GROW Model for Coaching
Explore the GROW Model for Coaching, a structured framework enhancing goal-setting, problem-solving, and personal development in various fields.


The GROW Model is a widely used coaching method that provides a simple yet effective framework for guiding individuals towards achieving their goals. It is commonly used by managers, executives, and industry leaders to enhance performance and facilitate personal and professional development.
The GROW Model was introduced by Sir John Whitmore, a renowned executive coach and author, in the 1980s. It stands for Goal, Reality, Options, and Way Forward. The model follows a structured approach to coaching sessions, with each stage representing a key component of the coaching conversation.

During the coaching session, the coach helps the individual identify their specific goal or desired outcome. This sets the foundation for the coaching process. The next stage involves exploring the individual's current reality, which involves understanding where they are currently and what factors are affecting their progress. This step allows for a comprehensive assessment of the individual's situation.
Once the reality is established, the coach assists the individual in generating various options for moving forward. This encourages creative thinking skill development and helps the individual consider alternative approaches or solutions. Finally, the coach helps the individual establish a clear action plan or way forward, outlining specific steps and milestones to achieve their goal.
The GROW Model has gained considerable popularity due to its simplicity and practicality. It provides coaches with a clear structure and allows for a focused and productive coaching conversation. Moreover, the model can be easily adapted to different contexts and situations, making it a versatile tool for leadership development and personal growth.
the GROW Model is a powerful coaching method that facilitates goal attainment and creates personal and professional development. Its structured approach and flexibility have made it one of the most popular coaching models used by managers, executives, and industry leaders.
The model's strength lies in its structured yet flexible approach to developmental conversations. Unlike traditional directive teaching methods, GROW positions the educator as a facilitator who guides students to discover their own solutions and pathways forward. This approach builds critical thinking skills and personal ownership of learning outcomes.
Developed originally for workplace coaching, the GROW model has found particular relevance in educational settings because it mirrors the natural learning process. Students move from identifying what they want to achieve, through honest self-assessment, to creative problem-solving, and finally to committed action. Research by educational psychologist Carol Dweck demonstrates that this process of guided self-discovery helps develop the growth mindset essential for lifelong learning.
What makes GROW particularly effective in education is its non-judgmental framework that encourages honest reflection without fear of failure. For instance, when a student struggles with time management, rather than simply providing a ready-made study schedule, the educator might ask: "What does successful time management look like for you?" This questioning technique helps students identify their own definition of success whilst developing self-awareness. The practical framework transforms challenging conversations into opportunities for student development, whether addressing academic difficulties, career planning, or personal growth challenges that affect learning outcomes.
The GROW Model is a structured coaching framework that stands for Goal, Reality, Options, and Way Forward, developed by Sir John Whitmore in the 1980s. It provides coaches with a systematic approach to guide individuals through identifying objectives, assessing their current situation, exploring possibilities, and creating actionable plans. This four-stage process helps managers and leaders facilitate meaningful conversations that lead to personal and professional development.
The GROW Model Coaching Framework consists of four main steps: Goals, Reality, Options, and Will.

The first step, Goals, involves identifying the specific goal or desired outcome that the individual wants to achieve. This sets the direction for the coaching process and gives it a clear focus. By defining the goal, the individual gains clarity and motivation.
Next is the Reality step, where the individual explores their current reality. This involves analysing their current situation, understanding the factors influencing their progress, and assessing any barriers or challenges. It provides a comprehensive perspective on where they currently stand.
In the Options step, the coach helps the individual generate various possible solutions or approaches to achieve their goal. This encourages creative thinking, expands the individual's perspective, and allows for exploration of different paths.
Finally, the Will step involves creating a concrete action plan. The coach helps the individual establish specific steps, milestones, and timelines to move forward towards their goal. It ensures that the individual is committed and accountable for taking action.

Each component of GROW serves a distinct psychological purpose in the coaching relationship. The Goal phase activates the student's intrinsic motivation by connecting the conversation to their personal aspirations. Reality checking prevents the common educational pitfall of moving to solutions before properly understanding the current situation. This phase often reveals assumptions or knowledge gaps that need addressing.
