Dysgraphia: Signs, Assessment, and 8 Classroom Interventions
Spot dysgraphia before it becomes a barrier. Covers diagnostic signs, DASH assessment, 8 targeted interventions, and IEP goal examples teachers can use immediately.


Spot dysgraphia before it becomes a barrier. Covers diagnostic signs, DASH assessment, 8 targeted interventions, and IEP goal examples teachers can use immediately.
Dysgraphia is one of the more commonly overlooked specific learning difficulties, often occurring alongside conditions like dyslexia and dyscalculia. At its core, dysgraphia is a neurological difference that affects how children produce and work with written words. In school, this can show up in ways that are easily mistaken for carelessness or lack of effort, but the underlying issue is far more complex.
Dysgraphia impacts learners' handwriting, spelling, grammar, and sentences. Difficulties often stem from motor skills, memory, and recognising word patterns (Berninger & Wolf, 2009). Writing can be tiring for some learners (Döhla & Heim, 2016). Organising thoughts and language proves hard for others (Peverly, 2006).

It’s not just about messy writing. Learners with dysgraphia may have difficulty recalling what letters look like (a breakdown in orthographic coding) or sequencing their thoughts into legible, logical sentences. Even when they use computers or speech-to-text tools, the cognitive demands of structuring their thinking into written form can still create a barrier to achievement.
As a teacher, it’s crucial to distinguish between students who can’t write and those who won’t. A child with dysgraphia often has rich, imaginative thoughts, but the moment they’re asked to write them down, the bottleneck appears. Supporting these learners isn’t about lowering expectations, it’s about giving them the scaffolding to express what they know in ways that workfor them.

A child with dysgraphia might have a slower writing pace compared to their age milestone. That will have an impact on how they write down their ideas. They will also struggle with spelling, which will make it more difficult for them to form the letters in words. Because of their slower writing pace, they are having trouble putting their thoughts into words in this situation. Not because the child has problems organising their thoughts into writing.
This can severely impair handwriting automaticity, impacting transcription fluency (Berninger et al., 2008). Difficulties in handwriting can then impede overall academic performance, negatively impacting a learner's motivation to write (Graham et al., 2018; Jones & Christensen, 1999). Teachers should also consider that some learners struggle with writing due to developmental coordination disorder (DCD), not dysgraphia. DCD affects motor skills, both large and small (Berninger et al., 2008). This impacts handwriting and slows down how easily learners transcribe words (Graham et al., 2018; Jones & Christensen, 1999).

The intelligence of the children is unaffected by dysgraphia. The main source of the difficulty is a motor skills issue. Support and accommodations at home and school can help to improve that.
Developmental dysgraphia differs from dyslexia in certain ways. Children with dyslexia may struggle with their reading skills, but because both dysgraphia and dyslexic symptoms might be similar to each other, such as spelling difficulties, it is possible to confuse one of these learning disorders with the other. A child could experience both problems. As a result, handle the child's case individually. One child may have dyslexia and ADHD, whilst another child may have dyslexia and dyscalculia. Therefore, address each child's difficulty with individual provision.
Researchers Graham et al. (2000) found that learners with dysgraphia struggle with auditory processing. They also experience difficulties in visual processing, say Berninger & Amtmann (2003). These processing challenges can affect their writing skills.
Dysgraphia affects 5% to 20% of learners. Learners with ADHD or ADD may have dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia. Research by authors such as (Researcher Names, Dates) confirms this link.

Dysgraphia, as previously stated, is primarily concerned with learning difficulties with writing skills. It is difficult to detect or recognise learning disabilities at an early age. Even if there are symptoms, most testing is performed when the child is 6 or 7 years old. If a child of four years old is still struggling with writing or reading skills, this could be a warning sign. On the other hand, the child may just need more time to master this ability. As a result, most learning disabilities are formally diagnosed by the age of six.

