Developing Student Metacognition: A Teacher's Guide

Developing learner metacognition, the phrase teachers search for, developing student metacognition, means teaching learners to plan, monitor and review their own thinking while they work, then handing that control over a step at a time. It is not a separate study skill or a reflection sheet at the end of a lesson. The teacher models a strategy in full, leaves a step out, prompts, and then watches the learner attempt the task alone and in a new context. Every routine on this page is built for that fade, from the first full model to independent use.

In practice, teachers help learners notice what they know, choose a strategy, check whether it is working and explain what they will change next. The strongest routines are built into subject teaching, classroom talk and feedback.

This article sets out the core phases. It covers the classroom strategies and the assessment routines you can use. Together they make metacognition visible without adding paperwork.

‍

Metacognition In Education

Flavell (1979) said metacognition helps learners take charge of their thinking. Knowing yourself, planning and reflecting help learning in every subject. Hattie (2012) showed that it improves results and confidence. Zimmerman (2002) described self-regulated learning as a cycle. It has three phases: forethought, performance and self-reflection.

‍

Metacognition means learners think about their own thinking (Flavell, 1979). These strategies help learners become metacognitive (Nelson & Narens, 1990). Teachers support that awareness through guidance and practice (Hartman, 2001). We will make the learning process clear and give reflection its due.

Metacognitive knowledge means learners know about themselves as thinkers (Flavell, 1979). It also covers what they know about tasks and strategies, and that shapes how well they learn (Flavell, 1979).

Learners show they are aware of their own memory and understanding. Rehearsal helps them monitor how they are doing (Bjork et al., 2013). Chunking and elaborative interrogation help too (Dunlosky et al., 2013). These boost memory and build metacognitive skills (Flavell, 1979).

‍

Three Phases of Metacognitive Learning

Metacognition is usually split into two parts: metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation. Nelson and Narens (1990) modelled it as monitoring and control, passing between a meta level and an object level of thinking. Learners track their progress and use strategies such as rehearsal (Flavell, 1979). Judging your own work improves learning (Dunlosky & Metcalfe, 2009). This links to planning for success in class (Diamond, 2013).

‍

‍

Flavell (1981) told two kinds of thinking strategy apart. Learners use 'cognitive strategies' to learn. They use 'metacognitive strategies' to check that learning.

People sometimes use 'cognitive strategy' to mean metacognition. The terms differ, though. Our guide to metacognition versus cognition sets the two side by side. Cognitive strategies help learners solve problems (Flavell, 1981). Metacognitive strategies watch over their thinking as they learn.

Metacognitive strategies fall into three groups: self-monitoring, reflection on performance, and evaluation of knowledge. Self-monitoring means noticing what you do while you try to understand something. That includes noting how your mind works: how long an idea takes to come, whether you have made mistakes, and so on. Reflection on performance means asking why you did well or badly at a task. That can include asking yourself what worked well and what did not.

Checking understanding after a task is how you judge what learners know. Make sure they grasp the idea before you move on. Metacognitive strategies help learners spot their strengths and weaknesses. For example, learners who struggle to remember might use Post-it notes (e.g. Dunlosky et al., 2013).

‍

Essential Metacognitive Skills for Learners

Metacognition is linked to executive functions. These include planning and attention. They help learners plan, organise, remember and focus. Brown (1987) discussed metacognition alongside executive control and self-regulation. Flavell (1979) defined it as knowing about your own thinking and keeping watch on it.

Reasoning and problem-solving matter in school and in daily life. Metacognition shapes how well we learn. Research shows learners who use it often do better (Flavell, 1979). Reviews find that teaching these strategies can lift school results. Learners who monitor their thinking do well because they adjust what they do (Schraw, 1998).

‍

‍

Attention skills help learners focus. Planning strategies help them set out how to learn. Monitoring skills let learners check their progress. Debugging strategies deal with errors (Schraw, 1998). Evaluation skills help learners judge how well it went.

1) Monitoring, observing oneself and one's environment

2) Reflective, analysing information

3) Evaluative, assessing progress

4) Control, managing effort and resources. 

Metacognitive abilities are essential to successful learning. When we learn new information, we must first process it mentally. We then need to evaluate its meaning and relevance to ourselves. If we don't know where to begin with a subject, we should ask ourselves, "what am I good at? What am I bad at? Where would I benefit from additional study?" By doing these types of evaluations, we will make sure that we spend enough time studying topics that interest us most. 