The framework's sequential nature isn't rigid - skilled educators often cycle between components as new insights emerge. For instance, exploring options might reveal that the original goal needs refinement, or examining reality might uncover additional goals worth pursuing. This flexibility makes GROW particularly suitable for the complex, evolving nature of student development conversations.
In educational settings, the psychological safety created by this structured approach proves invaluable. Students feel heard during the Reality phase, helped during Options, and accountable during Way forward. This progression mirrors natural problem-solving processes whilst ensuring nothing crucial gets overlooked. The framework also prevents educators from jumping straight to advice-giving, instead developing genuine dialogue where students develop their own solutions and build confidence in their decision-making abilities.
During the Options stage, coaches use open-ended questions to help individuals brainstorm multiple solutions without judgment, encouraging creative thinking beyond their usual patterns. Effective techniques include asking 'What else could you do?' and 'If you had unlimited resources, what would you try?' to expand thinking. This stage deliberately separates idea generation from evaluation to overcome cognitive biases and discover effective approaches.
Within the GROW Model coaching framework, there are various strategies and choices that can be utilised to address specific challenges or goals. These strategies and choices help individuals gain clarity, explore possibilities, and take actionable steps towards their desired outcome.
In the Goals stage, strategies such as goal setting, visioning, and creating SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goals can be employed. By setting clear and specific goals, individuals are able to focus their efforts and maintain engagement throughout the coaching process.
During the Reality stage, strategies like self-reflection and assessment can be used. Effective questioning techniques help individuals explore their current situation thoroughly. This might involve examining past experiences, identifying patterns, and understanding the resources available. The coach provides supportive feedback to help deepen this self-awareness process.
The Options stage benefits from brainstorming techniques and creative problem-solving approaches. Coaches might also draw on emotional intelligence principles to help individuals consider how different options align with their values and feelings.
For educators using this model, understanding coaching and leadership styles is essential, particularly when working with students who have special educational needs. The model can also be integrated with lesson observations and feedback processes to create comprehensive development opportunities.
The goal-setting phase of the GROW model establishes the destination for your coaching conversation, transforming vague aspirations into concrete, actionable targets. Effective goals in educational settings must be specific and measurable, allowing both educator and student to recognise progress and celebrate achievements. Rather than accepting "I want to get better at maths," guide students towards precision: "I will complete five algebraic equations correctly in ten minutes by Friday." This specificity aligns with Edwin Locke's goal-setting theory, which demonstrates that challenging, specific goals lead to higher performance than vague intentions.
When facilitating goal-setting conversations, ensure goals are student-owned rather than imposed. Ask open questions like "What would success look like to you?" or "How will you know you've achieved this?" This approach creates intrinsic motivation and personal accountability. Additionally, effective educational goals should stretch students appropriately, sitting in what Vygotsky termed the zone of proximal development, challenging enough to promote growth yet achievable with support.
In practice, encourage students to articulate both outcome goals and process goals. Whilst "achieving a B grade in my history essay" provides clear direction, pairing it with "I will spend 30 minutes researching primary sources each evening" creates actionable steps. This dual approach ensures students understand both their destination and their journey, establishing a solid foundation for the remaining stages of the GROW framework.
The Reality phase represents a critical juncture in coaching conversations where students develop an honest understanding of their current circumstances. Research by Carol Dweck on mindset theory demonstrates that students who accurately assess their present situation are better positioned to develop effective growth strategies. This phase requires skilled questioning to help students move beyond surface-level descriptions and explore the deeper factors influencing their academic performance, behaviour, or personal development challenges.
Effective reality exploration involves asking specific, non-judgmental questions that encourage self-reflection rather than defensive responses. Questions such as "What have you tried so far?" or "How do others see this situation?" help students examine their circumstances from multiple perspectives. Tim Gallwey's work on performance coaching emphasises that awareness precedes change, making this honest self-assessment essential for meaningful progress in educational settings.
In practice, educators should create a safe environment where students feel comfortable acknowledging both strengths and areas for improvement. Use active listening techniques and avoid immediately offering solutions, allowing students to fully articulate their current reality. This structured approach ensures that subsequent goal-setting and action planning are grounded in accurate self-awareness rather than wishful thinking or incomplete understanding of the situation.
