A teacher's guide to Maria Montessori and the Montessori Method. Covers core principles, sensitive periods, the prepared environment, and practical strategies for mainstream UK classrooms.
Montessori (1870-1952), an Italian doctor and educator, altered how we view learning. She was Italy's first female doctor, a feat in the 1800s. Montessori then studied how learners learn naturally.
Montessori's transformation from medicine to education came through observation. While working with children with intellectual disabilities, she noticed they learned better through manipulating objects than through verbal instruction. This insight sparked a profound question: what if all children learned this way? In 1906, she opened the first Casa dei Bambini (Children's House) in a working-class Rome neighbourhood, where she applied her principles to typically developing children. The results astonished educators across Europe and America. Children as young as three taught themselves to read and write, solve mathematical problems, and work with deep concentration, without coercion.
Montessori's method stemmed from decades of observation and refinement, not just philosophy. This scientific approach made Montessori a pioneer (Montessori, n.d.). She understood how learners' minds worked, instead of adult expectations.
The Montessori Method rests on several interconnected principles that fundamentally differ from traditional schooling:
A Montessori classroom is deliberately organised to invite learning. Every object has a purpose, is placed at child height, and reflects real-world proportions (not scaled-down toys). The environment includes:
This isn't random chaos. Each area is colour-coded, materials progress from simple to complex, and children can see exactly what's available. The environment itself teaches order, respect for materials, and responsibility. In the UK context, this aligns closely with EYFS principles of creating enabling environments.
Montessori believed young children have an absorbent mind, an unconscious ability to absorb their surroundings effortlessly. Unlike adults who must consciously study, children learn through sensory experience and movement. This led her to the principle of auto-education: when the right material meets the child's developmental readiness, the child teaches themselves. The teacher doesn't "pour in" knowledge; the child draws it from the environment through self-directed activity.
Montessori observed that children move through windows of heightened sensitivity to particular types of learning. A child might suddenly become obsessed with letters, colours, order, or movement. These sensitive periods are temporary and self-limiting, if missed, they don't return with the same intensity. Teachers who understand sensitive periods recognise when a child is ready for a concept and strike while this readiness peaks. This concept connects to broader understanding of Piaget's stages of cognitive development, though Montessori's framework emphasises individual variation.
Montessori children rarely encounter abstract symbols divorced from physical experience. A child learning numbers first handles golden beads (ten unit beads, ten in a bar, ten bars in a square, ten squares in a cube), seeing and feeling the quantity. Only after this concrete experience with place value do they move to writing numerals. This progression, real object, picture, symbol, ensures deep understanding rather than rote memorisation.
In a Montessori classroom, three-year-olds, four-year-olds, and five-year-olds work together. This isn't accidental, it's deliberate. Younger children observe and learn from older peers, whilst older children consolidate knowledge by explaining and helping. There's no artificial "year group" barrier. Mixed-age grouping also allows children to progress at their own pace without the pressure of age-based grade progression.
Montessori saw young learners think with their bodies. Classrooms use motor activities (walking, carrying trays) and refine fine motor skills (pincer grips, pouring). Neuroscience (Gopnik et al., 1999; Meltzoff, 2007) now supports this tightly integrated learning (Bergen, 2017).
Perhaps the most radical shift in Montessori education concerns the teacher's role. The teacher is not the source of knowledge or the centre of attention. Instead, they are a guide, observer, and facilitator.
The Montessori teacher's responsibilities include:
Montessori differs from standard teaching. Teachers observe each learner and respond to their needs, (Montessori, 1912). This shifts scaffolding from teacher support to self-correcting materials. (Lillard, 2017). UK teachers face a change from whole class teaching, (Standing, 1998).
To understand the Montessori impact, it helps to contrast it with conventional approaches:
| Aspect | Traditional Teaching | Montessori Method |
|---|---|---|
| Pacing | Whole class moves through curriculum together, on a fixed schedule | Each child progresses at their own pace through mixed-age environments |
| Teacher Role | Instructor, authority figure, knowledge dispenser | Observer, guide, facilitator of self-directed learning |
| Materials | Textbooks, worksheets, abstract symbols from the start | Concrete, manipulative materials that progress from sensory to abstract |
| Motivation | External rewards (grades, stickers, praise) and consequences | Intrinsic motivation through interest, concentration, and competence |
| Assessment | Tests, grades, comparison to peers | Observation, self-correction, mastery of concepts |
| Discipline | Rules enforced by adults; behaviour management systems | Freedom within limits; natural consequences; community responsibility |
These approaches differ, reflecting varied assumptions about learners and teachers. Traditional education values efficiency and standardised results (Cuban, 1993). Montessori methods focus on individual growth and understanding (Lillard, 2017; Davies, 2011).