‍

Self-Regulated Learning In Practice

Self-regulated learning lets learners think and act on their own. They monitor, judge and control what they do (Zimmerman, 2000). Self-regulation needs both knowledge and the will to use it. It happens during lessons and activities. Research shows these practical skills lift learner performance (Panadero et al, 2017).

Study strategies count as metacognitive thinking: planning, organising, setting goals, taking notes, rehearsing, testing and reviewing. This type of metacognitive thinking helps learners see their strengths and weaknesses more clearly, and it tends to improve their results. How does metacognition affect learner achievement? Metacognition, or thinking about your thinking, matters a great deal for success at school, because it helps you understand yourself and think more critically. Many learners do well on memory tasks but struggle to see the wider meaning of what they know. A metacognitive approach can help children learn deeply, where they have to build the meaning themselves.

‍

Metacognitive Knowledge And Learner Progress

Metacognitive knowledge means what a learner knows about themselves as a thinker (Flavell, 1979). Learners also weigh up the task and the strategies on offer, and that shapes how they learn. Research links metacognitive and self-regulated learning strategies with better school results (Hattie, 2012). This helps learners work on their own in every subject.

A common split is between working memory and long-term memory. Long-term memory includes declarative (explicit) memory and non-declarative forms such as procedural memory. Declarative knowledge covers things like names, dates, places and events; procedural knowledge covers skills such as maths calculations, grammar rules and ways of solving problems. Working memory is used to store and recall things for a short time. It lets people hold a few pieces of information while they work on other tasks.

Metacognitive knowledge is what learners know about themselves as thinkers. It includes what they know about tasks and strategies (Flavell, 1979). Learners think about their own thinking as they learn and solve problems (Nelson, 1996). This "thinking about thinking" includes knowing yourself, as many researchers have described.

Learners using rote learn facts, not skills (Anderson, 1983). They struggle to use knowledge in new situations. For example, a learner may learn times tables by repetition. They might not apply this knowledge unprompted (Bransford et al., 2000).

Study strategies are essential for academic achievement. Learners need a variety of study methods that will allow them to manage their time spent studying effectively. Some learners prefer to read textbooks from cover to cover before doing any practise problems. Others prefer to work out questions first then go back over the material. Still, others prefer to write down key points and make flashcards. Regardless of the method chosen, learners must know how to choose appropriate study tools based upon their needs. How should they Study Effectively? There are many ways to approach studying. The most effective way depends on an individual learner's preferences and the type of learning task.

‍

‍

Here are some tips for your learners.

1) Plan, Make sure you have enough time to complete all assignments.

2) Organise Materials. Keep everything in order, so you do not waste class time hunting for what you need.

3) Set Goals, Know exactly where you want to end up when you start studying.

4) Take Notes, Write down anything you wish to retain.

5) Re-read Material, Read what you wrote down earlier; this will help reinforce concepts learned during previous lessons.

6) Practise Problems, Work out answers ahead of time.

7) Use Resources, Find additional resources online or at home.

8) Review Test Questions, Go over test questions after completing homework.

9) Reflect, Think about what went well and what could be improved next time around.

10)

11) Be Flexible, Don't get too attached to one particular strategy. 

‍

Developing Metacognitive Skills

Learners gain from monitoring, reflecting, evaluating and controlling their own work (Zimmerman, 2002; Pintrich, 2002). These self-regulation tactics let learners check what they know and change tack. The research suggests that reflecting on a strategy, and judging it, helps learners learn on their own.

Metacognition means learners take charge of their thoughts and actions. Self-regulation helps learners focus and shut out distractions. It lets them check their work and do better (Nelson & Narens, 1990). Think of it as monitoring, regulation and control (Flavell, 1979).

‍

‍

Metacognition is not just for school work. People with high levels of metacognition do better both in their studies and socially. A person's level of metacognition may change with the setting. For example, someone who finds it hard to focus might do much better in school than outside it. Someone who does very well in school but struggles socially might find things harder at college. So people differ in which areas of life call for higher levels of metacognition.

Here are some everyday situations. Each one needs a different amount of metacognitive management.

• Studying a foreign language requires more attention to detail than reading a book.

• Playing sport takes focus and concentration, while watching TV takes less.

• A creative project needs more careful thought than a routine job assignment.

