Thinking Maps for Deeper Learning

What are Thinking Maps?

Thinking maps (AI-generated thinking maps) are visual tools that help students organise their thoughts and ideas. These graphic organisers guide students through complex thinking tasks by making abstract concepts more concrete. When students can see their ideas on paper, they find it easier to make connections and solve problems.

Students use these visual tools across all subjects and grade levels. For teachers working with early literacyand speech development, visual sound teaching methods can complement thinking maps by making phonetic concepts equally concrete and accessible. The maps support different types of thinking: creative, critical thinking, and analytical. Teachers find them useful because they help all students access higher-order thinking skills, regardless of their starting ability.

The beauty of thinking maps lies in their simplicity. They turn complex ideas into manageable visual patterns. This makes learning more accessible for students who struggle with traditional text-based approaches.

These tools also work well for developing higher-order thinking skills. Students learn to analyse, evaluate, and create through structured visual activities. The spatial organisation helps them engage in clear reasoning as they work through their ideas.

The thinking maps framework provides creative thinking opportunities across topics. They help students make connections between concepts, ideas, values and knowledge. These tools offer opportunities for exploration, collaboration and finding original solutions to complex questions.

Teachers can use thinking maps to teach advanced science concepts such as scientific reasoning. Students learn to identify patterns and relationships between data points. The visual format helps them understand the scientific process and support their hypotheses with evidence.

These maps also work well for teaching abstract concepts like ethics, philosophy and morality. Students can see why certain decisions are made and learn to think critically about situations. The visual format helps them look beyond surface observations and spot patterns in underlying principles.

You can explore a variety of graphic organisers by opening a free account on the Structural Learningwebsite, where you can access and view a range of visual tools to support your teaching.

‍

How do Thinking Maps help Students Build Background Knowledge?

Thinking maps work as a common visual language for learning across entire school communities. When used systematically, they promote the cognitive thinking processes needed for understanding abstract ideas. Teachers can use these consistent, clear patterns to help all students access thinking skill tools.

These visual tools help students become aware of their own assumptions and biases. They notice patterns and connections that may not be obvious otherwise. Students can identify gaps in their knowledge and areas that need improvement.

The best part is there's no single right answer. Just as you might draw different aspects of yourself in a self-portrait, thinking maps allow students to explore different facets of complex topics. This flexibility makes them suitable for all learners.

When students use thinking maps, they learn to tackle abstract concepts more effectively. The visual format turns complex ideas into concrete representations. This helps students build the background knowledge they need for deeper learning and reduces cognitive load.

If you want to learn more about different thinking processes and how to use them in daily classroom practice, the resources below will help your students turn abstract concepts into concrete ideas.

‍

What Are the Different Types of Thinking Maps?

There are eight specific types of thinking maps, each designed for a different cognitive process: Circle Maps for defining, Bubble Maps for describing, Flow Maps for sequencing, Brace Maps for part-whole relationships, Tree Maps for classifying, Double Bubble Maps for comparing, Multi-Flow Maps for cause and effect, and Bridge Maps for analogies. Each map uses a distinct visual pattern that guides students through specific thinking tasks. Teachers select the appropriate map based on the type of thinking they want students to demonstrate and can complement these with active learning strategies.

Thinking maps are organised into eight different types. Each type connects a specific cognitive skill with a visual pattern, similar to how mind map techniques work but with more structured frameworks.

1. Circle map: Circle maps help students brainstorm ideas. They work as a quick assessment tool and students can create them independently. The structure includes a smaller circle inside a bigger circle, enclosed in a square. The smaller circle contains the concept name. Words or phrases that define this concept go in the outer circle. The square frame shows sources of information or references. Circle maps provide an effective way to explore and retain knowledge at the beginning of any topic and support engagement throughout the learning process.

2. Flow map: Flow maps help students organise a series of events. They show how things connect with one another through sub-stages that contain specific actions within each part of the event. Flow maps illustrate the stages of a system or cycle. They can guide people through processes, projects or historical timelines.

