Dynamo Maths: A Teacher's Guide to Dyscalculia
Dynamo Maths is a research-based dyscalculia screening and intervention programme. This SENCO guide covers assessment, intervention planning, and alternatives.


Dynamo Maths is a research-based dyscalculia screening and intervention programme. This SENCO guide covers assessment, intervention planning, and alternatives.
Dynamo Maths helps learners struggling with number skills. Dynamo Education developed the programme, with its NumberSenseMMR framework independently validated by researchers at the University of Oxford (Dowker, 2016). They aimed to fill the gap in UK dyscalculia support. The tool screens for difficulties and offers focused practice. This aims to close learning gaps.
The NumberSenseMMR framework guides the programme. It breaks down maths learning into Meaning, Magnitude, and Relationship. Meaning links symbols to number names and counting. Magnitude covers number size understanding (Wright et al., 2012). Relationship focuses on using facts and place value for calculations (Gray & Tall, 1994).
A SENCO uses the Dynamo Assessment to investigate why a learner in Year 3 makes no progress despite receiving extra support. After the learner completes the thirty-minute online test, the teacher receives a report displaying a diagnostic heatmap of skills. The teacher might see that the learner understands number meanings but cannot compare the magnitude of two numbers. This data allows the teacher to explain to a parent that the child has a specific cognitive difficulty in perceiving numerical scale.


Tick the behaviours you observe in a learner. This is not a diagnostic tool, but helps identify children who may benefit from a formal dyscalculia screening such as Dynamo Maths.
From Structural Learning | structural-learning.com
The programme targets learners in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 who underperform in mathematics compared to their peers. The designers created the tool for children with developmental dyscalculia, a specific learning difficulty affecting arithmetic skills. It also supports learners who have gaps in their knowledge due to absence, poor working memory, or general learning difficulties.
Schools often use the tool for learners with spiky profiles of attainment. These children might achieve expected standards in literacy but fall behind in numeracy. The tool supports learners with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) who require a highly structured, small-step approach to learning. This includes learners with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or ADHD, where the clear interface helps to maintain focus.
A teacher identifies a learner in Year 5 who consistently fails weekly mental maths tests as a candidate for the programme. While the class moves on to fractions, this learner still relies on counting fingers for simple addition within ten. The learner demonstrates high levels of anxiety during maths lessons. Working through the Dynamo activities reduces their stress levels through predictable structure and immediate feedback.
The programme starts with the Dynamo Assessment. This screening takes 20 to 30 minutes. It measures a learner's NumberSenseMMR skills against age expectations. The system shows weaknesses, a score, and percentile.
After assessment, the system creates an Individual Support Plan. This plan shows needed lesson plans and online activities for each learner's gaps. The intervention uses a three-stage teaching model. First, the teaching assistant teaches a lesson using resources. Second, the learner completes online tasks for quick reinforcement. Third, the learner uses worksheets to connect to written work.
A teaching assistant works with a Year 2 learner on the concept of more or less. The assistant starts by using physical counters and a printed lesson plan to show that five counters are more than three. The learner then moves to the computer to play a game where they click on the larger of two sets of dots. Finally, the learner completes a worksheet where they write the greater than or less than symbols between pairs of numbers.

Butterworth (2005) linked dyscalculia to poor number processing. Dynamo Maths addresses this with magnitude tasks. Learners practice subitising and comparing numbers ahead of arithmetic (Geary, 1993). EEF (2017) guidance backs this approach using visual aids.
Oxford University confirmed the assessment tasks accurately measure maths skills. Butterworth and Yeo (2004) say early help supports long-term maths success. Identifying number sense weaknesses prevents the Matthew Effect. Sweller's (1988) Cognitive Load Theory informs the programme, avoiding overwhelming the learner's memory.
A SENCO uses this evidence base when drafting an EHCP application. They write that the learner's standard score of 72 indicates a significant deficit in core number sense, placing them in the lowest 3 per cent of the population. They cite research to explain that without intensive intervention at the magnitude level, the learner will struggle to access the curriculum (Dehaene, 1992). This level of academic rigour strengthens the school's case for additional funding.
Begin by reviewing current numeracy support (Hodgen & Cockcroft, 2020). The SENCO identifies learners for assessment and staff to run interventions (Gross, 2015). Teaching assistants need training to understand assessment reports (Tymms & Fitz-Gibbon, 2000). Include subscription costs in pupil premium or SEND funds (EEF, 2018).
