Interleaving: A teacher's guide
Discover how interleaving boosts student memory by mixing topics in lessons. A complete teacher's guide to implementing this powerful learning technique effectively.


Interleaving is a learning technique where students mix multiple topics or subjects during study sessions rather than focusing on one topic at a time. For example, instead of spending an entire period on fractions, a teacher might alternate between fractions, decimals, and percentages within the same lesson. This approach strengthens long-term retention and improves students' ability to distinguish between different problem types.
Interleaving is a learning technique in which learners mix, or interleave multiple topics or subjects while studying to improve their learning process.
The theory proposes that for learning two or more related topics or concepts, it is better to alternate between them rather than focusing exclusively on one topic or concept at a time. For instance, if a student is learning about short-term difficulties of pollution in a geography project, the student would also study how to bring improvements in energy supply on the same day by mixing the two topics or by switching back and forth between them.
This study strategy has been linked to an improvement in memory and its popularity has grown as the beneficial effects have been documented by organisations such as the chartered college of teaching. Interleaving is a method of teaching where students learn concepts in different ways at different times. This approach helps them retain information better because they're not just memorizing facts and figures. They're actually thinking about the material and applying it to real life situations.
When you teach a concept through interleaving, you give students practice with the material before moving on to another topic. So when you teach a concept, you should spend some time explaining it, then move on to another concept. Then come back to the original concept later.
This process repeats itself throughout the course, giving students multiple chances to understand the material. Interleaving works well for topics that require deep understanding, such as algebra or calculus. But it doesn't work very well for subjects that are taught in bite-sized chunks, like reading comprehension or vocabulary.
To help students grasp these types of concepts, try interleaving during class time. Instead of lecturing on the same topic over and over again, break the lesson down into small pieces and let students discuss each piece individually. Afterward, bring the group together and review the entire concept.
Interleaving is an effective strategy for developing problem-solving and categorisation skills. Also, interleaving leads to enhanced long-term retention and increased ability to transmit learned knowledge.
Interleaving forces the deep brain stimulation for retrieving because each practice attempt is new, so rote responses used from short-term memory won't help. Experts of Cognitive Psychology believe that interleaving improves the brain's ability to discriminate or differentiate, between concepts and fortifies memory associations. Along with the application of spaced practice, schools are increasingly seeing this as an effective strategy for exam preparation. The implications for memory & cognition.

Research shows interleaving works because it forces students to constantly retrieve and apply different strategies, strengthening neural pathways. Studies by organisations like the Chartered College of Teaching demonstrate that while blocked practice feels easier and shows immediate gains, interleaved practice leads to superior long-term retention and transfer of knowledge. The difficulty students experience during interleaving actually signals deeper learning is occurring.

Many research studies have indicated that students learn better when they are repeatedly exposed to different interleaved or shuffled concepts, rather than blocked (Rohrer, 2012). In a study session, a student might feel that he had a more difficult time studying due to interleaving. But, in the long-term, he would end up learning better through interleaving.
Cognitive psychologists suggest that one shouldn't study a single topic, idea, or similar type of problem for too long. It is recommended to change the topic often. Interleaving may seem more difficult than studying a single topic for a long time, but it is more beneficial in the long run (Kornell & Bjork, 2013).
Students with sen may require additional support when implementing interleaving strategies, as maintaining attention across multiple topics can be challenging. Bjork R & Bjork E (2011) assessed the impact of adding twotopics can be challenging. Bjork R & Bjork E (2011) assessed the impact of adding two or more concepts together, to see if that could lead to improved learning outcomes. In their study, they found that interleaving can improve learning outcomes, especially when the concepts are related to each other.
To effectively use interleaving in the classroom, consider these strategies:
By incorporating interleaving into your teaching practices, you encourage students to actively engage with the material, make connections between different concepts, and develop a deeper, more durable understanding.
Effective interleaved practice requires careful planning to maximise the discriminative contrast mechanism - the brain's ability to distinguish between different problem types when they're presented together. Start by selecting 2-3 related concepts that students often confuse, such as area, perimeter, and volume in mathematics, or metaphors, similes, and personification in English. The key is choosing topics that share surface similarities but require different solution strategies.
Structure your practice sessions using 10-15 minute cycles where you rotate between concepts rather than spending entire lessons on single topics. For example, in a 45-minute maths lesson, spend 15 minutes on solving equations, switch to interpreting graphs for 15 minutes, then move to probability problems. Within each segment, present 3-4 problems before switching. This timing prevents cognitive overload whilst ensuring students experience enough examples to recognise patterns and differences between problem types.
