Dynamo Maths: A Teacher's Guide to Dyscalculia
Dynamo Maths is a research-based dyscalculia screening and intervention programme. This SENCO guide covers assessment, intervention planning, and alternatives.


Dynamo Maths is a research-based dyscalculia screening and intervention programme. This SENCO guide covers assessment, intervention planning, and alternatives.


Tick the behaviours you observe in a learner. This is not a diagnostic tool, but helps identify children who may benefit from a formal dyscalculia screening such as Dynamo Maths.
From Structural Learning | structural-learning.com
Dynamo Maths is an online platform designed to support learners who struggle with basic number concepts. Dynamo Education developed the programme in collaboration with researchers from the University of Oxford to address the lack of evidence-based dyscalculia support in the UK. The tool screens for mathematical learning difficulties and provides corrective intervention to close attainment gaps through systematic practise.
The NumberSenseMMR framework forms the basis of the programme, categorising mathematical development into Meaning, Magnitude, and Relationship. Meaning involves associating a number symbol with a name and a count. Magnitude refers to understanding the size of a number and its position relative to others. Relationship focuses on the ability to use number facts and place value to solve calculations.
A SENCO uses the Dynamo Assessment to investigate why a learner in Year 3 makes no progress despite receiving extra support. After the learner completes the thirty-minute online test, the teacher receives a report displaying a diagnostic heatmap of skills. The teacher might see that the learner understands number meanings but cannot compare the magnitude of two numbers. This data allows the teacher to explain to a parent that the child has a specific cognitive difficulty in perceiving numerical scale.
The programme targets learners in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 who underperform in mathematics compared to their peers. The designers created the tool for children with developmental dyscalculia, a specific learning difficulty affecting arithmetic skills. It also supports learners who have gaps in their knowledge due to absence, poor working memory, or general learning difficulties.
Schools often use the tool for learners with spiky profiles of attainment. These children might achieve expected standards in literacy but fall behind in numeracy. The tool supports learners with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) who require a highly structured, small-step approach to learning. This includes learners with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or ADHD, where the clear interface helps to maintain focus.
A teacher identifies a learner in Year 5 who consistently fails weekly mental maths tests as a candidate for the programme. While the class moves on to fractions, this learner still relies on counting fingers for simple addition within ten. The learner demonstrates high levels of anxiety during maths lessons. Working through the Dynamo activities reduces their stress levels through predictable structure and immediate feedback.
The programme operates through a logical sequence beginning with the Dynamo Assessment. This standardised screening tool takes approximately twenty to thirty minutes to complete. It measures performance against age-appropriate expectations across the NumberSenseMMR components. The system displays results that highlight specific weaknesses, providing a standardised score and a percentile rank.
Following the assessment, the system generates an Individual Support Plan (ISP). This plan identifies the lesson plans and online activities the learner needs to address their identified gaps. The intervention follows a three-stage pedagogical model. First, the teaching assistant delivers a lesson plan using physical resources. Second, the learner completes online activities for immediate reinforcement. Third, the learner works through active worksheets to bridge the gap to written recording.
A teaching assistant works with a Year 2 learner on the concept of more or less. The assistant starts by using physical counters and a printed lesson plan to show that five counters are more than three. The learner then moves to the computer to play a game where they click on the larger of two sets of dots. Finally, the learner completes a worksheet where they write the greater than or less than symbols between pairs of numbers.

