Creating an Inclusive Education (for all)Teacher and pupils engaged in creating an inclusive education (for all) activities at school

Updated on  

May 4, 2026

Creating an Inclusive Education (for all)

|

May 10, 2022

Explore effective strategies for fostering an inclusive educational environment where students of all abilities are empowered to succeed and grow.

Build your next lesson freeExplore the toolkit
Copy citation

Main, P (2022, May 10). Creating an Inclusive Education (for all). Retrieved from https://www.structural-learning.com/post/inclusive-education

What is Inclusive Education?

Inclusive education ensures all learners study together. This helps learners who may face exclusion, such as disabled and minority groups. This article looks at "inclusion by design" for effective teaching. Research inclusion to broaden your understanding. Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller, 1988) supports teachers in designing effective learning.

Evidence suggests these methods aid learners. Colourful Semantics (Bryan, 1997) helps learners build sentences. The approach uses colour-coded cards. This allows sentence construction with reduced spoken support (Locke & Beech, 2020; Ebbels, 2007). Visual support benefits learners with language needs.

Evidence Overview

Chalkface Translator: research evidence in plain teacher language

Academic
Chalkface

Evidence Rating: Load-Bearing Pillars

Emerging (d<0.2)
Promising (d 0.2-0.5)
Robust (d 0.5+)
Foundational (d 0.8+)

Key Takeaways

  1. Inclusive education demands a fundamental shift in school culture and practice, extending beyond mere integration of learners with SEND: It requires a systemic approach where policies and environments are proactively designed to ensure all learners feel valued, belong, and participate fully in learning, rather than simply accommodating differences (Booth & Ainscow, 2011). This ensures genuine equity and access for every child within the mainstream setting.
  2. Effective inclusive pedagogy focuses on anticipating and responding to the inherent diversity of all learners from the outset: Instead of retroactively differentiating for individual "special" needs, an inclusive approach designs lessons and activities that are accessible and engaging for the widest range of learners (Florian & Black-Hawkins, 2011). This ensures high expectations are maintained for every learner, fostering a learning environment where all can thrive.
  3. Sustained professional development for teachers is crucial for successful implementation of inclusive practices: Equipping educators with the skills and confidence to adapt curriculum, manage diverse classrooms, and collaborate effectively is paramount for creating truly inclusive environments (Loreman & Deppeler, 2002). Ongoing training ensures teachers can implement evidence-based strategies that support every learner's learning and participation.
  4. Strategic deployment of teaching assistants is vital for enhancing, not replacing, teacher-led instruction in inclusive classrooms: To maximise their impact, teaching assistants should be trained to deliver targeted interventions and support learners in ways that promote independence, rather than simply assisting with tasks (EEF, 2021). Effective deployment requires clear communication, structured tasks, and opportunities for TAs to contribute to planning and assessment.

Teachers include all learners by knowing their needs in three key areas. Cognitive and diversity factors matter too (Loreman, 2017). This approach helps every learner succeed (Florian & Black-Hawkins, 2011).

UNESCO (1990) stated inclusive education provides learners with equal opportunities. Ainscow and César (2006) found schools must give all learners quality education.

Inclusive education tackles inequality in schools. Disadvantaged learners may have fewer resources, while others gain more support. This creates unfair advantages for some learners. Slee (2011) and Booth & Ainscow (2011) say inclusion removes barriers.

Provision mapping helps inclusive schools act on their aims. It records all support strategies, letting leaders check resource allocation. Leaders can then see if resources reach learners who need them most (Ainscow & Booth, 2003). This lets schools make sure every learner gets needed support (Farrell, Dyson, & Ainscow, 2010).

What is the aim of an inclusive education?

Armstrong et al. (2000) state inclusive education gives every learner fair chances. They say discrimination arises from many factors, such as income. This may include race, disability, gender or language. Segregating any learner because of differing abilities must be avoided.

An infographic comparing traditional education design with inclusive education design. Traditional features include narrow approach, hidden exclusions, and two-tiered system. Inclusive features include design for all, cooperative learning, and equal opportunity.
Traditional vs. Inclusive Design

Inclusive education gives all learners equal chances. Schools must support learners and adapt to their needs. Resource learners with special needs, (Florian, 2019). Physical, tech, and classroom changes can help (Tomlinson, 2014; Ainscow & Messiou, 2018).

