Concept-Based Learning: Teaching for Deep TransferGCSE students in royal blue jumpers engaging in concept-based discussion at individual desks, secondary school setting

Updated on  

April 1, 2026

Concept-Based Learning: Teaching for Deep Transfer

Concept-based learning explained: how to move beyond topic coverage to transferable understanding. Erickson's model with practical strategies for primary and secondary.

Course Enquiry
Copy citation

Main, P. (2024, April 26). Concept-Based Learning. Retrieved from www.structural-learning.com/post/concept-based-learning

What is Concept-Based Learning?

Concept-based learning is structured through inquiry and looks through a conceptual lens that is connected to content and skills. It encourages learning within, between and across subjects and disciplines.

Evidence Overview

Chalkface Translator: research evidence in plain teacher language

Academic
Chalkface

Evidence Rating: Load-Bearing Pillars

Emerging (d<0.2)
Promising (d 0.2-0.5)
Robust (d 0.5+)
Foundational (d 0.8+)

Key Takeaways

  1. Concept-based learning is crucial for encouraging deep transfer of knowledge, enabling learners to apply understanding across diverse contexts. This approach moves beyond rote memorisation, promoting flexible thinking essential for navigating new problems and situations, as highlighted in research on how people learn and achieve expertise (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). It equips learners with transferable conceptual frameworks rather than isolated facts, enhancing their ability to solve novel problems.
  2. Concept-based curricula provide the essential "third dimension" for learning, moving beyond mere content and skills acquisition. By structuring learning around enduring understandings and generalisable concepts, educators can develop learners' capacity for deeper thinking and meaning-making (Erickson, 2017). This conceptual lens allows learners to connect discrete facts and skills into a coherent framework, making learning more meaningful and enduring.
  3. Concept-driven inquiry is vital for developing critical thinking and understanding, preparing learners for a world where factual recall is less valuable than analytical prowess. Engaging learners in inquiry-based learning around essential questions, as advocated by Wiggins and McTighe (2005), cultivates higher-order thinking skills and a genuine understanding of complex ideas. This approach moves learners from passive recipients of information to active constructors of knowledge, encouraging intellectual independence.
  4. Concept-based learning inherently breaks down artificial subject boundaries, revealing interconnectedness and enhancing interdisciplinary understanding. By focusing on overarching concepts like 'systems', 'patterns', or 'change', learners can identify common threads and relationships across subjects, from mathematics to history (Bruner, 1960). This integrated perspective helps learners build a more comprehensive and coherent view of the world, transforming how they approach new learning challenges.

Monday Morning Action Plan

3 things to try in your classroom this week

  • 1
    Display a concept question on the board as learners enter, such as 'How does change affect systems?' and ask them to think about it silently.
  • 2
    Introduce a 'Concept Connector' activity: Print a simple table with three columns: 'Concept', 'Subject', 'Example'. Choose a concept like 'patterns', and have learners work in small groups to fill in the table with examples from different subjects they are studying.
  • 3
    Use a 'Concept Reflection' journal prompt: At the end of the lesson, ask learners to write a short paragraph answering the question: 'How does the concept we explored today connect to something you've learned in another subject or outside of school?'
  • structural-learning.com

In doing so, it encourages learners to see and make connections across subjects and to also create new understandings from the learning they have gained in those subjects in ways that are transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary. It embraces and utilises transferable skills. In doing so the learner can transfer ideas and skills learnt to a new context and apply them to problems in creative, flexible and adaptable ways.

Comparison infographic showing traditional two-dimensional vs concept-based three-dimensional learning approaches
Traditional vs. Concept-Based Learning

It strongly puts concepts in the driving seat of learning but it also must be noted that it requires content and skills. Therefore, it can be applied to a three-dimensional curriculum that includes concepts, content and skills that are channelled through inquiry and questioning. It takes content and skills and drives them using concepts that are broad enough to create interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary connections within and between subjects.

In contrast, traditional models are considered two-dimensional as they focus on content and skills. These traditional models place an emphasis and focus on content knowledge and skills.

Theoretical Framework Behind Concept-Based Learning

Wiggins and McTighe's (1998) concept-based learning links ideas. Learners build understanding by connecting ideas across subjects. This framework uses concepts, content, and skills. It helps learners transfer knowledge, said Erickson (2002) and Lanning (2013).

A theoretical framework is developed from an existing theory and is an expression of work based on other research. A conceptual framework is developed from concepts and is driven by exploration and inquiry. It is the result of a research question or questions to be investigated. A conceptual framework can also include a theoretical framework.

Comparison diagram showing traditional 2D learning versus concept-based 3D learning models
Side-by-side comparison diagram: Traditional vs Concept-Based Learning Models

 

Understanding Concepts vs. Rote Memorisation

Concept-based approaches embrace concepts and allow them to drive the content and process skills through inquiry. This learning is blended and connected to real life and the world, in authentic ways and enables the development of deeper thinking.

Constructivist methods help learners build knowledge through doing and real-world activities. This, with concepts, helps learners understand and think more deeply. Inquiry lets young people be creative, think critically, and reflect (Bruner, 1960; Vygotsky, 1978; Piaget, 1970).