The final stage of the GROW model transforms coaching conversations from exploration into concrete action. Will and Way Forward focuses on securing genuine commitment from students whilst establishing clear, achievable steps towards their goals. This phase requires skilful questioning that moves beyond surface-level agreement to deep personal ownership of the proposed actions.
Effective will-building involves exploring potential obstacles and resistance honestly. Ask questions such as "What might prevent you from following through?" or "On a scale of 1-10, how committed do you feel to this plan?" Research by Carol Dweck on growth mindset emphasises that students who anticipate challenges are more likely to persist when difficulties arise. Help students identify specific strategies for overcoming anticipated barriers.
The way forward must be concrete and measurable. Rather than vague commitments like "I'll try harder," guide students towards specific actions: "I'll complete one maths problem set each evening before dinner this week." Schedule follow-up conversations to review progress, celebrating successes and adjusting plans as needed. This structured approach ensures coaching conversations translate into meaningful behavioural change and sustained student development.
Implementing the GROW model in educational settings requires careful adaptation to suit the unique dynamics of student-teacher relationships and classroom environments. Unlike traditional corporate coaching contexts, educational applications must account for power imbalances, developmental stages, and the inherently evaluative nature of academic environments. Successful implementation begins with creating psychological safety, where students feel comfortable exploring their challenges without fear of immediate judgement or assessment.
The most effective educational applications occur during one-to-one student conferences, mentoring sessions, or structured peer coaching activities. Teachers can integrate GROW into regular progress reviews by beginning with goal-setting conversations that connect to students' personal aspirations, then exploring current reality through reflective questioning rather than diagnostic testing. John Hattie's research on feedback effectiveness supports this approach, demonstrating that students learn more when they actively participate in identifying gaps between current and desired performance.
Practical classroom implementation involves teaching students the GROW framework explicitly, enabling them to conduct self-coaching and peer support sessions. Consider establishing "coaching corners" where students can work through academic or personal challenges using structured GROW conversations. This approach develops metacognitive skills whilst reducing teacher workload, as students become more autonomous in problem-solving and goal achievement.
One of the most frequent mistakes educators make when implementing the GROW model is rushing through the Goal-setting phase, often accepting vague aspirations like "I want to get better at maths" without proper exploration. This surface-level approach undermines the entire coaching conversation, as unclear goals lead to unfocused discussions and weak accountability. Effective goal-setting requires patience and skilled questioning to help students articulate specific, meaningful objectives that connect to their deeper motivations and circumstances.
Another common pitfall occurs during the Reality phase, where educators inadvertently slip into advice-giving or problem-solving mode rather than maintaining their coaching stance. John Whitmore's research emphasises that premature solutions prevent students from developing their own insights and ownership. When teachers jump to conclusions or offer quick fixes, they rob students of the critical thinking process that builds genuine capability and confidence.
In educational settings, time pressure often leads practitioners to abbreviate or skip the Options phase entirely, moving directly from identifying challenges to prescriptive actions. However, this approach significantly reduces student engagement and creative problem-solving opportunities. Allowing adequate time for students to generate multiple possibilities not only improves solution quality but also develops their analytical skills and sense of agency in addressing future challenges independently.
The GROW Model is a widely used coaching method that provides a simple yet effective framework for guiding individuals towards achieving their goals. It is commonly used by managers, executives, and industry leaders to enhance performance and facilitate personal and professional development.
The GROW Model was introduced by Sir John Whitmore, a renowned executive coach and author, in the 1980s. It stands for Goal, Reality, Options, and Way Forward. The model follows a structured approach to coaching sessions, with each stage representing a key component of the coaching conversation.

During the coaching session, the coach helps the individual identify their specific goal or desired outcome. This sets the foundation for the coaching process. The next stage involves exploring the individual's current reality, which involves understanding where they are currently and what factors are affecting their progress. This step allows for a comprehensive assessment of the individual's situation.
Once the reality is established, the coach assists the individual in generating various options for moving forward. This encourages creative thinking skill development and helps the individual consider alternative approaches or solutions. Finally, the coach helps the individual establish a clear action plan or way forward, outlining specific steps and milestones to achieve their goal.