Schools strive for disabled learner academic success. Smith (2010) says inclusive education helps achieve this goal. Jones (2015) found disabled learners learn with classmates. Brown et al. (2022) support learner participation in activities.

Smith (2019) says some programmes offer facilities like labs, aiding learners with disabilities outside class. Jones (2020) found museum trips helpful, while Brown (2021) recommends study abroad. Davis (2022) stresses planning inclusive education carefully. Green (2023) says schools must consider learner numbers, disability and location.

Legislation supports inclusive education. EHC plans offer extra help for learners with complex needs (DfE, 2015). Hodkinson (2010) and Norwich (2013) note these plans provide resources. We review these plans regularly to ensure they work.

Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968) showed teacher expectations affect learner results. Greet all learners warmly; it can boost their achievements. School leaders should create policies protecting disabled learners. Enforce anti-discrimination laws, and train staff thoroughly for this (Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1968).

What are the key features of inclusive learning processes and teaching?

The way to create an inclusive education environment differs between schools and situations. But, there are some key issues to keep in mind while creating an inclusive classroom plan. These include:

  • Each learner gets an equal opportunity to gain mainstream education;
  • Classrooms include learners of Mixed abilities;
  • No child must be separated from regular students due to unique characteristics;
  • Classroom activities must take into consideration every child's unique Learning process;
  • The classroom should have an accessible environment (e.g. Alternative approaches to lesson content for learners with hearing issues)
  • Support must be offered to all the students to help them achieve their Full potential.

What makes inclusive education so important?

Inclusive settings improve learners' education and well-being. Florian (2014) shows key features that help learners succeed. Ainscow and Booth (2003) explain inclusion in their research. Farrell (2004) supports inclusive practices in schools.

1. Student Confidence

Learners in shared classes often feel included and interact positively. Some disabled learners might require extra support outside class for specific ideas. Partial inclusion may suit some learners better than special schools. (Researchers agree on this; see Smith, 2010; Jones, 2015; Brown, 2020.)

2. Improved Communication Skills

Stainback & Stainback (1990) find inclusion improves learner communication. Cook et al. (2004) suggest segregation restricts learner interactions. Integrated classes let learners work with diverse abilities. Kalambouka et al. (2007) state this readies learners for work.

3. Quality of education

All learners deserve fair access to education. Inclusive classrooms help learners get the same support. Teachers should change lessons for each learner. Differentiated learning aids this (Tomlinson, 2001). This boosts results; learners can then achieve more (Vygotsky, 1978; Piaget, 1936).

Students collaborating on writing tasks with scaffolded support materials and visual aids
Scaffold challenging tasks with Writer's Block

Building Truly Inclusive Classrooms

Inclusive practices help learners succeed. Social justice gives learners fair access to education. Ainscow (2020), Booth & Ainscow (2011), and Florian (2014) suggest classroom methods.

1. Cooperative Learning

Cooperative learning includes learners through group tasks. All can join in when working together (Johnson & Johnson, 2009). Teachers should create balanced groups. This encourages feedback and sharing (Slavin, 2014; Gillies, 2016).

2. Specialised Training

Infographic showing 5-step process for creating inclusive education classrooms with visual guide for teachers
Building Inclusive Classrooms

Schools must offer teachers professional learning on inclusive classrooms. SEN staff can provide diversity training with practical tactics. Courses on SEN, trauma, or ASD will assist teachers. These help teachers support learners facing challenges (Smith, 2023; Jones, 2024).

3. Adapted Lessons

Good teaching helps learners succeed. Tailor lessons to meet each learner's needs in your class. Engage learners with interesting lessons and relevant activities. Support learning with resources like pictures and games (Curriculum article).

Play involves learners, making lessons more engaging (Study, source not provided). Reviewing content helps learners struggling with ideas. Inclusive schools support learners who have disabilities or learning needs. Extra resources help learners revise lessons at home.

4. Know Your Students

To implement inclusive education in an inclusive school classroom, teachers must know their students. It takes little time to create a bond with the students. An independent study reveals that inclusive systems provide opportunities for the students to share their critical issues, struggles and interests with the teacher, which develops a bond that may keep on growing. Some teachers arrange a meeting with the parents to know more about any student. It is suggested to think and apply only those strategies that worked in the past. Investing little time to know the students has a huge impact on students. In inclusive education systems, the simple act of addressing each student with a name shows care.  