When designing mixed practice homework, create worksheets that randomly distribute different question types rather than grouping them by concept. Include a brief recap section where students must identify which strategy to use before solving. For instance, a science homework might include questions on photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration mixed throughout the worksheet, forcing students to actively decide which biological process each question addresses rather than simply following a repetitive pattern.
Interleaving creates significant challenges for working memory because students must constantly switch between different cognitive strategies and hold multiple problem-solving approaches in their minds simultaneously. Unlike blocked practice, where students can rely on recent examples and maintain the same mental approach, interleaving forces the brain to actively retrieve and apply different strategies for each new problem. This creates interference effects that make learning feel more difficult and less fluent, even though it actually strengthens long-term retention.
Students often report feeling less confident about their learning during interleaved practice because they make more mistakes and need to think harder about each problem. Teacher Shannon Payette observed that her pupils initially complained when she introduced mixed practice sessions, saying they felt 'confused' and preferred working through similar problems in sequence. This reaction occurs because interleaved practice prevents students from falling into automatic routines, forcing them to engage in deeper processing and actively discriminate between different problem types.
The perceived difficulty stems from what researchers call the difficulty paradox - whilst blocked practice feels easier and creates an illusion of learning, interleaved practice requires more mental effort but produces superior long-term results. Students need explicit explanation about why this approach feels challenging. Teacher Kim Kelly found success by explaining to her Year 8 students that 'feeling confused means your brain is working harder to make stronger connections', helping them understand that the temporary discomfort signals effective learning rather than poor teaching or their own inadequacy.
The most frequent mistake teachers make is attempting to interleave too many concepts simultaneously, overwhelming students' cognitive capacity and creating frustration rather than productive challenge. Beginning teachers often try to mix 4-5 different topics in a single lesson, which exceeds working memory limits and prevents students from recognising meaningful patterns. Start with just 2 concepts, gradually building to 3 once students adapt to the switching demands. Similarly, avoid interleaving completely unrelated topics - the concepts should share enough similarity that students might reasonably confuse them, but require distinctly different approaches.
Another critical error involves insufficient scaffolding when introducing interleaved practice. Some teachers jump directly from blocked practice to fully mixed sessions without providing intermediate support. Successful implementation requires a gradual transition: begin with short interleaved segments within predominantly blocked lessons, explicitly model the decision-making process for choosing strategies, and provide students with strategy cards or decision trees until they internalise the discrimination process. Teacher observations show that students need at least 3-4 guided practice sessions before attempting independent interleaved work.
Many educators also fail to maintain the crucial balance between challenge and overwhelm. Whilst interleaving should feel more difficult than blocked practice, students experiencing genuine distress or complete confusion require additional support. Monitor student responses carefully - productive difficulty involves increased effort and occasional mistakes, but students should still achieve reasonable success rates. If accuracy drops below 60-70%, consider reducing the number of interleaved concepts, providing additional worked examples, or temporarily returning to blocked practice before reintroducing mixed formats. Remember that interleaving works best when students have already achieved basic competency in each individual concept through initial blocked practice.
These practical steps show teachers how to implement interleaving effectively across different subjects and year groups.
In a Year 8 English lesson, Mrs. Thompson alternates between persuasive writing techniques, grammar revision, and poetry analysis every 15 minutes. Students initially feel confused switching between metaphors, semicolons, and persuasive language, but by half-term, they demonstrate stronger retention and can identify these elements more accurately in unseen texts compared to her previous classes who studied each topic in separate week-long blocks.
| Aspect | Blocked Practice | Interleaved Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Practice one skill repeatedly before moving to the next (AAABBBCCC) | Mix different skills within a single practice session (ABCABCABC) |
| Initial Performance | Higher during practice (feels easier) | Lower during practice (feels harder) |
| Long-Term Retention | Lower (rapid forgetting) | Higher (durable learning) |
| Transfer to New Contexts | Limited transfer ability | Superior transfer to novel problems |
| Discrimination Skills | Minimal discrimination practice | Builds strong discrimination between concepts |
| Cognitive Load | Lower during practice | Higher (desirable difficulty) |
| Student Perception | Often preferred (feels more productive) | Often resisted initially (feels harder) |
| Best For | Initial skill acquisition, complete beginners | Consolidation, exam preparation, application |
Research consistently shows interleaved practice produces superior long-term retention despite lower performance during practice sessions. This is a prime example of a "desirable difficulty."
