Interleaving: Why Mixing Topics Produces Stronger
Interleaving mixes related topics within practice sessions instead of blocking them. Research shows this produces 43% better retention on delayed tests.


If you're looking to boost your students' long-term retention and problem-solving abilities, interleaving could be the game-changing technique your classroom needs. This evidence-based approach involves mixing different topics or skills within a single lesson or study session, rather than teaching them in separate blocks. While it might feel counterintuitive at first, interleaving has been shown to significantly improve learning outcomes across subjects from maths to languages. Ready to discover how to seamlessly weave this powerful strategy into your existing lesson plans?

Interleaving is a learning technique where students mix multiple topics or subjects during study sessions rather than focusing on one topic at a time. For example, instead of spending an entire period on fractions, a teacher might alternate between fractions, decimals, and percentages within the same lesson. This approach strengthens long-term retention and improves students' ability to distinguish between different problem types.
Interleaving is a learning technique in which learners mix, or interleave multiple topics or subjects while studying to improve their learning process.
What does the research say? Rohrer and Taylor (2007) found interleaved practice produced 43% better performance on delayed tests compared to blocked practice. Pan et al.'s (2019) meta-analysis confirmed a moderate-to-large effect (d = 0.67) favouring interleaving for discriminative learning. Bjork and Bjork (2011) classify interleaving as a "desirable difficulty" that slows initial learning but strengthens long-term retention. The EEF reports that metacognitive strategies, which include interleaving, add +7 months of progress.
The theory proposes that for learning two or more related topics or concepts, it is better to alternate between them rather than focusing exclusively on one topic or concept at a time. For instance, if a student is learning about short-term difficulties of pollution in a geography project, the student would also study how to bring improvements in energy supply on the same day by mixing the two topics or by switching back and forth between them.
This study strategy has been linked to an improvement in memory and its popularity has grown as the beneficial effects have been documented by organisations such as the chartered college of teaching. Interleaving is a method of teaching where students learn concepts in different ways at different times. This approach helps them retain information better because they're not just memorising facts and figures. They're actually thinking about the material and applying it to real life situations.
When you teach a concept through interleaving, you give students practise with the material before moving on to another topic. So when you teach a concept, you should spend some time explaining it, then move on to another concept. Then come back to the original concept later.
This process repeats itself throughout the course, giving students multiple chances to understand the material. Interleaving works well for topics that require deep understanding, such as algebra or calculus. But it doesn't work very well for subjects that are taught in bite-sized chunks, like reading comprehension or vocabulary.
To help students grasp these types of concepts, try interleaving during class time. Instead of lecturing on the same topic over and over again, break the lesson down into small pieces and let students discuss each piece individually. Afterwards, bring the group together and review the entire concept.
Interleaving aids learners in developing problem-solving skills (Rohrer, 2012). This strategy also boosts retention and knowledge transfer (Kornell & Bjork, 2008). Brown et al. (2014) show learners categorise information better with interleaving.
Interleaving forces the deep brain stimulation for retrieving because each practise attempt is new, so rote responses used from short-term memory won't help. Experts of Cognitive Psychology believe that interleaving improves the brain's ability to discriminate or differentiate, between concepts and fortifies memory associations. Along with the application of spaced practise, schools are increasingly seeing this as an effective strategy for exam preparation. The implications for memory & cognition.

This builds on the foundational work of John Flavell (1979), who first identified metacognitive knowledge, and Barry Zimmerman (2002), whose self-regulated learning model provides the framework for teaching these skills.
Research shows interleaving works because it forces students to constantly retrieve and apply different strategies, strengthening neural pathways. Studies by organisations like the Chartered College of Teaching demonstrate that while blocked practise feels easier and shows immediate gains, interleaved practise leads to superior long-term retention and transfer of knowledge. The difficulty students experience during interleaving actually signals deeper learning is occurring.

Many research studies have indicated that students learn better when they are repeatedly exposed to different interleaved or shuffled concepts, rather than blocked (Rohrer, 2012). In a study session, a student might feel that he had a more difficult time studying due to interleaving. But, in the long-term, he would end up learning better through interleaving.
Cognitive psychologists suggest that one shouldn't study a single topic, idea, or similar type of problem for too long. It is recommended to change the topic often. Interleaving may seem more difficult than studying a single topic for a long time, but it is more beneficial in the long run (Kornell & Bjork, 2013).

