Growth Mindset and Metacognition: How They Work Together

Growth mindset and metacognition work together when learners believe they can improve and know what to do next. Without a strategy, growth mindset can become empty encouragement. Metacognition gives learners a clear route: plan, monitor, adjust, and review.

‍

‍

For teachers, the useful question is not whether learners can repeat positive phrases. It is whether they can notice confusion, choose a better strategy and explain why that strategy fits the task.

This guide shows how to link mindset language with practical metacognitive routines. The aim is for feedback to lead to action, rather than posters, slogans, or vague talk about resilience.

‍

For the full plan-monitor-review cycle that gives mindset feedback a next step, see our main metacognition guide.

‍

Growth Mindset Defined

Growth mindset is the belief that intelligence and abilities can be developed. This is in contrast to a "fixed mindset," which assumes that intelligence is static. Learners with a growth mindset embrace challenges, persist through setbacks, and see effort as a path to mastery. They are also more likely to take risks and view failure as an opportunity to learn (Dweck, 2006).

‍

‍

A growth mindset isn't just about positive thinking. It is about understanding that the brain is like a muscle that grows stronger with use. When learners are encouraged to focus on the process of learning, rather than just the outcome, they are more likely to develop a growth mindset. This can lead to increased motivation, resilience, and academic achievement.

Teachers can build a growth mindset by praising effort and strategies, not just innate ability. They should also make reflection routine, so learners can explain which strategy helped and what to try next. Treat mistakes as information: in a Year 7 maths lesson, an incorrect first method can become the prompt for checking the question, choosing a representation and revising the plan.

For example, instead of saying "You're so smart!" when a learner answers a question correctly, a teacher could say, "I can see you worked really hard to understand this concept." This reinforces the idea that effort and learning are the keys to success. Another example is to use formative assessment to provide feedback focused on improvement, rather than just a grade.

​

‍

Metacognition Defined

Metacognition means "thinking about thinking". See Flavell (1979) for details. It means learners know how they think and how to manage that thinking. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.

Metacognition has two parts: knowledge and regulation. Learners use knowledge to understand what they can do. Regulation means planning, monitoring, and evaluating learning.

Research from Flavell (1979) and Schraw (1998) shows learners understand their own strengths and weaknesses. Learners know various strategies, choosing the right ones. Metacognitive regulation means learners actively manage their learning. They set goals, monitor progress, and adjust tactics (Brown, 1987).

Metacognition helps learners become more self-directed. When learners understand how they learn best, they take more ownership of their education. This can improve grades, motivation, and self-belief. Teachers need to teach metacognitive strategies clearly (Flavell, 1979; Dunlosky & Metcalfe, 2009).

Metacognition develops when teachers ask learners to explain their work (Flavell, 1979). For example, ask: "What strategy did you use?" and "What would you change next time?" Graphic organisers help learners see their thinking (Novak, 1998). Learners can then spot areas needing improvement (Zimmerman, 2000).

​

‍

How Growth Mindset and Metacognition Connect

Growth mindset and metacognition help attainment when belief leads to self-regulation. Learners need to believe they can improve. That belief matters when it helps them plan, monitor their work, and change strategy, not just try harder (Burnette et al., 2023; Zimmerman, 2002).

The classroom mechanism is not motivation on its own. The causal chain is: belief that ability can improve, selection of a strategy, monitoring of whether that strategy is working, then adjustment after feedback. Without the middle steps, a growth mindset slogan can leave learners repeating "I can improve" while using the same ineffective method.

Learners see links between effort, strategies, and results if you make them clear. After tough tasks, discuss the strategies learners tried (Dweck, 2006). Explore how those strategies affected success or failure (Yeager & Dweck, 2012). This shows learners how their work impacts outcomes (Blackwell et al., 2007).

In a maths lesson, learners may struggle with a new concept. A teacher can say, "This is tough, but remember, our brains grow when we face challenges. Let's think about different strategies we can use to solve this problem."

The teacher can then ask, "Which methods have worked for you in the past? How can we adapt them to this new situation?" This clearly links growth mindset with metacognitive strategies.

​

‍

Dweck's Research: What Teachers Need to Know

Carol Dweck's (2006) research on mindset has influenced education by focusing attention on effort, strategy and response to challenge. Dweck found that learners praised for intelligence are more likely to avoid challenge and give up when work becomes difficult. In contrast, learners praised for effort and strategy are more likely to take on challenge and persist through setbacks.