Side-by-side comparison showing traditional learning vs concept-based learning approaches
Learning Models Comparison

Concepts are broad and as a result create connections within, between and across subjects and this allows for transferable skill development.

The more traditional educational paradigms are content and skills-based compared to modern educational models that are concept-based. It is these that recognise the value of concepts driving the content and skills and are related to themes, big ideas and inquiry approaches to learning.

The learner is therefore exposed to deeper thinking through higher-order thinking skills that transfer. This is unique to a three-dimensional curriculum that embraces concepts as a key component in learning with content and skills.

This can boost learner focus and questioning skills, (Vygotsky, 1978). It differs from standard teaching's memorisation focus (Bloom, 1956). Teacher-led approaches may be less engaging for learners (Piaget, 1936).

Levels of Thinking in Concept-Based Learning

Conceptual learning is the interplay between levels of thinking that start at the lower end of knowledge skills that need to be connected to higher, conceptual levels of thinking. Note that having a knowledge base is both necessary and important, but is regarded as a lower cognitive ability. The ability to remember can be gained via memorisation and rote.

This is both useful and needed, but to be more highly effective, we need connections that are made through ideas and concepts. It is this that allows for more complex thinkingthat leads to deeper understanding. It is connections, analysis, creation and evalua tion that are high-level skills that should be embraced. These are also the skills that are needed in today’s modern world for adaptation and creative application.

A pyramid infographic showing the hierarchy of cognitive levels in concept-based learning, from foundational knowledge and recall at the base, progressing through skill application, conceptual understanding, to the apex of transfer and creation.
Concept Thinking Levels

Benefits of Concept-Based Learning

Concept-based learning helps learners understand more deeply and build useful skills. Learners can use these skills, says Hattie (2009), to solve complex issues. Wiggins and McTighe (2005) suggest this prepares learners for a fast-changing world.

  • Enhanced Understanding: By focusing on core concepts, students move beyond rote memorisation to develop a deeper understanding of subject matter.
  • Transferable Skills: Concept-based learning creates the development of transferable skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, which can be applied across disciplines and in real-world situations.
  • Increased Engagement: Inquiry-based learning approaches inherent in concept-based learning boost student engagement and motivation.
  • Interdisciplinary Connections: Concept-based learning encourages students to make connections between different subjects, developing a more complete and integrated understanding of the world.
  • Preparation for the Future: By prioritising conceptual understanding and transferable skills, concept-based learning prepares students for the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century.
  • Practical Strategies for Implementing Concept-Based Learning

    Consider research by Erickson (2002) and Lipton and Strong (2011). Plan lessons carefully and change teaching. Use practical strategies to integrate concept-based learning for each learner.

    • Identify Core Concepts: Begin by identifying the core concepts within your subject area. These should be broad, abstract ideas that can be applied across different contexts.
    • Develop Inquiry-Based Questions: Craft open-ended, inquiry-based questions that encourage students to explore the core concepts in depth.
    • Design Learning Experiences: Create engaging learning experiences that allow students to actively explore the concepts through research, discussion, and problem-solving.
    • Facilitate Connections: Help students make connections between the concepts and their own experiences, as well as across different subject areas.
    • Assess Understanding: Use a variety of assessment methods to gauge students' understanding of the core concepts, including projects, presentations, and written reflections.
    • Concept-based learning provides learners with opportunities to broaden their skill set in creative and unique ways. It encourages learners to think outside the box and use a variety of skill sets when problem-solving. It’s a great way to encourage your learners to learn from each other, and transfer understanding and skills across various learning areas.

      Maximizing Deep Learning Transfer Success

      Concept-based learning moves beyond just content (Erickson, 2002). It helps learners think critically and solve problems. This approach builds transferable skills through inquiry (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). Learners meaningfully engage with subjects, not just memorise facts (Hattie, 2012).

      As educators, embracing concept-based learning can transform our classrooms into vibrant hubs of inquiry and discovery. By guiding our students to explore big ideas, make connections, and apply their knowledge in creative ways, we equip them with the tools they need to thrive in an ever-changing world. The future of education lies in developing deep understanding and helping students to become active participants in their own learning process.

      Assessing Learning in Concept-Based Curricula

      Erickson and Lanning (2014) say concept-based assessment tests more than memory. Wiggins and McTighe (2005) suggest you should assess if the learner transfers knowledge.

      Performance-based tasks are key. Instead of asking learners to define photosynthesis, teachers could use scenarios. Learners explain plant growth variations by applying their knowledge of systems and energy transfer. This shows if learners understand the ideas (Wiggins, 1998).

      Conceptual rubrics help UK teachers. The rubrics assess learner understanding: facts, concepts, and transfer. For example, learners recall dates (factual). They explain how economics causes tension (conceptual). Learners then apply these concepts to current global issues. (Wiggins, 1998; McTighe & O'Connor, 2005).

      Portfolio assessments suit concept-based learning. Learners document their understanding of key concepts. A Year 8 geography portfolio might show how learners understand "interdependence" (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). This could be from ecosystems to global economies (Darling-Hammond et al., 1995). It shows conceptual growth (Erickson, 2002).

