Developing emotional intelligence in the classroom
How can teachers help develop their students' emotional intelligence?
How can teachers help develop their students' emotional intelligence?
As practitioners, emotional intelligence is something that we often overlook as just another additional thing to think about in our daily dealings with students. However, once considered it can have a massive impact on our interactions in the learning environment and on the social behavior of our students, how we organize learning, and how we communicate with our students.
There are clear links between increased engagement and academic achievement. (Dotterer and Lowe, 2011) (Reyes, Brackett, Rivers, White, and Salovey 2012). According to Hamre & Pianta, (2007), a classroom characterized by high interactions with teachers who are sensitive to students’ needs and also understand the student’s emotional quotient; shows Humanistic trends of being warm, caring, nurturing, and congenial in which achievement is highest.
Teachers in such classrooms are therefore aware of their student’s emotional skills and academic needs and regularly reflect on and in action (Schon 1992) to support the best learning environment possible hence making them effective leaders with proper leadership skills. This is in contrast to classrooms with a negative emotional climate in which teachers and students share little emotional connection and regularly disregard, disrespect, taunt, humiliate, threaten, or even physically lash out at one another, which has low engagement and achievement.
In these classrooms, the effective leader i.e., teachers, very often do not design or apply lessons with students’ perspectives or cognitive intelligence in mind, nor do these teachers divert from a lesson plan when students’ boredom, discomfort, or confusion arises. It could therefore be concluded that teachers have the significant power to control the social behavior, emotions, academic performance, task performance and achievement of their students through being emotionally intelligent.
Emotional intelligence is the ability to perceive, interpret, demonstrate, control, evaluate, and use emotions to communicate with and relate to others effectively and constructively. Some psychologists suggest that emotional intelligence is a transferrable skill and hence it is considered more important than IQ for success in life. Emotional intelligence is the ability to learn about yourself and apply that wisdom to the world around you.
In addition, its impact is not just on the teacher and student relationship but also on relationship management inside the classroom, well-being, and peer interactions. It is also worth noting that positive student-teacher relationships are associated with increased behavioral engagement and in some cases cognitive intelligence over time compared to negative student-teacher relationships in less academic engagement and therefore, well-being (English et al 2016).
If we consider the impact of the Covid pandemic, evidence suggests that children's and young people’s mental well-being has been significantly impacted. For example, between April and September 2021, there was an 81% increase in referrals for children and young people's mental and physical health services compared with the same period in 2019.
A relationship can also be found between well-being and pupils’ experiences of disruptive social behaviour whilst at school, with students showing poorer happiness and anxiousness because of peers’ classroom behaviour. (GOV 2021)
Between March and June 2020, a period when schools were closed to most pupils, symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder were found to have significantly increased in children and young people aged between 7.5 and 12 years old compared to immediately before the pandemic. The effects of lockdown and a decline in well-being can be seen in data collected across 2020 and 2021, showing students could concentrate very (25%) or quite (59%) well in lessons in their classroom (84% very/quite well), whilst 16% said they could not concentrate very or well at all. Further, 39% of pupils were very worried about catching up on their learning.
As a practitioner being able to use emotionally intelligent strategies with students by talking about experiences, developing confidence, and supporting them to develop mindfulness strategies has and can support a positive classroom experience.By September 2020, relative to the March to June 2020 lockdown, reported behavioural, attention, and emotional difficulties in children had returned to, and stabilized at, a lower level. (Gov 2021).
As a result of the pandemic, emotional intelligence, therefore, has never been more important as a tool in the practitioners’ toolbox. As understanding a pupil’s feelings and emotions and being empathetic can increase engagement and well-being.
As practitioners, it is useful to understand the components of the brain that are linked to emotional intelligence, including, among others, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and frontal cortex, and amygdala.
The diagram below shows areas of the limbic system which is the part of the brain involved in our behavioural and emotional responses, especially when it comes to social behaviours we need for survival: and fight or flight responses. Often in neurodiverse students, the amygdala is associated with the body's fear and stress responses, taking over the body's responses to a variety of situations, which to others may not be threatening. For the practitioner to be aware of neurodiverse needs within their student group can then able these students to be supported through a range of strategies, including coaching, mentoring, and transactional analysis.
While the amygdala is often associated with the body’s fear and stress responses, it also plays a pivotal role in memory, often tagging that memory so it is remembered. This partially explains why the similar response to threatening situations perpetuate themselves. Therefore, neuro-diverse learners will have a remembered response from their past to situations which they repeat.