Dweck's research also emphasises the importance of creating a classroom culture that values learning and growth. This includes providing opportunities for learners to reflect on their learning process and learn from their mistakes. It also involves creating a safe and supportive environment where learners feel comfortable taking risks and challenging themselves. Teachers should model a growth mindset themselves, demonstrating a willingness to learn and grow.

the point for teachers is that growth mindset is not about telling learners they can do anything if they just try hard enough. It is about helping them understand that their abilities can be developed through dedication, hard work, and effective strategies. It is also about teaching them how to learn effectively, including how to set goals, monitor their progress, and adjust their approach when needed. Teachers can use scaffolding in education to support learners as they develop these skills.

For instance, a teacher could share a personal story about a time when they struggled to learn something new. They could then explain how they overcame those challenges by using effective strategies and persisting through setbacks. This helps learners see that even teachers face challenges and that growth is a process that takes time and effort.

​

‍

The EEF Evidence on Metacognition

The Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) studied how metacognition affects learner results. Its findings show that teaching metacognitive strategies can improve academic achievement. The EEF Toolkit (2021) suggests these approaches can add seven months of learning. It also shows that metacognition is a cost-effective intervention for educators.

The EEF highlights teaching metacognitive strategies explicitly. Do not just expect learners to develop them (EEF). Instead, teach learners to plan, monitor, and review their learning.

Give them chances to practise in different situations. The EEF suggests teachers use a structured approach like "plan, do, review".

The EEF also highlights feedback on learners' use of metacognitive strategies. Feedback should be specific, timely and focused on the learning process. Use questions such as "Which strategy did you choose?" and "What evidence tells you it worked?" Keep growth mindset language separate from the core metacognitive teaching: learners still need explicit modelling of planning, monitoring and review within each subject.

‍

‍

For example, in a science lesson, a teacher could ask learners to plan their approach to an experiment before they begin. During the experiment, they could encourage learners to monitor their progress and make adjustments as needed. After the experiment, they could ask learners to evaluate their findings and reflect on what they have learned. This helps learners develop metacognitive skills in the context of a specific subject area.

Growth mindset helps learners embrace challenges (Dweck, 2006). Metacognition gives learners skills to understand and manage their learning. This guide offers ways to use these ideas in your classroom.

​

‍

Practical Strategies for the Classroom

Dweck's (2006) growth mindset is useful only when paired with routines teachers use often. Departments should agree the metacognitive moves they expect to see in lessons: teacher modelling, guided practice, learner self-checking and review. This is stronger than a one-off assembly because it places mindset language inside subject teaching (Flavell, 1979; Zimmerman, 2002).

"Think-alouds," where teachers show their thought processes, work well. Learners then see how experts tackle problems and use metacognition. Teachers should also have learners use graphic organisers to plan ideas (Vygotsky, 1978).

Another powerful technique is to incorporate reflection activities into lessons. Ask learners to reflect on what they have learned, how they learned it, and what challenges they faced. Encourage them to identify strategies that worked well and areas where they need to improve. This can also be supported by scaffolding in education.

For example, after a science experiment, ask learners to write a short reflection on the steps they took, the results they observed, and any challenges they encountered. Encourage them to think about how they could improve their approach next time. This promotes metacognitive awareness and helps learners develop more effective learning strategies. Retrieval practice can also be used to reinforce learning and promote metacognitive reflection.

​

‍

Common Mistakes with Growth Mindset

Dweck's (2006) growth mindset is powerful, but avoid focusing only on effort. Learners need effective strategies, not just hard work, for success. Blackwell et al. (2007) found strategy use matters.

Another mistake is to use praise that is insincere or generic. Learners can often see through empty praise, which can undermine their motivation. Praise should be specific, genuine, and focused on the process rather than the outcome. Avoid phrases like "You're so clever!" and instead say "I noticed you used a really effective strategy to solve that problem!".

Avoid confusing growth mindset with telling learners to "try harder." Growth mindset is a belief about improvement, but learners also need tools, feedback and time to change how they learn. Teach them how to set goals, monitor progress and choose a better strategy when the first one fails.