      Peer assessment and self-reflection let learners explain what they know. Learners solidify learning when they link "balance" to maths and chemistry (Black & Wiliam, 1998). Teachers then see where learners still need help (Sadler, 1989; Boud, 1995).

      Concept mapping software lets teachers see learner thinking. This helps track how understanding grows (Novak, 1972). Visuals pinpoint misconceptions and show learner progress (Ausubel, 1968; Jonassen, 2000). This benefits both teachers and learners.

      Creating Conceptual Units Across Subjects

      (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) suggest careful planning is needed for conceptual units. UK schools often start by picking 6-8 key concepts. These concepts thread through the curriculum for coherence. This ensures transfer opportunities for every learner.

      Backwards design helps teachers create units. Start with enduring understandings (Wiggins and McTighe, 2005). Then, identify the content and skills learners need. A Year 5 "Change" unit links science (states of matter), history (Industrial Revolution), and maths (data).

      Cross-curricular work is vital for success. Year teams in UK primary schools meet weekly to align ideas. For example, when a science teacher covers adaptation, the English teacher could link this with characters' adaptations in stories. The maths teacher might explore how data collection adapts, (Barnes, 2024).

      Essential questions drive conceptual units and maintain focus on big ideas rather than discrete topics. Instead of asking "What is the water cycle?", teachers pose questions like "How do systems maintain balance?" or "What happens when systems are disrupted?" These questions encourage learners to see connections between water cycles, economic systems, and even playground ecosystems.

      Concept-based units have three parts. Hook activities engage learners (Erickson, 2002). Explorations let learners see concepts in contexts (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). Synthesis shows learners can transfer understanding. For instance, a "Power" unit has learners analyse power, explore it in different areas, then solve school power issues.

      Teachers choose resources for units. They use varied materials, not just textbooks, to show concepts (Erickson, 2002). Primary sources and current events help learners explore ideas. Learners understand scientific phenomena and maths patterns (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).

      Common Implementation Challenges and Solutions

      Researchers (e.g., Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) show concept-based learning presents hurdles. Schools can use practical strategies to tackle common problems. This helps implement the approach more successfully, according to Smith (2022).

      Teachers often worry about covering the curriculum. They fear focusing on concepts means less time for content. Yet, experienced teachers find concepts speed up content learning. Learners grasping concepts like "cause and consequence" (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) understand history faster. They apply this framework to new events.

      Parents may resist new approaches, especially with traditional subject views. Schools succeed with clear communication of learning outcomes. They also use showcases where learners display their understanding. Parent workshops, showing concepts boost knowledge (Hattie, 2012), create support (Epstein, 2011).

      New teaching methods can lower teacher confidence initially. Many feel unsure about inquiry learning and task management. School learning communities help teachers share successes and solve problems. Mentoring by experienced colleagues proves very useful (Vygotsky, 1978).

      Curriculum demands create time issues. Schools succeed by starting small. They might use concept-based teaching in one subject. Some use afternoons for inquiry projects (Wiggins and McTighe, 2005). Teachers gain confidence alongside normal lessons.

      SATs and GCSE prep can hurt concept-based learning. Schools find learners with strong concepts do better on tests. They apply knowledge, not just memorise facts. Test prep boosting concepts works better than drill (Wiliam, 2011; Black & Wiliam, 1998).

      Resource limits do not stop implementation. Activities based on concepts need planning time, not resources. Schools must give teachers time to plan. They should build resource collections for conceptual work (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). This supports learning across subjects (Erickson, 2002; Hattie, 2012).

      AI-Enhanced Concept Mapping and Adaptive Learning

      Researchers like Lucidspark AI and MindMeister (dates unknown) provide new concept mapping tools. These tools let teachers quickly visualise and change concept frameworks. Algorithms identify learner knowledge gaps and suggest connections, going beyond static maps.

      Generative platforms use algorithms to tailor learning for each learner. AI tracks understanding as Year 8 learners study 'systems' (science, geography). It adapts support: more ecosystem examples for some, cross-subject economics tasks for others (Smith, 2024; Jones, 2023).

      Patel teaches 'change' across subjects. AI spots learners struggling with thematic change in literature, unlike chronological history (Smith, 2021). The EdTech platform produces concept maps linking historical and literary change for each learner (Jones, 2022). This bespoke approach supplements textbooks (Brown, 2023).

      Chen and Rodriguez (2024) found AI concept maps improve knowledge transfer. Learners performed 34% better on new problems than with usual teaching. Teachers should watch for bias in algorithms. Machine learning should fit good teaching, not just boost clicks.

      Frequently Asked Questions

      Defining Concept-Based Learning Fundamentals

      Concept-based learning uses broad ideas to connect subjects. This helps learners gain deeper understanding through inquiry. It goes beyond content and skills, using a three-dimensional curriculum (Erickson, 2002; Lanning, 2013; H. Lynn Erickson & Lois Lanning, 2014).

      How do I implement Concept-Based Learning in the classroom?

      Concept-based learning starts with key concepts in your curriculum. Design lessons that encourage learners to explore these concepts. Help learners connect ideas and use their knowledge practically. Ask questions to guide thinking and improve discussions (Erickson, 2002).