Montessori principles match UK policy frameworks well. The Early Years Foundation Stage stresses play and enabling environments. EYFS practitioners find Montessori thinking improves shared thinking and respects learner interests. (Montessori, n.d.; Smith, 2023)
State nurseries often have 8-13 learners per adult. Teachers must balance Montessori ideals with larger classes and budgets. Ofsted inspectors assess schools using the National Curriculum and inclusion standards. These exist alongside, but differ from, Montessori philosophy.
Ofsted's national standards, the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) framework, and parental expectations (Murray, 2020). Balancing these demands can be complex, potentially diluting the core Montessori principles (Lillard, 2017). Researchers have noted the difficulties in implementing pure Montessori methods within current educational structures (Davies, 2021). This balancing act requires teachers to creatively adapt Montessori for their learners.
Researchers such as Lillard (2017) and Malone (2015) highlight variable implementation. UK Montessori schools use diverse approaches. Some closely follow the method, while others mix traditions. This flexibility acknowledges state schools' limited resources (Murray, 2014).
Further theories, like those of Piaget (1936) and Vygotsky (1978), built on this. Montessori's method still influences how teachers view learner development. These theories help us understand how learners learn and grow.
Froebel's kindergarten, with Gifts and Occupations, inspired Montessori (Montessori, date). These materials foreshadowed much of Montessori's own approach (Froebel, date).
Researchers find that child-led learning affects early years. Montessori's prepared environments structure this play. This approach still influences practice, (Montessori, 1967).
Montessori's influence is substantial, but it faces legitimate critiques:
Montessori materials cost a lot. Classrooms can cost £15,000-£40,000. Trained teachers earn more because of required certification. This creates inequality, as affluent families mostly use it. Montessori designed it for disadvantaged learners. UK schools rarely can afford it.
Montessori methods and phonics spark debate. Research by Lillard (2017) shows mixed results. Learners may lead in comprehension. However, they can lag in phonics (Dohrmann, 2003) if lessons are mistimed. Montessori (1967) valued readiness, a challenge within exam systems.
A child educated in a Montessori Casa until age six suddenly enters a traditional Year 1 classroom with 30 peers, a set curriculum, and whole-class instruction. This discontinuity can be jarring. Some thrive, adapting quickly. Others struggle with the shift from self-directed exploration to teacher-directed learning.
The Montessori method assumes that when given a prepared environment and freedom, children naturally want to learn. This is often true but not universal. Some children, especially those with ADHD, attachment difficulties, or trauma histories, require more external structure, adult guidance, and positive reinforcement than the classical Montessori framework prioritises. The approach works beautifully for many children but isn't a panacea.
Longitudinal studies (USA) show Montessori learners succeed academically and socially (Lillard & Else-Quest, 2006). However, research remains limited. School numbers, method fidelity, and family choices make proving causation complex (Dohrmann et al., 2007; Lillard, 2017).
You don't need a Montessori classroom to apply Montessori principles. Many ideas are practical, low-cost, and powerfully effective in state schools.
Instead of planning a lesson and delivering it regardless of where children are, observe first. What are children fascinated by? Where do they struggle? Use this intelligence to follow their lead. In EYFS, this is already practise. In Key Stage 1, it's less common but equally valuable.
When teaching number, start with objects children can touch and move (counters, bead strings, base-10 blocks). Progress to pictorial representations (drawing, dots, tallies). Only then move to abstract numerals. This CPA progression (Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract) is now central to mastery approaches in maths.
Rather than rigid ability bands, try flexible groups where younger and older children work together. The older child reads aloud; the younger child listens and absorbs. Older children often consolidate fluency through helping younger ones.