Butterworth (2005) found dyscalculia often stems from weak number processing. Dynamo Maths targets this using magnitude understanding activities. Learners practice subitising and number comparison before arithmetic (Geary, 1993). EEF (2017) guidance supports this approach with visual representations.
Consultation with the University of Oxford ensured that the assessment tasks are valid measures of mathematical cognition. Early identification of mathematical difficulties supports long term success (Butterworth and Yeo, 2004). By identifying deficits in number sense early, schools prevent the Matthew Effect, where learners who start behind fall further behind over time. The programme incorporates principles of Cognitive Load Theory by presenting information in a way that does not overwhelm working memory (Sweller, 1988).
A SENCO uses this evidence base when drafting an EHCP application. They write that the learner's standard score of 72 indicates a significant deficit in core number sense, placing them in the lowest 3 per cent of the population. They cite research to explain that without intensive intervention at the magnitude level, the learner will struggle to access the curriculum (Dehaene, 1992). This level of academic rigour strengthens the school's case for additional funding.
Successful implementation starts with an audit of the school's current numeracy intervention provision. The SENCO decides which learners require assessment and which staff members lead the intervention. Teaching assistants benefit from training on how to interpret the diagnostic reports. Factor the annual subscription fee into the pupil premium or SEND budget.
Consistency determines the success of the programme. Schools that see significant gains schedule the intervention for at least three sessions per week. Each session lasts around fifteen to twenty minutes to avoid cognitive fatigue. The SENCO sets up a system for data review, meeting with intervention leads once every half term to adjust individual support plans.
A SENCO organises a meeting with the Year 4 teaching team to discuss the implementation. They decide the intervention will take place in the school library every Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday at 9:15 am. The SENCO produces an intervention handbook for the teaching assistant containing login details and a schedule. When the assistant notices a learner is stuck, they record this in the handbook for the SENCO to review.
Considering programme aims is vital before choosing maths support. Some programmes emphasise memorisation, while others build understanding using objects (Piaget, 1954). This can affect learner outcomes (Boaler, 1998; Nunes, 2009).
| Feature | Dynamo Maths | Numicon | Power of 2 | 1stClass @Number |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
Dyscalculia screening helps identify learners needing support (Butterworth, 2010). Using visual and tactile tools builds number understanding (Wynn, 1992). Practice boosts learners' mental calculation skills (Gray & Tall, 1994). Small group work improves basic numeracy skills (Dowker, 2004).
| Assessment Tool | Standardised online diagnostic screener | Informal curriculum-based assessment | No formal entry assessment | Pre and post assessments |
| Delivery Model | Online activities and lesson plans | Physical tiles and manipulatives | Daily 1 to 1 coaching with a book | Teacher or TA led small groups |
| Target Age | 5 to 11 (plus older SEN) | Early Years to Key Stage 3 | Key Stage 2, 3, and adults | Key Stage 1 and 2 |
Research suggests various maths teaching methods are useful. NumberSenseMMR (Wright et al., 2000) uses meaning, magnitude, and relationships. CPA (Bruner, 1966) goes from concrete to pictorial to abstract learning. Repetitive practice helps learners recall facts (Brown et al., 2014). Consider national curriculum stages too (DfE, 2013).
A school leadership team uses this table to decide which programme to invest in. They conclude that while Numicon supports general classroom learning, they need Dynamo Maths for vulnerable learners who require diagnostic assessment. The headteacher purchases a ten-learner licence for Dynamo to target those with potential dyscalculia. They use Numicon as the universal support tool in every classroom.
A SENCO in Manchester noticed that TAs were skipping the offline lesson plans. To fix this, the SENCO held a breakfast briefing where they modelled a five-minute lesson plan on place value. They showed the TAs how to use physical base-ten blocks to represent the numbers on the screen. The TAs felt more confident in teaching the concepts, and the learners' progress scores began to rise.