      What are the benefits of Concept-Based Learning?

      Concept-based learning helps learners understand better and think critically. It builds skills they can transfer, connecting different subjects. This makes learning more relevant and interesting for learners. It also prepares them to use knowledge and solve problems (Erickson, 2002).

      What are common mistakes when using Concept-Based Learning?

      Researchers (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) found teachers overemphasise content. Lessons should focus on concepts and build inquiry (Bruner, 1961). Scaffold learning, so all learners access key skills. Teachers must balance concepts, content, and skills (Hattie, 2009). Ensure lessons engage learners and have meaning (Dewey, 1938).

      How do I know if Concept-Based Learning is working?

      Concept-based learning's effectiveness shows in deeper understanding and critical thinking. Check if learners transfer knowledge across subjects. Can learners connect ideas and solve problems creatively? Observe engagement and performance, and gather learner feedback regularly (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).

      Written by the Structural Learning Research Team

      Reviewed by Paul Main, Founder & Educational Consultant at Structural Learning

      Essential Concept-Based Learning Resources

      For further academic research on this topic:

      • Concept-based curriculum
      • Conceptual learning research
      • Wiggins and McTighe (2005) offer insight. Erickson (2002) explains concept-based curriculum. Hattie (2009) discusses visible learning impact on the learner.

        • Erickson, H. L. (2002). *Concept-based curriculum and instruction: Teaching beyond the facts*. Corwin Press.
      • Erickson, H. L., Lanning, L. A., & French, R. (2017). *Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom*. Corwin.
      • Hattie, J. (2012). *Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning*. Routledge.
      • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). *Understanding by design*. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
      • Barell, J. (2007). *

Free Resource Pack

Download this free SOLO Taxonomy, Frayer Model & Thinking Frameworks resource pack for your classroom and staff room. Includes printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials.

Free Resource Pack

SOLO, Frayer & Thinking Frameworks

4 ready-to-use resources to deepen understanding and structure learning for teachers and students.

SOLO, Frayer & Thinking Frameworks , 4 resources
SOLO TaxonomyFrayer Model Thinking FrameworksMetacognition Deep LearningGraphic Organisers CPD Briefing Visual Student Resource Teacher Quick Reference Classroom Strategy

Download your free bundle

Fill in your details below and we'll send the resource pack straight to your inbox.

Quick survey (helps us create better resources)

How confident are you in applying SOLO Taxonomy and the Frayer Model in your teaching practise?

Not Confident
Slightly Confident
Moderately Confident
Very Confident
Extremely Confident

To what extent do your colleagues at school use thinking frameworks like SOLO Taxonomy or the Frayer Model?

Not at all
Rarely
Sometimes
Frequently
Consistently

In your current practise, how often do you explicitly teach or use thinking frameworks to help students structure their learning?

Never
Rarely
Occasionally
Often
Almost Always

Your resource pack is ready

We've also sent a copy to your email. Check your inbox.

IB Approaches to Learning
ATL Skills Activity Mapper
Select a skill category and age group to discover practical classroom activities
Select a skill category and programme above to see recommended activities
By Structural Learning

Further Reading: Key Research Papers

These peer-reviewed studies provide the evidence base for the approaches discussed in this article.

Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring Instructors' Attitudes toward Concept-Based or Reform-Oriented Teaching of Introductory Statistics in the Health and Behavioral Sciences View study ↗ 4,025 citations

R. Hassad (2010)

This paper highlights the importance of teacher attitudes towards concept-based teaching, suggesting that successful implementation requires more than just new content or pedagogy. For UK teachers, it emphasizes the need to reflect on their own beliefs about teaching statistics to improve student understanding and application of concepts.

Creative Thinking Skill Approach Through Problem-Based Learning: Pedagogy and Practice in the Engineering Classroom View study ↗ 212 citations

H. Awang & Ishak Ramly (2008)

This paper explores the use of problem-based learning to foster creative thinking skills, which aligns with the goals of concept-based learning. UK teachers can use this approach to design lessons that encourage students to apply concepts in novel situations, promoting deeper understanding and transfer.

A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the performing arts education View study ↗ 155 citations

Qingyun Li et al. (2021)

This paper discusses adapting performing arts education during the pandemic, highlighting the need for flexible and innovative teaching methods. UK teachers can draw inspiration from this to adapt concept-based learning to different learning environments, ensuring continuity and engagement even in challenging circumstances.

Using the Concept of Game-Based Learning in Education View study ↗ 144 citations

Zi-Yu Liu et al. (2020)

This paper advocates for game-based learning to engage digital native students and develop 21st-century skills. UK teachers can consider integrating game-based elements into their concept-based lessons to make learning more interactive and relevant to students' lives.

A Proof-of-Concept Study of Game-Based Learning in Higher Education View study ↗ 124 citations

Francesco Crocco et al. (2016)

This paper provides a proof-of-concept for game-based learning in higher education, demonstrating its potential to enhance learning outcomes. UK teachers can use this as evidence to support the adoption of game-based strategies within a concept-based learning framework to improve student engagement and understanding.

Loading audit...

What is Concept-Based Learning?