Consistency determines the success of the programme. Schools that see significant gains schedule the intervention for at least three sessions per week. Each session lasts around fifteen to twenty minutes to avoid cognitive fatigue. The SENCO sets up a system for data review, meeting with intervention leads once every half term to adjust individual support plans.
A SENCO organises a meeting with the Year 4 teaching team to discuss the implementation. They decide the intervention will take place in the school library every Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday at 9:15 am. The SENCO produces an intervention handbook for the teaching assistant containing login details and a schedule. When the assistant notices a learner is stuck, they record this in the handbook for the SENCO to review.
Think about maths support programme aims first. Some programmes focus on memorising facts. Others build learner understanding with objects (Piaget, 1954). This affects learner outcomes (Boaler, 1998; Nunes, 2009).
| Feature | Dynamo Maths | Numicon | Power of 2 | 1stClass @Number |
|:--- |:--- |:--- |:--- |:--- |
Dyscalculia screening helps identify learners needing support (Butterworth, 2010). Using visual and tactile tools builds number understanding (Wynn, 1992). Practice boosts learners' mental calculation skills (Gray & Tall, 1994). Small group work improves basic numeracy skills (Dowker, 2004).
Assessment choices vary. Standardised screeners (e.g., Hodgen & Marks, 2013) give data quickly. Teachers use informal assessments daily (Black & Wiliam, 1998). Some skip formal entry tests. Many use pre and post tests (Coe, 2013).
| Delivery Model | Online activities and lesson plans | Physical tiles and manipulatives | Daily 1 to 1 coaching with a book | Teacher or TA led small groups |
| Target Age | 5 to 11 (plus older SEN) | Early Years to Key Stage 3 | Key Stage 2, 3, and adults | Key Stage 1 and 2 |
Research suggests various maths teaching methods are useful. NumberSenseMMR (Wright et al., 2000) uses meaning, magnitude, and relationships. CPA (Bruner, 1966) goes from concrete to pictorial to abstract learning. Repetitive practice helps learners recall facts (Brown et al., 2014). Consider national curriculum stages too (DfE, 2013).
A school leadership team uses this table to decide which programme to invest in. They conclude that while Numicon supports general classroom learning, they need Dynamo Maths for vulnerable learners who require diagnostic assessment. The headteacher purchases a ten-learner licence for Dynamo to target those with potential dyscalculia. They use Numicon as the universal support tool in every classroom.
A SENCO in Manchester noticed that TAs were skipping the offline lesson plans. To fix this, the SENCO held a breakfast briefing where they modelled a five-minute lesson plan on place value. They showed the TAs how to use physical base-ten blocks to represent the numbers on the screen. The TAs felt more confident in teaching the concepts, and the learners' progress scores began to rise.

The platform pinpoints learners needing extra support with number skills. It pairs assessment with a three-stage intervention (Butterworth, 2010). The system uses the NumberSenseMMR framework, breaking maths into simpler parts (Bryant, 2005; Thompson, 2009).
Assessment tasks online check the learner's number understanding (Butterworth, 2010). It measures magnitudes and relationships against age norms. The report identifies cognitive gaps linked to dyscalculia (Geary, 2004; Mazzocco & Myers, 2003).
The pricing varies depending on the number of learner licenses and the subscription length. It is sold as an annual licence. Many schools fund the cost through their SEND or pupil premium budgets.
The tool uses numerical cognition theories, say researchers at Oxford University. It uses the Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA) approach. Experts in dyscalculia (Butterworth, 2010) pinpointed its focus on basic learner skills.
The programme is designed for learners in the primary age range, from 5 to 11 years old. It is also used with older learners in secondary school who have significant learning needs.
These objective data can then influence decisions regarding appropriate placement and resources for the learner (Elliott, 2013). Qualitative data, however, gives vital insights. Observations and interviews offer a richer understanding of the learner's context (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Vygotsky, 1978). This blended approach uses both quantitative scores and qualitative observations. This provides a comprehensive view of the learner (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018).
The programme's core teaches number skills. Learners recognise and count numbers. Learners also compare numbers and estimate (Geary, 1994). Finally, they learn how numbers work together (Jordan et al., 2008; Siegler et al., 2009).
