Action Research in EducationStudents and teacher working on action research in education in a school setting

Updated on  

May 15, 2026

Action Research in Education

|

November 26, 2021

Action research explained for teachers: plan, act, observe, reflect. A step-by-step guide to improving your teaching practice through classroom-based inquiry.

Build your next lesson freeExplore the toolkit
Copy citation

Main, P (2021, November 26). Action research in the classroom: A teacher's guide. Retrieved from https://www.structural-learning.com/post/action-research-in-the-classroom-a-teachers-guide

What is action research?

Teachers use action research to study classroom problems. They collect data, check results, and adjust lesson plans. This cycle tests solutions and expands knowledge (Somekh, 2019). Action research turns teaching questions into organised studies, building learner skills (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988; Stenhouse, 1975).

Action research helps teachers examine and improve their practice. The cycle involves planning, action, observation, and reflection (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). This aims to deepen understanding of practice in schools. Adapt the research process to fit various settings (Lewin, 1946).

Evidence Overview

Chalkface Translator: research evidence in plain teacher language

Academic
Chalkface

Evidence Rating: Load-Bearing Pillars

Emerging (d<0.2)
Promising (d 0.2-0.5)
Robust (d 0.5+)
Foundational (d 0.8+)

Key Takeaways

  1. Action research is a active, iterative cycle for continuous professional development: It systematically guides educators through planning, acting, observing, and reflecting to improve their teaching practice and learner outcomes, embodying a commitment to ongoing learning (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). This cyclical process ensures that interventions are continually refined based on real-world classroom evidence.
  2. Teachers are uniquely positioned as expert researchers of their own classrooms: By engaging in action research, educators transform their practical insights into evidence-based knowledge, systematically investigating their pedagogy to generate improvements that are directly relevant to their learners' learning (McNiff, 2013). This equips teachers to become agents of change, rather than passive recipients of external directives.
  3. Rigorous observation and data collection are crucial for understanding what truly works in the classroom: Moving beyond intuition, action research demands systematic gathering and analysis of evidence to inform pedagogical decisions and validate interventions, providing empirical grounds for improving curriculum and teaching (Stenhouse, 1975). This ensures that improvements are based on demonstrable impact, not just assumptions.
  4. Action research fosters collaborative professional learning and systemic change within educational settings: It encourages teachers to transform everyday teaching problems into shared inquiries, leading to collective knowledge building and the development of improved school-wide practices (Reason & Bradbury, 2008). This collaborative approach strengthens professional communities and can drive broader organisational development.

Action research helps teachers improve practice through critical reflection. Consider your teaching, behaviour management, and learner participation. Collaboration values input from teachers, learners, and stakeholders (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988).

Circular diagram showing the four-stage action research cycle: Planning, Action, Observation, Reflection
Cycle diagram with directional arrows: The Action Research Cycle in Education

Action research repeats, improving insight. Teachers find school problems and plan actions. Use journals for plans, like Kemmis and McTaggart (1988) advised. Reflect and analyse next, as Lewin (1946) demonstrated.

Infographic showing four sequential steps for teachers to create an action research project: identifying a problem, developing a plan, implementing action, and documenting results.
Teacher Project Steps

Action research enhances teaching and learner results. (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988; Stenhouse, 1975; Lewin, 1946). Quality Assurance supports relevant actions to meet school needs.

Teachers share findings in forums or journals, adding to practice theory. Tertiary education uses these studies to inform training and curriculum. (Wenger, 1998; Lave & Wenger, 1991)

The significant parts of action research include:

  • A continuous cycle of planning, action, observation, and reflection.
  • A focus on reflective practice to achieve a deeper understanding of educational methodologies.
  • A commitment to inclusive and participatory processes that engage the entire school community.
  • How Do Teachers Create an Action Research Project?

