Understand Shulman's PCK framework and why knowing your subject isn't enough. Learn how expert teachers transform content knowledge into effective instruction with practical examples.
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) is a teacher's ability to blend deep subject knowledge with effective teaching methods to help students understand complex ideas. Developed by Lee Shulman in the 1980s, PCK focuses on knowing both what to teach and how to teach it in ways that make sense to specific learners. It enables teachers to anticipate student misconceptions, choose appropriate explanations, and adapt their teaching to the specific demands of the content.
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) is a concept that describes a teacher's ability to blend subject knowledge with to help students understand complex ideas. Originally introduced by educational researcher Lee Shulman in the 1980s, particularly in the context of
Unlike general teaching skills or expertise in a subject alone, PCK focuses on how well a teacher can anticipate student misconceptions, choose appropriate representations or explanations, and to the specific demands of the content. In essence, it's about knowing what to teach and how to teach it in a way that makes sense to learners.
Experienced teachers naturally draw on PCK during lessons, integrating techniques like questioning, concept mapping, and analogies to clarify difficult ideas. These strategies don't just deliver content; they make it meaningful, accessible, and memorable. In contrast, novice or pre-service teachers often find this more challenging, as they are still developing both their pedagogical approaches and deep understanding of subject matter.
Understanding and applying PCK allows educators to make more informed decisions during lesson planning, classroom delivery, and assessment. It also enhances learner engagement and improves long-term outcomes by connecting pedagogy with purpose.
What does the research say? Hattie (2009) reports that teacher clarity, a direct product of strong PCK, has an effect size of 0.75 on student achievement. Hill, Rowan and Ball (2005) found that teachers with stronger mathematical knowledge for teaching produced student gains equivalent to 2-3 additional weeks of instruction per year. A meta-analysis by Keller et al. (2017) across 60 studies confirmed that PCK is a stronger predictor of student outcomes than subject knowledge alone (r = 0.44 vs r = 0.29).
In this article, we'll unpack the core components of PCK, examine practical tools to support it, and explore how teachers at every stage of their career can develop this vital area of professional expertise.
Therefore, it is useful to support novice teachers in understanding how to and success best. Vital therefore is a consideration of the following key ideas to support effective teaching; these can be used in isolation or together :
The main PCK models include Shulman's original framework, which identifies seven knowledge bases for teaching, and later expansions like the TPACK model that incorporates technology. These models typically include components such as knowledge of student misconceptions, instructional strategies, curriculum, and assessment methods specific to the subject. Each model emphasises the intersection between content expertise and pedagogical skills rather than treating them as separate domains.
According to Shulman (1986), Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is a type of knowledge that is unique to teachers and is based on how teachers relate their pedagogical knowledge (what they constructivist perspective on teaching and learning. They described a model of pedagogical content k nowledge(PCK) that results from an integration of four major components,
Teachers' PCK is enhanced through collaborative lesson planning, observation, reflection, and
Teachers can develop PCK by reflecting on their teaching practise, seeking feedback, collaborating with colleagues, and staying updated on research in both their subject area and in pedagogy. They should also analyse student work to identify common misconceptions and adjust their teaching accordingly. Continuous professional development and engagement with educational research are also crucial.
Developing PCK is an ongoing process that requires dedication and reflection. Here are some
There are numerous tools and techniques that can support the development and application of PCK:
Pedagogical Content Knowledge is not a static body of knowledge but a dynamic and evolving understanding of how to effectively teach specific content to specific learners. By embracing reflective practise, seeking feedback, and continuously updating their knowledge, teachers can develop and refine their PCK to
Developing strong Pedagogical Content Knowledge requires intentional, subject-specific professional development that goes beyond generic teaching strategies. Mathematics teachers, for instance, benefit enormously from exploring common misconceptions around fractions in Year 4, such as students believing that 1/5 is larger than 1/3 because 5 is greater than 3.Professional Development Through PCK
Mentoring and coaching programmes represent one of the most powerful vehicles for PCK development, particularly when they focus on subject-specific challenges rather than general classroom management. Experienced mentors can model how to anticipate student difficulties with specific content areas, such as the transition from concrete to abstract thinking in KS2 algebra or the conceptual leap required for understanding photosynthesis in Year 7 biology. Research by Grossman and Richert suggests that effective mentoring involves collaborative planning where mentors demonstrate how to sequence learning, choose appropriate representations, and design formative assessments that reveal student thinking. For example, a mentor might show how to use manipulatives when introducing decimal place value, then gradually transition to visual representations before moving to abstract number work.