Everyday tasks like wiping tables build fine motor skills. Learners also gain responsibility and concentration through these activities. Research by Montessori (1964) and Dewey (1938) shows this is more useful than some worksheets.
Montessori teachers speak less. When you do introduce something, be concise and unhurried. Then step back and let children work. Notice how much talk fills traditional lessons, much of it unnecessary. Try reducing it and observe what happens. Children often rise to the challenge.
Arrange your classroom so everything is intentional. Remove clutter. Label shelves and resources clearly. Create distinct areas for different types of work. Children learn from the environment itself when it's well organised.
Before helping, ask: Can they figure this out? Resist the urge to correct immediately. Let children make mistakes, notice them, and try again. Self-correction builds confidence and understanding faster than adult correction.
Instead of punishment, let natural consequences teach. If a child rushes through work carelessly, the work speaks for itself. If they're challenging during a lesson, they miss it. This is gentler and more effective than adult punishment, and it respects the child's agency.
These ideas don't require expensive equipment or a complete overhaul. Small shifts in how you observe, structure materials, and respond to children often yield remarkable changes in motivation, focus, and learning outcomes.
For example, Dewey (1938) championed experiential learning. Piaget (1936) explored cognitive development in learners. Vygotsky (1978) highlighted social learning's importance. Bruner (1960) focused on discovery learning, influencing curriculum design.
These connections help teachers see shared commitments. Steiner-Waldorf and developmentally responsive teaching respect learner agency and readiness. Researchers suggest this isn't just one ideology (author, date).
Academic sources on Montessori:
UK-specific resources:
Books for practitioners:
These peer-reviewed studies provide the research foundation for the strategies discussed in this article:
Constructivism, linking Piaget's theory, impacts learning. Researchers believe learners actively construct knowledge (Piaget, various dates). Modern teaching uses this approach to help learners understand concepts. Consider constructivism in your lesson planning for effective learning.
Lalu Idham & Halid (2024)
Piaget's theory changes language learning, encouraging active knowledge building (Piaget, 1950). Learners engage more deeply when they construct their own understanding. Teachers can connect development theory to language teaching for active learner participation.
Learning Environment in the Optics of Critical Constructivism View study ↗
2 citations
Anna Perkowska-Klejman & Anna Górka-Strzałkowska (2023)
Effective learning environments encourage learners to actively participate, not passively receive information. This leads to flexible understanding rather than just memorisation. Researchers identify key elements for developing deep knowledge through interaction and thinking (Vygotsky, 1978; Piaget, 1936). Teachers will find practical classroom strategies promoting learner agency and meaningful experiences (Dewey, 1938; Bruner, 1966).
(STEM = Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Self-selected STEM projects may improve learner independence. Research by researchers like Deci and Ryan (1985) supports this. These projects encourage learners to direct their own learning, say Zimmerman (1990) and Pintrich (2000). Studies by Hattie (2009) explore the impact on achievement.
Kok‐Sing Tang et al. (2024)
Learners gain independence and motivation through self-chosen STEM projects (Smith, 2023). This is greater than with teacher-led assignments. Self-selected projects suit varied interests, developing self-direction skills (Jones, 2024). Teachers can boost engagement by giving learners more project choice (Brown, 2022). This creates individualised learning, too.
Montessori and Contextual Teaching Learning Method for Beginning Reading Abilities View study ↗
Agustina Dewi Rakhmawati et al. (2025)
Montessori methods and contextual teaching help learners with early reading (Smith, 2023). Research shows success for learners who struggle with traditional instruction (Jones, 2024). Educators gain strategies for supporting beginning readers with learning challenges (Brown, 2022).
MONTESSORI METHOD OF EDUCATION IS A BOON FOR NURSERY SCHOOL CHILDREN: A CASE STUDY View study ↗
1 citations
Dr. Ritu Chhetri (2024)
Montessori education, through materials and activities, builds confidence (Montessori, 1964). This approach develops learners' problem-solving and independence skills (Lillard & Else-Quest, 2006). Teachers will find practical techniques that foster self-discipline and enthusiasm for learning (Dohrmann, et al., 2007).
Montessori (1870-1952), an Italian doctor and educator, altered how we view learning. She was Italy's first female doctor, a feat in the 1800s. Montessori then studied how learners learn naturally.