    Action research starts when teachers pinpoint a classroom issue (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). They plan data collection using surveys or notes (Elliott, 1991). Teachers then trial the intervention and record findings (Lewin, 1946). This process spans 4-8 weeks, focusing on a single manageable change (Carr & Kemmis, 1986).

    Action research starts when teachers want change (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). It supports school improvement projects and learner progress (Elliott, 1991). Teachers examine their practice and identify areas for development (Stenhouse, 1975). They then plan and implement changes, evaluating the impact (Lewin, 1946).

    This support transforms broad issues into research questions, prompting experimentation. Teachers use existing research (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1993) to plan actions. Analysing the results exposes practical implications (Stenhouse, 1975; Elliott, 1991).

    Lewin (1946) started participatory action research in the 1940s. Researchers and learners work together to understand issues and improve them. Teachers, as researchers, examine their own practice, (Corey, 1953). This questioning challenges norms often unseen in schools. Inquiry can boost learner learning and development. Teachers drive positive change, (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988).

    Action research in education involves teachers working to boost learner reading skills. Groups of teachers can collaborate to create and use a new curriculum. School leaders can study the success of behaviour programs (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988).

    Action research aids learners and solves school problems. Educators can improve their skills with action research (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). Learner learning benefits from this work (Reason & Bradbury, 2001; Somekh, 2006; McNiff & Whitehead, 2011).

    Action research projects
    Action research projects

    Potential research questions could include:

    Regardless of the types ofgraphic organisers be used for exam preparation?

    Researchers such as Hattie (2008) show teachers should focus on constant classroom progress. Black and Wiliam (1998) emphasise the impact of formative assessment on learner success. Shifting focus to learner needs helps improve outcomes (Sadler, 1989).

    What are the Benefits of Action Research?

    Action research helps teachers and schools. Teachers control their learning and development. Research increases job satisfaction (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). Learners gain more agency in the classroom (Somekh, 2005).

    Action research is practical and specific to context. Unlike lab research, action research happens in classrooms. It tackles issues relevant to learners and teachers. This makes findings easier to use (Lewin, 1946; Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988).

    Action research helps teams and encourages learners to work together. Research involves learners and parents to boost communication. This builds shared responsibility for learning (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). Supportive schools and stronger relationships can grow (Somekh, 2006).

    Types and Methods of Action Research

    Action research has different approaches for classrooms. Individual teachers study their own practice. Groups of teachers explore common problems through teamwork. Kurt Lewin (dates not provided) created the core plan-act-observe-reflect model. This cycle remains key for both types of action research.

    Scores show measurable learner change (Stenhouse). Interviews capture learner experiences that numbers miss. Both combined give a fuller picture through inquiry (Stenhouse). Mixed methods help action research.

    Match your method to your context and questions. Use pre- and post-tests with learner input to check a strategy (Cohen et al., 2018). Qualitative research helps understand behaviour better. Collaboration assists when putting change into practice.

    Data Collection Techniques for Teachers

    Action research requires solid data collection for better learning outcomes. Teachers should use structured methods, not only informal observations (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988; Stringer, 2014; Mertler, 2020). This provides reliable evidence supporting learner improvement.

    Educators quickly assess learner experiences through surveys. Checklists document learner behaviours in class (Bell, 2023). Reflective journals record teaching thoughts and feelings. Assessment data clearly reveals learner progress. Focus groups offer detailed understanding.

    Choose data methods that work with your time and give you varied insights. Triangulation, combining questionnaires, notes, and scores, is effective (Cohen et al., 2018). Smaller, frequent data collection offers better results than large, complex surveys (Bryman, 2016; Bell, 2014).

    Ethical Considerations in Classroom Research

    Ethical action research needs careful thought. Informed consent is key, but getting it from young learners is hard. Parents/guardians need to know about the research (purpose, methods, results). Learners need simple explanations and the right to opt out.