These evidence-based interleaving strategies help students develop stronger discrimination skills and more durable learning. Implement these interleaved practice activities to combat the illusion of competence created by blocked practice.
Start implementing interleaving gradually by mixing just two or three topics initially. Explain to students why practice feels harder but produces better results - understanding the science helps them persist through the desirable difficulty of interleaved practice.
Interleaving is a learning technique where students mix multiple topics or subjects during study sessions rather than focusing on one topic at a time. For example, instead of spending an entire period on fractions, a teacher might alternate between fractions, decimals, and percentages within the same lesson. This approach strengthens long-term retention and improves students' ability to distinguish between different problem types.
Start by breaking your lesson into small pieces and cycling through related topics instead of teaching one topic for extended periods. Spend time explaining one concept, then move to another topic before returning to the original concept later in the lesson. This process should repeat throughout the course, giving students multiple chances to understand and apply the material in different contexts.
Interleaving strengthens long-term retention and improves students' problem-solving and categorisation skills. Research by organisations like the Chartered College of Teaching shows it enhances the brain's ability to discriminate between concepts and creates stronger memory associations. Students also develop better transfer of knowledge, meaning they can apply what they've learned to new situations more effectively.
Interleaving works particularly well for subjects that require deep understanding, such as mathematics, algebra, or calculus where students need to distinguish between different problem types. It's also effective in subjects like geography where students can alternate between related concepts such as pollution effects and energy supply improvements. However, it may be less suitable for subjects taught in small, discrete chunks like basic vocabulary or reading comprehension.
Students find interleaving more challenging because it forces them to constantly retrieve and apply different strategies, which requires more mental effort than practising one skill repeatedly. While blocked practice feels easier and shows immediate gains, the difficulty students experience during interleaving actually signals that deeper learning is occurring. This creates what experts call the "difficulty paradox", where the harder method produces better long-term results.
Look for improved performance on assessments that require students to identify problem types or apply knowledge to new situations, rather than just repeat practised procedures. Students should demonstrate better long-term retention when topics are revisited weeks or months later. You may notice that whilst students initially struggle more during lessons, their ability to transfer knowledge and solve unfamiliar problems gradually improves over time.
Interleaving presents a powerful alternative to traditional blocked practice, developing enhanced long-term retention and problem-solving capabilities. While it may initially pose a greater challenge to students, this very difficulty is a catalyst for deeper cognitive processing and stronger memory formation. By strategically mixing related topics and encouraging students to discriminate between different concepts, teachers can develop a more effective and enduring learning experience.
Embracing interleaving requires a shift in mindset, both for educators and learners. It necessitates a move away from the comfort of concentrated study blocks towards a more dynamic and interconnected approach. As research continues to validate the benefits of interleaving, its integration into educational settings promises to equip students with the skills and knowledge necessary to thrive in an increasingly complex world. The ability to connect disparate ideas, apply knowledge flexibly, and retain information over time are invaluable assets that interleaving helps to cultivate.
Spacing and interleaving effects
Interleaving is a learning technique where students mix multiple topics or subjects during study sessions rather than focusing on one topic at a time. For example, instead of spending an entire period on fractions, a teacher might alternate between fractions, decimals, and percentages within the same lesson. This approach strengthens long-term retention and improves students' ability to distinguish between different problem types.
Interleaving is a learning technique in which learners mix, or interleave multiple topics or subjects while studying to improve their learning process.
The theory proposes that for learning two or more related topics or concepts, it is better to alternate between them rather than focusing exclusively on one topic or concept at a time. For instance, if a student is learning about short-term difficulties of pollution in a geography project, the student would also study how to bring improvements in energy supply on the same day by mixing the two topics or by switching back and forth between them.
This study strategy has been linked to an improvement in memory and its popularity has grown as the beneficial effects have been documented by organisations such as the chartered college of teaching. Interleaving is a method of teaching where students learn concepts in different ways at different times. This approach helps them retain information better because they're not just memorizing facts and figures. They're actually thinking about the material and applying it to real life situations.
When you teach a concept through interleaving, you give students practice with the material before moving on to another topic. So when you teach a concept, you should spend some time explaining it, then move on to another concept. Then come back to the original concept later.