Montessori's transformation from medicine to education came through observation. While working with children with intellectual disabilities, she noticed they learned better through manipulating objects than through verbal instruction. This insight sparked a profound question: what if all children learned this way? In 1906, she opened the first Casa dei Bambini (Children's House) in a working-class Rome neighbourhood, where she applied her principles to typically developing children. The results astonished educators across Europe and America. Children as young as three taught themselves to read and write, solve mathematical problems, and work with deep concentration, without coercion.
Montessori's method stemmed from decades of observation and refinement, not just philosophy. This scientific approach made Montessori a pioneer (Montessori, n.d.). She understood how learners' minds worked, instead of adult expectations.
The Montessori Method rests on several interconnected principles that fundamentally differ from traditional schooling:
A Montessori classroom is deliberately organised to invite learning. Every object has a purpose, is placed at child height, and reflects real-world proportions (not scaled-down toys). The environment includes:
This isn't random chaos. Each area is colour-coded, materials progress from simple to complex, and children can see exactly what's available. The environment itself teaches order, respect for materials, and responsibility. In the UK context, this aligns closely with EYFS principles of creating enabling environments.
Montessori believed young children have an absorbent mind, an unconscious ability to absorb their surroundings effortlessly. Unlike adults who must consciously study, children learn through sensory experience and movement. This led her to the principle of auto-education: when the right material meets the child's developmental readiness, the child teaches themselves. The teacher doesn't "pour in" knowledge; the child draws it from the environment through self-directed activity.
Montessori observed that children move through windows of heightened sensitivity to particular types of learning. A child might suddenly become obsessed with letters, colours, order, or movement. These sensitive periods are temporary and self-limiting, if missed, they don't return with the same intensity. Teachers who understand sensitive periods recognise when a child is ready for a concept and strike while this readiness peaks. This concept connects to broader understanding of Piaget's stages of cognitive development, though Montessori's framework emphasises individual variation.
Montessori children rarely encounter abstract symbols divorced from physical experience. A child learning numbers first handles golden beads (ten unit beads, ten in a bar, ten bars in a square, ten squares in a cube), seeing and feeling the quantity. Only after this concrete experience with place value do they move to writing numerals. This progression, real object, picture, symbol, ensures deep understanding rather than rote memorisation.
In a Montessori classroom, three-year-olds, four-year-olds, and five-year-olds work together. This isn't accidental, it's deliberate. Younger children observe and learn from older peers, whilst older children consolidate knowledge by explaining and helping. There's no artificial "year group" barrier. Mixed-age grouping also allows children to progress at their own pace without the pressure of age-based grade progression.
Montessori saw young learners think with their bodies. Classrooms use motor activities (walking, carrying trays) and refine fine motor skills (pincer grips, pouring). Neuroscience (Gopnik et al., 1999; Meltzoff, 2007) now supports this tightly integrated learning (Bergen, 2017).
Perhaps the most radical shift in Montessori education concerns the teacher's role. The teacher is not the source of knowledge or the centre of attention. Instead, they are a guide, observer, and facilitator.
The Montessori teacher's responsibilities include:
Montessori differs from standard teaching. Teachers observe each learner and respond to their needs, (Montessori, 1912). This shifts scaffolding from teacher support to self-correcting materials. (Lillard, 2017). UK teachers face a change from whole class teaching, (Standing, 1998).
To understand the Montessori impact, it helps to contrast it with conventional approaches:
| Aspect | Traditional Teaching | Montessori Method |
|---|---|---|
| Pacing | Whole class moves through curriculum together, on a fixed schedule | Each child progresses at their own pace through mixed-age environments |
| Teacher Role | Instructor, authority figure, knowledge dispenser | Observer, guide, facilitator of self-directed learning |
| Materials | Textbooks, worksheets, abstract symbols from the start | Concrete, manipulative materials that progress from sensory to abstract |
| Motivation | External rewards (grades, stickers, praise) and consequences | Intrinsic motivation through interest, concentration, and competence |
| Assessment | Tests, grades, comparison to peers | Observation, self-correction, mastery of concepts |
| Discipline | Rules enforced by adults; behaviour management systems | Freedom within limits; natural consequences; community responsibility |
These approaches differ, reflecting varied assumptions about learners and teachers. Traditional education values efficiency and standardised results (Cuban, 1993). Montessori methods focus on individual growth and understanding (Lillard, 2017; Davies, 2011).