Professional learning communities focused on The most effective professional development programmes combine theoretical understanding with practical application, allowing teachers to experiment with new approaches in their own classrooms and reflect on the outcomes.
Teacher education programmes across the UK are increasingly recognising the importance of developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge from the very start of training. Rather than treating subject knowledge and teaching methods as separate entities, modern initial teacher education (ITE) courses weave PCK development throughout their curriculum. This integrated approach helps trainee teachers understand that effective teaching requires more than just knowing their subject; it demands understanding how students learn specific topics and what makes certain concepts challenging.
During their training year, student teachers engage in activities specifically designed to build PCK. For instance, they might analyse video recordings of experienced teachers explaining difficult concepts, identifying the specific representations and examples used. Microteaching sessions allow trainees to practise explaining challenging topics to their peers, receiving feedback on their choice of analogies and their ability to anticipate misconceptions. Subject-specific seminars often focus on common student errors in particular topics, such as why students struggle with fractions in mathematics or misconceptions about photosynthesis in science.
Universities and school-based training providers use several strategies to develop PCK in
Developing strong PCK typically takes several years of classroom experience, with most teachers showing significant improvement after 3-5 years. The timeline varies depending on the subject area, teaching context, and opportunities for professional development. New teachers can accelerate this process through mentoring, reflective practise, and engaging with subject-specific educational research.
PCK varies significantly between subjects because each discipline has unique concepts, common misconceptions, and effective teaching strategies. For example, mathematics PCK involves understanding number sense and procedural fluency, whilst science PCK focuses on experimental design and scientific reasoning. English PCK emphasises literacy development and text analysis, requiring different pedagogical approaches entirely.
School leaders can support PCK development through subject-specific professional development, peer observation programmes, and collaborative planning time. Providing access to educational research, encouraging lesson study approaches, and pairing novice teachers with experienced mentors in the same subject area are particularly
PCK can be assessed through classroom observations, teacher interviews, and analysis of lesson planning materials. Some researchers use video analysis of teaching episodes and student outcome data to evaluate PCK effectiveness. However, measuring PCK remains challenging as it involves both observable teaching behaviours and internal decision-making processes.
Student feedback is crucial for developing PCK as it reveals which explanations, examples, and teaching strategies actually work in practise. Teachers can gather this through formative assessments,
These peer-reviewed studies provide the research foundation for the strategies discussed in this article:
Pedagogical knowledge for active-learning instruction in large undergraduate biology courses: a large-scale qualitative investigation of instructor thinking View study ↗
75 citations
A. Auerbach & Tessa C. Andrews (2018)
This large-scale study examined what separates successful active-learning instructors from those who struggle, focusing specifically on their general teaching knowledge rather than subject expertise. The researchers found that effective instructors possess deep understanding of
Evaluating teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in implementing classroom-based assessment: A case study among esl secondary school teachers in Selangor, Malaysia View study ↗ Rafiza Abdul Razak et al. (2023) This study investigated how well ESL teachers understand both their subject matter and effective assessment strategies, examining their ability to design classroom-based assessments that truly measure student progress.
13 citations
Foreign Language Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge about Teaching Intercultural Communication: A Chinese Perspective View study ↗
1 citations
Zhao Fuxia & Hongling Zhang (2025)
This research explored how foreign language teachers develop the specialised knowledge needed to teach intercultural communication effectively, going beyond basic language instruction to help students navigate cultural differences. The study found that successful intercultural communication teaching requires teachers to blend deep cultural understanding with specific pedagogical strategies tailored to cross-cultural learning. This work is essential for language educators in our increasingly globalized world, providing insights into how teachers can prepare students not just to speak a language, but to communicate meaningfully across cultures.
