Updated on
September 18, 2026
Learning to Learn Strategies: Metacognition in the Lesson
Learning to learn strategies for teachers: the key principles, which techniques work best, how learners adopt them and how a school builds the culture.

Learning to learn strategies are the routines a learner uses to plan a task, check how it is going and decide what to change next time. They are not a separate subject. They are taught inside ordinary lessons, in the middle of real content, by a teacher who shows the thinking out loud and then hands it over. Learning to learn is the broader competence; metacognition, knowing and steering your own thinking, is the engine that drives it.
In a Year 5 literacy lesson the teacher opens a persuasive letter task by saying, "Before I write, I am going to list my three strongest points and pick the order." Learners copy the move: each writes three points, numbers them, then starts. Ten minutes in, the teacher stops the room and asks every learner to tick whether their first paragraph matches point one. Those who cannot tick go back and fix it. That short pause is where the gain sits: explicit teaching of planning and monitoring inside the subject adds about seven months' progress on average, and the effect is largest when the strategy is tied to the content in front of the class (EEF, 2018).
'Learning how to learn' is the talent to seek and persist in learning. It shows the ability to organise knowledge, by way of effective time and information management, both at personal and group levels. As the amount of information available to us increases, the ability to understand how our memory works has become more important than ever. Ideas such as a memory palace have been around for awhile and organisations such as the EEF are providing more insights than ever into the domains of metacognition.
We believe that any learner in school has the capacity to develop and use insights into the mind to improve how they approach learning. Whether you are working with a child in a primary school or learners in University, there are key principles that will enable us all to advance learning outcomes.
Learning capability is not a fixed trait, but rather a skill that can be developed and improved over time. By understanding how we learn and applying effective learning strategies, we can enhance our ability to acquire and retain new information. This includes techniques such as spaced repetition, active recall, and chunking.
A growth mindset also helps. When we take on challenges, we get past obstacles and keep going with our learning. With the right mindset and the right tools, anyone can get better at learning and reach their goals.
A diligent learner might know how he she can learn best and how to direct learning. A diligent learner might also guide his/her way through the wide variety of available options in school and beyond.
The process of learning is central to our existence. We eat food to feed our bodies, and we seek knowledge and keep learning to feed our minds. This guide sets out to show that learning is indeed learnable.
Children can learn how to chunk information into semantic categories, which are groups based on meaning, and this improves memory. There are also exercises that help learners switch modes of thinking. The bottom line is that intelligence is not fixed. If we want to challenge some of the myths about attainment, we must first look more closely at how the mind works.

Every learning to learn strategy sits inside one cycle: plan how to tackle the task, monitor how it is going, then evaluate what worked. The EEF guidance report makes this cycle the spine of metacognitive teaching, and each of the principles below is a way of making one stage of it visible in a lesson (EEF, 2018).
Metacognitive skills help learners organise what they know and manage their time well. Memory techniques, such as memory palaces, do work. Spaced repetition and active recall are the core principles (Bjork & Bjork, 1992; Karpicke & Blunt, 2011).
A growth mindset matters too (Dweck, 2006). When learners understand how memory works and use these strategies, they learn more (Dunlosky et al., 2013).
Learners need to learn how to learn, especially when teachers are not their primary source. Sejnowski and Oakley note useful learning techniques. These help learners build skills and manage time (Oakley & Sejnowski, 2018).
The techniques with the strongest evidence are retrieval practice, spaced practice and self-explanation, and the weakest are rereading and highlighting (Dunlosky et al., 2013). Which one fits depends on the learning task and the time you have. Our guide to thinking strategies sets them out in detail.
In the last few years, researchers have given us insights about learning that we did not have 20 years ago. This knowledge has let schools and colleges develop valuable learning techniques that help a learner 'think for themselves'. The Internet is full of courses that claim to improve our memory.