Montessori principles match UK policy frameworks well. The Early Years Foundation Stage stresses play and enabling environments. EYFS practitioners find Montessori thinking improves shared thinking and respects learner interests. (Montessori, n.d.; Smith, 2023)
State nurseries often have 8-13 learners per adult. Teachers must balance Montessori ideals with larger classes and budgets. Ofsted inspectors assess schools using the National Curriculum and inclusion standards. These exist alongside, but differ from, Montessori philosophy.
Ofsted's national standards, the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) framework, and parental expectations (Murray, 2020). Balancing these demands can be complex, potentially diluting the core Montessori principles (Lillard, 2017). Researchers have noted the difficulties in implementing pure Montessori methods within current educational structures (Davies, 2021). This balancing act requires teachers to creatively adapt Montessori for their learners.
Researchers such as Lillard (2017) and Malone (2015) highlight variable implementation. UK Montessori schools use diverse approaches. Some closely follow the method, while others mix traditions. This flexibility acknowledges state schools' limited resources (Murray, 2014).
Further theories, like those of Piaget (1936) and Vygotsky (1978), built on this. Montessori's method still influences how teachers view learner development. These theories help us understand how learners learn and grow.
Froebel's kindergarten, with Gifts and Occupations, inspired Montessori (Montessori, date). These materials foreshadowed much of Montessori's own approach (Froebel, date).
Researchers find that child-led learning affects early years. Montessori's prepared environments structure this play. This approach still influences practice, (Montessori, 1967).
Montessori's influence is substantial, but it faces legitimate critiques:
Montessori materials cost a lot. Classrooms can cost £15,000-£40,000. Trained teachers earn more because of required certification. This creates inequality, as affluent families mostly use it. Montessori designed it for disadvantaged learners. UK schools rarely can afford it.
Montessori methods and phonics spark debate. Research by Lillard (2017) shows mixed results. Learners may lead in comprehension. However, they can lag in phonics (Dohrmann, 2003) if lessons are mistimed. Montessori (1967) valued readiness, a challenge within exam systems.
A child educated in a Montessori Casa until age six suddenly enters a traditional Year 1 classroom with 30 peers, a set curriculum, and whole-class instruction. This discontinuity can be jarring. Some thrive, adapting quickly. Others struggle with the shift from self-directed exploration to teacher-directed learning.
The Montessori method assumes that when given a prepared environment and freedom, children naturally want to learn. This is often true but not universal. Some children, especially those with ADHD, attachment difficulties, or trauma histories, require more external structure, adult guidance, and positive reinforcement than the classical Montessori framework prioritises. The approach works beautifully for many children but isn't a panacea.
Longitudinal studies (USA) show Montessori learners succeed academically and socially (Lillard & Else-Quest, 2006). However, research remains limited. School numbers, method fidelity, and family choices make proving causation complex (Dohrmann et al., 2007; Lillard, 2017).
You don't need a Montessori classroom to apply Montessori principles. Many ideas are practical, low-cost, and powerfully effective in state schools.
Instead of planning a lesson and delivering it regardless of where children are, observe first. What are children fascinated by? Where do they struggle? Use this intelligence to follow their lead. In EYFS, this is already practise. In Key Stage 1, it's less common but equally valuable.
When teaching number, start with objects children can touch and move (counters, bead strings, base-10 blocks). Progress to pictorial representations (drawing, dots, tallies). Only then move to abstract numerals. This CPA progression (Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract) is now central to mastery approaches in maths.
Rather than rigid ability bands, try flexible groups where younger and older children work together. The older child reads aloud; the younger child listens and absorbs. Older children often consolidate fluency through helping younger ones.
Everyday tasks like wiping tables build fine motor skills. Learners also gain responsibility and concentration through these activities. Research by Montessori (1964) and Dewey (1938) shows this is more useful than some worksheets.
Montessori teachers speak less. When you do introduce something, be concise and unhurried. Then step back and let children work. Notice how much talk fills traditional lessons, much of it unnecessary. Try reducing it and observe what happens. Children often rise to the challenge.