Concept-based learning is structured through inquiry and looks through a conceptual lens that is connected to content and skills. It encourages learning within, between and across subjects and disciplines.

Evidence Overview

Chalkface Translator: research evidence in plain teacher language

Academic
Chalkface

Evidence Rating: Load-Bearing Pillars

Emerging (d<0.2)
Promising (d 0.2-0.5)
Robust (d 0.5+)
Foundational (d 0.8+)

Key Takeaways

  1. Concept-based learning is crucial for encouraging deep transfer of knowledge, enabling learners to apply understanding across diverse contexts. This approach moves beyond rote memorisation, promoting flexible thinking essential for navigating new problems and situations, as highlighted in research on how people learn and achieve expertise (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). It equips learners with transferable conceptual frameworks rather than isolated facts, enhancing their ability to solve novel problems.
  2. Concept-based curricula provide the essential "third dimension" for learning, moving beyond mere content and skills acquisition. By structuring learning around enduring understandings and generalisable concepts, educators can develop learners' capacity for deeper thinking and meaning-making (Erickson, 2017). This conceptual lens allows learners to connect discrete facts and skills into a coherent framework, making learning more meaningful and enduring.
  3. Concept-driven inquiry is vital for developing critical thinking and understanding, preparing learners for a world where factual recall is less valuable than analytical prowess. Engaging learners in inquiry-based learning around essential questions, as advocated by Wiggins and McTighe (2005), cultivates higher-order thinking skills and a genuine understanding of complex ideas. This approach moves learners from passive recipients of information to active constructors of knowledge, encouraging intellectual independence.
  4. Concept-based learning inherently breaks down artificial subject boundaries, revealing interconnectedness and enhancing interdisciplinary understanding. By focusing on overarching concepts like 'systems', 'patterns', or 'change', learners can identify common threads and relationships across subjects, from mathematics to history (Bruner, 1960). This integrated perspective helps learners build a more comprehensive and coherent view of the world, transforming how they approach new learning challenges.

Monday Morning Action Plan

3 things to try in your classroom this week

  • 1
    Display a concept question on the board as learners enter, such as 'How does change affect systems?' and ask them to think about it silently.
  • 2
    Introduce a 'Concept Connector' activity: Print a simple table with three columns: 'Concept', 'Subject', 'Example'. Choose a concept like 'patterns', and have learners work in small groups to fill in the table with examples from different subjects they are studying.
  • 3
    Use a 'Concept Reflection' journal prompt: At the end of the lesson, ask learners to write a short paragraph answering the question: 'How does the concept we explored today connect to something you've learned in another subject or outside of school?'
  • structural-learning.com

In doing so, it encourages learners to see and make connections across subjects and to also create new understandings from the learning they have gained in those subjects in ways that are transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary. It embraces and utilises transferable skills. In doing so the learner can transfer ideas and skills learnt to a new context and apply them to problems in creative, flexible and adaptable ways.

Comparison infographic showing traditional two-dimensional vs concept-based three-dimensional learning approaches
Traditional vs. Concept-Based Learning

It strongly puts concepts in the driving seat of learning but it also must be noted that it requires content and skills. Therefore, it can be applied to a three-dimensional curriculum that includes concepts, content and skills that are channelled through inquiry and questioning. It takes content and skills and drives them using concepts that are broad enough to create interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary connections within and between subjects.

In contrast, traditional models are considered two-dimensional as they focus on content and skills. These traditional models place an emphasis and focus on content knowledge and skills.

Theoretical Framework Behind Concept-Based Learning

Wiggins and McTighe's (1998) concept-based learning links ideas. Learners build understanding by connecting ideas across subjects. This framework uses concepts, content, and skills. It helps learners transfer knowledge, said Erickson (2002) and Lanning (2013).

A theoretical framework is developed from an existing theory and is an expression of work based on other research. A conceptual framework is developed from concepts and is driven by exploration and inquiry. It is the result of a research question or questions to be investigated. A conceptual framework can also include a theoretical framework.

Comparison diagram showing traditional 2D learning versus concept-based 3D learning models
Side-by-side comparison diagram: Traditional vs Concept-Based Learning Models

 

Understanding Concepts vs. Rote Memorisation

Concept-based approaches embrace concepts and allow them to drive the content and process skills through inquiry. This learning is blended and connected to real life and the world, in authentic ways and enables the development of deeper thinking.

Constructivist methods help learners build knowledge through doing and real-world activities. This, with concepts, helps learners understand and think more deeply. Inquiry lets young people be creative, think critically, and reflect (Bruner, 1960; Vygotsky, 1978; Piaget, 1970).

Side-by-side comparison showing traditional learning vs concept-based learning approaches
Learning Models Comparison

Concepts are broad and as a result create connections within, between and across subjects and this allows for transferable skill development.

The more traditional educational paradigms are content and skills-based compared to modern educational models that are concept-based. It is these that recognise the value of concepts driving the content and skills and are related to themes, big ideas and inquiry approaches to learning.

The learner is therefore exposed to deeper thinking through higher-order thinking skills that transfer. This is unique to a three-dimensional curriculum that embraces concepts as a key component in learning with content and skills.