The amygdala is often thought of as being a survival-oriented brain area. Things that have strong emotions associated with them, good and bad, are likely to be the things that allow a species to not only stay alive but also thrive in its environment. Through emotional intelligence, practitioners can support students to have positive memories about a learning experience by using such tools as the 'it’s alright to fail' technique, scaffolding, and conveying the message 'we don't just have one attempt at a task performance'.
Goleman D (2011) identified that as practitioners we should be supporting our students to understand their emotions and thereby identify the appropriateness of their actions. Examples can be drawn from neurodiversity whereby the student often use flight or fight as a means of expressing their frustrations and anxieties. Such displays of emotions can have a massive impact on the whole class environment as the individual potentially interrupts the whole learning situation.
Tied in with this notion is one of a Growth Mindset (Dweck 2011) and the need to give our students a safe environment in which to fail. This humanistic approach to learning echoes Black and Williams’s (2006) research, in that ensuing students can fail and that acting on feedback will promote learning.
Salovey P and JoMayer (1990) defined emotional intelligence that can be used in positive psychology as a “subset of social intelligence that involves the ability to monitor one's own emotions and others' emotions, and how it affects one's task performance to discriminate among them, and to use this information to guide one's own thinking and actions” (Bechtoldt et al, 2011).
Whether you are a teacher or just learning to add on your leadership skill, emotional perception is important to everyone. Thorndike (Sharma 2008) researched dimensions of emotional intelligence as a form of “social intelligence”. He classified intelligence into three dimensions: abstract intelligence refers to managing and understanding ideas; mechanical intelligence includes managing and understanding concrete objects, and social intelligence refers to managing and understanding people.
According to Thorndike, social intelligence is the ability to perceive one’s own and others’ behaviours and motives to successfully make use of that information in social situations. Kaufman (2001) spoke of the influence of both intellective and non-intellective factors on one’s intelligence and the impact that both types of factors have on a person’s ability to act intelligently (Bar-On, 2006; Cherniss, 2000). Gardner (1983) expanded the knowledge of interpersonal skills and intrapersonal skills by introducing his theory of multiple intelligences.
Cantor and Kihlstrom (1987) define social intelligence as possessing knowledge of social skills and having the ability-based measures to get along well with others. John Mayer and Salovey P (1993) refer to social intelligence as adapting to social situations and using social skills to act accordingly. According to Salovey P and Mayer (1990), a more accurate assessment and talking about expressing emotions is emotional intelligence which uses social awareness and social intelligence.
Models of Emotional Intelligence
It is useful to consider diverse types of emotional intelligence and how they can be applied to practice.
Faltas (2017) argues that there are three major models/ types of intelligence:
These three models have been developed from research, analysis, and scientific studies. Some of these models, like the Bar-on model can be used as emotional intelligence tests.
Daniel Goleman’s self-rated performance model of emotional intelligence includes five realms that focus on how we react to and in different social situations.
These can be broken down into four quadrants as shown by the diagram below which can be used as a guide to support the practitioner:
In research, Gill, Ramsey, and Leberman (2015) used self-awareness competency to explore and develop a causal loop diagram.
Source: Gill et al., 2015
This diagram above explores a unique way of thinking in that there is a relationship between different learning themes. If we apply this model to practice, practitioners should discuss with their students their thoughts and feelings and explore respect for each other.
Mayer and colleagues (2004) developed the ability model as a tool for talking about how emotions and interactions.
They suggest that the abilities and skills of Emotional intelligence can be divided into four areas – the ability to:
Bar-On model looks at five core factors of emotional intelligence by focusing on our reaction to change:
First, emotional intelligence helps students cope with emotions in the academic environment. Students can feel anxious about exams, feel disappointed with poor results, feel frustrated when they try hard but cannot achieve what they want, or feel bored if they don't find the subject matter interesting. Being able to regulate these emotions so they do not interfere with learning helps students achieve success in the learning environment. The following chart can be used with students to explore feelings, well-being, and mindfulness.
Second, emotional intelligence can help students maintain their relationships with teachers, students, and family. Personal relationship management means they can call on friends and teachers to help them when they struggle, can learn from others in group work, or can call on others for emotional support hence creating the skills of an effective leader. Using pair-share strategies, snowballing techniques, thinking environments, and general active learning technical skills are all ways relationships can be explored
Third, some humanities subjects (like literature or history) lend themselves to some level of emotional and social knowledge. It is, therefore, useful to use themes from these subjects to explore and channel emotions.