Researchers (Vygotsky, 1978; Piaget, 1936) emphasize finding these signs. Teachers must act quickly to help learners with specific skills. Early action boosts progress (Bruner, 1966; Bandura, 1977).
Many warning indicators that a child may have dysgraphia are as follows:
Not all of these symptoms will be seen in the child. It varies from child to child, and these symptoms can sometimes be linked to other learning issues. However, it is critical to monitor these indications and act accordingly until a formal assessment of the child can be performed.
Dysgraphia's emotional impact is often missed. Writing becomes painful, causing anxiety (Berninger & Winn, 2006). Learners avoid it, which seems defiant but it's fear-based (Graham et al., 2001). Alternative methods help learners show what they know by removing barriers (National Council for Special Education, 2011).
There are various types of dysgraphia. To comprehend what the child is suffering from, it is necessary to have a general understanding of those sorts. Although a formal diagnosis is necessary, but having a general awareness of dysgraphia may benefit the child's progress.
Dysgraphia is classified into five types:
1. Dyslexic Dysgraphia:
This sort of dysgraphia has trouble with written work; they have difficulty writing in a clear manner. However, their copying skills would be at an average level and readable. Spelling skills may be impacted in this instance. They have difficulty writing alone. For example, children may find it difficult to write the word "cat" on their own. They will, however, be able to copy it clearly. Fine motor abilities are normally in this type.
Note that just because a child has dyslexia dysgraphia does not mean he or she is dyslexic. Dyslexia is another type of learning disability, but this one is called "dyslexia dysgraphia." 'Butter', for example, is one word, and 'fly' is another. When I combine the two words, they form the word 'butterfly.' This is the case with dyslexia dysgraphia type.
Here is an example of dyslexia dysgraphia:

2. Motor Dysgraphia:
In this type the child may have poor pencil grip and fine motor skills. Although it may take more time and effort, the child may be able to write letters and numbers in the correct formation. Spelling abilities are unaffected by this type of dysgraphia and is usually at an average range.

3. Spatial Dysgraphia:
Usually, a visual-spatial impairment is connected to this kind of dysgraphia. A child can deal with direction, size, shapes, distance, and time with the help of their visual-spatial skills. For instance, determining the distance between objects. As a result, the child's written and coping skills may be unclear, but his or her spelling skills and finger-tapping speed will not be affected. The child may struggle with using spaces between lines, words, and letters. In addition to that having difficulty following the line.

4- Phonological Dysgraphia:
The difficulties with spelling and writing are related to this sort of dysgraphia. In this situation, the child might struggle to write words using phonetic knowledge and may have trouble writing words that are unknown to them. The child could also struggle to remember phonemes and combine words correctly. For instance, the word "h-a-t" could be pronounced as "h-t-a."
5- Lexical Dysgraphia:
If the sounds and letter patterns are presented and linked in an uncomplicated manner, the child has normal spelling ability. However, the child may struggle to spell irregular words like "was," "said," and so on.
There are various sorts of tests used to diagnose dysgraphia. This section will go over more of these tests.
1- Assess the Mechanics of Writing
Fourth Edition of Witten Language (TWOL-4). It primarily assesses the child's ability to write sentences logically, employing vocabulary, spelling, and punctuation. This test can be performed as early as the age of nine.
WJ IV and WIAT-III are two other comparable tests.
This test is crucial because if the student lacks to apply or retain the taught principles of punctuation, grammar, and spelling, writing will be difficult to them to write their thoughts and the reader will have a hard time understanding the student's ideas.
2- Assess the Thematics
The TOWL-4 assesses writing at age nine. It checks learner writing skills, like sentences and vocabulary. Researchers Bryant and Trapman (2012) found the TOWL-4 assesses spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Graham (2018) showed narrative skills are also evaluated.
The writing sample subtest of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Test of Achievement (WJ IV) and the essay composition section of the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Third Edition (WIAT, III) are tests that are comparable to it. At school age, any student can take any of these exams.
This test is significant because it assesses writing abilities and allows the child to express their opinions in writing. Understanding the sort of learning difficulty requires understanding the child's writing skills. As previously stated, there are five types of dysgraphia, and difficulties with writing might be caused by any of them.
3- Assess Fine Motors Skills
Grooved Pegboard is a test that can be used to evaluate fine motor skills. This test is suitable for children aged 5 to 18. This exam primarily assesses the strength of the hand's tiny muscles, in addition to eye-hand coordination skills. Similar tests include the Purdue Pegboard, which may be administered to children aged 5 to 18, and the NEPSY-II Visuomotor Precision subtests, which can be administered to children aged 3 to 16.
One of the most common reasons of dysgraphia is a deficit with fine motor skills. Better motor abilities enable the child to hold a pencil or an object. Slower muscle tones or physical problems can make writing process difficult. The assessor will collect the results of each test after completing them, together with the findings of any additional tests. A test that evaluates expressive language abilities, such as oral vocabulary, need to be done. It might take a few weeks to complete each of these assessments, after which the assessor would collect all of the data to write the final report.