This process repeats itself throughout the course, giving students multiple chances to understand the material. Interleaving works well for topics that require deep understanding, such as algebra or calculus. But it doesn't work very well for subjects that are taught in bite-sized chunks, like reading comprehension or vocabulary.
To help students grasp these types of concepts, try interleaving during class time. Instead of lecturing on the same topic over and over again, break the lesson down into small pieces and let students discuss each piece individually. Afterward, bring the group together and review the entire concept.
Interleaving is an effective strategy for developing problem-solving and categorisation skills. Also, interleaving leads to enhanced long-term retention and increased ability to transmit learned knowledge.
Interleaving forces the deep brain stimulation for retrieving because each practice attempt is new, so rote responses used from short-term memory won't help. Experts of Cognitive Psychology believe that interleaving improves the brain's ability to discriminate or differentiate, between concepts and fortifies memory associations. Along with the application of spaced practice, schools are increasingly seeing this as an effective strategy for exam preparation. The implications for memory & cognition.

Research shows interleaving works because it forces students to constantly retrieve and apply different strategies, strengthening neural pathways. Studies by organisations like the Chartered College of Teaching demonstrate that while blocked practice feels easier and shows immediate gains, interleaved practice leads to superior long-term retention and transfer of knowledge. The difficulty students experience during interleaving actually signals deeper learning is occurring.

Many research studies have indicated that students learn better when they are repeatedly exposed to different interleaved or shuffled concepts, rather than blocked (Rohrer, 2012). In a study session, a student might feel that he had a more difficult time studying due to interleaving. But, in the long-term, he would end up learning better through interleaving.
Cognitive psychologists suggest that one shouldn't study a single topic, idea, or similar type of problem for too long. It is recommended to change the topic often. Interleaving may seem more difficult than studying a single topic for a long time, but it is more beneficial in the long run (Kornell & Bjork, 2013).
Students with sen may require additional support when implementing interleaving strategies, as maintaining attention across multiple topics can be challenging. Bjork R & Bjork E (2011) assessed the impact of adding twotopics can be challenging. Bjork R & Bjork E (2011) assessed the impact of adding two or more concepts together, to see if that could lead to improved learning outcomes. In their study, they found that interleaving can improve learning outcomes, especially when the concepts are related to each other.
To effectively use interleaving in the classroom, consider these strategies:
By incorporating interleaving into your teaching practices, you encourage students to actively engage with the material, make connections between different concepts, and develop a deeper, more durable understanding.
Effective interleaved practice requires careful planning to maximise the discriminative contrast mechanism - the brain's ability to distinguish between different problem types when they're presented together. Start by selecting 2-3 related concepts that students often confuse, such as area, perimeter, and volume in mathematics, or metaphors, similes, and personification in English. The key is choosing topics that share surface similarities but require different solution strategies.
Structure your practice sessions using 10-15 minute cycles where you rotate between concepts rather than spending entire lessons on single topics. For example, in a 45-minute maths lesson, spend 15 minutes on solving equations, switch to interpreting graphs for 15 minutes, then move to probability problems. Within each segment, present 3-4 problems before switching. This timing prevents cognitive overload whilst ensuring students experience enough examples to recognise patterns and differences between problem types.
When designing mixed practice homework, create worksheets that randomly distribute different question types rather than grouping them by concept. Include a brief recap section where students must identify which strategy to use before solving. For instance, a science homework might include questions on photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration mixed throughout the worksheet, forcing students to actively decide which biological process each question addresses rather than simply following a repetitive pattern.
Interleaving creates significant challenges for working memory because students must constantly switch between different cognitive strategies and hold multiple problem-solving approaches in their minds simultaneously. Unlike blocked practice, where students can rely on recent examples and maintain the same mental approach, interleaving forces the brain to actively retrieve and apply different strategies for each new problem. This creates interference effects that make learning feel more difficult and less fluent, even though it actually strengthens long-term retention.
Students often report feeling less confident about their learning during interleaved practice because they make more mistakes and need to think harder about each problem. Teacher Shannon Payette observed that her pupils initially complained when she introduced mixed practice sessions, saying they felt 'confused' and preferred working through similar problems in sequence. This reaction occurs because interleaved practice prevents students from falling into automatic routines, forcing them to engage in deeper processing and actively discriminate between different problem types.