• Writing a paper requires more planning than writing a letter.

• Meeting new friends requires more effort than meeting old ones.

• Talking to strangers takes more preparation than talking to your family.

• Making decisions requires more reflection than making choices.

• Learning how to play an instrument requires more practise than learning how to read music.

• Reading books requires more attention than listening to lectures.

• Listening to lectures requires more attention than doing homework.

• Doing homework requires more attention than playing video games.

Teachers can use these strategies in class (EEF, 2018). The findings build on work by researchers such as Flavell (1979).

‍

Benefits of Metacognitive Learner Development

Metacognition helps learners learn by helping them manage what they do. Learners pay close attention to what they need to know, so they miss nothing. They also make time to reflect after studying or doing a task. And when they hit a problem while they study or work, they use strategies to solve it, such as re-reading, taking notes and asking questions.

‍

‍

Metacognition involves watching your thoughts and managing your feelings (Flavell, 1979). These skills help learners control how they act and make good choices. Thinking skills include critical thinking, problem-solving and communication (Lai, 2011). Critical thinking means weighing all sides before you decide (Ennis, 1993). Problem-solving is finding answers (Anderson, 1983).

Working together builds skills (Mercer & Littleton, 2007). Learners reason by grasping ideas and using logic (Inhelder & Piaget, 1958). They build judgement by testing ideas against evidence (Kahneman, 2011). Good communication helps learners say what they mean clearly (Vygotsky, 1978).

Metacognitive strategies are used to improve school results. Learners who use them tend to do better, because they can watch their own work and adjust it. For instance, if learners have trouble grasping an idea, they may ask themselves why. If the answer is not clear, they should try to find out where the gaps in their knowledge are.

Metacognition is key; learners manage their thinking with it. It helps them create better ways to handle thoughts and actions. Brown (1987), Flavell (1979) and Dunlosky and Metcalfe (2009) show useful activities.

Monitor yourself while reading. You might notice that you get distracted easily. Try to identify which parts of the text attract your attention first. Ask yourself whether there are any other reasons why you do not like specific passages.

Self-regulation: control what you do based on how well the assignment is going. When you start to feel anxious, remind yourself that anxiety usually fades once you get going on something hard. Self-evaluation: judge your progress towards your goals. Are you getting closer to finishing? Do you still have homework left? How much effort did you put into each part of the assignment?

Strategies from researchers such as Dunlosky et al. (2013) help learners reflect. Putting these ideas to work, as Nelson (1996) explored, supports learner progress in class.

To learn well, learners need to be self-regulated. They need to know what works best for them when they study or do a task. They must know how to manage what they do, so they can succeed at school and beyond. To help them get there, teachers should give learners chances to practise self-regulation and feedback on their efforts. Teachers also need to teach learners how to spot stress and cope with it while they study. Stressful moments often make learners lose focus and forget details.

Learners need subject knowledge to solve problems. They use what they already know to build new understanding (Anderson, 1983). They find, sort, analyse and judge information, then put it to use (Bransford & Stein, 1993). Learners must weigh up their options before they choose a solution.

‍

‍

Implementing Metacognitive Strategies in Classrooms

Metacognitive teaching helps learners reflect and use strategies. Teachers model their thinking, then guide learners to work on their own across subjects. Small steps in class build self-regulation (Perry et al., 2019).

Metacognition is key to learning. Universal thinking frameworks help learners process ideas (Flavell, 1979). They help learners break tasks down. Whole schools can raise metacognitive awareness. Use thinking tasks to set learning goals that learners can reach (Higgins et al., 2004; EEF, 2018).

This kind of metacognitive approach is easy to manage and useful straight away. Content knowledge does not have to give way to procedural knowledge; the two work together. As well as the framework, we have ready-made graphic organisers you can use as an off-the-shelf thinking strategy. Over time, we believe this approach can lift the confidence of every learner. If you would like to see the idea in action, do explore our dedicated webpage.

Metacognitive knowledge has three sides: declarative, procedural and conditional. Paris et al. (1983) found conditional knowledge is the hardest to teach. It is also the most useful for carrying learning from one subject to another.

Kruger and Dunning (1999) showed that new learners often think they understand more than they do. Expert learners, on the other hand, may underrate what they know. That gap in judgement means learners need metacognitive training to assess themselves well.