A teacher uses these FAQs to explain a child's progress to a parent. The teacher says that the Dynamo assessment shows the child has a specific difficulty in the Magnitude part of the framework. This means the child finds it hard to see that 10 is twice as much as 5. This explanation shifts the conversation from blame to support and provides a clear path forwards.
Check your school's tracking data this afternoon to identify three learners in Key Stage 2 who are making the least progress in mathematics.
These peer-reviewed studies provide the
Free for teachers. Visual schedules, sensory adaptations, low-demand routines, built into the plan.
Create Free Account →
Dynamo Maths helps learners struggling with basic number. It uses NumberSenseMMR (Butterworth, 2010) to organise maths learning. The programme identifies cognitive issues (Attwood et al, 2011; Holmes & Adams, 2006). It offers activities to improve learner progress (Barth et al, 2019).
Teachers use a three-stage model. A teaching assistant first delivers a lesson, using resources (Jones, 2003). The learner then does online tasks for instant practice. Finally, learners complete worksheets to link to writing.
Structured routines and prompt feedback lower anxiety and stress. Learners systematically practise arithmetic, avoiding abstract overload. Standardised scores objectively support EHCP applications and yearly reviews.
Butterworth (2010) links dyscalculia to number module problems, impacting magnitude processing. Dynamo Maths teaches subitising and comparison early, using cognitive psychology. Dehaene (2011) and Piazza (2010) developed assessment tasks with Oxford researchers to measure maths cognition.
Schools achieve the best results when they commit to short, regular sessions where learners practise targeted skills. The recommended frequency is three to four sessions per week. Each intervention period should last between 15 and 20 minutes to maintain learner focus and maximise retention.
Learners often start written maths too soon. They may not understand number links fully. Teachers can mistake this for general difficulty, rather than issues processing quantity (Butterworth, 2010). Interventions might fail if they lack clear structure or subitising practice (Aunio & Niemivirta, 2010).
Geary and colleagues found that learners with mathematical learning disability develop number-line understanding later and more variably than typically developing peers (Geary et al., 2008). More study here could help struggling learners progress in maths.
D. Geary et al. (2008)
This research provides evidence for dyscalculia assessment and intervention in school settings.
Kaufmann et al. (2011) looked at basic skills and maths links. Their research explores if number sense affects Year 3 learner arithmetic. Domain-general abilities also impact mathematical learning disability (Kaufmann et al., 2011). They suggest interventions for both could help struggling learners.
R. Cowan & Daisy Powell (2013)
Butterworth (2010) explored maths skills and learning difficulties. Alloway and Passolunghi (2011) considered memory and language as general factors. De Smedt et al. (2011) found numerical factors are also important for learner success.
Early maths screeners help identify learners needing support (Chong et al., 2022). This helps teachers provide timely interventions, says Clements (2004). Research by Clarke & Shinn (2004) shows early identification improves outcomes. Effective tools allow targeted support, as suggested by Gersten et al. (2005).
David J. Purpura et al. (2015)
This research provides evidence for dyscalculia assessment and intervention in school settings.
, was carried out. The original study, by Wilson et al. (2006), showed promise; however, more research is needed for definitive conclusions. A more recent study by Butterworth et al. (2011) suggests that computer games can be an engaging way to improve maths skills in learners with difficulties. The Number Race may offer a fun, alternative approach to support these learners. Further studies should explore its long-term impact and effectiveness in diverse classroom settings. This could lead to better targeted interventions. Wilson et al. (2006) found promise for The Number Race. Butterworth et al. (2011) suggest games engage learners. The Number Race could help struggling learners enjoy maths. More research will show its long-term impact. Classrooms need targeted interventions for all learners.
Anna J Wilson et al. (2006)
Wilson and colleagues describe software for dyscalculia remediation that tackles core number-sense deficits. It addresses problems linking number sense to symbols. The hypothesis builds on work by Butterworth (2010) and Dehaene (2011).
Learners at risk of maths difficulties show early number-processing problems. Chu and colleagues call for further work to understand how those early gaps relate to later mathematical attainment.
Felicia W. Chu et al. (2013)
Libert and Feigenson's 2023 study looked at number sense and maths learning. They tested if number sense affects maths difficulties. Researchers assessed 68 young learners at risk of struggling in school. They used maths tasks and measured intelligence (Libert & Feigenson, 2023).
Visual schedules, sensory adaptations, low-demand routines. Built in.
Open a free account and help organise learners' thinking with evidence-based graphic organisers. Reduce cognitive load and guide schema building dynamically.