The perceived difficulty stems from what researchers call the difficulty paradox - whilst blocked practice feels easier and creates an illusion of learning, interleaved practice requires more mental effort but produces superior long-term results. Students need explicit explanation about why this approach feels challenging. Teacher Kim Kelly found success by explaining to her Year 8 students that 'feeling confused means your brain is working harder to make stronger connections', helping them understand that the temporary discomfort signals effective learning rather than poor teaching or their own inadequacy.
The most frequent mistake teachers make is attempting to interleave too many concepts simultaneously, overwhelming students' cognitive capacity and creating frustration rather than productive challenge. Beginning teachers often try to mix 4-5 different topics in a single lesson, which exceeds working memory limits and prevents students from recognising meaningful patterns. Start with just 2 concepts, gradually building to 3 once students adapt to the switching demands. Similarly, avoid interleaving completely unrelated topics - the concepts should share enough similarity that students might reasonably confuse them, but require distinctly different approaches.
Another critical error involves insufficient scaffolding when introducing interleaved practice. Some teachers jump directly from blocked practice to fully mixed sessions without providing intermediate support. Successful implementation requires a gradual transition: begin with short interleaved segments within predominantly blocked lessons, explicitly model the decision-making process for choosing strategies, and provide students with strategy cards or decision trees until they internalise the discrimination process. Teacher observations show that students need at least 3-4 guided practice sessions before attempting independent interleaved work.
Many educators also fail to maintain the crucial balance between challenge and overwhelm. Whilst interleaving should feel more difficult than blocked practice, students experiencing genuine distress or complete confusion require additional support. Monitor student responses carefully - productive difficulty involves increased effort and occasional mistakes, but students should still achieve reasonable success rates. If accuracy drops below 60-70%, consider reducing the number of interleaved concepts, providing additional worked examples, or temporarily returning to blocked practice before reintroducing mixed formats. Remember that interleaving works best when students have already achieved basic competency in each individual concept through initial blocked practice.
These practical steps show teachers how to implement interleaving effectively across different subjects and year groups.
In a Year 8 English lesson, Mrs. Thompson alternates between persuasive writing techniques, grammar revision, and poetry analysis every 15 minutes. Students initially feel confused switching between metaphors, semicolons, and persuasive language, but by half-term, they demonstrate stronger retention and can identify these elements more accurately in unseen texts compared to her previous classes who studied each topic in separate week-long blocks.
| Aspect | Blocked Practice | Interleaved Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Practice one skill repeatedly before moving to the next (AAABBBCCC) | Mix different skills within a single practice session (ABCABCABC) |
| Initial Performance | Higher during practice (feels easier) | Lower during practice (feels harder) |
| Long-Term Retention | Lower (rapid forgetting) | Higher (durable learning) |
| Transfer to New Contexts | Limited transfer ability | Superior transfer to novel problems |
| Discrimination Skills | Minimal discrimination practice | Builds strong discrimination between concepts |
| Cognitive Load | Lower during practice | Higher (desirable difficulty) |
| Student Perception | Often preferred (feels more productive) | Often resisted initially (feels harder) |
| Best For | Initial skill acquisition, complete beginners | Consolidation, exam preparation, application |
Research consistently shows interleaved practice produces superior long-term retention despite lower performance during practice sessions. This is a prime example of a "desirable difficulty."
These evidence-based interleaving strategies help students develop stronger discrimination skills and more durable learning. Implement these interleaved practice activities to combat the illusion of competence created by blocked practice.
Start implementing interleaving gradually by mixing just two or three topics initially. Explain to students why practice feels harder but produces better results - understanding the science helps them persist through the desirable difficulty of interleaved practice.
Interleaving is a learning technique where students mix multiple topics or subjects during study sessions rather than focusing on one topic at a time. For example, instead of spending an entire period on fractions, a teacher might alternate between fractions, decimals, and percentages within the same lesson. This approach strengthens long-term retention and improves students' ability to distinguish between different problem types.
Start by breaking your lesson into small pieces and cycling through related topics instead of teaching one topic for extended periods. Spend time explaining one concept, then move to another topic before returning to the original concept later in the lesson. This process should repeat throughout the course, giving students multiple chances to understand and apply the material in different contexts.
Interleaving strengthens long-term retention and improves students' problem-solving and categorisation skills. Research by organisations like the Chartered College of Teaching shows it enhances the brain's ability to discriminate between concepts and creates stronger memory associations. Students also develop better transfer of knowledge, meaning they can apply what they've learned to new situations more effectively.