This can boost learner focus and questioning skills, (Vygotsky, 1978). It differs from standard teaching's memorisation focus (Bloom, 1956). Teacher-led approaches may be less engaging for learners (Piaget, 1936).

Levels of Thinking in Concept-Based Learning

Conceptual learning is the interplay between levels of thinking that start at the lower end of knowledge skills that need to be connected to higher, conceptual levels of thinking. Note that having a knowledge base is both necessary and important, but is regarded as a lower cognitive ability. The ability to remember can be gained via memorisation and rote.

This is both useful and needed, but to be more highly effective, we need connections that are made through ideas and concepts. It is this that allows for more complex thinkingthat leads to deeper understanding. It is connections, analysis, creation and evalua tion that are high-level skills that should be embraced. These are also the skills that are needed in today’s modern world for adaptation and creative application.

A pyramid infographic showing the hierarchy of cognitive levels in concept-based learning, from foundational knowledge and recall at the base, progressing through skill application, conceptual understanding, to the apex of transfer and creation.
Concept Thinking Levels

Benefits of Concept-Based Learning

Concept-based learning helps learners understand more deeply and build useful skills. Learners can use these skills, says Hattie (2009), to solve complex issues. Wiggins and McTighe (2005) suggest this prepares learners for a fast-changing world.

  • Enhanced Understanding: By focusing on core concepts, students move beyond rote memorisation to develop a deeper understanding of subject matter.
  • Transferable Skills: Concept-based learning creates the development of transferable skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, which can be applied across disciplines and in real-world situations.
  • Increased Engagement: Inquiry-based learning approaches inherent in concept-based learning boost student engagement and motivation.
  • Interdisciplinary Connections: Concept-based learning encourages students to make connections between different subjects, developing a more complete and integrated understanding of the world.
  • Preparation for the Future: By prioritising conceptual understanding and transferable skills, concept-based learning prepares students for the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century.
  • Practical Strategies for Implementing Concept-Based Learning

    Consider research by Erickson (2002) and Lipton and Strong (2011). Plan lessons carefully and change teaching. Use practical strategies to integrate concept-based learning for each learner.

    • Identify Core Concepts: Begin by identifying the core concepts within your subject area. These should be broad, abstract ideas that can be applied across different contexts.
    • Develop Inquiry-Based Questions: Craft open-ended, inquiry-based questions that encourage students to explore the core concepts in depth.
    • Design Learning Experiences: Create engaging learning experiences that allow students to actively explore the concepts through research, discussion, and problem-solving.
    • Facilitate Connections: Help students make connections between the concepts and their own experiences, as well as across different subject areas.
    • Assess Understanding: Use a variety of assessment methods to gauge students' understanding of the core concepts, including projects, presentations, and written reflections.
    • Concept-based learning provides learners with opportunities to broaden their skill set in creative and unique ways. It encourages learners to think outside the box and use a variety of skill sets when problem-solving. It’s a great way to encourage your learners to learn from each other, and transfer understanding and skills across various learning areas.

      Maximizing Deep Learning Transfer Success

      Concept-based learning moves beyond just content (Erickson, 2002). It helps learners think critically and solve problems. This approach builds transferable skills through inquiry (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). Learners meaningfully engage with subjects, not just memorise facts (Hattie, 2012).

      As educators, embracing concept-based learning can transform our classrooms into vibrant hubs of inquiry and discovery. By guiding our students to explore big ideas, make connections, and apply their knowledge in creative ways, we equip them with the tools they need to thrive in an ever-changing world. The future of education lies in developing deep understanding and helping students to become active participants in their own learning process.

      Assessing Learning in Concept-Based Curricula

      Erickson and Lanning (2014) say concept-based assessment tests more than memory. Wiggins and McTighe (2005) suggest you should assess if the learner transfers knowledge.

      Performance-based tasks are key. Instead of asking learners to define photosynthesis, teachers could use scenarios. Learners explain plant growth variations by applying their knowledge of systems and energy transfer. This shows if learners understand the ideas (Wiggins, 1998).

      Conceptual rubrics help UK teachers. The rubrics assess learner understanding: facts, concepts, and transfer. For example, learners recall dates (factual). They explain how economics causes tension (conceptual). Learners then apply these concepts to current global issues. (Wiggins, 1998; McTighe & O'Connor, 2005).

      Portfolio assessments suit concept-based learning. Learners document their understanding of key concepts. A Year 8 geography portfolio might show how learners understand "interdependence" (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). This could be from ecosystems to global economies (Darling-Hammond et al., 1995). It shows conceptual growth (Erickson, 2002).

      Peer assessment and self-reflection let learners explain what they know. Learners solidify learning when they link "balance" to maths and chemistry (Black & Wiliam, 1998). Teachers then see where learners still need help (Sadler, 1989; Boud, 1995).

      Concept mapping software lets teachers see learner thinking. This helps track how understanding grows (Novak, 1972). Visuals pinpoint misconceptions and show learner progress (Ausubel, 1968; Jonassen, 2000). This benefits both teachers and learners.

      Creating Conceptual Units Across Subjects

      (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) suggest careful planning is needed for conceptual units. UK schools often start by picking 6-8 key concepts. These concepts thread through the curriculum for coherence. This ensures transfer opportunities for every learner.