For example, if a learner is struggling with a writing assignment, don't just tell them to "try harder." Instead, provide them with specific feedback on their writing, model effective writing strategies, and offer opportunities for revision and improvement. This provides the necessary support for growth. This is relevant to cognitive load theory.

​

‍

Assessing Metacognitive Growth

Black and Wiliam (1998) argue assess learner understanding, not just facts. Focus on how learners control their learning, as Flavell (1979) suggested. Use self-reflection and peer assessment as Hattie (2012) recommends. Teachers can also observe learning, as Vygotsky (1978) noted.

Self-reflection helps learners understand their thinking (Flavell, 1979). Teachers can ask learners to consider their strategies, strengths, and areas for improvement. Learners can use writing, journals, or group talks to reflect (Schön, 1983; Boud et al., 1985).

Peer assessment can also be a useful tool for assessing metacognitive growth. Encourage learners to provide feedback to each other on their learning strategies and their ability to solve problems. This can help learners become more aware of their own thinking processes and learn from others.

Teachers can also assess metacognitive growth through observation. Pay attention to how learners approach challenges, how they use learning strategies, and how they respond to feedback. Use this information to provide targeted support and guidance.

Learners can plan, track progress, and assess their contributions in group work. Give feedback on their goal-setting, strategies, and learning reflections. (Flavell, 1979; Nelson & Narens, 1990). This gives useful insight into learner metacognitive development. (Veenman et al., 2006).

Assessment Method	Description	Example
Self-Reflection	Learners reflect on their learning process.	Journal entries on learning strategies.
Peer Assessment	Learners provide feedback to each other.	Feedback on problem-solving approaches.
Teacher Observation	Teachers observe learners' strategies.	Observing group project planning.

​

‍

Growth Mindset Beyond the Poster

Growth mindset should be more than a poster or an assembly theme. Meta-analyses suggest standalone mindset interventions have small and inconsistent effects on attainment, especially when they are not tied to subject-specific strategy instruction (Sisk et al., 2018; Macnamara and Burgoyne, 2023). Use the language only where learners can practise a concrete learning move such as planning a method, checking a worked example, revising a paragraph or reviewing feedback.

Teachers can model a growth mindset by sharing their own struggles and learning experiences. Talk about times when you faced challenges, made mistakes, and learned from them. This shows learners that it's okay to struggle and that learning is a continuous process.

It's also important to challenge fixed mindset beliefs when they arise. When learners say things like "I'm not good at this," challenge them to reframe their thinking. Encourage them to focus on what they can learn and how they can improve. Remind them of the power of effort and perseverance.

For example, if a learner says "I'm just not a maths person," respond by saying "Maybe you have not found the right strategy yet. Let's test one together, then check whether it worked." In AI-supported tasks, add a metacognitive check before learners use a tool: "Do I need help generating ideas, checking an answer or doing the hard thinking myself?" This protects productive struggle and evaluative judgement (Lodge et al., 2023). Spaced practice and other learning techniques can also support this.

​

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

Limitations and Critiques

Growth mindset should not be seen as a sure route to higher attainment. Meta-analyses have found small and mixed links between mindset interventions and academic achievement. The strongest effects are mainly for learners who are already at academic risk or from low socioeconomic backgrounds (Sisk et al., 2018). Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) go further, arguing that many positive findings may reflect weak design, reporting bias, and poor control conditions.

A second limitation is methodological. Many studies rely on brief interventions, short self-report scales and outcomes measured close to the intervention. This makes it hard to tell whether learners have changed their learning behaviour or have simply repeated the message they were taught. The English Changing Mindsets trial found no added progress in Key Stage 2 literacy or numeracy, which cautions against whole-school programmes built mainly around slogans (Foliano et al., 2019).

There are cultural and ethical concerns too. Kohn (2015) argued that growth mindset can place too much responsibility on individual learners. This can shift attention away from poverty, SEND provision, curriculum access, racism, and workload.

In classrooms using generative AI, a related risk appears when learners are told to try harder while tools remove productive struggle. Metacognitive checks about when to use AI and when to think independently are now part of the work (Lodge et al., 2023).

The theory still has value when teachers link it to clear strategy teaching, feedback, and self-regulated learning. It works best as part of teaching practice, not as a stand-alone fix.

‍

References

Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success.

Further Reading