Students with sen may require additional support when implementing interleaving strategies, as maintaining attention across multiple topics can be challenging. Bjork R & Bjork E (2011) assessed the impact of adding twotopics can be challenging. Bjork R & Bjork E (2011) assessed the impact of adding two or more concepts together, to see if that could lead to improved learning outcomes. In their study, they found that interleaving can improve learning outcomes, especially when the concepts are related to each other.
To effectively use interleaving in the classroom, consider these strategies:
Interleaving helps learners engage actively with content. It also helps them connect different ideas (Rohrer, 2012). Learners build stronger, longer-lasting understanding (Brown et al., 2014; Weinstein et al., 2018).
Interleaved practice needs planning to improve learners' problem type recognition. Choose 2-3 related concepts learners confuse, like area/perimeter/volume. Pick topics with surface similarities needing different solutions (Rohrer, 2009; Kornell & Bjork, 2008; Taylor & Rohrer, 2010).
Structure your practise sessions using 10-15 minute cycles where you rotate between concepts rather than spending entire lessons on single topics. For example, in a 45-minute maths lesson, spend 15 minutes on solving equations, switch to interpreting graphs for 15 minutes, then move to probability problems. Within each segment, present 3-4 problems before switching. This timing prevents cognitive overload whilst ensuring students experience enough examples to recognise patterns and differences between problem types.
When designing mixed practise homework, create worksheets that randomly distribute different question types rather than grouping them by concept. Include a brief recap section where students must identify which strategy to use before solving. For instance, a science homework might include questions on photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration mixed throughout the worksheet, forcing students to actively decide which biological process each question addresses rather than simply following a repetitive pattern.
Interleaving creates significant challenges for working memory because students must constantly switch between different cognitive strategies and hold multiple problem-solving approaches in their minds simultaneously. Unlike blocked practise, where students can rely on recent examples and maintain the same mental approach, interleaving forces the brain to actively retrieve and apply different strategies for each new problem. This creates interference effects that make learning feel more difficult and less fluent, even though it actually strengthens long-term retention.
Students often report feeling less confident about their learning during interleaved practise because they make more mistakes and need to think harder about each problem. Teacher Shannon Payette observed that her learners initially complained when she introduced mixed practise sessions, saying they felt 'confused' and preferred working through similar problems in sequence. This reaction occurs because interleaved practise prevents students from falling into automatic routines, forcing them to engage in deeper processing and actively discriminate between different problem types.
The perceived difficulty stems from what researchers call the difficulty paradox, whilst blocked practise feels easier and creates an illusion of learning, interleaved practise requires more mental effort but produces superior long-term results. Students need explicit explanation about why this approach feels challenging. Teacher Kim Kelly found success by explaining to her Year 8 students that 'feeling confused means your brain is working harder to make stronger connections', helping them understand that the temporary discomfort signals effective learning rather than poor teaching or their own inadequacy.
Teachers often interleave too many ideas, which overwhelms learners. New teachers might mix 4-5 topics, exceeding working memory (Sweller, 1988). Start with 2 ideas, adding a third later. Ensure interleaved topics are similar enough to cause confusion (Rohrer, 2007; Taylor & Rohrer, 2016).
Teachers sometimes don't scaffold interleaved practice well enough. They skip vital support (Rohrer, 2007). Begin with small interleaved sections inside mainly blocked lessons. Model strategy choices (Weinstein et al., 2018). Give learners strategy cards while they learn. Observations show learners need 3-4 guided sessions before independent work (Agarwal & Roediger, 2018).
Teachers must balance challenge and learner overwhelm. Interleaving is harder than blocked practice, but struggling learners need support. Watch learner responses closely; effort and errors are fine. If accuracy drops below 60-70%, reduce interleaved concepts. Offer more worked examples, or use blocked practice. Interleaving works best after learners understand each concept (Rohrer, 2012).
These practical steps show teachers how to implement interleaving effectively across different subjects and year groups.