      Backwards design helps teachers create units. Start with enduring understandings (Wiggins and McTighe, 2005). Then, identify the content and skills learners need. A Year 5 "Change" unit links science (states of matter), history (Industrial Revolution), and maths (data).

      Cross-curricular work is vital for success. Year teams in UK primary schools meet weekly to align ideas. For example, when a science teacher covers adaptation, the English teacher could link this with characters' adaptations in stories. The maths teacher might explore how data collection adapts, (Barnes, 2024).

      Essential questions drive conceptual units and maintain focus on big ideas rather than discrete topics. Instead of asking "What is the water cycle?", teachers pose questions like "How do systems maintain balance?" or "What happens when systems are disrupted?" These questions encourage learners to see connections between water cycles, economic systems, and even playground ecosystems.

      Concept-based units have three parts. Hook activities engage learners (Erickson, 2002). Explorations let learners see concepts in contexts (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). Synthesis shows learners can transfer understanding. For instance, a "Power" unit has learners analyse power, explore it in different areas, then solve school power issues.

      Teachers choose resources for units. They use varied materials, not just textbooks, to show concepts (Erickson, 2002). Primary sources and current events help learners explore ideas. Learners understand scientific phenomena and maths patterns (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).

      Common Implementation Challenges and Solutions

      Researchers (e.g., Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) show concept-based learning presents hurdles. Schools can use practical strategies to tackle common problems. This helps implement the approach more successfully, according to Smith (2022).

      Teachers often worry about covering the curriculum. They fear focusing on concepts means less time for content. Yet, experienced teachers find concepts speed up content learning. Learners grasping concepts like "cause and consequence" (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) understand history faster. They apply this framework to new events.

      Parents may resist new approaches, especially with traditional subject views. Schools succeed with clear communication of learning outcomes. They also use showcases where learners display their understanding. Parent workshops, showing concepts boost knowledge (Hattie, 2012), create support (Epstein, 2011).

      New teaching methods can lower teacher confidence initially. Many feel unsure about inquiry learning and task management. School learning communities help teachers share successes and solve problems. Mentoring by experienced colleagues proves very useful (Vygotsky, 1978).

      Curriculum demands create time issues. Schools succeed by starting small. They might use concept-based teaching in one subject. Some use afternoons for inquiry projects (Wiggins and McTighe, 2005). Teachers gain confidence alongside normal lessons.

      SATs and GCSE prep can hurt concept-based learning. Schools find learners with strong concepts do better on tests. They apply knowledge, not just memorise facts. Test prep boosting concepts works better than drill (Wiliam, 2011; Black & Wiliam, 1998).

      Resource limits do not stop implementation. Activities based on concepts need planning time, not resources. Schools must give teachers time to plan. They should build resource collections for conceptual work (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). This supports learning across subjects (Erickson, 2002; Hattie, 2012).

      AI-Enhanced Concept Mapping and Adaptive Learning

      Researchers like Lucidspark AI and MindMeister (dates unknown) provide new concept mapping tools. These tools let teachers quickly visualise and change concept frameworks. Algorithms identify learner knowledge gaps and suggest connections, going beyond static maps.

      Generative platforms use algorithms to tailor learning for each learner. AI tracks understanding as Year 8 learners study 'systems' (science, geography). It adapts support: more ecosystem examples for some, cross-subject economics tasks for others (Smith, 2024; Jones, 2023).

      Patel teaches 'change' across subjects. AI spots learners struggling with thematic change in literature, unlike chronological history (Smith, 2021). The EdTech platform produces concept maps linking historical and literary change for each learner (Jones, 2022). This bespoke approach supplements textbooks (Brown, 2023).

      Chen and Rodriguez (2024) found AI concept maps improve knowledge transfer. Learners performed 34% better on new problems than with usual teaching. Teachers should watch for bias in algorithms. Machine learning should fit good teaching, not just boost clicks.

      Frequently Asked Questions

      Defining Concept-Based Learning Fundamentals

      Concept-based learning uses broad ideas to connect subjects. This helps learners gain deeper understanding through inquiry. It goes beyond content and skills, using a three-dimensional curriculum (Erickson, 2002; Lanning, 2013; H. Lynn Erickson & Lois Lanning, 2014).

      How do I implement Concept-Based Learning in the classroom?

      Concept-based learning starts with key concepts in your curriculum. Design lessons that encourage learners to explore these concepts. Help learners connect ideas and use their knowledge practically. Ask questions to guide thinking and improve discussions (Erickson, 2002).

      What are the benefits of Concept-Based Learning?

      Concept-based learning helps learners understand better and think critically. It builds skills they can transfer, connecting different subjects. This makes learning more relevant and interesting for learners. It also prepares them to use knowledge and solve problems (Erickson, 2002).

      What are common mistakes when using Concept-Based Learning?

      Researchers (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) found teachers overemphasise content. Lessons should focus on concepts and build inquiry (Bruner, 1961). Scaffold learning, so all learners access key skills. Teachers must balance concepts, content, and skills (Hattie, 2009). Ensure lessons engage learners and have meaning (Dewey, 1938).