3. Bubble map: Bubble maps are descriptive tools. They contain a central theme in the centre of the map. Adjectives surrounding the central theme provide more information. Use bubble maps for language building and character development activities.

4. Double bubble map: Double bubble maps help students to compare two things. They visually represent similarities and differences in topics, characters, ideas, or events. The overlapping bubbles highlight shared qualities, while separate bubbles show unique characteristics.

5. Tree map: Tree maps help students classify things. The main topic is at the top of the map. Below this, categories branch out, with supporting details listed underneath. Tree maps promote organisation and information recall, encouraging students to sort and group information effectively.

6. Brace map: Brace maps break things down into their component parts. The overall object sits to the left, and its parts branch out to the right. Sub-parts can be further detailed, offering a hierarchical representation of the object's structure.

7. Flow map: Flow maps illustrate a sequence of events. Events appear in chronological order, connected by arrows that show the flow of time. Use flow maps to map out historical timelines, scientific processes or the steps in a story.

8. Multi-flow map: Multi-flow maps illustrate cause-and-effect relationships. The central event is in the middle, with causes on the left and effects on the right. Multi-flow maps help students analyse the consequences of actions, encouraging critical thinking and problem-solving.

9. Bridge map: Bridge maps help students make analogies. At the top and bottom of the map, connecting factors link the first item in the analogy with the second. Bridge maps encourage critical thinking and teach students about relationships between different things.

Teachers should choose the thinking map that best fits the task. This helps students to select the thinking processes that will help them achieve success. By systematically matching cognitive tasks to visual tools, teachers can create a classroom environment that actively cultivates critical thinking.

‍

How Can You Use Thinking Maps in Your Classroom?

Thinking maps can transform classroom teaching across all subjects. They equip students with the tools to break down complex problems and think through intricate ideas. Here’s how:

• Introducing new topics: Use Circle Maps to brainstorm what students already know. This activates prior knowledge and sets the stage for new learning.
• Character analysis: Use Bubble Maps to describe characters in literature. This helps students understand motivations and relationships.
• Scientific processes: Use Flow Maps to illustrate the steps in an experiment. This visual aid makes complex procedures easier to grasp.
• Historical timelines: Use Flow Maps to chart historical events. This helps students understand the sequence of history and cause-and-effect relationships.
• Compare and contrast: Use Double Bubble Maps to compare different concepts or characters. This strengthens analytical skills.
• Classification exercises: Use Tree Maps to classify living organisms. This makes complex classification systems more accessible.
• Analyse structures: Use Brace Maps to break down the parts of a cell. This helps students visualise complex structures.
• Problem solving: Use Multi-Flow Maps to analyse the causes and effects of a social issue. This creates critical thinking and decision-making skills.
• Analogical thinking: Use Bridge Maps to explore relationships between different concepts. This encourages creative problem-solving.

By integrating these maps into your lessons, you’ll provide all learners with a common visual language. This consistency helps students develop a deep understanding of different thinking processes.

Thinking Maps help students take ownership of their learning. By systematically using these tools, teachers can help students achieve mastery across all subjects.

‍

Conclusion

Thinking Maps offer a transformative approach to teaching and learning. By converting abstract concepts into visual patterns, they make complex ideas more accessible to all students. These tools support various thinking skills, from creative brainstorming to critical analysis, and help students develop a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

By integrating Thinking Maps into classroom practice, teachers can creates a more engaging, inclusive, and effective learning environment. The systematic use of these visual tools helps students to take control of their learning, develop essential thinking skills, and achieve academic success. Embrace Thinking Maps and unlock the potential for deeper learning in your classroom.

‍

Further Reading

• Hyërczyk, M. M., Strzelec, M., & Vera, A. (2024). See, Think, Learn: Using Visual Tools to Enhance L earning. Educational Leadership, 78(2), 40-46.
• Hyerle, D. (2009). Visual Tools for Transforming Information Into Knowledge. Journal of Staff Deve lopment, 30(1), 56, 67.
• Parks, S., & Black, H. (2005). Learning to Think Mathematically with Multiple Representation-Based S oftware. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(3/4), 265, 283.