The GROW Model has gained considerable popularity due to its simplicity and practicality. It provides coaches with a clear structure and allows for a focused and productive coaching conversation. Moreover, the model can be easily adapted to different contexts and situations, making it a versatile tool for leadership development and personal growth.
the GROW Model is a powerful coaching method that facilitates goal attainment and creates personal and professional development. Its structured approach and flexibility have made it one of the most popular coaching models used by managers, executives, and industry leaders.
The model's strength lies in its structured yet flexible approach to developmental conversations. Unlike traditional directive teaching methods, GROW positions the educator as a facilitator who guides students to discover their own solutions and pathways forward. This approach builds critical thinking skills and personal ownership of learning outcomes.
Developed originally for workplace coaching, the GROW model has found particular relevance in educational settings because it mirrors the natural learning process. Students move from identifying what they want to achieve, through honest self-assessment, to creative problem-solving, and finally to committed action. Research by educational psychologist Carol Dweck demonstrates that this process of guided self-discovery helps develop the growth mindset essential for lifelong learning.
What makes GROW particularly effective in education is its non-judgmental framework that encourages honest reflection without fear of failure. For instance, when a student struggles with time management, rather than simply providing a ready-made study schedule, the educator might ask: "What does successful time management look like for you?" This questioning technique helps students identify their own definition of success whilst developing self-awareness. The practical framework transforms challenging conversations into opportunities for student development, whether addressing academic difficulties, career planning, or personal growth challenges that affect learning outcomes.
The GROW Model is a structured coaching framework that stands for Goal, Reality, Options, and Way Forward, developed by Sir John Whitmore in the 1980s. It provides coaches with a systematic approach to guide individuals through identifying objectives, assessing their current situation, exploring possibilities, and creating actionable plans. This four-stage process helps managers and leaders facilitate meaningful conversations that lead to personal and professional development.
The GROW Model Coaching Framework consists of four main steps: Goals, Reality, Options, and Will.

The first step, Goals, involves identifying the specific goal or desired outcome that the individual wants to achieve. This sets the direction for the coaching process and gives it a clear focus. By defining the goal, the individual gains clarity and motivation.
Next is the Reality step, where the individual explores their current reality. This involves analysing their current situation, understanding the factors influencing their progress, and assessing any barriers or challenges. It provides a comprehensive perspective on where they currently stand.
In the Options step, the coach helps the individual generate various possible solutions or approaches to achieve their goal. This encourages creative thinking, expands the individual's perspective, and allows for exploration of different paths.
Finally, the Will step involves creating a concrete action plan. The coach helps the individual establish specific steps, milestones, and timelines to move forward towards their goal. It ensures that the individual is committed and accountable for taking action.

Each component of GROW serves a distinct psychological purpose in the coaching relationship. The Goal phase activates the student's intrinsic motivation by connecting the conversation to their personal aspirations. Reality checking prevents the common educational pitfall of moving to solutions before properly understanding the current situation. This phase often reveals assumptions or knowledge gaps that need addressing.
The framework's sequential nature isn't rigid - skilled educators often cycle between components as new insights emerge. For instance, exploring options might reveal that the original goal needs refinement, or examining reality might uncover additional goals worth pursuing. This flexibility makes GROW particularly suitable for the complex, evolving nature of student development conversations.
In educational settings, the psychological safety created by this structured approach proves invaluable. Students feel heard during the Reality phase, helped during Options, and accountable during Way forward. This progression mirrors natural problem-solving processes whilst ensuring nothing crucial gets overlooked. The framework also prevents educators from jumping straight to advice-giving, instead developing genuine dialogue where students develop their own solutions and build confidence in their decision-making abilities.
During the Options stage, coaches use open-ended questions to help individuals brainstorm multiple solutions without judgment, encouraging creative thinking beyond their usual patterns. Effective techniques include asking 'What else could you do?' and 'If you had unlimited resources, what would you try?' to expand thinking. This stage deliberately separates idea generation from evaluation to overcome cognitive biases and discover effective approaches.
Within the GROW Model coaching framework, there are various strategies and choices that can be utilised to address specific challenges or goals. These strategies and choices help individuals gain clarity, explore possibilities, and take actionable steps towards their desired outcome.