In a Year 8 English lesson, Mrs. Thompson alternates between persuasive writing techniques, grammar revision, and poetry analysis every 15 minutes. Students initially feel confused switching between metaphors, semicolons, and persuasive language, but by half-term, they demonstrate stronger retention and can identify these elements more accurately in unseen texts compared to her previous classes who studied each topic in separate week-long blocks.
| Aspect | Blocked Practise | Interleaved Practise |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Practise one skill repeatedly before moving to the next (AAABBBCCC) | Mix different skills within a single practise session (ABCABCABC) |
| Initial Performance | Higher during practise (feels easier) | Lower during practise (feels harder) |
| Long-Term Retention | Lower (rapid forgetting) | Higher (durable learning) |
| Transfer to New Contexts | Limited transfer ability | Superior transfer to novel problems |
| Discrimination Skills | Minimal discrimination practise | Builds strong discrimination between concepts |
| Cognitive Load | Lower during practise | Higher (desirable difficulty) |
| Student Perception | Often preferred (feels more productive) | Often resisted initially (feels harder) |
| Best For | Initial skill acquisition, complete beginners | Consolidation, exam preparation, application |
Interleaved practice improves long-term retention, say research findings. Learners may perform worse during practice (Bjork, 1994). This difference shows a valuable learning challenge. (Bjork & Bjork, 2011) call it a "desirable difficulty."
Interleaved practice activities, based on evidence, help learners improve discrimination skills. Use them to counter the illusion of competence that blocked practice causes. (Rohrer, 2012; Taylor & Rohrer, 2010)
Start implementing interleaving gradually by mixing just two or three topics initially. Explain to students why practise feels harder but produces better results, understanding the science helps them persist through the desirable difficulty of interleaved practise.
Interleaving is a learning technique where students mix multiple topics or subjects during study sessions rather than focusing on one topic at a time. For example, instead of spending an entire period on fractions, a teacher might alternate between fractions, decimals, and percentages within the same lesson. This approach strengthens long-term retention and improves students' ability to distinguish between different problem types.
Start by breaking your lesson into small pieces and cycling through related topics instead of teaching one topic for extended periods. Spend time explaining one concept, then move to another topic before returning to the original concept later in the lesson. This process should repeat throughout the course, giving students multiple chances to understand and apply the material in different contexts.
Interleaving strengthens long-term retention and improves students' problem-solving and categorisation skills. Research by organisations like the Chartered College of Teaching shows it enhances the brain's ability to discriminate between concepts and creates stronger memory associations. Students also develop better transfer of knowledge, meaning they can apply what they've learned to new situations more effectively.
Interleaving works particularly well for subjects that require deep understanding, such as mathematics, algebra, or calculus where students need to distinguish between different problem types. It's also effective in subjects like geography where students can alternate between related concepts such as pollution effects and energy supply improvements. However, it may be less suitable for subjects taught in small, discrete chunks like basic vocabulary or reading comprehension.
Students find interleaving more challenging because it forces them to constantly retrieve and apply different strategies, which requires more mental effort than practising one skill repeatedly. While blocked practise feels easier and shows immediate gains, the difficulty students experience during interleaving actually signals that deeper learning is occurring. This creates what experts call the "difficulty paradox", where the harder method produces better long-term results.
Look for improved performance on assessments that require students to identify problem types or apply knowledge to new situations, rather than just repeat practised procedures. Students should demonstrate better long-term retention when topics are revisited weeks or months later. You may notice that whilst students initially struggle more during lessons, their ability to transfer knowledge and solve unfamiliar problems gradually improves over time.
Interleaving beats blocked practice for long-term retention, say researchers (e.g., Kang, 2016). Learners may find it harder at first. This struggle promotes deeper thinking and strengthens memory (Bjork, 1994). Teachers can mix topics to improve learning (Rohrer, 2012).
Embracing interleaving requires a shift in mindset, both for educators and learners. It necessitates a move away from the comfort of concentrated study blocks towards a more active and interconnected approach. As research continues to validate the benefits of interleaving, its integration into educational settings promises to equip students with the skills and knowledge necessary to thrive in an increasingly complex world. The ability to connect disparate ideas, apply knowledge flexibly, and retain information over time are invaluable assets that interleaving helps to cultivate.
Spacing and interleaving effects
If you're looking to boost your students' long-term retention and problem-solving abilities, interleaving could be the game-changing technique your classroom needs. This evidence-based approach involves mixing different topics or skills within a single lesson or study session, rather than teaching them in separate blocks. While it might feel counterintuitive at first, interleaving has been shown to significantly improve learning outcomes across subjects from maths to languages. Ready to discover how to seamlessly weave this powerful strategy into your existing lesson plans?