Encourage writing as a means of expression by:
Have conversations about the character by:
The intelligence of emotional intelligence is something we should use in the classroom through simple strategies that support thinking, and internal inquiry and promote understanding of self and how we interact with others. These are some frameworks available that look at ways we can approach emotional intelligence, but it is about opening communication channels within the learning environment to explore thoughts and feelings.
Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18(Suppl), 13–25.
Bechtoldt, M. N., Rohrmann, S., De Pater, I. E., & Beersma, B. (2011). The primacy of perceiving: Emotion recognition buffers negative effects of emotional labor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1087–1094
Black and Williams(2006)Inside the Black box: Rising standards through classroom assessment.GT assessment Ltd
Cherniss, C. (2000). Social and emotional competence in the workplace. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp. 433–458). Jossey-Bass.
Dotterer, A.M., Lowe, K. (2000)Classroom Context, School Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Early Adolescence. J Youth Adolescence 40, 1649–1660 .
Dweck (2011) Mindset how you can fulfill your potential. Robinson Publishing
English T, Lee IA, John OP, Gross JJ.(2016) Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals. Motiv Emot. 2017 Apr;41(2):230-242.
Faltas I (2017) Three Models of Emotional Intelligence https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314213508_Three_Models_of_Emotional_Intelligence
Gardner (1983)Frames of Mind. Basic Books
Gill, L. J., Ramsey, P. L., & Leberman, S. I. (2015). A systems approach to developing emotional intelligence using the self-awareness engine of growth model. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(6), 575–594.
Goleman (2011) Emotional intelligence why it can matter more than IQ. Bloomsbury Publishing
Gov (2021) State of the Nation 2021:children and young peoples well being
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). Learning opportunities in preschool and early elementary classrooms. In R. C. Pianta, M. J. Cox, & K. L. Snow (Eds.), School readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability (pp. 49–83). Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (2001). Emotional intelligence as an aspect of general intelligence: What would David Wechsler say? Emotion, 1(3), 258–264
Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (2000). Social intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 359–379). Cambridge University Press.
Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012, ).
Classroom Emotional Climate, Student Engagement, and Academic Achievement. Journal of
Educational Psychology.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Journal of International Medical Research, 9(3), 145–151.
Schon D (1992) The Reflective Practitioner. Routledge
Sharma, R. R. (2008). Emotional Intelligence from 17th Century to 21st Century: Perspectives and Directions for Future Research. Vision, 12(1), 59–66.
As practitioners, emotional intelligence is something that we often overlook as just another additional thing to think about in our daily dealings with students. However, once considered it can have a massive impact on our interactions in the learning environment and on the social behavior of our students, how we organize learning, and how we communicate with our students.
There are clear links between increased engagement and academic achievement. (Dotterer and Lowe, 2011) (Reyes, Brackett, Rivers, White, and Salovey 2012). According to Hamre & Pianta, (2007), a classroom characterized by high interactions with teachers who are sensitive to students’ needs and also understand the student’s emotional quotient; shows Humanistic trends of being warm, caring, nurturing, and congenial in which achievement is highest.
Teachers in such classrooms are therefore aware of their student’s emotional skills and academic needs and regularly reflect on and in action (Schon 1992) to support the best learning environment possible hence making them effective leaders with proper leadership skills. This is in contrast to classrooms with a negative emotional climate in which teachers and students share little emotional connection and regularly disregard, disrespect, taunt, humiliate, threaten, or even physically lash out at one another, which has low engagement and achievement.
In these classrooms, the effective leader i.e., teachers, very often do not design or apply lessons with students’ perspectives or cognitive intelligence in mind, nor do these teachers divert from a lesson plan when students’ boredom, discomfort, or confusion arises. It could therefore be concluded that teachers have the significant power to control the social behavior, emotions, academic performance, task performance and achievement of their students through being emotionally intelligent.
Emotional intelligence is the ability to perceive, interpret, demonstrate, control, evaluate, and use emotions to communicate with and relate to others effectively and constructively. Some psychologists suggest that emotional intelligence is a transferrable skill and hence it is considered more important than IQ for success in life. Emotional intelligence is the ability to learn about yourself and apply that wisdom to the world around you.
In addition, its impact is not just on the teacher and student relationship but also on relationship management inside the classroom, well-being, and peer interactions. It is also worth noting that positive student-teacher relationships are associated with increased behavioral engagement and in some cases cognitive intelligence over time compared to negative student-teacher relationships in less academic engagement and therefore, well-being (English et al 2016).
If we consider the impact of the Covid pandemic, evidence suggests that children's and young people’s mental well-being has been significantly impacted. For example, between April and September 2021, there was an 81% increase in referrals for children and young people's mental and physical health services compared with the same period in 2019.