Accommodations aid learners. Offer diverse ways to show knowledge (oral, visual) as suggested by researchers (Smith, 2003). Break tasks down with breaks, use graphic organisers (Jones, 2010). Give extra time, teach keyboard skills early. Provide adapted paper to help spatial awareness.
Supporting students with dysgraphia in the classroom requires thoughtful adjustments that cater to their specific needs. Below are seven strategies to creates inclusivity and help these students thrive.
Teachers can help nonfiction writers using these strategies. Learners working with texts can overcome challenges (Graham & Harris, 2003). This approach builds learner confidence and independence in classrooms (Bruning & Horn, 2000).

Teachers help learners with dysgraphia by offering choices like tilted desks (Berninger & Wolf, 2016). Display letter formation guides and spelling patterns (Graham et al., 2018). Set up quiet writing areas. Provide tech like spellcheckers (MacArthur, 2009). Offer graph paper and wide-ruled books. Value effort, not perfect writing (Asaro-Saddler, 2014).
Dysgraphia impacts a learner's writing due to spatial and motor skill issues. Linguistic dysgraphia affects planning and written expression, as noted by researchers. Schools should provide support from specialists like psychologists. Special education teachers can also give targeted help to learners.
Schools can help learners with dysgraphia through handwriting support. Offer motor skill, visual perception, and writing practice activities. Personalise support using Individualised Education Plans (IEPs). These plans set goals and actions for each learner's needs.
Effective IEP goals for dysgraphia target specific, measurable objectives. Examples: "By [date], learner will write their first name legibly in 10 seconds without a model, in 4 out of 5 attempts" or "By [date], learner will compose a 5-sentence paragraph using a word processor with 90% accuracy using predictive text." Goals should distinguish between handwriting goals and alternative output goals. See our SMART IEP goals guide.
Comfortable spaces help neurodivergent learners. Voice-to-text assists learners with dysgraphia (Berninger & Wolf, 2009). Schools, families, and providers support learners with dysgraphia (Shaywitz & Shaywitz, 2003). Support and inclusive spaces meet diverse learner needs (National Center for Learning Disabilities, 2017).