Interleaving works particularly well for subjects that require deep understanding, such as mathematics, algebra, or calculus where students need to distinguish between different problem types. It's also effective in subjects like geography where students can alternate between related concepts such as pollution effects and energy supply improvements. However, it may be less suitable for subjects taught in small, discrete chunks like basic vocabulary or reading comprehension.
Students find interleaving more challenging because it forces them to constantly retrieve and apply different strategies, which requires more mental effort than practising one skill repeatedly. While blocked practice feels easier and shows immediate gains, the difficulty students experience during interleaving actually signals that deeper learning is occurring. This creates what experts call the "difficulty paradox", where the harder method produces better long-term results.
Look for improved performance on assessments that require students to identify problem types or apply knowledge to new situations, rather than just repeat practised procedures. Students should demonstrate better long-term retention when topics are revisited weeks or months later. You may notice that whilst students initially struggle more during lessons, their ability to transfer knowledge and solve unfamiliar problems gradually improves over time.
Interleaving presents a powerful alternative to traditional blocked practice, developing enhanced long-term retention and problem-solving capabilities. While it may initially pose a greater challenge to students, this very difficulty is a catalyst for deeper cognitive processing and stronger memory formation. By strategically mixing related topics and encouraging students to discriminate between different concepts, teachers can develop a more effective and enduring learning experience.
Embracing interleaving requires a shift in mindset, both for educators and learners. It necessitates a move away from the comfort of concentrated study blocks towards a more dynamic and interconnected approach. As research continues to validate the benefits of interleaving, its integration into educational settings promises to equip students with the skills and knowledge necessary to thrive in an increasingly complex world. The ability to connect disparate ideas, apply knowledge flexibly, and retain information over time are invaluable assets that interleaving helps to cultivate.
Spacing and interleaving effects
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/interleaving-a-teachers-guide#article","headline":"Interleaving: A teacher's guide","description":"Interleaving: A teacher's guide to using this study technique for better student memory and retrieval.","datePublished":"2021-11-04T16:02:38.051Z","dateModified":"2026-01-26T10:09:32.212Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/interleaving-a-teachers-guide"},"image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409501de055d1/6946808bca3d3eb89c2752a9_6870e5cc3c8c9e534a69d299_618401b01da163e8459d8df6_Interleaved%252520practice%252520vs%252520massed%252520practice.png","wordCount":3647},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/interleaving-a-teachers-guide#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Interleaving: A teacher's guide","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/interleaving-a-teachers-guide"}]},{"@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What is interleaving in education?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Interleaving is a learning technique where students mix multiple topics or subjects during study sessions rather than focusing on one topic at a time. For example, instead of spending an entire period on fractions, a teacher might alternate between fractions, decimals, and percentages within the same lesson. This approach strengthens long-term retention and improves students' ability to distinguish between different problem types."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I implement interleaving in my classroom?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Start by breaking your lesson into small pieces and cycling through related topics instead of teaching one topic for extended periods. Spend time explaining one concept, then move to another topic before returning to the original concept later in the lesson. This process should repeat throughout the course, giving students multiple chances to understand and apply the material in different contexts."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What are the benefits of interleaving for students?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Interleaving strengthens long-term retention and improves students' problem-solving and categorisation skills. Research by organisations like the Chartered College of Teaching shows it enhances the brain's ability to discriminate between concepts and creates stronger memory associations. Students also develop better transfer of knowledge, meaning they can apply what they've learned to new situations more effectively."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Which subjects work best with interleaving?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Interleaving works particularly well for subjects that require deep understanding, such as mathematics, algebra, or calculus where students need to distinguish between different problem types. It's also effective in subjects like geography where students can alternate between related concepts such as pollution effects and energy supply improvements. However, it may be less suitable for subjects taught in small, discrete chunks like basic vocabulary or reading comprehension."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Why do students find interleaving more difficult than blocked practice?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Students find interleaving more challenging because it forces them to constantly retrieve and apply different strategies, which requires more mental effort than practising one skill repeatedly. While blocked practice feels easier and shows immediate gains, the difficulty students experience during interleaving actually signals that deeper learning is occurring. This creates what experts call the \"difficulty paradox\", where the harder method produces better long-term results."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I know if interleaving is working in my classroom?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Look for improved performance on assessments that require students to identify problem types or apply knowledge to new situations, rather than just repeat practised procedures. Students should demonstrate better long-term retention when topics are revisited weeks or months later. You may notice that whilst students initially struggle more during lessons, their ability to transfer knowledge and solve unfamiliar problems gradually improves over time."}}]}]}