    Bryman (2016) says protect learner identities when collecting data. Anonymise work and use fake names to ensure privacy. Secure your digital files carefully. Hammersley and Atkinson (2019) advise avoiding bias. Christensen & James (2017) suggest you maintain good learner relationships.

    Embed safeguarding measures in research. Set up clear data storage rules and limit access. Consult leaders on ethics policies; schools often require approval. Research impacts learners, so prioritise ethics early. This builds trust in teaching and learning.

    Action Research Examples from Real Classrooms

    One Year 4 teacher in Manchester saw learners struggle with word problems, even with good maths skills. Observation and interviews showed learners felt swamped by long texts. She used Sweller's (1988) cognitive load theory. She taught learners to spot key language and added complexity slowly. Assessment data and feedback over two terms showed 40% better accuracy.

    Action research in Birmingham aimed to improve learner engagement. Surveys and observations showed learners felt detached during lab work. The teacher used inquiry: learners formed hypotheses. Engagement and understanding improved through questioning and assessments (researcher name not given).

    Action research helps with class challenges. It offers chances for teachers to grow professionally. Systematic study, like that from Kemmis and McTaggart (1988), improves learner results. McNiff and Whitehead (2002) show it's evidence-based practice.

    Making Sense of Your Research Data

    Analysing data is vital for action research. Organise data by date or theme. Look for patterns and trends. Unexpected findings may emerge (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). These findings should come from your practice.

    Go beyond simple observations to truly understand data. Wiliam's formative assessment work (dates not provided) shows learning gaps. Check findings against questions, but look for unexpected themes. New themes may change your teaching.

    Action research aids teacher growth through study. Use findings to inform lessons and change classrooms. Visuals, like charts, help colleagues grasp your work. Document successes and failures to improve practice (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988).

    Overcoming Common Action Research Challenges

    Teachers face hurdles in action research. Knowing them helps, (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). Time is a big issue; teachers balance research with daily work. Start small, (Somekh, 2006). Use brief observations to answer focused questions, (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1993). Simple data works with your routine, (Elliott, 1991).

    New action researchers find data collection hard if they think they need complex tools. Real classroom evidence comes from learner work or quick exit tickets. Jot down notes from chats (McNiff & Whitehead). Share observations with colleagues for support, and to lighten the load.

    Objectivity is hard when researching your teaching. Teachers are invested, so seeing failure is tough. Set success measures beforehand, (Somekh & Levin, 2005). Get feedback from colleagues for new views (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1993). Discovering what fails is valuable learning (Schön, 1983).

    Written by the Structural Learning Research Team

    Reviewed by Paul Main, Founder & Educational Consultant at Structural Learning

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is action research in education?

    Action research is a cycle: teachers explore their practice for practical fixes. The cycle has four stages: plan, act, observe, reflect. This helps educators see how teaching impacts learner progress (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988).

    How do teachers implement action research in the classroom?

    To begin, a teacher identifies a specific area for improvement or a question about classroom behaviour. They then create a simple plan to test a new strategy and collect data through observations or student feedback. As they practise this new approach, they record what happens to see if the change is effective.

    What are the benefits of action research for learning?

    Action research lets teachers control their professional growth, focusing on relevant issues. Staff can see the impact of their actions and use evidence to decide. Action research may boost confidence and solve classroom problems (Carr & Kemmis, 1986; Stenhouse, 1975).

    What does the research say about action research?

    Action research links theory and practice in schools. It helps schools focus on what learners need for improvement. Engaging in this process makes teachers more likely to use strategies to engage learners (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988; Stenhouse, 1975; Lewin, 1946).

    What are common mistakes when using action research?

    Choosing a question too big for your schedule is a common error. Some teachers also neglect to record observations well, hindering reflection. (Some teachers) can refer to Bell (2016). Instead, focus on a small change and collect basic data (Cordingley et al., 2015).

    Why is reflection important in the action research process?