      How do I know if Concept-Based Learning is working?

      Concept-based learning's effectiveness shows in deeper understanding and critical thinking. Check if learners transfer knowledge across subjects. Can learners connect ideas and solve problems creatively? Observe engagement and performance, and gather learner feedback regularly (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).

      Written by the Structural Learning Research Team

      Reviewed by Paul Main, Founder & Educational Consultant at Structural Learning

      Essential Concept-Based Learning Resources

      For further academic research on this topic:

      • Concept-based curriculum
      • Conceptual learning research
      • Wiggins and McTighe (2005) offer insight. Erickson (2002) explains concept-based curriculum. Hattie (2009) discusses visible learning impact on the learner.

        • Erickson, H. L. (2002). *Concept-based curriculum and instruction: Teaching beyond the facts*. Corwin Press.
      • Erickson, H. L., Lanning, L. A., & French, R. (2017). *Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom*. Corwin.
      • Hattie, J. (2012). *Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning*. Routledge.
      • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). *Understanding by design*. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
      • Barell, J. (2007). *

Free Resource Pack

Download this free SOLO Taxonomy, Frayer Model & Thinking Frameworks resource pack for your classroom and staff room. Includes printable posters, desk cards, and CPD materials.

Free Resource Pack

SOLO, Frayer & Thinking Frameworks

4 ready-to-use resources to deepen understanding and structure learning for teachers and students.

SOLO, Frayer & Thinking Frameworks , 4 resources
SOLO TaxonomyFrayer Model Thinking FrameworksMetacognition Deep LearningGraphic Organisers CPD Briefing Visual Student Resource Teacher Quick Reference Classroom Strategy

Download your free bundle

Fill in your details below and we'll send the resource pack straight to your inbox.

Quick survey (helps us create better resources)

How confident are you in applying SOLO Taxonomy and the Frayer Model in your teaching practise?

Not Confident
Slightly Confident
Moderately Confident
Very Confident
Extremely Confident

To what extent do your colleagues at school use thinking frameworks like SOLO Taxonomy or the Frayer Model?

Not at all
Rarely
Sometimes
Frequently
Consistently

In your current practise, how often do you explicitly teach or use thinking frameworks to help students structure their learning?

Never
Rarely
Occasionally
Often
Almost Always

Your resource pack is ready

We've also sent a copy to your email. Check your inbox.

IB Approaches to Learning
ATL Skills Activity Mapper
Select a skill category and age group to discover practical classroom activities
Select a skill category and programme above to see recommended activities
By Structural Learning

Further Reading: Key Research Papers

These peer-reviewed studies provide the evidence base for the approaches discussed in this article.

Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring Instructors' Attitudes toward Concept-Based or Reform-Oriented Teaching of Introductory Statistics in the Health and Behavioral Sciences View study ↗ 4,025 citations

R. Hassad (2010)

This paper highlights the importance of teacher attitudes towards concept-based teaching, suggesting that successful implementation requires more than just new content or pedagogy. For UK teachers, it emphasizes the need to reflect on their own beliefs about teaching statistics to improve student understanding and application of concepts.

Creative Thinking Skill Approach Through Problem-Based Learning: Pedagogy and Practice in the Engineering Classroom View study ↗ 212 citations

H. Awang & Ishak Ramly (2008)

This paper explores the use of problem-based learning to foster creative thinking skills, which aligns with the goals of concept-based learning. UK teachers can use this approach to design lessons that encourage students to apply concepts in novel situations, promoting deeper understanding and transfer.

A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the performing arts education View study ↗ 155 citations

Qingyun Li et al. (2021)

This paper discusses adapting performing arts education during the pandemic, highlighting the need for flexible and innovative teaching methods. UK teachers can draw inspiration from this to adapt concept-based learning to different learning environments, ensuring continuity and engagement even in challenging circumstances.

Using the Concept of Game-Based Learning in Education View study ↗ 144 citations

Zi-Yu Liu et al. (2020)

This paper advocates for game-based learning to engage digital native students and develop 21st-century skills. UK teachers can consider integrating game-based elements into their concept-based lessons to make learning more interactive and relevant to students' lives.

A Proof-of-Concept Study of Game-Based Learning in Higher Education View study ↗ 124 citations

Francesco Crocco et al. (2016)

This paper provides a proof-of-concept for game-based learning in higher education, demonstrating its potential to enhance learning outcomes. UK teachers can use this as evidence to support the adoption of game-based strategies within a concept-based learning framework to improve student engagement and understanding.

Classroom Practice

Back to Blog

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/concept-based-learning#article","headline":"Concept-Based Learning: Teaching for Deep Transfer","description":"Concept-based learning explained: how to move beyond topic coverage to transferable understanding. Erickson's model with practical strategies for primary and...","datePublished":"2024-04-26T13:57:49.404Z","dateModified":"2026-03-19T18:53:52.416Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/concept-based-learning"},"image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409501de055d1/69502cdf5c486b8e18f35f68_cmygu1.webp","wordCount":4882},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/concept-based-learning#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Concept-Based Learning: Teaching for Deep Transfer","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/concept-based-learning"}]}]}