Interleaving is a learning technique where students mix multiple topics or subjects during study sessions rather than focusing on one topic at a time. For example, instead of spending an entire period on fractions, a teacher might alternate between fractions, decimals, and percentages within the same lesson. This approach strengthens long-term retention and improves students' ability to distinguish between different problem types.
Interleaving is a learning technique in which learners mix, or interleave multiple topics or subjects while studying to improve their learning process.
What does the research say? Rohrer and Taylor (2007) found interleaved practice produced 43% better performance on delayed tests compared to blocked practice. Pan et al.'s (2019) meta-analysis confirmed a moderate-to-large effect (d = 0.67) favouring interleaving for discriminative learning. Bjork and Bjork (2011) classify interleaving as a "desirable difficulty" that slows initial learning but strengthens long-term retention. The EEF reports that metacognitive strategies, which include interleaving, add +7 months of progress.
The theory proposes that for learning two or more related topics or concepts, it is better to alternate between them rather than focusing exclusively on one topic or concept at a time. For instance, if a student is learning about short-term difficulties of pollution in a geography project, the student would also study how to bring improvements in energy supply on the same day by mixing the two topics or by switching back and forth between them.
This study strategy has been linked to an improvement in memory and its popularity has grown as the beneficial effects have been documented by organisations such as the chartered college of teaching. Interleaving is a method of teaching where students learn concepts in different ways at different times. This approach helps them retain information better because they're not just memorising facts and figures. They're actually thinking about the material and applying it to real life situations.
When you teach a concept through interleaving, you give students practise with the material before moving on to another topic. So when you teach a concept, you should spend some time explaining it, then move on to another concept. Then come back to the original concept later.
This process repeats itself throughout the course, giving students multiple chances to understand the material. Interleaving works well for topics that require deep understanding, such as algebra or calculus. But it doesn't work very well for subjects that are taught in bite-sized chunks, like reading comprehension or vocabulary.
To help students grasp these types of concepts, try interleaving during class time. Instead of lecturing on the same topic over and over again, break the lesson down into small pieces and let students discuss each piece individually. Afterwards, bring the group together and review the entire concept.
Interleaving aids learners in developing problem-solving skills (Rohrer, 2012). This strategy also boosts retention and knowledge transfer (Kornell & Bjork, 2008). Brown et al. (2014) show learners categorise information better with interleaving.
Interleaving forces the deep brain stimulation for retrieving because each practise attempt is new, so rote responses used from short-term memory won't help. Experts of Cognitive Psychology believe that interleaving improves the brain's ability to discriminate or differentiate, between concepts and fortifies memory associations. Along with the application of spaced practise, schools are increasingly seeing this as an effective strategy for exam preparation. The implications for memory & cognition.

This builds on the foundational work of John Flavell (1979), who first identified metacognitive knowledge, and Barry Zimmerman (2002), whose self-regulated learning model provides the framework for teaching these skills.
Research shows interleaving works because it forces students to constantly retrieve and apply different strategies, strengthening neural pathways. Studies by organisations like the Chartered College of Teaching demonstrate that while blocked practise feels easier and shows immediate gains, interleaved practise leads to superior long-term retention and transfer of knowledge. The difficulty students experience during interleaving actually signals deeper learning is occurring.

Many research studies have indicated that students learn better when they are repeatedly exposed to different interleaved or shuffled concepts, rather than blocked (Rohrer, 2012). In a study session, a student might feel that he had a more difficult time studying due to interleaving. But, in the long-term, he would end up learning better through interleaving.
Cognitive psychologists suggest that one shouldn't study a single topic, idea, or similar type of problem for too long. It is recommended to change the topic often. Interleaving may seem more difficult than studying a single topic for a long time, but it is more beneficial in the long run (Kornell & Bjork, 2013).

Students with sen may require additional support when implementing interleaving strategies, as maintaining attention across multiple topics can be challenging. Bjork R & Bjork E (2011) assessed the impact of adding twotopics can be challenging. Bjork R & Bjork E (2011) assessed the impact of adding two or more concepts together, to see if that could lead to improved learning outcomes. In their study, they found that interleaving can improve learning outcomes, especially when the concepts are related to each other.