In the Goals stage, strategies such as goal setting, visioning, and creating SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goals can be employed. By setting clear and specific goals, individuals are able to focus their efforts and maintain engagement throughout the coaching process.
During the Reality stage, strategies like self-reflection and assessment can be used. Effective questioning techniques help individuals explore their current situation thoroughly. This might involve examining past experiences, identifying patterns, and understanding the resources available. The coach provides supportive feedback to help deepen this self-awareness process.
The Options stage benefits from brainstorming techniques and creative problem-solving approaches. Coaches might also draw on emotional intelligence principles to help individuals consider how different options align with their values and feelings.
For educators using this model, understanding coaching and leadership styles is essential, particularly when working with students who have special educational needs. The model can also be integrated with lesson observations and feedback processes to create comprehensive development opportunities.
The goal-setting phase of the GROW model establishes the destination for your coaching conversation, transforming vague aspirations into concrete, actionable targets. Effective goals in educational settings must be specific and measurable, allowing both educator and student to recognise progress and celebrate achievements. Rather than accepting "I want to get better at maths," guide students towards precision: "I will complete five algebraic equations correctly in ten minutes by Friday." This specificity aligns with Edwin Locke's goal-setting theory, which demonstrates that challenging, specific goals lead to higher performance than vague intentions.
When facilitating goal-setting conversations, ensure goals are student-owned rather than imposed. Ask open questions like "What would success look like to you?" or "How will you know you've achieved this?" This approach creates intrinsic motivation and personal accountability. Additionally, effective educational goals should stretch students appropriately, sitting in what Vygotsky termed the zone of proximal development, challenging enough to promote growth yet achievable with support.
In practice, encourage students to articulate both outcome goals and process goals. Whilst "achieving a B grade in my history essay" provides clear direction, pairing it with "I will spend 30 minutes researching primary sources each evening" creates actionable steps. This dual approach ensures students understand both their destination and their journey, establishing a solid foundation for the remaining stages of the GROW framework.
The Reality phase represents a critical juncture in coaching conversations where students develop an honest understanding of their current circumstances. Research by Carol Dweck on mindset theory demonstrates that students who accurately assess their present situation are better positioned to develop effective growth strategies. This phase requires skilled questioning to help students move beyond surface-level descriptions and explore the deeper factors influencing their academic performance, behaviour, or personal development challenges.
Effective reality exploration involves asking specific, non-judgmental questions that encourage self-reflection rather than defensive responses. Questions such as "What have you tried so far?" or "How do others see this situation?" help students examine their circumstances from multiple perspectives. Tim Gallwey's work on performance coaching emphasises that awareness precedes change, making this honest self-assessment essential for meaningful progress in educational settings.
In practice, educators should create a safe environment where students feel comfortable acknowledging both strengths and areas for improvement. Use active listening techniques and avoid immediately offering solutions, allowing students to fully articulate their current reality. This structured approach ensures that subsequent goal-setting and action planning are grounded in accurate self-awareness rather than wishful thinking or incomplete understanding of the situation.
The final stage of the GROW model transforms coaching conversations from exploration into concrete action. Will and Way Forward focuses on securing genuine commitment from students whilst establishing clear, achievable steps towards their goals. This phase requires skilful questioning that moves beyond surface-level agreement to deep personal ownership of the proposed actions.
Effective will-building involves exploring potential obstacles and resistance honestly. Ask questions such as "What might prevent you from following through?" or "On a scale of 1-10, how committed do you feel to this plan?" Research by Carol Dweck on growth mindset emphasises that students who anticipate challenges are more likely to persist when difficulties arise. Help students identify specific strategies for overcoming anticipated barriers.
The way forward must be concrete and measurable. Rather than vague commitments like "I'll try harder," guide students towards specific actions: "I'll complete one maths problem set each evening before dinner this week." Schedule follow-up conversations to review progress, celebrating successes and adjusting plans as needed. This structured approach ensures coaching conversations translate into meaningful behavioural change and sustained student development.
Implementing the GROW model in educational settings requires careful adaptation to suit the unique dynamics of student-teacher relationships and classroom environments. Unlike traditional corporate coaching contexts, educational applications must account for power imbalances, developmental stages, and the inherently evaluative nature of academic environments. Successful implementation begins with creating psychological safety, where students feel comfortable exploring their challenges without fear of immediate judgement or assessment.
