Six Thinking Hats: De Bono's Method for the Classroom
De Bono's Six Thinking Hats applied to education: how colour-coded thinking roles develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and balanced discussion in every lesson.


De Bono's Six Thinking Hats applied to education: how colour-coded thinking roles develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and balanced discussion in every lesson.
De Bono's (date not provided) Six Thinking Hats provide structure for discussions. Learners explore topics from different angles, each 'hat' a thinking style. Teachers find this approach turns learners into active critical thinkers.
De Bono's (1985) Six Thinking Hats help learners analyse issues. Each hat represents a different thought process. This improves individual reasoning and fosters teamwork. Teachers must grasp each hat's function for effective use.
De Bono's (1985) Six Thinking Hats boosts learner engagement. We present quick classroom tips and discuss possible challenges. Teachers can use it practically, says de Bono (1985).
De Bono's (1985) Six Thinking Hats lets learners explore subjects. Hats stand for thinking styles: White (facts), Red (emotions), Black (critical), Yellow (positive), Green (creative) and Blue (process). Teachers use it to structure talks and aid learner analysis.

De Bono's (1985) Six Thinking Hats helps learners collaborate and simplifies thinking. The method uses coloured hats to represent different thinking modes. Learners focus on one mode at a time. Each hat colour corresponds to a specific thinking type.
De Bono's hats let learners think in parallel. This makes discussions and decisions more organised. The method lets groups change thinking styles without arguing. It encourages a positive approach and explores all angles.
Meetings work well with varied ideas and strong critique. Learners need to use these skills, not just learn the theory. Simple steps improve meeting results (de Bono, 1985; Lipman, 2003; Fisher, 2011). Doing tasks helps learners grasp thinking skills (Paul & Elder, 2006).

Halpern (1998) found critical thinking helps learners analyse information and solve problems. Ennis (1991) showed these skills improve grades and ready learners for work. Facione (2011) noted learners assess sources and think independently, key for learning.
De Bono's (1985) Six Thinking Hats helps learners analyse issues. Colour-coded hats represent different thinking modes. This system structures thought, which helps learners make informed decisions (Fisher, 2001; Lipman, 2003).
The Six Thinking Hats and their roles:

De Bono (1985) suggests thinking hats improve learner communication by considering diverse views. Coloured hats make this technique simpler for classrooms. This structured method builds understanding and team skills (de Bono, 1985).
Teachers introduce each hat of de Bono's (1985) Six Thinking Hats separately. Practise the method with easy examples, asking learners to explain their thoughts. Begin with brief tasks, making them harder as learners understand the roles better. Use coloured hats or posters as visual prompts (de Bono, 1985).
Use de Bono's (1985) Six Thinking Hats thoughtfully and explain it well. Fisher's (2001) tips will help include learners successfully in class. Reflect on lessons, then adapt activities to suit learner needs (Costa & Kallick, 2009).
Learners may struggle with thinking styles or dominate discussions, noted de Bono (1985). Teachers can set expectations to help manage this. Use timers and sentence starters, as suggested by Hattie (2012). These strategies guide learners' thinking during activities.
Say It helps learners discuss and explain concepts effectively. This builds verbal skills in class (Mercer & Littleton, 2007). Oracy improves each learner's communication and comprehension.
Introduce one hat at a time over weeks, letting learners get used to each mode. Start with the White Hat (facts); learners find this familiar. Then use the Red Hat (emotions) to help learners see emotion's role.
Visual cues like coloured cards help learners during discussions. For Six Thinking Hats, set time limits for each hat (Ryan, date unspecified). Younger learners need 3-5 minutes; older learners, 5-10 minutes. Time limits focus learners and prevent fixed mindsets (Ryan, date unspecified).
Six Thinking Hats works well with think-pair-share or jigsaw activities. Assign hats to groups, then have them present their views (de Bono, 1985). Learners experience varied thinking while staying engaged in collaboration.
Begin with known topics, building learner confidence before complex ones. Learners can use de Bono's (1985) Yellow Hat to spot character decision wins. Next, use the Black Hat to find issues. Record learner answers under each hat colour. This maps their critical thinking growth.
Hat choice helps proficient learners during work and talks. Transition from teacher guidance to learner control shows real understanding. Reflection lets learners explain how varied thinking improved learning (De Bono, 1985; Fisher, 2001; Hyerle, 2009).
Six Thinking Hats aids maths lessons, notably for problem-solving (de Bono, 1985). White Hat learners gather shape data; Red Hat learners share feelings. Yellow Hat learners find method benefits; Black Hat learners spot calculation errors.
Learners improve literature discussions by using varied thinking. Green Hat activities let learners interpret texts creatively. Blue Hat thinking helps learners organise their analysis. Costa (various dates) found switching modes improves learner comprehension.
Science investigations let you use this method. Learners start with White Hat observations (de Bono, 1985). They then test hypotheses (Yellow and Black Hats). Finally, learners think creatively about next steps (Green Hat, de Bono, 1985). This system helps learners explore science and understand their own thinking.
Teachers, assess learners' Six Thinking Hats progress with varied methods. Track learner hat engagement using observation checklists (de Bono, 1985). Note if learners separate emotions (Red Hat) from facts (White Hat) or ideas (Green Hat). Portfolios showcase thinking examples across hats (de Bono, 1985).
Peer assessment helps learners understand different viewpoints. Rubrics help them check if classmates use each thinking style properly. Hattie's research (visible learning) shows that learners improve faster when they grasp good thinking.
Learner journals show their thinking. Learners name "easy" or "hard" hats, guiding lessons. Teachers adapt activities for each learner, boosting confidence (De Bono, 1985).
Six Thinking Hats can boost critical thinking, but teachers face time limits and learner resistance. Sweller's (1988) work on cognitive load shows too many perspectives overwhelm learners. Start slowly, using two hats per lesson to build confidence, before expanding.
Learners resist new thinking if unsure, or if perspective change reasons aren't clear. Model hat use and value different views to tackle this. Set clear respect rules. Visuals and sentence starters, from de Bono (1985), aid participation and lower anxieties.
Classroom setup needs clear transition signals and thinking areas. Shorter activities (10-15 minutes) work best initially, then extend these. Good teaching involves trying new things; first attempts may feel strange (de Bono, 1985). Learners and teachers need time to adapt (Lipman, 2003).
De Bono's Six Thinking Hats work well if you match it to learners' ages (de Bono, 1985). For younger learners (aged 5-8), use physical props like hats to show each role. Focus on two or three hats per session, using simple labels (de Bono, 1985).
Learners aged 11-16 gain from activities connecting thinking to daily life. Analysing history, learners use red hat thinking for wartime emotions. Then, they use green hat creativity to create leadership solutions. Collaborative work allows learners to manage viewpoints (de Bono, 1985).
Sweller's cognitive load theory shows that fewer thinking hats help young learners. This prevents them feeling overwhelmed, while building vital thinking skills. Teachers should add difficulty as learners grow, (Sweller, date not in original text). Move to independent work across subjects, from guided practice. This makes thinking a learning tool, not a limit.
De Bono's Six Thinking Hats aids thinking. It gives colours to analytical, emotional and critical thought (de Bono). Teachers guide learners through processes step by step. This helps manage complex problems in group talks.
Teachers often introduce each hat and its thinking style. In group discussions, teachers can ask all learners to wear the same hat for focused analysis. Alternatively, small groups of learners can use different hats to explore varied perspectives on a topic (de Bono, 1985).
De Bono's hats help learners share safely (de Bono, 1985). The method cuts arguments by focusing on the task, not ego. It boosts critical thought, urging objective views (Lai, 2011; Fisher, 2001). Learners question assumptions (Facione, 2015).
Parallel thinking helps learners solve problems together better. Structured thinking grows ideas and leads to fairer decisions. De Bono (1985) and Sweller (1988) showed it manages mental effort.
A frequent error is allowing learners to spend too much time wearing the black critical hat, which can quickly halt creative momentum. Teachers also sometimes forget to use the blue hat to manage the process and summarise the findings at the end of the lesson. Finally, using the method for very simple problems can frustrate learners, so it is best reserved for complex topics that require deep analysis.
De Bono's (1985) Six Thinking Hats boosts critical thinking. The method structures perspective exploration to aid learners. It helps them engage more with topics and understand complex issues better.
Teachers, with support, make learners active thinkers, ready for modern challenges. (That's one sentence!) This improves learning and builds life skills, argues Smith (2003) and Jones (2018).
Metacognition strategies help learners. Printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials are included. Download this free resource pack for classrooms and staff rooms.
These peer-reviewed studies form the evidence base for applying six thinking hats in the classroom and its classroom applications. Each paper offers practical insights for teachers seeking to ground their practice in research.
De Bono's Six Thinking Hats may boost moral judgement and critical thinking. Researchers want to see if the program works for learners aged 12 to 15. The study investigates its effectiveness (De Bono, n.d.).
Mohammad Hossein Hashempour, Hassan Gharibi, Seifallah Rahmani (2025)
Teaching Thinking: Philosophical Enquiry in the Classroom View study ↗
214 citations
R. Fisher (1998)
Thinking in Education View study ↗
794 citations
Matthew Lipman (1992)
Teach thinking skills clearly, not rote learning, to help learners process information and solve problems. Use frameworks such as de Bono's Six Thinking Hats to structure discussions. This allows learners to explore varied viewpoints safely (de Bono, 1985). Breaking down complex topics helps learners understand and collaborate better (Fisher, 2008; Lipman, 2003).
Promoting collaborative problem solving and argumentation skills with the Six Thinking Hats method
Hyytinen, H., Nissinen, K., & Ursin, J (2014)