A relationship can also be found between well-being and pupils’ experiences of disruptive social behaviour whilst at school, with students showing poorer happiness and anxiousness because of peers’ classroom behaviour. (GOV 2021)
Between March and June 2020, a period when schools were closed to most pupils, symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder were found to have significantly increased in children and young people aged between 7.5 and 12 years old compared to immediately before the pandemic. The effects of lockdown and a decline in well-being can be seen in data collected across 2020 and 2021, showing students could concentrate very (25%) or quite (59%) well in lessons in their classroom (84% very/quite well), whilst 16% said they could not concentrate very or well at all. Further, 39% of pupils were very worried about catching up on their learning.
As a practitioner being able to use emotionally intelligent strategies with students by talking about experiences, developing confidence, and supporting them to develop mindfulness strategies has and can support a positive classroom experience.By September 2020, relative to the March to June 2020 lockdown, reported behavioural, attention, and emotional difficulties in children had returned to, and stabilized at, a lower level. (Gov 2021).
As a result of the pandemic, emotional intelligence, therefore, has never been more important as a tool in the practitioners’ toolbox. As understanding a pupil’s feelings and emotions and being empathetic can increase engagement and well-being.
As practitioners, it is useful to understand the components of the brain that are linked to emotional intelligence, including, among others, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and frontal cortex, and amygdala.
The diagram below shows areas of the limbic system which is the part of the brain involved in our behavioural and emotional responses, especially when it comes to social behaviours we need for survival: and fight or flight responses. Often in neurodiverse students, the amygdala is associated with the body's fear and stress responses, taking over the body's responses to a variety of situations, which to others may not be threatening. For the practitioner to be aware of neurodiverse needs within their student group can then able these students to be supported through a range of strategies, including coaching, mentoring, and transactional analysis.
While the amygdala is often associated with the body’s fear and stress responses, it also plays a pivotal role in memory, often tagging that memory so it is remembered. This partially explains why the similar response to threatening situations perpetuate themselves. Therefore, neuro-diverse learners will have a remembered response from their past to situations which they repeat.
The amygdala is often thought of as being a survival-oriented brain area. Things that have strong emotions associated with them, good and bad, are likely to be the things that allow a species to not only stay alive but also thrive in its environment. Through emotional intelligence, practitioners can support students to have positive memories about a learning experience by using such tools as the 'it’s alright to fail' technique, scaffolding, and conveying the message 'we don't just have one attempt at a task performance'.
Goleman D (2011) identified that as practitioners we should be supporting our students to understand their emotions and thereby identify the appropriateness of their actions. Examples can be drawn from neurodiversity whereby the student often use flight or fight as a means of expressing their frustrations and anxieties. Such displays of emotions can have a massive impact on the whole class environment as the individual potentially interrupts the whole learning situation.
Tied in with this notion is one of a Growth Mindset (Dweck 2011) and the need to give our students a safe environment in which to fail. This humanistic approach to learning echoes Black and Williams’s (2006) research, in that ensuing students can fail and that acting on feedback will promote learning.
Salovey P and JoMayer (1990) defined emotional intelligence that can be used in positive psychology as a “subset of social intelligence that involves the ability to monitor one's own emotions and others' emotions, and how it affects one's task performance to discriminate among them, and to use this information to guide one's own thinking and actions” (Bechtoldt et al, 2011).
Whether you are a teacher or just learning to add on your leadership skill, emotional perception is important to everyone. Thorndike (Sharma 2008) researched dimensions of emotional intelligence as a form of “social intelligence”. He classified intelligence into three dimensions: abstract intelligence refers to managing and understanding ideas; mechanical intelligence includes managing and understanding concrete objects, and social intelligence refers to managing and understanding people.
According to Thorndike, social intelligence is the ability to perceive one’s own and others’ behaviours and motives to successfully make use of that information in social situations. Kaufman (2001) spoke of the influence of both intellective and non-intellective factors on one’s intelligence and the impact that both types of factors have on a person’s ability to act intelligently (Bar-On, 2006; Cherniss, 2000). Gardner (1983) expanded the knowledge of interpersonal skills and intrapersonal skills by introducing his theory of multiple intelligences.
Cantor and Kihlstrom (1987) define social intelligence as possessing knowledge of social skills and having the ability-based measures to get along well with others. John Mayer and Salovey P (1993) refer to social intelligence as adapting to social situations and using social skills to act accordingly. According to Salovey P and Mayer (1990), a more accurate assessment and talking about expressing emotions is emotional intelligence which uses social awareness and social intelligence.