To become a lifelong learner, all we have to do is adopt a few simple ideas that can be transformational for our thinking. At Structural Learning, we develop mental tools that are built on insights on education. An education professional is bombarded with new information every day and it's not always easy to keep up with the latest concepts. Our passionate community of readers and contributors are continually adding to our tool box of resources and ideas.

Articles to read and concepts to try:
Teach the strategy at the point in the lesson where learners need it, using the content they are already working on. A stand-alone study skills course gives learners a vocabulary; a strategy modelled inside a maths problem or a history source gives them a habit. The move is always the same: show your own thinking, give learners a short check to run themselves, then ask them to judge the result.
In a Year 3 maths lesson on column addition the teacher works one example on the board while thinking aloud: "I line up the units first, then I check whether I need to carry." Learners then attempt three questions with a two-item check card on the desk: units lined up, carry recorded. Halfway through, the teacher pauses the room and every learner ticks or corrects each item. At the end each learner says one thing they would change on the next question.
In a Year 10 history lesson the teacher opens with a five-question retrieval starter on the causes of the First World War, answered from memory before books open. At ten minutes the teacher stops the source analysis and asks pairs to say whether their notes answer the question set or merely describe the source. The exit ticket asks for the answer and the name of the strategy used to get there. This is where the evidence sits: Higgins and the EEF find that gains from metacognitive teaching are largest when the strategy is taught inside the subject rather than as a separate course (EEF, 2018).
Learners benefit from using a few proven techniques well. Chunking information (Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968) and recall helps learning. Focus on one strategy, practise it, and add more as habits form (Brown et al., 2014). Learners should reflect on what works best to personalise learning (Bjork & Bjork, 1992).
Like any new idea implemented in a school, it is best to drip feed new ideas and techniques into an educational environment. Providing too much too soon can be problematic for teachers and learners alike. The following strategies are evidence based techniques that might prove a good starting point.
Metacognitive training for teachers builds a positive school culture. Use these strategies across subjects and year groups. Learners should think about how they learn. The shortest route is one shared routine, such as a two-minute retrieval starter in every lesson, so learners meet the same technique in every subject.
They can share strategies and celebrate growth. Learning journals and peer mentoring help here. Give learners time to talk about the techniques they use (Flavell, 1979; Hattie, 2012; Dweck, 2006).
Learning gets learners ready for the tasks that matter in life. Every modern organisation needs people who can learn well (Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1993). So the benefits reach well beyond the classroom.
Learning-styles theory (VAK or VARK) has been tested and found wanting (Pashler et al., 2008).
Though learning styles theory (e.g. VAK/VARK) has been widely debunked by research (Pashler et al., 2008; Kirschner, 2017), providing varied instructional approaches can still benefit all learners.
Learners should try different learning methods, finding what suits them best. This helps make learning more efficient and enjoyable for the individual (Bjork & Bjork, 1992; Dunlosky et al., 2013).
To help learners remember as much as possible, build repetition and practice into lessons. Flashcards and quizzes are two simple ways to do this. They go over key ideas again and help fix them in the learner's mind.
A supportive classroom helps memory. When learners feel at ease, they keep more of what they learn and put it to good use. Teachers can use these methods to help learners keep on learning.
Dr Barb Oakley and Dr Terrence Sejnowski are experts in the art and science of learning. If you want to find out more, their key ideas on education and learning strategies are available as mobile apps in Chinese, Portuguese and Spanish versions. You can also hear their thoughts on learning in the many podcasts they appear in.
Study skills, or learning to learn skills, give children a real boost. They teach them 'how to learn' and how to do well in school. Metacognitive skills play a key part in building the critical thinking skills a learner needs for lifelong learning and academic success.
This is not another quick fix, and it does need a clear vision. We are sure you will soon see the benefits. Teachers should also help learners notice metacognitive experiences. These are the real-time feelings of difficulty or confidence during a task, and they guide whether to keep going with a strategy or switch to another.