Knowledge Distillation and Student-Teacher Learning for Visual Intelligence: A Review and New Outlooks View study ↗
880 citations
Lin Wang & Kuk-Jin Yoon (2020)
This technical review examines how artificial intelligence systems can learn more efficiently by mimicking the student-teacher relationship, where complex AI models teach simpler ones to perform similar tasks. While focused on computer science applications, the research offers fascinating parallels to human classroom dynamics, exploring how knowledge transfer occurs between expert and novice learners. Teachers may find this perspective intriguing as it validates many intuitive teaching practices through the lens of machine learning, potentially offering new insights into how students acquire and process complex information.
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) is a teacher's ability to blend deep subject knowledge with effective teaching methods to help students understand complex ideas. Developed by Lee Shulman in the 1980s, PCK focuses on knowing both what to teach and how to teach it in ways that make sense to specific learners. It enables teachers to anticipate student misconceptions, choose appropriate explanations, and adapt their teaching to the specific demands of the content.
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) is a concept that describes a teacher's ability to blend subject knowledge with to help students understand complex ideas. Originally introduced by educational researcher Lee Shulman in the 1980s, particularly in the context of
Unlike general teaching skills or expertise in a subject alone, PCK focuses on how well a teacher can anticipate student misconceptions, choose appropriate representations or explanations, and to the specific demands of the content. In essence, it's about knowing what to teach and how to teach it in a way that makes sense to learners.
Experienced teachers naturally draw on PCK during lessons, integrating techniques like questioning, concept mapping, and analogies to clarify difficult ideas. These strategies don't just deliver content; they make it meaningful, accessible, and memorable. In contrast, novice or pre-service teachers often find this more challenging, as they are still developing both their pedagogical approaches and deep understanding of subject matter.
Understanding and applying PCK allows educators to make more informed decisions during lesson planning, classroom delivery, and assessment. It also enhances learner engagement and improves long-term outcomes by connecting pedagogy with purpose.
What does the research say? Hattie (2009) reports that teacher clarity, a direct product of strong PCK, has an effect size of 0.75 on student achievement. Hill, Rowan and Ball (2005) found that teachers with stronger mathematical knowledge for teaching produced student gains equivalent to 2-3 additional weeks of instruction per year. A meta-analysis by Keller et al. (2017) across 60 studies confirmed that PCK is a stronger predictor of student outcomes than subject knowledge alone (r = 0.44 vs r = 0.29).
In this article, we'll unpack the core components of PCK, examine practical tools to support it, and explore how teachers at every stage of their career can develop this vital area of professional expertise.
Therefore, it is useful to support novice teachers in understanding how to and success best. Vital therefore is a consideration of the following key ideas to support effective teaching; these can be used in isolation or together :
The main PCK models include Shulman's original framework, which identifies seven knowledge bases for teaching, and later expansions like the TPACK model that incorporates technology. These models typically include components such as knowledge of student misconceptions, instructional strategies, curriculum, and assessment methods specific to the subject. Each model emphasises the intersection between content expertise and pedagogical skills rather than treating them as separate domains.
According to Shulman (1986), Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is a type of knowledge that is unique to teachers and is based on how teachers relate their pedagogical knowledge (what they constructivist perspective on teaching and learning. They described a model of pedagogical content k nowledge(PCK) that results from an integration of four major components,
Teachers' PCK is enhanced through collaborative lesson planning, observation, reflection, and
Teachers can develop PCK by reflecting on their teaching practise, seeking feedback, collaborating with colleagues, and staying updated on research in both their subject area and in pedagogy. They should also analyse student work to identify common misconceptions and adjust their teaching accordingly. Continuous professional development and engagement with educational research are also crucial.