‍

‍

‍

Advanced Metacognitive Teaching Challenges

Teachers need metacognition strategies that work, plus tools to measure how self-aware learners are. They want ways to add metacognition to the curriculum that fit the age group and do not add strain. These questions explore the move towards independent learners (e.g. Flavell, 1979; Dunlosky & Metcalfe, 2009).

‍

‍

Can Metacognition Be Taught?

We all have metacognitive skills, but we tend to rely on others to tell us when we're right or wrong. However, we can teach ourselves to improve these skills, and it's something that everyone should strive to do. There are many ways to practise metacognition, such as asking yourself why you believe something, or evaluating your own reasoning process.

One of the best ways to improve your metacognitive skills is to write down your thoughts and analyse them later. By writing down your thoughts, you force yourself to consider them objectively, and you may realise that you weren't thinking clearly at the moment.

Another great way to practise metacognition is to ask yourself questions like "How did I arrive at my conclusion?" or "Is this true?" These questions require you to step outside of your current thought pattern and look at your conclusions from another perspective. Once you've practised metacognition, you'll notice that you're able to identify flaws in your logic much faster and more accurately.

What is the Purpose of Metacognition?

We use metacognitive skills to understand ourselves and others, and to improve our performance. Metacognition is a skill that everyone should practise, especially learners.

This metacognitive ability is important for academic success (Flavell, 1979). Learners who reflect on learning usually improve (Zimmerman, 2000). Effective reflection helps learners understand their strengths and weaknesses (Hattie, 2008). This understanding supports better learning outcomes (Black & Wiliam, 1998).

Metacognition also plays a role in professional development. People who are good at identifying strengths and weaknesses tend to excel in their careers. By practising metacognition, we can become better leaders, teachers, parents, and employees.

What are four Metacognitive Skills?

Here are four metacognition skills:

Self Awareness: Self awareness involves recognising your strengths and weaknesses, and knowing what you like and dislike. It's about understanding yourself and becoming comfortable with who you are.

Critical thinking involves evaluating information, (Facione, 1990). Learners question assumptions and evidence presented to them. Skills help learners challenge ideas critically, (Ennis, 2011; Willingham, 2007).

‍

Evidence-Based Strategies for Developing Learner Metacognition

Teachers need structured ways to use metacognition. Education Endowment Foundation research shows that teaching it directly can add eight months of progress over a year, on average. That makes it good value in the classroom (EEF).

The 'Think Aloud' method is one of the most powerful tools for building metacognitive awareness. Teachers say their thinking out loud as they solve a problem or read a text. That models the inner talk that skilled learners use without being told. For instance, a maths teacher might say: "I'm stuck on this equation, so I'll try working backwards from the answer." Or: "This method seems complicated; let me check if there's a simpler approach." Modelling like this helps learners see that confusion, and changing tack, are normal parts of learning.

Several studies offer classroom techniques for learners who use digital tools. These build metacognitive skills. Use them to support learner self-regulation (Dignath & Büttner, 2008). Research by Zimmerman (2002) shows this lifts results.

Structured reflection journals are another approach backed by evidence. They work well in Key Stages 3 and 4. Do not ask learners to write general reflections. Give them precise prompts aimed at metacognitive skills: "What strategy did you use to memorise these vocabulary words?" or "At what point did this concept click for you, and what helped?" Questions like these help learners spot their own learning patterns and the strategies that work for them.

Exit tickets give teachers quick assessment data. They also build learners' skill at judging their own work. Simple questions, like "Rate understanding 1-5, explain why," help learners check their progress. Checking like this, done often, builds the self-monitoring habits of learners who succeed on their own (Black & Wiliam, 1998).

This links closely with research on learning to learn, which offers more classroom strategies for teachers.

‍

‍

‍

How to Assess and Track Learner Metacognitive Development

Assessing metacognitive growth is tricky, because these skills are not always easy to see. Teachers need to capture learners' thinking, not just the subject knowledge that a normal test checks. A planned assessment shows where the metacognitive gaps are, so teachers can adapt what they teach. (Brown, 1987; Flavell, 1979; Pintrich, 2000)

One method that works is a learning journal, where learners write down their thinking on a regular basis. Teachers can give prompts such as "What strategy did you use to solve this problem?" or "What would you do differently next time?" Over time, these reflections show patterns in how learners think about their thinking. For younger learners, simple visual tools such as traffic light cards (red, amber, green) let them signal how confident they feel during a task. That gives you a quick read on how well they monitor themselves.