Start with the EEF's research on metacognition. Books on memory techniques and the science of learning are also worth reading. Guides to growth mindset help teachers too (Dweck, 2006). The three below are free, evidence-based and written for teachers rather than researchers.
Look for materials that mix theory with things you can do in class. Courses on teaching metacognition offer hands-on training (e.g. Quigley et al., 2018).

Research shows using deliberate practice helps learners. Spaced repetition also helps learners remember facts (Ericsson et al., 1993; Karpicke, 2016). Teaching good study skills supports learner independence and boosts grades (Bjork & Bjork, 1992; Dunlosky et al., 2013).
1. Choffin, B., Popineau, F., Bourda, Y., & Vie, J. (2019). DAS3H: Modeling Student Learning and Forgetting for Optimally Scheduling Distributed Practice of Skills. arXiv.
The DAS3H model (Choffin et al., 2019) improves how spaced repetition is timed. It takes into account how memory fades and which skills each task involves. Learning that is tailored to each learner helps them remember more.
Spaced repetition helps learners hold on to complex skills for longer. Deliberate practice also helps when memory is weak (Ericsson et al., 1993).
2. Feng, K., Zhao, X., Liu, J., Cai, Y., Ye, Z., Chen, C., & Xue, G. (2019). Spaced Learning Enhances Episodic Memory by Increasing Neural Pattern Similarity Across Repetitions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 5351-5360.
Feng et al. (2019) studied the spacing effect's brain science. They found spaced learning boosted brain pattern similarity. Episodic memory also improved, backing the study-phase retrieval idea. Spaced repetition is key for better study and memory, the research suggests.
3. Lambers and Tauber (2020) explored spaced repetition for surgical training. Their research in the Journal of Surgical Education studied learners preparing for exams. They found it a useful learning tool.
The researchers examined spaced repetition with Anki for orthopaedic learners. The findings display a clear link between spaced practice and exam results. Spaced repetition improved study skills and knowledge retention. It worked well in demanding professional contexts.

4. Greene, R. (2008). Repetition and Spacing Effects. In H. L. Roediger III (Ed.), Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference (Vol. 2, pp. 65-78).
Greene (2008) shows that repetition affects how well we learn. Spacing out practice improves memory more than cramming it all at once. This suggests that spaced repetition and regular practice support long-term learning. Ebbinghaus (1885) backs this way of tackling memory problems.
Lehtinen et al. (2017) discussed improving maths skills. They looked at moving from rote learning to focused practice. The study appeared in ZDM, volume 49, pages 625-636.
Metacognition research in maths helps teachers. It provides practical classroom strategies (Flavell, 1979). These strategies support learners' thinking skills (Dunlosky et al., 2013). They can improve outcomes for all learners (Hattie, 2009).
The study examines deliberate practice for maths skills (Ericsson et al., 1993). It contrasts drill with reflective activities to boost learning. Deliberate practice with spaced repetition improves understanding (Rohrer, 2009; Dunlosky et al., 2013). This helps learners' maths skills, say researchers (Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006).
Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms.
Karpicke, J. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning.
Kirschner, P. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work.
Roediger, H. R. (2006). Test-enhanced learning.
The most direct criticism of learning to learn as a school aim is that it can be taught as a set of general habits divorced from any subject. The EEF guidance argues the opposite: metacognitive knowledge is largely domain-specific, and a strategy modelled in maths does not transfer to history without being taught again there (EEF, 2018). Dignath and Büttner (2008) found in their meta-analysis that self-regulation programmes embedded in subject content outperformed general study skills courses. A course called "learning to learn" on the timetable is therefore the weakest version of the idea.
The evidence base has a methods problem. Much of the retrieval and spacing research on which this guide draws was run with undergraduates in laboratories, and Dunlosky et al. (2013) themselves rated several popular techniques as low utility partly because classroom trials were thin. Metacognition is also hard to measure: Veenman, Van Hout-Wolters and Afflerbach (2006) showed that self-report questionnaires correlate poorly with what learners actually do during a task, so studies that rely on them may overstate effects.