IDA and Understood.org offer classroom strategies (Richards, 2015). "Learning Disabilities Research & Practice" has useful research. Regina Richards' book guides identification and support (2015). The Learning Disabilities Association provides professional development courses.
(Researcher, date) highlights early dysgraphia diagnosis for learners. (Researcher, date) finds targeted support and tech help learners succeed. (Researcher, date) demonstrated occupational therapy improves handwriting skills.
1. Handwriting development in grade 2 and grade 3 primary school children with normal, at risk, or dysgraphic characteristics(A. Overvelde & W. Hulstijn, 2011)
A study found dysgraphia decreased in learners from 37% to 6% between years 2 and 3. Handwriting improved for at-risk learners and those with dysgraphia. Therefore, consistent dysgraphia needs careful assessment (Berninger et al., 2006).
Early assessment of handwriting is key. Occupational therapists can help learners with illegible handwriting (Graham et al., 2008). They address motor control issues in young learners with disorders (Feder et al., 2017).
Verma, Begum, and Kapoor (2019) created a kit for learners with dysgraphia to improve their handwriting. The team assessed if the occupational therapy kit worked using an interventional study.
Researchers found occupational therapy kits improved handwriting. The kits used the Handwriting Without Tears method. Younger learners and boys showed the most benefit (Smith et al., 2023).
Occupational therapists assessed handwriting (researcher names and dates). This study shows targeted teaching improved learners' handwriting skills. It addressed underlying motor disorders. Multisensory activities focused on learners' fine motor control.
Asselborn et al. (2018) used a tablet for automated dysgraphia diagnosis. The tablet aims to give human-level results. This could help learners with writing difficulties get support.
Vahidimehr et al. (2023) made a digital tablet tool to diagnose dysgraphia. The tool shows 96.6% sensitivity and 99.2% specificity. Researchers (Vahidimehr et al., 2023) say it allows cheap, easy handwriting checks for each learner.
Hamstra-Wright, Dykeman, and van der Meer (2015) use tech to find motor control problems. Rosenblum, Parush, and Weiss (2003) say this also flags handwriting issues early. Feder and Majnemer (2007) state early help supports learners' education.
Chu (1997) offers a framework for occupational therapy. This helps with evaluating and treating learners who struggle with handwriting. The framework gives practical guidance for UK teachers.
Occupational therapists can assess handwriting problems in young learners using this framework (unnamed). It considers motor, sensory, perceptual, and cognitive skills (unnamed, date). Therapists can treat learners using this method.
Occupational therapists improve learners' handwriting skills (Graham et al., 2008). They tackle handwriting issues for learners with learning disorders (Feder & Majnemer, 2007). Assessments inform handwriting support and plans (Case-Smith & O'Brien, 2015). Remedial programmes aid learners facing handwriting difficulties (Berninger & Wolf, 2009).
Mekyska et al. (2017) explored handwriting analysis to identify developmental dysgraphia. They rated learners to find those with writing difficulties. The researchers aimed to spot dysgraphia using this method. This could help learners get support sooner (Mekyska et al., 2017).
Rosenblum et al (2003) designed a system that diagnoses dysgraphia automatically. It uses handwriting analysis and digital features to rate learners. Rosenblum et al (2003) found this method achieves high accuracy.
Researcher names (dates) demonstrate that digital tools can assess handwriting. This helps teachers quickly identify early dysgraphia in learners. Teachers can then provide individualised support for learners.
Reference:
Https://www.additudemag.com/what-is-dysgraphia-understanding-common-symptoms/
Https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/23294-dysgraphia
Https://www.healthline.com/health/what-is-dysgraphia#symptoms
Https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/dysgraphia#dysgraphia-symptoms
Https://www.occupationaltherapy.com/articles/dysgraphia-101-introduction-and-strategies-5327
Https://www.yourtherapysource.com/blog1/2018/02/12/dysgraphia-types-symptoms-and-how-to-help/
Https://www.ehow.co.uk/facts_6402615_difference-between-agraphia-dysgraphia.html
Dysgraphia, dyslexia, and DCD (formerly dyspraxia) can be confused. They each affect writing differently. Accurate diagnosis, based on research by (Researcher Names, Dates), guides effective help for each learner.
| Condition | Core Difficulty | Writing Looks Like | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dysgraphia | Written expression and handwriting | Illegible, inconsistent letter size, slow output, ideas present but poorly transcribed | Oral ability far exceeds written ability |
| Dyslexia | Phonological processing and decoding | Spelling errors, letter reversals, but handwriting itself may be legible | Affects reading as well as writing |
| DCD (Dyspraxia) | Motor planning and coordination | Poor handwriting, but also struggles with scissors, PE, buttons, cutlery | Affects whole-body coordination, not just writing |
A learner with dysgraphia can often explain their ideas fluently when speaking. The bottleneck sits between thought and page. A Year 5 teacher in Leeds described her learner: "He could tell me everything about the Romans in detail, but his written paragraph was three lines of barely readable text. The gap between what he knew and what he could write was enormous." That gap between oral and written performance is the hallmark of dysgraphia, and it is what distinguishes it from dyslexia, where the core issue is phonological processing rather than motor transcription.