To effectively use interleaving in the classroom, consider these strategies:
Interleaving helps learners engage actively with content. It also helps them connect different ideas (Rohrer, 2012). Learners build stronger, longer-lasting understanding (Brown et al., 2014; Weinstein et al., 2018).
Interleaved practice needs planning to improve learners' problem type recognition. Choose 2-3 related concepts learners confuse, like area/perimeter/volume. Pick topics with surface similarities needing different solutions (Rohrer, 2009; Kornell & Bjork, 2008; Taylor & Rohrer, 2010).
Structure your practise sessions using 10-15 minute cycles where you rotate between concepts rather than spending entire lessons on single topics. For example, in a 45-minute maths lesson, spend 15 minutes on solving equations, switch to interpreting graphs for 15 minutes, then move to probability problems. Within each segment, present 3-4 problems before switching. This timing prevents cognitive overload whilst ensuring students experience enough examples to recognise patterns and differences between problem types.
When designing mixed practise homework, create worksheets that randomly distribute different question types rather than grouping them by concept. Include a brief recap section where students must identify which strategy to use before solving. For instance, a science homework might include questions on photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration mixed throughout the worksheet, forcing students to actively decide which biological process each question addresses rather than simply following a repetitive pattern.
Interleaving creates significant challenges for working memory because students must constantly switch between different cognitive strategies and hold multiple problem-solving approaches in their minds simultaneously. Unlike blocked practise, where students can rely on recent examples and maintain the same mental approach, interleaving forces the brain to actively retrieve and apply different strategies for each new problem. This creates interference effects that make learning feel more difficult and less fluent, even though it actually strengthens long-term retention.
Students often report feeling less confident about their learning during interleaved practise because they make more mistakes and need to think harder about each problem. Teacher Shannon Payette observed that her learners initially complained when she introduced mixed practise sessions, saying they felt 'confused' and preferred working through similar problems in sequence. This reaction occurs because interleaved practise prevents students from falling into automatic routines, forcing them to engage in deeper processing and actively discriminate between different problem types.
The perceived difficulty stems from what researchers call the difficulty paradox, whilst blocked practise feels easier and creates an illusion of learning, interleaved practise requires more mental effort but produces superior long-term results. Students need explicit explanation about why this approach feels challenging. Teacher Kim Kelly found success by explaining to her Year 8 students that 'feeling confused means your brain is working harder to make stronger connections', helping them understand that the temporary discomfort signals effective learning rather than poor teaching or their own inadequacy.
Teachers often interleave too many ideas, which overwhelms learners. New teachers might mix 4-5 topics, exceeding working memory (Sweller, 1988). Start with 2 ideas, adding a third later. Ensure interleaved topics are similar enough to cause confusion (Rohrer, 2007; Taylor & Rohrer, 2016).
Teachers sometimes don't scaffold interleaved practice well enough. They skip vital support (Rohrer, 2007). Begin with small interleaved sections inside mainly blocked lessons. Model strategy choices (Weinstein et al., 2018). Give learners strategy cards while they learn. Observations show learners need 3-4 guided sessions before independent work (Agarwal & Roediger, 2018).
Teachers must balance challenge and learner overwhelm. Interleaving is harder than blocked practice, but struggling learners need support. Watch learner responses closely; effort and errors are fine. If accuracy drops below 60-70%, reduce interleaved concepts. Offer more worked examples, or use blocked practice. Interleaving works best after learners understand each concept (Rohrer, 2012).
These practical steps show teachers how to implement interleaving effectively across different subjects and year groups.
In a Year 8 English lesson, Mrs. Thompson alternates between persuasive writing techniques, grammar revision, and poetry analysis every 15 minutes. Students initially feel confused switching between metaphors, semicolons, and persuasive language, but by half-term, they demonstrate stronger retention and can identify these elements more accurately in unseen texts compared to her previous classes who studied each topic in separate week-long blocks.
| Aspect | Blocked Practise | Interleaved Practise |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Practise one skill repeatedly before moving to the next (AAABBBCCC) | Mix different skills within a single practise session (ABCABCABC) |
| Initial Performance | Higher during practise (feels easier) | Lower during practise (feels harder) |
| Long-Term Retention | Lower (rapid forgetting) | Higher (durable learning) |
| Transfer to New Contexts | Limited transfer ability | Superior transfer to novel problems |
| Discrimination Skills | Minimal discrimination practise | Builds strong discrimination between concepts |
| Cognitive Load | Lower during practise | Higher (desirable difficulty) |
| Student Perception | Often preferred (feels more productive) | Often resisted initially (feels harder) |
| Best For | Initial skill acquisition, complete beginners | Consolidation, exam preparation, application |
Interleaved practice improves long-term retention, say research findings. Learners may perform worse during practice (Bjork, 1994). This difference shows a valuable learning challenge. (Bjork & Bjork, 2011) call it a "desirable difficulty."