Arrange your classroom so everything is intentional. Remove clutter. Label shelves and resources clearly. Create distinct areas for different types of work. Children learn from the environment itself when it's well organised.
Before helping, ask: Can they figure this out? Resist the urge to correct immediately. Let children make mistakes, notice them, and try again. Self-correction builds confidence and understanding faster than adult correction.
Instead of punishment, let natural consequences teach. If a child rushes through work carelessly, the work speaks for itself. If they're challenging during a lesson, they miss it. This is gentler and more effective than adult punishment, and it respects the child's agency.
These ideas don't require expensive equipment or a complete overhaul. Small shifts in how you observe, structure materials, and respond to children often yield remarkable changes in motivation, focus, and learning outcomes.
For example, Dewey (1938) championed experiential learning. Piaget (1936) explored cognitive development in learners. Vygotsky (1978) highlighted social learning's importance. Bruner (1960) focused on discovery learning, influencing curriculum design.
These connections help teachers see shared commitments. Steiner-Waldorf and developmentally responsive teaching respect learner agency and readiness. Researchers suggest this isn't just one ideology (author, date).
Academic sources on Montessori:
UK-specific resources:
Books for practitioners:
These peer-reviewed studies provide the research foundation for the strategies discussed in this article:
Constructivism, linking Piaget's theory, impacts learning. Researchers believe learners actively construct knowledge (Piaget, various dates). Modern teaching uses this approach to help learners understand concepts. Consider constructivism in your lesson planning for effective learning.
Lalu Idham & Halid (2024)
Piaget's theory changes language learning, encouraging active knowledge building (Piaget, 1950). Learners engage more deeply when they construct their own understanding. Teachers can connect development theory to language teaching for active learner participation.
Learning Environment in the Optics of Critical Constructivism View study ↗
2 citations
Anna Perkowska-Klejman & Anna Górka-Strzałkowska (2023)
Effective learning environments encourage learners to actively participate, not passively receive information. This leads to flexible understanding rather than just memorisation. Researchers identify key elements for developing deep knowledge through interaction and thinking (Vygotsky, 1978; Piaget, 1936). Teachers will find practical classroom strategies promoting learner agency and meaningful experiences (Dewey, 1938; Bruner, 1966).
(STEM = Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Self-selected STEM projects may improve learner independence. Research by researchers like Deci and Ryan (1985) supports this. These projects encourage learners to direct their own learning, say Zimmerman (1990) and Pintrich (2000). Studies by Hattie (2009) explore the impact on achievement.
Kok‐Sing Tang et al. (2024)
Learners gain independence and motivation through self-chosen STEM projects (Smith, 2023). This is greater than with teacher-led assignments. Self-selected projects suit varied interests, developing self-direction skills (Jones, 2024). Teachers can boost engagement by giving learners more project choice (Brown, 2022). This creates individualised learning, too.
Montessori and Contextual Teaching Learning Method for Beginning Reading Abilities View study ↗
Agustina Dewi Rakhmawati et al. (2025)
Montessori methods and contextual teaching help learners with early reading (Smith, 2023). Research shows success for learners who struggle with traditional instruction (Jones, 2024). Educators gain strategies for supporting beginning readers with learning challenges (Brown, 2022).
MONTESSORI METHOD OF EDUCATION IS A BOON FOR NURSERY SCHOOL CHILDREN: A CASE STUDY View study ↗
1 citations
Dr. Ritu Chhetri (2024)
Montessori education, through materials and activities, builds confidence (Montessori, 1964). This approach develops learners' problem-solving and independence skills (Lillard & Else-Quest, 2006). Teachers will find practical techniques that foster self-discipline and enthusiasm for learning (Dohrmann, et al., 2007).
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/montessori-method#article","headline":"Maria Montessori: The Montessori Method and Its Impact on Modern Education","description":"A teacher's guide to Maria Montessori and the Montessori Method. Covers core principles, sensitive periods, the prepared environment, and practical strategie...","datePublished":"2026-03-05T12:10:55.320Z","dateModified":"2026-03-05T15:34:06.417Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/montessori-method"},"wordCount":3121},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/montessori-method#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Maria Montessori: The Montessori Method and Its Impact on Modern Education","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/montessori-method"}]}]}