Developing PCK is an ongoing process that requires dedication and reflection. Here are some
There are numerous tools and techniques that can support the development and application of PCK:
Pedagogical Content Knowledge is not a static body of knowledge but a dynamic and evolving understanding of how to effectively teach specific content to specific learners. By embracing reflective practise, seeking feedback, and continuously updating their knowledge, teachers can develop and refine their PCK to
Developing strong Pedagogical Content Knowledge requires intentional, subject-specific professional development that goes beyond generic teaching strategies. Mathematics teachers, for instance, benefit enormously from exploring common misconceptions around fractions in Year 4, such as students believing that 1/5 is larger than 1/3 because 5 is greater than 3.Professional Development Through PCK
Mentoring and coaching programmes represent one of the most powerful vehicles for PCK development, particularly when they focus on subject-specific challenges rather than general classroom management. Experienced mentors can model how to anticipate student difficulties with specific content areas, such as the transition from concrete to abstract thinking in KS2 algebra or the conceptual leap required for understanding photosynthesis in Year 7 biology. Research by Grossman and Richert suggests that effective mentoring involves collaborative planning where mentors demonstrate how to sequence learning, choose appropriate representations, and design formative assessments that reveal student thinking. For example, a mentor might show how to use manipulatives when introducing decimal place value, then gradually transition to visual representations before moving to abstract number work.
Professional learning communities focused on The most effective professional development programmes combine theoretical understanding with practical application, allowing teachers to experiment with new approaches in their own classrooms and reflect on the outcomes.
Teacher education programmes across the UK are increasingly recognising the importance of developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge from the very start of training. Rather than treating subject knowledge and teaching methods as separate entities, modern initial teacher education (ITE) courses weave PCK development throughout their curriculum. This integrated approach helps trainee teachers understand that effective teaching requires more than just knowing their subject; it demands understanding how students learn specific topics and what makes certain concepts challenging.
During their training year, student teachers engage in activities specifically designed to build PCK. For instance, they might analyse video recordings of experienced teachers explaining difficult concepts, identifying the specific representations and examples used. Microteaching sessions allow trainees to practise explaining challenging topics to their peers, receiving feedback on their choice of analogies and their ability to anticipate misconceptions. Subject-specific seminars often focus on common student errors in particular topics, such as why students struggle with fractions in mathematics or misconceptions about photosynthesis in science.
Universities and school-based training providers use several strategies to develop PCK in
Developing strong PCK typically takes several years of classroom experience, with most teachers showing significant improvement after 3-5 years. The timeline varies depending on the subject area, teaching context, and opportunities for professional development. New teachers can accelerate this process through mentoring, reflective practise, and engaging with subject-specific educational research.
PCK varies significantly between subjects because each discipline has unique concepts, common misconceptions, and effective teaching strategies. For example, mathematics PCK involves understanding number sense and procedural fluency, whilst science PCK focuses on experimental design and scientific reasoning. English PCK emphasises literacy development and text analysis, requiring different pedagogical approaches entirely.
School leaders can support PCK development through subject-specific professional development, peer observation programmes, and collaborative planning time. Providing access to educational research, encouraging lesson study approaches, and pairing novice teachers with experienced mentors in the same subject area are particularly
PCK can be assessed through classroom observations, teacher interviews, and analysis of lesson planning materials. Some researchers use video analysis of teaching episodes and student outcome data to evaluate PCK effectiveness. However, measuring PCK remains challenging as it involves both observable teaching behaviours and internal decision-making processes.
Student feedback is crucial for developing PCK as it reveals which explanations, examples, and teaching strategies actually work in practise. Teachers can gather this through formative assessments,
These peer-reviewed studies provide the research foundation for the strategies discussed in this article:
Pedagogical knowledge for active-learning instruction in large undergraduate biology courses: a large-scale qualitative investigation of instructor thinking View study ↗
75 citations
A. Auerbach & Tessa C. Andrews (2018)
This large-scale study examined what separates successful active-learning instructors from those who struggle, focusing specifically on their general teaching knowledge rather than subject expertise. The researchers found that effective instructors possess deep understanding of
Evaluating teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in implementing classroom-based assessment: A case study among esl secondary school teachers in Selangor, Malaysia View study ↗ Rafiza Abdul Razak et al. (2023) This study investigated how well ESL teachers understand both their subject matter and effective assessment strategies, examining their ability to design classroom-based assessments that truly measure student progress.