Models of Emotional Intelligence
It is useful to consider diverse types of emotional intelligence and how they can be applied to practice.
Faltas (2017) argues that there are three major models/ types of intelligence:
These three models have been developed from research, analysis, and scientific studies. Some of these models, like the Bar-on model can be used as emotional intelligence tests.
Daniel Goleman’s self-rated performance model of emotional intelligence includes five realms that focus on how we react to and in different social situations.
These can be broken down into four quadrants as shown by the diagram below which can be used as a guide to support the practitioner:
In research, Gill, Ramsey, and Leberman (2015) used self-awareness competency to explore and develop a causal loop diagram.
Source: Gill et al., 2015
This diagram above explores a unique way of thinking in that there is a relationship between different learning themes. If we apply this model to practice, practitioners should discuss with their students their thoughts and feelings and explore respect for each other.
Mayer and colleagues (2004) developed the ability model as a tool for talking about how emotions and interactions.
They suggest that the abilities and skills of Emotional intelligence can be divided into four areas – the ability to:
Bar-On model looks at five core factors of emotional intelligence by focusing on our reaction to change:
First, emotional intelligence helps students cope with emotions in the academic environment. Students can feel anxious about exams, feel disappointed with poor results, feel frustrated when they try hard but cannot achieve what they want, or feel bored if they don't find the subject matter interesting. Being able to regulate these emotions so they do not interfere with learning helps students achieve success in the learning environment. The following chart can be used with students to explore feelings, well-being, and mindfulness.
Second, emotional intelligence can help students maintain their relationships with teachers, students, and family. Personal relationship management means they can call on friends and teachers to help them when they struggle, can learn from others in group work, or can call on others for emotional support hence creating the skills of an effective leader. Using pair-share strategies, snowballing techniques, thinking environments, and general active learning technical skills are all ways relationships can be explored
Third, some humanities subjects (like literature or history) lend themselves to some level of emotional and social knowledge. It is, therefore, useful to use themes from these subjects to explore and channel emotions.
Encourage writing as a means of expression by:
Have conversations about the character by:
The intelligence of emotional intelligence is something we should use in the classroom through simple strategies that support thinking, and internal inquiry and promote understanding of self and how we interact with others. These are some frameworks available that look at ways we can approach emotional intelligence, but it is about opening communication channels within the learning environment to explore thoughts and feelings.
Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18(Suppl), 13–25.
Bechtoldt, M. N., Rohrmann, S., De Pater, I. E., & Beersma, B. (2011). The primacy of perceiving: Emotion recognition buffers negative effects of emotional labor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1087–1094
Black and Williams(2006)Inside the Black box: Rising standards through classroom assessment.GT assessment Ltd
Cherniss, C. (2000). Social and emotional competence in the workplace. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp. 433–458). Jossey-Bass.
Dotterer, A.M., Lowe, K. (2000)Classroom Context, School Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Early Adolescence. J Youth Adolescence 40, 1649–1660 .
Dweck (2011) Mindset how you can fulfill your potential. Robinson Publishing
English T, Lee IA, John OP, Gross JJ.(2016) Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals. Motiv Emot. 2017 Apr;41(2):230-242.
Faltas I (2017) Three Models of Emotional Intelligence https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314213508_Three_Models_of_Emotional_Intelligence
Gardner (1983)Frames of Mind. Basic Books
Gill, L. J., Ramsey, P. L., & Leberman, S. I. (2015). A systems approach to developing emotional intelligence using the self-awareness engine of growth model. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(6), 575–594.
Goleman (2011) Emotional intelligence why it can matter more than IQ. Bloomsbury Publishing
Gov (2021) State of the Nation 2021:children and young peoples well being
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). Learning opportunities in preschool and early elementary classrooms. In R. C. Pianta, M. J. Cox, & K. L. Snow (Eds.), School readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability (pp. 49–83). Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (2001). Emotional intelligence as an aspect of general intelligence: What would David Wechsler say? Emotion, 1(3), 258–264
Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (2000). Social intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 359–379). Cambridge University Press.
Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012, ).
Classroom Emotional Climate, Student Engagement, and Academic Achievement. Journal of
Educational Psychology.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Journal of International Medical Research, 9(3), 145–151.
Schon D (1992) The Reflective Practitioner. Routledge
Sharma, R. R. (2008). Emotional Intelligence from 17th Century to 21st Century: Perspectives and Directions for Future Research. Vision, 12(1), 59–66.