Think-aloud protocols help you assess learners. Ask learners to describe their thinking while doing tasks. This shows you metacognitive strategies, as seen by Ericsson and Simon (1993). Use this in maths or science problem-solving. Regular recordings make a good progress record.

Rubrics help learners assess their own progress, and they give you data. They can include criteria like, "I know when I don't understand". Panadero and Jonsson (2013) found that self-assessment boosts metacognition. Used week in, week out, a rubric supports each learner's metacognitive growth and shows you where to help.

‍

‍

Metacognitive Strategies by Age Group: Building Skills Progressively

Research by Flavell (1979) shows how metacognition develops with age. Teachers can pick strategies that match what learners are ready for. Work by Vygotsky (1978) on the Zone of Proximal Development helps with this.

In Key Stage 1 (ages 5-7), metacognitive development starts with simple self-monitoring activities. Young learners do well with visual tools like traffic light cards to show how they are doing. Green means confident, amber unsure, and red needing help. Teachers can introduce basic planning skills through picture task cards that break an activity into clear steps. For instance, before a writing task, children might use picture prompts showing "think," "plan," "write," and "check" to put their work in order.

In Key Stage 2 (ages 7-11), learners can handle more advanced ways of reflecting. Learning journals become powerful tools. Learners record not just what they learnt but how they learnt it. Teachers might use prompts such as "What helped me understand this?" or "What would I do differently next time?" Think-aloud modelling works especially well at this stage. Teachers say their thinking out loud as they solve problems, so learners can see thinking strategies that are usually hidden.

Teaching strategies directly helps learners aged 11 to 16 (EEF, 2018). Exam wrappers build self-awareness as learners pick over their test results. Subject strategies such as prediction work well in science. Questioning and summarising also help learners in English (Dignath & Büttner, 2008).

A judgment of learning (JOL) is a learner's guess at how well they will remember material in a future test. Nelson and Dunlosky (1991) found that delayed judgements of learning are far more accurate. These are made after a short gap rather than straight away. They help learners pitch their revision effort at the right level.

The Education Endowment Foundation found that metacognition works well. Fit it to the learner's age for the best results. Used well, it adds eight months' progress on average (Education Endowment Foundation).

‍

‍

‍

15 Metacognition Activities to Develop Self-Regulated Learners

Metacognition helps learners think about their own thinking (Brown, 1987; Flavell, 1979; Hattie, 2012). Regular practice builds their self-awareness, their planning and their skill at judging their own work. That helps them succeed and stand on their own feet.