Interleaved practice activities, based on evidence, help learners improve discrimination skills. Use them to counter the illusion of competence that blocked practice causes. (Rohrer, 2012; Taylor & Rohrer, 2010)
Start implementing interleaving gradually by mixing just two or three topics initially. Explain to students why practise feels harder but produces better results, understanding the science helps them persist through the desirable difficulty of interleaved practise.
Interleaving is a learning technique where students mix multiple topics or subjects during study sessions rather than focusing on one topic at a time. For example, instead of spending an entire period on fractions, a teacher might alternate between fractions, decimals, and percentages within the same lesson. This approach strengthens long-term retention and improves students' ability to distinguish between different problem types.
Start by breaking your lesson into small pieces and cycling through related topics instead of teaching one topic for extended periods. Spend time explaining one concept, then move to another topic before returning to the original concept later in the lesson. This process should repeat throughout the course, giving students multiple chances to understand and apply the material in different contexts.
Interleaving strengthens long-term retention and improves students' problem-solving and categorisation skills. Research by organisations like the Chartered College of Teaching shows it enhances the brain's ability to discriminate between concepts and creates stronger memory associations. Students also develop better transfer of knowledge, meaning they can apply what they've learned to new situations more effectively.
Interleaving works particularly well for subjects that require deep understanding, such as mathematics, algebra, or calculus where students need to distinguish between different problem types. It's also effective in subjects like geography where students can alternate between related concepts such as pollution effects and energy supply improvements. However, it may be less suitable for subjects taught in small, discrete chunks like basic vocabulary or reading comprehension.
Students find interleaving more challenging because it forces them to constantly retrieve and apply different strategies, which requires more mental effort than practising one skill repeatedly. While blocked practise feels easier and shows immediate gains, the difficulty students experience during interleaving actually signals that deeper learning is occurring. This creates what experts call the "difficulty paradox", where the harder method produces better long-term results.
Look for improved performance on assessments that require students to identify problem types or apply knowledge to new situations, rather than just repeat practised procedures. Students should demonstrate better long-term retention when topics are revisited weeks or months later. You may notice that whilst students initially struggle more during lessons, their ability to transfer knowledge and solve unfamiliar problems gradually improves over time.
Interleaving beats blocked practice for long-term retention, say researchers (e.g., Kang, 2016). Learners may find it harder at first. This struggle promotes deeper thinking and strengthens memory (Bjork, 1994). Teachers can mix topics to improve learning (Rohrer, 2012).
Embracing interleaving requires a shift in mindset, both for educators and learners. It necessitates a move away from the comfort of concentrated study blocks towards a more active and interconnected approach. As research continues to validate the benefits of interleaving, its integration into educational settings promises to equip students with the skills and knowledge necessary to thrive in an increasingly complex world. The ability to connect disparate ideas, apply knowledge flexibly, and retain information over time are invaluable assets that interleaving helps to cultivate.
Spacing and interleaving effects
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/interleaving-a-teachers-guide#article","headline":"Interleaving: Why Mixing Topics Produces Stronger","description":"Interleaving mixes related topics within practice sessions instead of blocking them. Research shows this produces 43% better retention on delayed tests.","datePublished":"2021-11-04T16:02:38.051Z","dateModified":"2026-03-02T11:01:41.863Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/interleaving-a-teachers-guide"},"image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409501de055d1/69a2d4d4b5de00bd67f1f859_69a2d4d123355fdf1057d154_blocked-vs-interleaved-nb2-infographic.webp","wordCount":3596},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/interleaving-a-teachers-guide#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Interleaving: Why Mixing Topics Produces Stronger","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/interleaving-a-teachers-guide"}]}]}