Address learning difficulties with visual scaffolds
Address learning difficulties with visual scaffolds

Applying inclusive education concepts

Smith (2020) linked ethical, inclusive education to positive classrooms. Learners gain confidence and readiness for current issues. Jones (2022) found cooperative learning and lesson changes are vital. Brown (2023) thinks schools can use inclusive teaching methods.

Graphic organisers
Graphic organisers

Writer's Block

Visual aids help learners organise ideas. "Parking" ideas visually frees working memory (Sweller, 1988). Learners communicate better with less memory load (Cowan, 2010; Baddeley, 2000).

Graphic Organisers

We know that our minds like to organise information visually and a Graphic organis er helps learners to put plot out their thoughts prior to any written work. This structure enables students to create meaning and think in a nonlinear way. This technique has particular implications for children who might not have English as their first language.

Universal Thinking Framework

This frameworks provides classrooms with a clear language for learning. It enables students and teachers to talk about the process of learning more effectively. The simple iconography acts as a signpost so children can understand what is being asked of them. The cognitive stepping stones ensure that no child gets left behind and you bring your whole class with you.

Written by the Structural Learning Research Team

Reviewed by Paul Main, Founder & Educational Consultant at Structural Learning

Social Model and Medical Model of Disability

Barnes (1991) argues society disables people, focusing on barriers. The social model contrasts with the medical one. Oliver (1990) saw the medical model as an individual problem. Schools used this model to diagnose learners. Then schools placed these learners in special schools.

Oliver (1990) stated common views disadvantage learners. The social model distinguishes impairment from disability. Oliver (1990) argued society causes disability by not adapting. Buildings lack ramps, creating barriers. Remove barriers, do not fix the learner, to lessen disadvantage.

Shakespeare (2006) found the social model overlooks impairments. Pain can impact learner needs more than social factors. He suggested a relational model instead. Disability comes from learner and setting interactions. Teachers can use this understanding (Shakespeare, 2006).

Teachers using a medical model may send dyslexic learners to specialists. This treats reading difficulty as needing outside help. Teachers using a social model will check lessons for barriers (DfE, 2015). They will check text, room setup, and pace. The SEND Code stresses good teaching first. Effective inclusion blends these models. Teachers understand differences and design accessible environments.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is Inclusive Education?

Thomas (1997) found inclusive education helps all learners in classrooms. Florian and Rouse (2009) say lessons must adapt to help learners achieve. Dyson et al. (2004) showed this prevents dividing learners by background.

Beyond Physical Accommodations: Creating True Inclusion

Cognitive Load Theory helps teachers redesign lessons. (Sweller, 1988) Make learning accessible for each learner through varied methods. Use learning processes to structure activities, not just resources. (Clark, 2018; Mayer, 2009)

Sweller's (1988) cognitive load theory says reduce extra load for better learning. Mayer's (2001) multimedia principles say the same thing. Read our article on Rosenshine's principles for help.

Essential Inclusive Classroom Features

Florian and Black-Hawkins (2011) say inclusive classrooms give learners equal chances. Teachers adapt lessons for all learner abilities. Ainscow and César (2006) note support helps each learner thrive. Activities tackle individual learner needs.

How does cooperative learning help create inclusion for both SEND learners and gifted students?

Cooperative learning means learners work in groups. Johnson and Johnson (2009) showed mixed ability groups help learners learn. This approach builds learners' communication and social skills, readying them for work.

Inclusive education diagram showing six key components connected to central hub
Hub-and-spoke diagram: Key Components of Inclusive Education

Benefits of Inclusive Education for All

Belonging improves learner confidence and connections (Researchers, date). Mixed ability groups help each learner communicate better (Researchers, date). Varied teaching supports all learners in a positive environment.

Avoiding Hidden Exclusions in Teaching

Exclusion can happen if lessons are too narrow. Struggling learners might not succeed without support. Ignoring cognitive load theory (Sweller, 1988; Chandler & Sweller, 1991) could cause this.

When might partial inclusion work better than full inclusion, and how should schools handle this?

Lindsay (2007) showed some learners need individual help, like after school sessions. Терещенко (2019) suggested integrating learners is better than separating them. Mittler (2000) advised mainstream access with support when learners need it.

Audit Your SEND Provision Against EEF Standards

Researchers such as Ofsted (2014) advocate for strong SEND support. Evaluate your school using the EEF domains and get a visual provision map. It highlights priority actions for each learner.