1. Think-Aloud Modelling: Say your thinking out loud while you solve a problem or read a text. Say things like "I'm confused here, so I'll re-read that paragraph" or "This reminds me of a similar problem we solved last week." Modelling like this makes hidden thinking strategies visible. It helps learners take on the self-talk that skilled learners use without thinking.
2. Traffic Light Self-Assessment: Learners use red, amber and green cards to signal how confident they feel during a lesson. Green means I understand and could explain it. Amber means I'm not quite sure. Red means I need help. This live metacognitive monitoring helps teachers spot learners who are struggling, and it builds the habit of self-awareness.
3. Learning Journal Reflections: Give structured prompts for regular written reflection. What strategy helped me most today? Where did I get stuck, and what did I do? What would I do differently next time? Questions aimed like this build metacognitive awareness far better than open-ended diary writing.
4. Prediction-Observation-Explanation Cycles: Before a task, learners predict the outcome and how hard it will be. During the task, they monitor their progress. Afterwards, they compare their predictions with what happened. This POE cycle builds accurate self-assessment and calibration: knowing what you know and what you don't.
5. Exit Ticket Self-Evaluation: End lessons with a short written reflection. It checks content and asks a metacognitive question. Rate your understanding 1-5 and explain why. What strategy would help you improve? These tickets do two jobs. They build self-assessment habits and they give you formative assessment data.
6. Exam Wrappers: After an assessment, learners look at how they did, step by step. Which question types did I struggle with? Did my revision strategy work? What will I do differently next time? This structured look at errors turns a test from a grade into a powerful chance to learn about your own learning.
7. Strategy Menus: Put up a visual display of learning strategies learners can pick from when they are stuck. Re-read the question. Draw a diagram. Ask a clarifying question. Try a simpler example first. Teaching learners to choose a strategy on purpose builds metacognitive regulation and cuts learned helplessness.
8. Planning Templates: Before a long task, learners fill in a planning sheet. What do I already know about this topic? What resources will I need? What steps will I take? How long will each part take? Teaching planning directly matters a great deal, because this metacognitive skill grows more slowly than monitoring does.
9. Peer Think-Alouds: Partners take turns solving a problem while saying their thinking out loud. The listener's job is to spot the strategies used and the moments of metacognitive monitoring. Working in pairs like this puts thinking out in the open, and it builds the listener's skill at observing.
10. Confidence Calibration Tasks: After answering a question, learners rate their confidence before they check the answer. Track how accurate those ratings are over time. Learners often find they are overconfident on certain topics. Practising calibration in the open makes their self-assessment more accurate.
11. The Pause Procedure: Build planned pauses into lessons. Learners stop, sum up what they have learnt so far, and note any questions or confusion. These metacognitive checkpoints break up passive listening and switch on self-monitoring while you teach.
12. Thinking Routines: Use the same thinking frameworks again and again, like "See-Think-Wonder" (What do you see? What do you think? What do you wonder?) or "Connect-Extend-Challenge" (How does this connect? How does it extend your thinking? What's challenging?). Repeated routines become metacognitive prompts learners reach for on their own.
13. Knowledge Rating Scales: Before and after a unit, learners rate their knowledge of the key ideas on a scale. Never heard of it. Heard of it but can't explain. Can explain simply. Can explain with examples. Could teach it. Tracking the change builds metacognitive awareness of what they have gained.
14. Strategy Attribution Questions: When learners succeed, ask "What did you do that worked?" rather than praising how clever they are. When they struggle, ask "What could you try differently?" Questions like these link strategies to results, and that link is at the heart of metacognitive development.
15. Metacognitive Questioning Stems: Teach learners questions to ask themselves during a task. What am I trying to accomplish? Is this strategy working? Do I need to adjust my approach? How will I know when I'm done? Post these stems where learners can see them and point to them often, until they become habit.

Practice over time is what builds learners' metacognitive skills. Begin with two or three techniques that suit their level. Build them into routines, then widen your toolkit. Research shows that direct, explicit teaching lifts learning across subjects (e.g., Hattie, 2008; Zimmerman, 2002).

‍

‍

‍

Four classrooms below show the fade as teachers described it on social media. One planned a five-rung fade; one put a pre-written model on screen that learners rehashed; one handed over algebra a line at a time; one made revision cards Year 11 never used.

‍

Plan Your Metacognition Implementation

Build an 8-week metacognition roadmap that fits your key stage, your subject and where your practice is now.

The planner below turns the fade into an eight-week sequence for your key stage and subject. Choose a phase, a subject and how established metacognitive teaching already is in your room, and it sets out week-by-week moves you can print or copy into a department plan. Treat the output as a first draft, not a script, and adjust the pace to the class in front of you.

‍

‍

The questions below are the ones teachers raised when fading towards independence met a real class. Is teaching learners about metacognition just Learning to Learn again? Is a discrete science-of-learning unit worth the time? Are scaffolds an adjustment or a substitute for teaching?

‍

Try one deliberate fade in your next lesson. Model a strategy in full on the board, then set the next example with one step missing and ask a learner to supply it. Note who needed the prompt and who did not. That single observation tells you where the class sits on the ladder from full model to independent attempt, and what the following lesson should hand over next.

‍

Frequently asked questions

‍

What exactly is metacognition and why is it important for learner learning?

Metacognition means learners think about their thinking. It includes self, task, action, and strategy awareness. These skills such as reasoning and planning help learners become independent. Research shows metacognitive practices improve grades, test scores, and knowledge retention (e.g., Flavell, 1979; Dunlosky & Metcalfe, 2009).

‍

How can teachers help learners develop metacognitive skills in the classroom?

Metacognition improves learning. Teachers guide learners through practice, making thinking visible. Learners use self-monitoring (Nelson & Narens, 1990). They reflect on performance (Winne & Hadwin, 1998). Learners evaluate knowledge (checking understanding; Flavell, 1979) to identify strengths.

‍

What are the four key metacognitive strategies that boost learner achievement?

Zimmerman's (2002) four strategies include monitoring and reflecting. Learners also evaluate progress and control resources. These strategies help learners track their thinking and make changes. Winne and Hadwin (1998) found this provides feedback for future learning.

