Structural Learning Editorial Policy

1. Submission Guidelines and Editorial Policy

Thank you for considering a submission to our Structural Learning blog. This editorial policy is effective from January 2025 through 2026. Our goal is to highlight innovative practices in education, psychology, and the application of structural learning to improve student outcomes. To maintain a high standard of content, we've outlined the following guidelines for submissions. Paul Main, Founder paul@structural-learning.com

2. Topic Submission

Before submitting, please propose your topic to our editorial team for approval. Topics should align with education, psychology, or the practical application of structural learning tools. We're looking for content that can illuminate these areas in a clear, engaging manner.

3. Blog Objective

Our blog is dedicated to advancing understanding and application of psychological and cognitive principles in education. We aim to cover a broad spectrum of topics, from behavioral science to effective teaching strategies, with the ultimate goal of enhancing children's learning experiences and outcomes in school. Contributors should share this commitment to supporting educators and school communities.

4. Content Objective

We seek to foster better educational outcomes by applying insights from cognitive science and psychology in the classroom. Our mission is to make these insights accessible to a wide range of stakeholders, including teachers, educational leaders, and policymakers, to inform and improve educational practices.

5. Additional Content Objective

We provide a platform for educators, researchers, and organizations to share achievements and best practices. Our aim is to support schools across all regions in reaching their educational goals by promoting effective strategies and innovations.

6. Editorial Criteria

Submissions are welcomed from educators, researchers, academic professionals, and non-profit organizations dedicated to educational improvement. Diversity of perspectives is valued, and we especially encourage contributions that reflect a wide range of experiences and backgrounds.

7. Desired Content

We welcome articles that provide insightful analysis, research findings, case studies, and practical applications in the fields of education and psychology. Contributions should aim to inspire, educate, and engage our diverse audience with fresh perspectives on enhancing learning and teaching.

8. Formatting and Style

Submissions should be concise, well-organized, and free of jargon, making complex ideas accessible to a broad audience. We encourage authors to structure their content with clear headings and to ensure that any educational or psychological terms are clearly explained.

9. Fact-Checking and Accuracy Standards

All content undergoes a rigorous fact-checking process before publication. Claims are verified against peer-reviewed research and authoritative sources. Statistics and data are cross-referenced with original studies. Educational practices are validated by qualified practitioners. Any corrections are made promptly with transparent update notes displayed at the top of articles.

10. Expert Review Process

Our content is reviewed by qualified education professionals with relevant credentials and classroom experience. Reviewers include practicing teachers, educational psychologists, and researchers with advanced degrees in education, psychology, or related fields. Each article is assessed for accuracy, pedagogical soundness, and practical applicability before publication. Our expert team brings decades of combined experience working directly with schools across the UK.

11. Correction Policy

We are committed to accuracy and transparency. If errors are identified in published content, we will promptly issue corrections with a clear note at the top of the article indicating what was changed and when. Readers can report potential inaccuracies by contacting paul@structural-learning.com. We take all feedback seriously and investigate reported issues within 48 hours. Significant corrections are documented in our update log to maintain editorial integrity.

12. Author Credentials

All contributors to Structural Learning are required to provide verified credentials demonstrating their expertise in education, psychology, or related fields. Author profiles include professional qualifications, current roles, and relevant experience. We prioritize contributors who are actively working in education or conducting research in cognitive science and learning. Our team page showcases the qualifications and backgrounds of our core contributors, ensuring readers can verify the expertise behind our content.