    Reflection is the stage where a teacher analyses their findings and decides how to change their teaching methods for the future. This part of the cycle ensures that the process leads to a deeper understanding of classroom behaviour. Without careful reflection, the project might not produce a clear path for further school improvement.

    Conclusion

    Action research helps teachers improve their work and learner outcomes. Teachers plan, act, observe, and reflect (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). This process gives valuable insights into teaching methods and learner needs (Lewin, 1946).

    Action research helps teachers and learners flourish in classrooms. Inquiry and improvement are key (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). Start your own action research to improve your practice (Lewin, 1946; Stenhouse, 1975). See how you can make positive changes (Carr & Kemmis, 1986).

    Action research helps teachers grow professionally and influence education's future. (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988) Researchers like Stenhouse (1975) find teachers learn through inquiry. Lewin (1946) showed action research improves practice.

    Build Your EEF Implementation Roadmap

    Use the Assess-Plan-Do-Review cycle to create evidence-based plans. Black and Wiliam (1998) and Hattie (2008) found this improves learning. The cycle will help you improve learner outcomes too.

    EEF Implementation Roadmap Builder

    Build a structured implementation plan using the Assess-Plan-Do-Review cycle.

    Stage 1: Assess

    Identify the challenge and your current baseline.

    Stage 2: Plan

    Choose your strategy and set measurable targets.

    Stage 3: Do

    Identify training, resources, and monitoring.

    Stage 4: Review

    Define success criteria and contingency plans.

    Free Resource Pack

    Metacognition supports learners in lessons (Dunlosky & Metcalfe, 2009). Planning and self-regulation improve outcomes (Hattie, 2012; Zimmerman, 2002). Our free pack boosts these skills with posters and CPD. Desk cards are included (Bjork et al., 2013).

    Free Resource Pack

    Metacognition Cycle Toolkit

    4 evidence-informed resources to develop planning, monitoring, and self-regulation skills in students and teachers.

    Metacognition Cycle Toolkit — 4 resources
    MetacognitionSelf-RegulationPlanning StrategiesMonitoring SkillsCPD Briefing VisualLesson Planning TemplateStudent Strategy CardTeacher Quick ReferenceCognitive Skills

    Download your free bundle

    Fill in your details below and we'll send the resource pack straight to your inbox.

    Quick survey (helps us create better resources)

    How confident do you feel teaching and fostering metacognitive skills (planning, monitoring, self-regulation) in your classroom?

    Not Confident
    Slightly Confident
    Moderately Confident
    Confident
    Very Confident

    To what extent are metacognition strategies (planning, monitoring, self-regulation) explicitly discussed and supported among staff at your school?

    Not at all
    Rarely
    Sometimes
    Often
    Consistently

    How consistently do you integrate explicit metacognitive prompts (before, during, and after tasks) into your daily teaching practice?

    Never
    Rarely
    Sometimes
    Often
    Always

    Your resource pack is ready

    We've also sent a copy to your email. Check your inbox.

    Further Reading

    Action research in education

    Teacher inquiry

    Practitioner research

    1. Somekh, B. (2006). Action research: A methodology for change and development. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
    2. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2009). Educational action research: A critical approach. Routledge.
    3. Johnson, A. P. (2019). Action research: Practical, reflective, and participatory. SAGE Publications.
    4. Stringer, E. T. (2013). Action research. SAGE Publications.
    5. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. SAGE.
Cognitive Science Platform

Make Thinking Visible

Open a free account and help organise learners' thinking with evidence-based graphic organisers. Reduce cognitive load and guide schema building dynamically.

Create Free Account No credit card required
Paul Main, Founder of Structural Learning
About the Author
Paul Main
Founder, Structural Learning · Fellow of the RSA · Fellow of the Chartered College of Teaching

Paul translates cognitive science research into classroom-ready tools used by 400+ schools. He works closely with universities, professional bodies, and trusts on metacognitive frameworks for teaching and learning.

More from Paul →

Metacognition

Back to Blog