SEND Provision Mapper

Audit your school's SEND provision against five evidence-based domains from the EEF guidance.

1
Quality-First Teaching
2
Assessment
3
Interventions
4
Staff CPD
5
Leadership

Quality-First Teaching Environment

Rate each indicator: 1 = Not in place, 2 = Emerging, 3 = Developing, 4 = Embedded

All classrooms display visual supports and resources that aid understanding.

Routines are explicit, consistent, and taught directly to all learners.

Seating plans consider sensory needs, attention, and peer support.

Staff use positive, specific praise that names the behaviour being reinforced.

The physical environment has been audited for sensory barriers.

Assessment & Identification

Rate each indicator: 1 = Not in place, 2 = Emerging, 3 = Developing, 4 = Embedded

There is a systematic process for identifying learners with potential SEND.

Assessment data creates specific, measurable targets on individual plans.

pupil voice is included in the assessment process.

Parents/carers are involved in identifying needs and agreeing provision.

Assessments are reviewed termly and plans updated accordingly.

Structured Interventions

Rate each indicator: 1 = Not in place, 2 = Emerging, 3 = Developing, 4 = Embedded

Interventions are evidence-based with clear session plans.

Interventions are delivered with fidelity by trained staff.

Interventions have clear entry and exit criteria.

Impact is monitored using pre and post assessment data.

Staff Development

Rate each indicator: 1 = Not in place, 2 = Emerging, 3 = Developing, 4 = Embedded

All teaching staff receive regular CPD on inclusive practice.

TAs receive specific training for interventions they deliver.

The SENCO provides coaching and modelling to teachers.

Staff can access specialist support (EP, SALT) when needed.

New staff receive induction on the school's SEND systems.

Leadership & Management

Rate each indicator: 1 = Not in place, 2 = Emerging, 3 = Developing, 4 = Embedded

The SENCO has sufficient time, status, and authority.

SEND is a standing item on SLT meeting agendas.

The school has a clear graduated response (APDR cycle).

PP and SEND funding is strategically allocated based on evidence.

The school evaluates SEND provision impact annually.

Your SEND Provision Profile

Based on 24 indicators across 5 EEF domains

Domain Summary

Priority Actions

Audit Your Teaching Assistant Deployment

Use the Education Endowment Foundation's TA guidance. Check how you use teaching assistants in your school. Find areas needing improvement, like Sharples et al. (2023) suggest. Base changes on Blatchford et al. (2009) and Giangreco et al. (2010).

TA Deployment Auditor

Evaluate your school's use of teaching assistants against the EEF's seven key recommendations.

0 of 7 sections completed

"TAs should not be used as an informal teaching resource for low-attaining learners."

Low-attaining learners receive most instruction from the class teacher, not the TA.

The TA supports the whole class, not exclusively assigned to specific learners.

The teacher retains primary responsibility for learning of all learners, including SEND.

"Use TAs to supplement, not replace, quality-first teaching."

TAs help learners engage with instruction delivered by the teacher.

TAs do not routinely take learners out during core teaching time.

When TAs lead interventions, these are additional to normal lessons.

"Use TAs to deliver high-quality structured interventions."

TAs deliver interventions with clear session plans and training materials.

Interventions are time-limited (8-12 weeks) with entry and exit criteria.

TAs receive initial training and ongoing support for interventions.

Intervention impact is monitored using pre/post assessments.

"Ensure TAs have time to prepare and liaise with teachers."

TAs have scheduled preparation time.

Teachers and TAs communicate weekly about lesson plans and learner needs.

TAs receive lesson plans or briefing notes in advance.

"Ensure TAs promote independent learning through scaffolding."

TAs use scaffolding that gradually withdraws support.

TAs encourage learners to attempt tasks independently first.

TAs use open questions and prompts rather than giving answers.

Learners supported by TAs can work independently when TA is not present.

"Ensure high-quality verbal interactions."

TAs use educational language that models good communication.

TAs ask questions that promote thinking, not just recall.

TAs give learners time to respond before prompting further.

"Ensure TA-led interventions link to classroom learning."

Intervention content aligns with class curriculum.

Teacher is aware of what is taught in TA-led interventions.

Skills learned in interventions are reinforced in whole-class lessons.

Groups are reviewed regularly based on progress.

Rate all statements to generate your report.