13 citations
Foreign Language Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge about Teaching Intercultural Communication: A Chinese Perspective View study ↗
1 citations
Zhao Fuxia & Hongling Zhang (2025)
This research explored how foreign language teachers develop the specialised knowledge needed to teach intercultural communication effectively, going beyond basic language instruction to help students navigate cultural differences. The study found that successful intercultural communication teaching requires teachers to blend deep cultural understanding with specific pedagogical strategies tailored to cross-cultural learning. This work is essential for language educators in our increasingly globalized world, providing insights into how teachers can prepare students not just to speak a language, but to communicate meaningfully across cultures.
Knowledge Distillation and Student-Teacher Learning for Visual Intelligence: A Review and New Outlooks View study ↗
880 citations
Lin Wang & Kuk-Jin Yoon (2020)
This technical review examines how artificial intelligence systems can learn more efficiently by mimicking the student-teacher relationship, where complex AI models teach simpler ones to perform similar tasks. While focused on computer science applications, the research offers fascinating parallels to human classroom dynamics, exploring how knowledge transfer occurs between expert and novice learners. Teachers may find this perspective intriguing as it validates many intuitive teaching practices through the lens of machine learning, potentially offering new insights into how students acquire and process complex information.
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/pedagogical-content-knowledge#article","headline":"Pedagogical Content Knowledge","description":"Learn what Pedagogical Content Knowledge is and how blending teaching strategies with subject expertise improves classroom learning outcomes.","datePublished":"2023-01-26T19:21:02.269Z","dateModified":"2026-02-13T11:30:09.566Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/pedagogical-content-knowledge"},"image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409501de055d1/69525f667923951d43ccf9f9_69525f63dbef871248402f27_pedagogical-content-knowledge-infographic.webp","wordCount":3033},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/pedagogical-content-knowledge#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Pedagogical Content Knowledge","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/pedagogical-content-knowledge"}]},{"@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"How long does it take to develop strong pedagogical content knowledge?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Developing strong PCK typically takes several years of classroom experience, with most teachers showing significant improvement after 3-5 years. The timeline varies depending on the subject area, teaching context, and opportunities for professional development. New teachers can accelerate this process through mentoring, reflective practise, and engaging with subject-specific educational research."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What are the main differences between PCK across different subjects?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"PCK varies significantly between subjects because each discipline has unique concepts, common misconceptions, and effective teaching strategies. For example, mathematics PCK involves understanding number sense and procedural fluency, whilst science PCK focuses on experimental design and scientific reasoning. English PCK emphasises literacy development and text analysis, requiring different pedagogical approaches entirely."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How can school leaders support teachers in developing pedagogical content knowledge?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"School leaders can support PCK development through subject-specific professional development, peer observation programmes, and collaborative planning time. Providing access to educational research, encouraging lesson study approaches, and pairing novice teachers with experienced mentors in the same subject area are particularly effective strategies ."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can pedagogical content knowledge be measured or assessed?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"PCK can be assessed through classroom observations, teacher interviews, and analysis of lesson planning materials. Some researchers use video analysis of teaching episodes and student outcome data to evaluate PCK effectiveness. However, measuring PCK remains challenging as it involves both observable teaching behaviours and internal decision-making processes."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What role does student feedback play in improving pedagogical content knowledge?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Student feedback is crucial for developing PCK as it reveals which explanations, examples, and teaching strategies actually work in practise. Teachers can gather this through formative assessments, exit tickets , and informal conversations to identify persistent misconceptions. This feedback helps teachers refine their understanding of how students learn specific content and adjust their pedagogical approaches accordingly."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Further Reading: Key Research Papers","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"These peer-reviewed studies provide the research foundation for the strategies discussed in this article:"}}]}]}