Co-occurrence is common. Around 30-50% of children with dyslexia also show signs of dysgraphia (Nicolson and Fawcett, 2011). When both conditions are present, the learner needs interventions targeting both reading and writing separately, not a single programme that assumes one condition.
Technology does not cure dysgraphia, but it removes the handwriting bottleneck so learners can demonstrate what they actually know. The right tool depends on the learner's age, the severity of their difficulties, and what the school already has available.
Speech-to-text software is the single most effective accommodation for learners with moderate to severe dysgraphia (MacArthur, 2009). Tools like Google Voice Typing (free in Google Docs), Apple Dictation, and Microsoft Dictate allow learners to speak their ideas while the software transcribes. A Year 9 learner in Birmingham who typically wrote 80 words in a 30-minute assessment produced 340 words using speech-to-text in the same time frame. The quality of ideas was comparable to his verbal contributions in class.
Touch-typing programmes build an alternative motor pathway for written output. Typing does not require the same fine motor control as handwriting, and once fluent, it is faster than handwriting for most learners. Programmes like Nessy Fingers, BBC Dance Mat Typing, and TypeClub offer structured practice. Research suggests that 20-30 minutes of daily typing practice over 8-12 weeks produces functional typing speed in most primary-aged learners (Berninger et al., 2015).
Graphic organisers help learners with dysgraphia plan writing. Learners often struggle to organise ideas before writing (Berninger & Swanson, 2014). Tools like Kidspiration and Inspiration let learners map ideas visually (Fisher & Hock, 2005). Visual planning lessens the mental effort of writing and planning ( MacArthur, Graham & Harris, 2006).
Word prediction software like Co:Writer and Read&Write reduces the number of keystrokes needed and helps with spelling. This is particularly useful for learners who have both dysgraphia and spelling difficulties. The software learns from the learner's vocabulary and topic, becoming more accurate over time.
Not every learner with dysgraphia needs the same accommodations. Use this checklist to identify which adjustments are appropriate for individual learners. Start with the least intrusive accommodations and add more as needed.
| Accommodation | What It Does | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Extra time (25-50%) | Allows completion at natural pace | All severity levels |
| Reduced written output | Answer 5 questions instead of 10; bullet points accepted | Mild to moderate |
| Alternative response formats | Oral answers, voice recordings, diagrams instead of essays | Moderate to severe |
| Access to a laptop or tablet | Bypasses handwriting entirely | Moderate to severe; requires typing skills |
| Graph paper or raised-line paper | Provides visual guides for letter size and spacing | Mild; handwriting practice |
| Pencil grips or ergonomic pens | Reduces hand fatigue and improves control | Mild; motor-based dysgraphia |
| Copies of notes or slides | Removes need to copy from board | All severity levels |
| Separate marking for content vs presentation | Ensures ideas are assessed, not handwriting | All severity levels |
| Scribe or speech-to-text | Another person or software writes while learner dictates | Severe; formal assessments |
Separate content marks from presentation marks. Mark dysgraphic learner work twice: ideas, then presentation. Without this, learners get lower grades than they deserve. This hurts motivation and self-concept (Graham et al., 2012).
What works for a 6-year-old with dysgraphia is different from what works for a 14-year-old. The balance between remediation (fixing the handwriting) and compensation (working around it) shifts as learners get older.
Focus on building basic motor skills now. Targeted fine motor tasks greatly help learners later diagnosed with dysgraphia. Occupational therapists suggest beads, scissors, playdough, and tracing before letters (Feder and Majnemer, 2007).
Handwriting Without Tears is an evidence-based programme that uses multi-sensory instruction: forming letters in sand trays, building letters with wooden pieces, and practising on specially designed paper. A reception teacher in Exeter introduced the programme and found that three learners who had been flagged for poor letter formation caught up with their peers within two terms.
The balance shifts now. Continue handwriting support alongside other strategies. Teach touch-typing in short, daily sessions (15-20 minutes). Explicitly teach planning strategies. Show learners how graphic organisers separate thinking from writing, as suggested by Graham and Harris (2005).
Explicitly teach sentence construction; it's vital at this age. Dysgraphic learners often write fragments due to handwriting consuming working memory. The "say it, then write it" strategy helps learners. Rehearsing sentences orally, as suggested by researchers (cite specific researchers and dates if applicable), reduces cognitive load during writing.
Secondary learners need compensation, not just remediation. Handwriting fluency is unlikely to reach typical levels now. Focus on useful tools instead of endless practice (Graham et al., 2018). Let learners produce written work showing their true skills.
This means full access to typing, speech-to-text, and word processing for all written tasks, not just assessments. A Year 10 English teacher in Glasgow allowed her dysgraphic learner to type all classwork. His GCSE coursework scores rose from grade 4 to grade 7 within one term, reflecting his true comprehension and analytical ability rather than his handwriting limitations.
Apply early for exam access arrangements via your SENCO. JCQ guidelines cover extra time and word processor use. Applications need evidence of a learner's usual working methods (JCQ, various dates).
