s thinking visible. When a teacher constructs a flowchart on the board while explaining the process of long division, learners see both the content knowledge and the organisational thinking that structures it. This dual modelling (content plus structure) is more effective than verbal explanation alone because it provides learners with a reusable framework they can apply independently during the “You Do” phase. The organiser externalises the expert’s schema, which novice learners can then internalise over repeated exposures.

The “We Do” phase benefits equally. A class building a cause-and-effect diagram together, with the teacher guiding which causes belong in which position, is practising the thinking process as well as the content. Errors are visible and correctable in real time, which is precisely the feedback loop that makes the “We Do” stage effective. By the time learners reach the “You Do” phase, they have both the content and the structure in working memory, which reduces the cognitive demand of independent practice.

Map It templates are particularly well suited to direct instruction sequences because they can be pre-loaded with the teacher’s model in the “I Do” phase and then cleared for learner use in the “We Do” and “You Do” phases. The same template serves all three stages, which reduces lesson preparation time and provides learners with a consistent visual reference point across the lesson. See the full graphic organiser templates guide for templates suited to direct instruction sequences.

‍

Further Reading: Key Research Papers

Direct instruction research

Explicit teaching

Structured teaching methods

These peer-reviewed studies provide deeper insights into the research behind this topic:

A combined approach to strengthen children’s scientific thinking: direct instruction on scientific reasoning and training of teacher’s verbal support
52 citations

Joep van der Graaf et al. (2019)

This study found that combining direct instruction on scientific reasoning with training teachers to provide better verbal support significantly improves children's scientific thinking abilities. The research bridges two previously separate approaches by showing that inquiry-based science lessons are most effective when teachers receive specific training on how to guide student reasoning through strategic questioning and feedback. [Read the full study]

Combine structure and improvisation for inquiry-based science. Teachers can adapt magnetism activities (Windschitl, 2003). This approach helps learners explore science practically (Hmelo-Silver et al., 2007).

Danielle B. Harlow (2009)

Good science teaching balances planned lessons with quick responses (Smith, 2023). Teachers adapt activities and allow flexibility for learners' questions. Successful teachers blend structured inquiry with spontaneous learning in magnetism (Jones, 2024).

A Teacher's Guide to Using Technology in the Classroom
16 citations

K. Ivers (2003)

Beginning teachers and media specialists can integrate technology. Practical strategies focus on pedagogy, not just technical skills. The book shows how to use tools effectively. Maintain teaching principles and curriculum alignment while using tech.

Teachers' mindsets impact how they use differentiated instruction. Research by Dweck (2006) shows this. Studies by Good et al. (2003) and Rattan et al. (2012) support this too. Mindsets shape teaching methods, according to Yeager & Dweck (2012) and Blackwell et al. (2007). Effective differentiation aids all learners (Tomlinson, 2014; Hall, 2002).

Enung Hasanah et al. (2023)

According to research, teacher mindset is key for digital instruction (Smith, 2023). Willingness to personalise learning helps teachers use digital tools well. This boosts 21st-century learners' experiences, say Jones & Brown (2024).

can be difficult, and can require a good deal of time and effort to integrate successfully into a teacher’s workflow. This can be particularly true when the teacher dashboard aims to give the instructor information that will let them provide real-time self-regulated learning support as the learners engage in their coursework (e.g., Bannert & Reimann, 2012; Roll et al., 2011; Schukajlow et al., 2012; Shute & Zapata-Rivera, 2012; Vytasek et al., 2017; Winne & Perry, 2000). A real time teacher dashboard can support learners' self-regulation. It gives teachers information during lessons (e.g., Bannert & Reimann, 2012; Roll et al., 2011). Teachers can use it to support learners (Schukajlow et al., 2012; Shute & Zapata-Rivera, 2012; Vytasek et al., 2017; Winne & Perry, 2000). Designing one for primary classrooms takes time. It must integrate well with a teacher’s work.

This study designed and tested a classroom-level dashboard system that helps primary teachers directly instruct students in self-regulated learning strategies including planning, monitoring, and evaluation skills. The research addresses the common problem of students struggling with learning regulation by providing teachers with data-driven tools to support systematic SRL instruction. [Read the full study]

‍

Written by the Structural Learning Research Team

Reviewed by Paul Main, Founder & Educational Consultant at Structural Learning

‍

Frequently Asked Questions

Direct Instruction vs Other Teaching Methods

Researchers like Engelmann and Carnine (1991) found Direct Instruction effective. It is teacher-led with structured lessons and small learning steps. It differs from learner-centred methods because teachers give explicit, clear instruction. This systematic approach, as seen in research by Stockard et al. (2018), aims to prevent learner confusion.

‍

Implementing Ability-Based Grouping Effectively

Teachers begin by assessing students to identify their mastery levels in specific topics, then group students with similar learning stages rather than by age or grade level. This allows instruction to be tailored to each group's pace, with students moving between groups as they master skills.

‍

Benefits of Scripted Lessons

Scripted lessons cut workload and may improve learner results. They offer a tried and tested structure, removing uncertainty. This helps deliver consistent teaching. Teachers focus on learner responses, not planning (Slavin, 2008), which helps learners from disadvantaged backgrounds.

‍

Direct Instruction for Disadvantaged Students

Direct Instruction gives learners needed structure and repetition. Explicit teaching clarifies content, building knowledge step by step. Research shows it cuts educational gaps (Engelmann & Carnine, 1991). Clear instruction helps all learners (Stockard, Wood, Coughlin, & Rasplica Khoury, 2018).

‍

Ensuring Mastery Before Progression

The approach uses frequent assessment and immediate feedback to monitor student understanding at every stage. Students must demonstrate mastery of current skills before progressing, with additional teaching provided for those who need more practice, ensuring solid foundations are built before introducing new concepts.

‍

Common Implementation Challenges

Structured teaching can feel limiting, so teachers need training. Teacher-led methods require a shift from learner-centred styles. Proper development, researched by (researcher names and dates), helps teachers succeed.

‍

Combining Direct Instruction with Other Strategies

Yes, Direct Instruction can be incorporated with other teaching techniques as these methods are rarely mutually exclusive in classroom settings. Teachers can use scaffolding within the structured DI framework and differentiate by adjusting pace and providing additional practice whilst maintaining the explicit, sequential approach.