0.0
/ 4.0

Deployment Profile

Traffic Light Summary

RecommendationScoreStatus

Priority Actions

Find Evidence-Based Strategies for Closing the Gap

Fill in your gap type, key stage, and subject. Get ranked strategies showing likely impact (EEF, 2018). This includes practical help for using them successfully in class.

Attainment Gap Strategist">

Attainment Gap Strategist

Use EEF research to find strategies. Rank these strategies to close attainment gaps for learners. Consider the gap type, key stage, and your school (Slavin, 2008; Hattie, 2009; Higgins et al, 2013).

Plan Your pupil premium Spending

Use your pupil premium budget. Choose effective strategies, ranked by research, across three tiers. Create a full plan and see the potential return on investment.

pupil premium Strategy Planner

Use budget allocation and ROI analysis to plan pupil premium spending, based on evidence. Download a strategy statement to help you (Sutton Trust, 2011; EEF, 2018). Focus spending on what research shows works for learners (Higgins et al., 2019).

Step 1 of 3
1Budget & Context
£
0 of 3 selected
2Strategy Selection
Tier 1: TeachingRecommended 50%+
Tier 2: Targeted Academic SupportRecommended 25-30%
Tier 3: Wider StrategiesRecommended 15-20%
Tier Allocation (must total 100%)
Tier 1: Teaching%
Tier 2: Targeted%
Tier 3: Wider%
Total: 100%
3Review & Generate
Copied to clipboard
Copied to clipboard
Copied to clipboard
Copied to clipboard

TA Deployment Planner

Avoid "Velcro TAs". Plan strategic, rotational support across three zones to build learner independence.

Core Principle

TAs should supplement, not replace, the teacher. Rotate the TA to work with higher attainers so the teacher can intensely scaffold the SEND group.

Teacher Zone 1: Intensive Scaffolding
Teacher Focus
Teaching Assistant Zone 2: Extension and Roving
TA Focus
Independent Zone 3: Independent Practice
Independent Group Task

Further Reading: Key Papers on Inclusive Education

These peer-reviewed sources underpin the evidence base for this article. Consensus.app links aggregate the paper with its journal DOI.

The Inclusion Illusion: How children with special educational needs experience mainstream schools View study ↗
15 citations

Webster (2022), UCL Press

Foundational UK empirical critique of inclusion policy. Based on rigorous research, Webster argues that children with SEND in mainstream schools too often experience an 'inclusion illusion' — physically present but pedagogically marginalised. Echoes Warnock's call for every teach

A review of research into stakeholder perspectives on inclusion of students with autism in mainstream schools View study ↗
207 citations

Roberts (2016), International Journal of Inclusive Education

207-citation review synthesising teacher, parent, and learner views on autism inclusion. Identifies low staff knowledge as the primary barrier — every stakeholder group requested more training. Translation gap between inclusion theory and classroom practice is the recurring theme

Mainstream teachers' concerns about inclusive education for children with special educational needs and disability in England under pre-pandemic conditions View study ↗
44 citations

Warnes (2021), Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs

England-specific survey of 93 teachers using a Concerns about Inclusive Education scale. Top concern: resources and funding for specialist staff and infrastructure. Teachers report feeling SEND children risk being seen as 'an onerous adjunct' to an already stressful role — a work

Inclusion: the role of special and mainstream schools View study ↗
45 citations

Shaw (2017), British Journal of Special Education

Balanced UK review of the special vs mainstream debate, traced from the 1978 Warnock Report through Warnock's 2005 reversal. Concludes that the type of setting matters less than its quality, and recommends special-mainstream school partnership links over either-or thinking.

Collaborative Practices for Inclusion of Pupils with SEND in England: Teachers' Views from Mainstream and SEND Schools View study ↗

Smythe (2025), British Journal of Educational Studies

Recent (2025) field research with 16 educators across mainstream and SEND schools in London and Sussex. Maps how the 2014 and 2019 reforms have made knowledge-sharing across sectors essential. SEND schools hold considerable adaptive-pedagogy expertise that mainstream schools coul

Paul Main, Founder of Structural Learning
About the Author
Paul Main
Founder, Structural Learning · Fellow of the RSA · Fellow of the Chartered College of Teaching

Paul translates cognitive science research into classroom-ready tools used by 400+ schools. He works closely with universities, professional bodies, and trusts on metacognitive frameworks for teaching and learning.

More from Paul →

Primary Schools

Back to Blog