Two popular companions to this topic have not survived scrutiny. Learning styles instruction has no supporting evidence (Pashler et al., 2008), and Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) found that growth mindset interventions have negligible effects on achievement once study quality is accounted for. Kirschner, Sweller and Clark (2006) add a further caution: asking novices to manage their own learning with minimal guidance overloads working memory rather than building independence.
Most trials are drawn from North American and European schools, so claims about universal effects should be read with care. Even so, the core practice of teaching learners to plan, monitor and evaluate inside subject content remains one of the best-supported, lowest-cost approaches available to a classroom teacher.
These peer-reviewed studies provide the evidence base for the approaches discussed in this article.
Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge 552 citations
C. Aufschnaiter et al. (2008)
Argument skills impact how learners grasp science, say researchers. Teachers should use argumentation in lessons to improve learner understanding. This helps with critical thinking too (Andrews, 2010; Bell & Linn, 2000; Osborne et al., 2004).
The Reflective Educator′s Guide to Classroom Research: Learning to Teach and Teaching to Learn Through Practitioner Inquiry 547 citations
N. Dana & Diane Yendol-Hoppey (2008)
This guide promotes classroom research as a tool for teacher development and improved practice. It encourages UK teachers to engage in practitioner inquiry to reflect on their teaching, learn from their experiences, and ultimately enhance learning.
Learning to write, reading to learn: genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School 455 citations
Yi Liu (2013)
This paper examines the relationship between writing, reading, and learning within the framework of genre pedagogy. It offers insights for UK teachers on how to use genre-based approaches to improve learners' writing skills and subject knowledge.
Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School 217 citations
D. Rose & Jeannett Martin (2012)
Genre-based pedagogy can improve writing and reading skills, boosting subject knowledge. This paper gives UK teachers strategies for using genre in lessons. It enhances literacy and learning across the curriculum (Badger & White, 2000; Hyland, 2003).
Learners need strategies that work. Managing their time and the information they take in helps (Bjork et al., 2013). Metacognition helps learners understand how their own memory works (Flavell, 1979).
Active recall and spaced repetition are two strategies that work well (Dunlosky et al., 2013). These skills help learners work on their own, and that matters long after they leave school.

Metacognitive knowledge includes 'what', 'how', and 'when/why' (Paris et al., 1983). Learners find conditional knowledge the hardest. Paris et al. (1983) suggest that conditional knowledge gives the best transfer across subjects.
Highlighting doesn't aid learning, say researchers (Brown et al., 2014). Teachers should ask learners to write short summaries instead. Regular recall exercises with tests help transfer knowledge to long-term memory (Karpicke, 2012). This gives reliable feedback on learner understanding.
Chunking breaks down complex ideas. Teachers can help learners see the big picture (survey the syllabus). Show examples, let learners practise, and repeat in varied contexts. Graphic organisers help learners structure knowledge packets.
Build in regular breaks. One way is the Pomodoro method, where learners work for 25 minutes and then rest for 5. This unfocused time matters as much as focused work, because it gives the brain a chance to sort and store new information. During breaks, encourage calm activities such as meditation, or simply let minds wander.
Teachers can use graphic organisers to structure information. Mind maps help learners sort their ideas. Learning journals let learners record tasks and think about their progress.
Use the Universal Thinking Framework and Bloom's taxonomy to plan learning. Oracy, which means talking and listening skills, helps learners explore different ways of thinking.
Teachers, have learners recall key topics to move knowledge to long-term memory. (Brown, Roediger & McDaniel, 2014) Learners should recall concepts in new places. (Smith, Glenberg & Bjork, 1978) Regular quizzes and self-assessment help learning and find gaps. (Black & Wiliam, 1998)