The most effective educational applications occur during one-to-one student conferences, mentoring sessions, or structured peer coaching activities. Teachers can integrate GROW into regular progress reviews by beginning with goal-setting conversations that connect to students' personal aspirations, then exploring current reality through reflective questioning rather than diagnostic testing. John Hattie's research on feedback effectiveness supports this approach, demonstrating that students learn more when they actively participate in identifying gaps between current and desired performance.
Practical classroom implementation involves teaching students the GROW framework explicitly, enabling them to conduct self-coaching and peer support sessions. Consider establishing "coaching corners" where students can work through academic or personal challenges using structured GROW conversations. This approach develops metacognitive skills whilst reducing teacher workload, as students become more autonomous in problem-solving and goal achievement.
One of the most frequent mistakes educators make when implementing the GROW model is rushing through the Goal-setting phase, often accepting vague aspirations like "I want to get better at maths" without proper exploration. This surface-level approach undermines the entire coaching conversation, as unclear goals lead to unfocused discussions and weak accountability. Effective goal-setting requires patience and skilled questioning to help students articulate specific, meaningful objectives that connect to their deeper motivations and circumstances.
Another common pitfall occurs during the Reality phase, where educators inadvertently slip into advice-giving or problem-solving mode rather than maintaining their coaching stance. John Whitmore's research emphasises that premature solutions prevent students from developing their own insights and ownership. When teachers jump to conclusions or offer quick fixes, they rob students of the critical thinking process that builds genuine capability and confidence.
In educational settings, time pressure often leads practitioners to abbreviate or skip the Options phase entirely, moving directly from identifying challenges to prescriptive actions. However, this approach significantly reduces student engagement and creative problem-solving opportunities. Allowing adequate time for students to generate multiple possibilities not only improves solution quality but also develops their analytical skills and sense of agency in addressing future challenges independently.
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/grow-model-for-coaching#article","headline":"GROW Model for Coaching","description":"Explore the GROW Model for Coaching, a structured framework enhancing goal-setting, problem-solving, and personal development in various fields.","datePublished":"2023-08-24T15:20:02.449Z","dateModified":"2026-01-26T10:09:32.212Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/grow-model-for-coaching"},"image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409501de055d1/69518cd50e9e06d253db6b97_69518cd29517d8d65b24aaba_grow-model-for-coaching-infographic.webp","wordCount":3763},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/grow-model-for-coaching#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"GROW Model for Coaching","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/grow-model-for-coaching"}]},{"@type":"FAQPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/grow-model-for-coaching#faq","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What is the GROW Model and how does it differ from traditional goal-setting approaches?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The GROW Model is a four-stage coaching framework that stands for Goal, Reality, Options, and Way Forward, developed by Sir John Whitmore in the 1980s. Unlike traditional goal-setting that often fails with struggling pupils, GROW's Reality stage helps unlock breakthrough moments by first exploring t"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How can teachers effectively use the Options stage to help students overcome cognitive biases?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"During the Options stage, teachers should use open-ended questions like 'What else could you do?' and 'If you had unlimited resources, what would you try?' to expand student thinking beyond their usual patterns. This stage deliberately separates idea generation from evaluation, encouraging brainstor"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Why does the GROW Model work particularly well with underperforming students?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The GROW Model works as a 'confidence catalyst' by transforming underperforming students into active learners who believe they can succeed through its self-efficacy principles. It breaks complex challenges into manageable stages that reduce overwhelm and anxiety, whilst creating psychological safety"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How should educators implement the Reality stage when working with struggling pupils?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"In the Reality stage, educators should help students explore their current situation using strategies like self-reflection, SWOT analysis, and reality questioning to gain a realistic understanding of where they stand. This involves analysing factors influencing their progress and assessing any barri"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What specific techniques can teachers use in each stage of the GROW Model?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"In the Goals stage, teachers can employ SMART goal setting and visioning techniques to help students focus their efforts. During Reality, self-reflection and SWOT analysis help students understand their current situation, whilst the Options stage uses brainstorming and exploring alternatives to enco"}}]}]}