Updated on
April 24, 2026
Team Teaching: A Teacher's Guide
Discover how team teaching transforms classroom practice through effective collaboration, accelerates professional development.


Updated on
April 24, 2026
Discover how team teaching transforms classroom practice through effective collaboration, accelerates professional development.
As the name suggests, team teaching indicates a group of educators, teaching in a team. It may be comprised of 2 to 5 teachers who will prepare individual lesson plans and teach a topic, using the same activities and resources to the same group of students. It is also called 'shared teaching' or 'co-teaching'. Team teaching is most beneficial when educators are collaborating effectively with one another, using dialogic approaches and share a common purpose.
Teaming an experienced teacher up with an early career member of staff certainly brings with it some distinct advantages such as being able to elaborate on the thought process when certain decisions are made, including demonstrating effective scaffolding approaches. This sort of modelling enables newly qualified teachers to get the inside picture of how an expert member of staff approaches certain tasks and monitors learner progress. These sorts of competencies can remain hidden away from the rest of the education co mmunity.

We have been utilising team teaching for creating inclusive classrooms that build students' cultural capital. When staffing timetables allow it, we are encouraging our partner schools to facilitate their action researchprojects in the presence of their colleagues. We have found that together, these teams develop much more objective observations.

This systems approach has helped our community of teachers who are utilising their new classroom resources to understand their student's needs in greater detail. This does however require more time, a luxury that many schools don't have but when they do, we think the benefits of facilitating together are really powerful. Many schools make the best use of their teaching assistants in this way. This guide will provide an outline of how schools can go about incorporating this type of instructional practice alongside other effective teaching strategies as part of a professional learning agenda. See also: Cooperative learning.
There are many benefits of this approach to instructional practice. Classrooms can be lonely places for early career teachers. The following are some of the main objectives of team teaching:
1. To improve the quality of teaching;
2. To modify the classroom teaching according to the abilities and interests of the students;
3. To best utilise the teaching style, interests and expertise of teachers in the teacher's community.
Below are the main characteristics of Team-Teaching:

In the field of education, team teaching is a powerful tool that can significantly enhance the learning environment. Here are nine creative ways that schools can use team teaching to advance teacher knowledge, improve outcomes, and develop new skills:

Team teaching lets schools improve learning and boost teacher skills. Subject integration, like lesson study, helps. Teachers link different subjects to show learners real-world connections. For instance, an English teacher and a history teacher could team up (e.g., Lewis, 2002; Murata, 2011) to explore historical fiction.
Differentiated instruction supports learners with two teachers in class. One teacher helps learners needing support while another challenges advanced learners. Team teaching aids special educational needs, allowing subject specialists to work with SEN coordinators for inclusive environments.
Large group teaching works well for lectures (Vygotsky, 1978). One teacher leads; another manages learners (Bandura, 1977). Schools use team teaching for development. Experienced teachers guide newer staff (Shulman, 1986). This boosts knowledge in real classrooms (Dewey, 1938).
Research shows team teaching involves educators sharing responsibilities (Littleton & Mercer, 2013). Teachers plan, deliver, and assess learners together in the same space. This method needs teachers to blend expertise and teaching styles for better learning (Vygotsky, 1978).
Team teaching includes co-teaching, parallel teaching, and station teaching. Friend's research shows team teaching boosts learner engagement and success. Teachers who use each other's strengths and target specific learning needs see improved outcomes (Friend, n.d.).
Team teaching works best with good planning and shared ideas (Cook & Friend, 1995). Teachers should agree roles, talk often, and plan assessments together (Villa et al., 2005). This helps learners in inclusive classes, using everyone's skills well (Idol, 2006). It also saves time and resources (Murawski & Hughes, 2009).
Team teaching helps learners and teachers with combined instructor skills. Learners gain more from varied teaching styles, views, and expertise (Cook & Friend). Collaborative teaching aids learners with diverse needs, research shows. Teachers support different levels and keep the class involved (Cook & Friend).
Team teaching helps teachers learn and grow professionally. Teachers see colleagues teach, boosting their skills through shared work (Vygotsky). This helps teachers develop beyond their own abilities via peer support and modelling (Vygotsky, date unspecified).
Classroom management benefits from extra support. Flexible groups happen easily with multiple staff. Teachers quickly help struggling learners and extend advanced learners (Vygotsky, 1978). This reduces teacher workload and boosts lesson response. Active learning meets diverse needs well (Tomlinson, 2014).
Team teaching uses different models for diverse aims. Co-teaching means two teachers share instruction. Parallel teaching divides learners into smaller groups, taught separately. Station teaching rotates learners through centres managed by team members. (Friend, 2008; Cook & Friend, 1995; Villa, Thousand & Nevin, 2004)
Friend's research shows co-teaching helps learners with diverse needs in inclusive classrooms. Parallel teaching, a temporary class size reduction, boosts focused instruction. Station teaching lets teachers deliver specialist content and keep learners engaged (Friend, date).
Consider learners' needs, resources, and curriculum when choosing a model. Start co-teaching to build team collaboration. Introduce parallel or station teaching as confidence grows. Define roles, plan together, and reflect on learner progress for effective teaching.
Team teaching success requires avoiding common pitfalls. Time limits are a big issue: teachers need time to plan lessons together (Little, 1990). Schools should change timetables for planning time (Rice, 2003). Ensure this change doesn't hurt other learners’ work (Friend & Cook, 2010).
Cook and Friend's research stresses defining roles early in partnerships. This prevents disagreements on curriculum or classroom management. Regular meetings must have plans for handling disagreements well. Focus on learner results, not personal preferences.
Good support helps with resource issues. Headteachers must provide spaces, resources, and training. Formal criteria for team teaching show its value (Fisher & Frey, 2013). Mentors for new team teachers aid knowledge sharing and build collaboration (Hattie, 2015; Timperley, 2011).
Team teaching, often called co-teaching or shared teaching, involves two or more educators working together to lead the same group of learners. These teachers collaborate on lesson planning, delivery, and assessment within a single classroom environment. This approach relies on a shared responsibility for learner progress rather than one teacher holding the entire workload alone.
Teachers can use several structures, such as parallel teaching where the class is split into two smaller groups. Another common method is station teaching, where learners rotate through different activities led by individual members of the team. Successful implementation requires dedicated time for joint planning and clear communication about specific roles before the lesson begins.
This approach allows for more targeted instruction and smaller group sizes, which helps teachers meet individual needs. It provides learners with different perspectives and teaching styles, making the learning environment more active. Evidence suggests that having two professionals in the room improves the quality of feedback and support given to every child.
Studies often highlight that team teaching can lead to an improvement in learner outcomes of around 15 percent when implemented with a clear purpose. Research shows that pairing experienced staff with early career teachers reveals hidden skills and speeds up professional development through live modelling. The success of this model depends heavily on the quality of the collaboration between staff members.
A frequent error is failing to plan the specific roles of each teacher, which can lead to confusion for the learners. Some teams fall into a pattern where one person leads the lesson while the other does not actively contribute to the instruction. Schools must avoid using team teaching as a tool for managing behaviour without focusing on the specific academic objectives of the session.
Parallel teaching works well with big classes, lowering ratios. Alternative teaching lets one teacher support a few learners while another teaches most (Friend et al., 2021). This personalises learning, even when classrooms are busy (Cook & Friend, 1995).
Team teaching needs careful planning with set roles (Friend & Cook). Teachers must share goals and teaching approaches. Discuss how each educator will help the learner. Plan activities together to use everyone’s strengths.
Planning needs three key areas: teaching methods, classroom rules, and assessment. Teachers choose teaching styles and transition signals. Villa, Thousand, and Nevin (dates not included) found planned physical positioning improves learner engagement. Smooth lessons reduce confusion.
Shared documents detail teacher roles, resources, and backup plans. These plans should include timings, differentiation, and agreed behaviour strategies. Consistent teaching helps learners regardless of which teacher leads (DuFour & Fullan, 2013).
Download this free Pedagogy, Teaching Practice & Learning Design resource pack for your classroom and staff room. Includes printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials.
These studies provide deeper insights into team teaching approaches and collaborative instruction.
Co-Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research View study ↗ 886 citations
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A. and McDuffie, K. A. (2007)
Co-teaching often uses "one teach, one assist" (Cook & Friend, 1995). Collaborative models achieve improved results, research shows (Murawski & Swanson, 2001). Planning time, similar beliefs and school support are vital (Idol, 2006; Friend, 2008). Schools should schedule co-planning and offer training on teamwork ( कंडा & Villa, 2018).
A Guide to Co-Teaching: New Lessons and Strategies to Improve Student Learning View study ↗ 3 citations
Villa, R. A., Thousand, J. S. and Nevin, A. I. (2013)
Villa et al. (2004) list six co-teaching methods. These include one teach/one observe and parallel teaching. Research shows flexible use of several approaches works best. Teachers should choose a model fitting the lesson’s aims.
The Effectiveness of Co-Teaching: A Review of the Literature View study ↗ 16 citations
Murawski, W. W. and Swanson, H. L. (2001)
Murawski and Swanson's review examines the evidence for co-teaching's impact on student achievement, finding modest but positive effects. The research notes that effect sizes increase when co-teachers move beyond the "one teach, one assist" model to genuinely shared instruction. For schools, this means that investment in developing collaborative teaching skills produces better returns than simply placing two teachers in the same classroom.
Professional Learning Communities and Teacher Collaboration View study ↗ 60 citations
DuFour, R. (2004)
DuFour's framework places team work in teacher professional learning communities. Research shows planned collaboration boosts outcomes (DuFour, 2004). Schools improve with shared planning, observation, and data analysis. Team teaching, requiring shared goals and reflection, is intensive collaboration.
Collaborative Teaching: Benefits and Challenges View study ↗ 1 citations
Bacharach, N., Heck, T. W. and Dahlberg, K. (2010)
Team teaching has benefits and challenges, say teachers, learners, and leaders. Benefits are: teaching tailored to needs, smaller class sizes, and shared learning (Littleton & Mercer, 2013). Challenges include scheduling, personality clashes, and unfair workloads (Vangrieken et al., 2015). Schools can use strategies to boost benefits while managing practical issues (Hattie, 2012).