‍

How does metacognition differ from regular study skills or cognitive strategies?

Anderson (1983) stated learners use thinking skills for problem solving. Flavell (1979) found learners check understanding using metacognitive strategies. Brown (1987) showed thinking skills improve learners; metacognition checks progress. Zimmerman (2000) linked metacognition with planning and feelings to help learners succeed.

‍

Can metacognitive skills be taught to learners of all ages, and how do they connect to self-regulated learning?

Learners' metacognitive skills improve through practice and help. Self-regulated learning means learners work independently; they need knowledge and drive (Brown, 1987). Zimmerman (2002) and Dunlosky & Rawson (2012) found strong self-regulation improves learner performance.

‍

What practical strategies can learners use to improve their metacognitive awareness during learning tasks?

Learners can use strategies such as rehearsal, chunking, and elaborative interrogation whilst monitoring their performance during ongoing tasks. They should regularly ask themselves evaluative questions like 'What am I good at? What am I bad at? Where would I benefit from additional study?' Learners can also use memory aids like Post-it notes and engage in regular self-evaluation to become more aware of their learning processes.

Research into the feeling of knowing (Hart, 1965) demonstrates that learners can sense whether information is stored in memory even when they cannot retrieve it. Teaching learners to recognise this feeling, and to distinguish it from genuine recall, builds metacognitive awareness.

Flavell (1979) found metacognitive experiences are feelings during tasks. Learners realise they don't understand passages, for example. Teachers can use these "aha" and "stuck" moments. This builds learner metacognitive awareness.

‍

How has the importance of metacognition changed in post-pandemic education?

Metacognition is popular post-pandemic because it builds independence. Learners may have less direct teacher help now. Specific techniques turn passive learners into self-regulated ones (Flavell, 1979). Independent thinking helps struggling learners succeed (Bjork et al., 2013).

‍

‍

References

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press.

Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe and A. P. Shimamura (eds), Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing (pp. 185 to 205). MIT Press.

Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J. and Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417 to 444.

Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7 to 74.

Bransford, J. D. and Stein, B. S. (1993). The Ideal Problem Solver: A Guide for Improving Thinking, Learning, and Creativity (2nd edition). W. H. Freeman.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. and Cocking, R. R. (eds) (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (expanded edition). National Academy Press.

Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert and R. H. Kluwe (eds), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding (pp. 65 to 116). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135 to 168.

Dignath, C. and Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231 to 264.

Dunlosky, J. and Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. SAGE.

Dunlosky, J. and Rawson, K. A. (2012). Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students' learning and retention. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 271 to 280.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J. and Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4 to 58.

Education Endowment Foundation (2018). Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning: Guidance Report. Education Endowment Foundation.

Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 179 to 186.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois.

Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (revised edition). MIT Press.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delphi Report). California Academic Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906 to 911.

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (ed.), Children's Oral Communication Skills (pp. 35 to 60). Academic Press.

Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(4), 208 to 216.

Hartman, H. J. (ed.) (2001). Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice. Kluwer.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge.

Higgins, S., Baumfield, V., Lin, M., Moseley, D., Butterworth, M., Downey, G., Gregson, M., Oberski, I., Rockett, M. and Thacker, D. (2004). Thinking skills approaches to effective teaching and learning: what is the evidence for impact on learners? EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education, University of London.

Inhelder, B. and Piaget, J. (1958). The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. Basic Books.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kruger, J. and Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121 to 1134.

Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical Thinking: A Literature Review. Pearson Research Report. Pearson.

Mercer, N. and Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. Routledge.

Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51(2), 102 to 116.

Nelson, T. O. and Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect". Psychological Science, 2(4), 267 to 271.

Nelson, T. O. and Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125 to 173.

Panadero, E. and Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129 to 144.

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A. and Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74 to 98.

Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y. and Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293 to 316.

Pearson, P. D. and Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317 to 344.

Perry, J., Lundie, D. and Golder, G. (2019). Metacognition in schools: what does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools? Educational Review, 71(4), 483 to 500.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner (eds), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451 to 502). Academic Press.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219 to 225.

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113 to 125.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, 31(2), 8 to 19.

Winne, P. H. and Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky and A. C. Graesser (eds), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 277 to 304). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner (eds), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13 to 39). Academic Press.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64 to 70.

‍