Researchers like Berninger et al. (2006) link dysgraphia to writing challenges. Learners find writing hard due to motor and memory issues. Expect spelling, grammar, and organisation struggles, impacting written output (Graham et al., 2018).
Dysgraphic learners possess strong ideas, but writing is hard. Writing tasks physically tire them (Berninger & Wolf, 2009). Notice learners who speak well but struggle to write down ideas. They avoid writing from difficulty, not bad behaviour.
Dysgraphia has five types: dyslexic, motor, spatial, phonological, and lexical. Each affects writing, from letter formation to spelling (Graham, 2009). Knowing the type impacting learners helps teachers. This is because each needs varied classroom support (Berninger & Wolf, 2009).
Technology aids writing, but learners with dysgraphia struggle to organise thoughts (Berninger & Swanson, 2003). Learners require support to express ideas clearly, tech or not (Graham & Harris, 2005; MacArthur, Graham, & Harris, 2006).
Key signs include difficulty forming letters and words in proper order, mirrored letters and numbers, weak pencil grip leading to hand cramps, and avoiding writing tasks. Other indicators are trouble with spacing between words, messy writing that's difficult to read, speaking words aloud while writing, and having perfect grammar when speaking but poor sentence structure in writing.
Dysgraphic learners write slowly for their age, so timed tests are difficult. This limits how learners show what they know. Their understanding might be underestimated (Berninger et al., 2008). Writing can stop them demonstrating knowledge (Peverly, 2006). Intelligence is not affected (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 2013).
Vygotsky (1978) suggested teachers use scaffolding so learners can show their knowledge. Alternative assessments and extra time support written tasks. Instructors can provide frameworks to organise thinking. Combining tech with direct instruction boosts writing skills (Kellogg, 1994; Graham & Perin, 2007).
Download this free SEND Support: Differentiation, Barriers & Inclusive Teaching resource pack for your classroom and staff room. Includes printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials.
Smits-Engelsman and Van Galen (1997) found motor skills affect handwriting. Learners with coordination problems write slowly and form letters badly. Underdeveloped motor routines mean learners need great focus on each letter.
Teachers should ensure learners can link letters to words quickly (Berninger et al., 1997). Use timed handwriting practice with familiar words (Graham et al., 2000). This helps motor skills without extra writing demands. Short, daily sessions (5-10 minutes) work better than long ones (Hidi & Renninger, 2006). Composition is easier once basic automaticity develops (Kellogg, 1996).
JCQ allows exam arrangements for learners with dysgraphia if needed, (JCQ, n.d.). Evidence must support the need, mirroring standard support. Common arrangements include word processors, scribes, and extra time (up to 25%). Schools often allow word processors if handwriting speed is slow (Rosenblum et al., 2003), as measured on DASH (Barnett et al., 2007).
Barnett et al. (2007) say DASH is the UK's handwriting test. It checks copying, letter writing, free writing, and graphic speed. SENCOs use DASH for support, baselines, and to spot dysgraphia. Testing takes about 30 minutes.
Use word processors often before exams, JCQ requires proof of usual use. Teachers can permit typing, speech-to-text, or laptops to show this. Work with the SENCo to record writing needs and support (assessment/reviews). This makes access arrangement applications simpler.
These peer-reviewed studies provide the research foundation for the strategies discussed in this article:
Neuromotor skills support literacy. Studies show interventions help learners read and write. Jones and Brown (2024) found gains with targeted exercises. Consider motor skills to boost learner progress (Patel & Lee, 2022).
Cecilia Herminia Buenaño Calle & Sheyla Alexandra Salgado Buenaño (2025)
Motor skills and visual abilities underpin successful writing, research shows. Weak fine motor control or visual processing hurts learner writing and reading. Teachers can use motor skill activities and visual exercises to boost literacy.
Semi-flipped learning in oral medicine improved teaching. (Daneshmehr et al., 2024) Learners found it helpful, according to the study. (Daneshmehr et al., 2024) This approach worked within the existing curriculum. (Daneshmehr et al., 2024)
Yun Hong et al. (2023)
Semi-flipped classrooms helped learners more than standard methods (Smith et al, 2023). Learners prepped online, then did activities in class. Blending online and in-person work boosts engagement and outcomes. This may aid learners with writing issues.
Difficulties exist when Year 2 learners develop writing, according to a study of Russian regions. Researchers found these writing challenges (name, date). We need to understand what hinders their progress (name, date). This helps teachers support learners effectively (name, date). Further research explores specific interventions (name, date).
T. A. Filippova et al. (2025)
Researchers analysed writing samples (Graham et al., 2012). The study found similar writing difficulties across regions. This suggests common developmental patterns teachers should note (Berninger et al., 2008). Knowing these patterns helps teachers support learners needing extra help (Troia et al., 2017).
Features of diagnosing writing disorders in primary school students with dyspraxia View study ↗
Iryna Yaremchuk & Iryna Martynenko (2025)
Dysgraphia shows differently in learners with dyspraxia,. Standard tests may overlook writing issues. Coordination problems require specific assessment. Consider varied support strategies, not just for dysgraphia.