It is an online platform that identifies and supports learners with significant difficulties in number sense. It combines a diagnostic assessment with a three-stage intervention programme. The system uses the NumberSenseMMR framework to break maths into manageable components.
The assessment uses online tasks to measure a child's understanding of number meanings, magnitudes, and relationships. It compares performance against a database of age-related norms. The resulting report identifies cognitive gaps characteristic of dyscalculia.
The pricing varies depending on the number of learner licenses and the subscription length. It is sold as an annual licence. Many schools fund the cost through their SEND or pupil premium budgets.
The tool is built on theories of numerical cognition and was developed with researchers from the University of Oxford. It follows the principles of the Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA) approach. It focuses on foundational skills identified by experts in dyscalculia.
The programme is designed for learners in the primary age range, from 5 to 11 years old. It is also used with older learners in secondary school who have significant learning needs.
Standardised scores and diagnostic reports are used by educational psychologists and local authority panels. They provide objective data that demonstrates a learner's level of need.
This is the pedagogical core of the programme. Meaning covers number recognition and counting. Magnitude involves comparing numbers and estimation. Relationship focuses on understanding how numbers interact in calculations.
A teacher uses these FAQs to explain a child's progress to a parent. The teacher says that the Dynamo assessment shows the child has a specific difficulty in the Magnitude part of the framework. This means the child finds it hard to see that 10 is twice as much as 5. This explanation shifts the conversation from blame to support and provides a clear path forwards.
Check your school's tracking data this afternoon to identify three learners in Key Stage 2 who are making the least progress in mathematics.
These peer-reviewed studies provide the
Dynamo Maths helps learners struggling with basic number. It uses NumberSenseMMR (Butterworth, 2010) to organise maths learning. The programme identifies cognitive issues (Attwood et al, 2011; Holmes & Adams, 2006). It offers activities to improve learner progress (Barth et al, 2019).
Teachers implement the programme using a structured three-stage pedagogical model. First, a teaching assistant delivers a lesson plan using physical resources to introduce a concept. The learner then completes online activities for immediate reinforcement, followed by active worksheets that bridge the gap to written recording.
The programme reduces anxiety and stress by providing a highly structured, predictable routine with immediate feedback. It allows learners to practise basic arithmetic skills systematically without feeling overwhelmed by abstract concepts. The standardised assessment scores also provide objective evidence for EHCP applications and annual reviews.
Dyscalculia often comes from a number module issue, affecting magnitude processing (Butterworth, 2010). Dynamo Maths uses cognitive psychology, teaching subitising and comparison first. Oxford researchers helped create assessment tasks to measure maths cognition (Dehaene, 2011; Piazza, 2010).
Schools achieve the best results when they commit to short, regular sessions where learners practise targeted skills. The recommended frequency is three to four sessions per week. Each intervention period should last between 15 and 20 minutes to maintain learner focus and maximise retention.
Learners often rush into written sums before grasping number relationships. Teachers may misdiagnose a general difficulty, not magnitude processing (Butterworth, 2010). Interventions can fail if they lack structure or subitising (Aunio & Niemivirta, 2010).
According to a study by researchers (unnamed, date unspecified), learners with mathematical learning disability develop number lines. More research into this area could help struggling learners progress.
D. Geary et al. (2008)
This research provides evidence for dyscalculia assessment and intervention in school settings.
(Kaufmann et al., 2011) investigates links between basic skills and maths. The research explores if number sense affects arithmetic in Year 3 learners. Domain-general abilities also impact mathematical learning disability (Kaufmann et al., 2011). The study suggests interventions targeting both could help struggling learners.
R. Cowan & Daisy Powell (2013)
Researchers explored maths skills and learning difficulties (Butterworth, 2010). Domain-general factors like memory and language were considered (Alloway & Passolunghi, 2011). Numerical factors are also important, according to findings by De Smedt et al. (2011).
Early maths screeners help identify learners needing support (Chong et al., 2022). This helps teachers provide timely interventions, says Clements (2004). Research by Clarke & Shinn (2004) shows early identification improves outcomes. Effective tools allow targeted support, as suggested by Gersten et al. (2005).
David J. Purpura et al. (2015)
This research provides evidence for dyscalculia assessment and intervention in school settings.
An open trial assessment of The Number Race, an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia View study ↗
71 citations
Anna J Wilson et al. (2006)
BackgroundIn a companion article [1], we described the development and evaluation of software designed to remediate dyscalculia. This software is based on the hypothesis that dyscalculia is due to a core deficit in number sense or in its access via symbolic information.
Preschool learners at risk for mathematical learning disability show quantitative deficits. Researchers suggest further study is needed (View study ↗53 citations).
Felicia W. Chu et al. (2013)
The study tested the hypothesis that acuity of the potentially inherent approximate number system (ANS) contributes to risk of mathematical learning disability (MLD). Sixty-eight (35 boys) preschoolers at risk for school failure were assessed on a battery of quantitative tasks, and on intelligence, .


Tick the behaviours you observe in a learner. This is not a diagnostic tool, but helps identify children who may benefit from a formal dyscalculia screening such as Dynamo Maths.
From Structural Learning | structural-learning.com
Dynamo Maths is an online platform designed to support learners who struggle with basic number concepts. Dynamo Education developed the programme in collaboration with researchers from the University of Oxford to address the lack of evidence-based dyscalculia support in the UK. The tool screens for mathematical learning difficulties and provides corrective intervention to close attainment gaps through systematic practise.
The NumberSenseMMR framework forms the basis of the programme, categorising mathematical development into Meaning, Magnitude, and Relationship. Meaning involves associating a number symbol with a name and a count. Magnitude refers to understanding the size of a number and its position relative to others. Relationship focuses on the ability to use number facts and place value to solve calculations.
A SENCO uses the Dynamo Assessment to investigate why a learner in Year 3 makes no progress despite receiving extra support. After the learner completes the thirty-minute online test, the teacher receives a report displaying a diagnostic heatmap of skills. The teacher might see that the learner understands number meanings but cannot compare the magnitude of two numbers. This data allows the teacher to explain to a parent that the child has a specific cognitive difficulty in perceiving numerical scale.
The programme targets learners in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 who underperform in mathematics compared to their peers. The designers created the tool for children with developmental dyscalculia, a specific learning difficulty affecting arithmetic skills. It also supports learners who have gaps in their knowledge due to absence, poor working memory, or general learning difficulties.
Schools often use the tool for learners with spiky profiles of attainment. These children might achieve expected standards in literacy but fall behind in numeracy. The tool supports learners with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) who require a highly structured, small-step approach to learning. This includes learners with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or ADHD, where the clear interface helps to maintain focus.
A teacher identifies a learner in Year 5 who consistently fails weekly mental maths tests as a candidate for the programme. While the class moves on to fractions, this learner still relies on counting fingers for simple addition within ten. The learner demonstrates high levels of anxiety during maths lessons. Working through the Dynamo activities reduces their stress levels through predictable structure and immediate feedback.
The programme operates through a logical sequence beginning with the Dynamo Assessment. This standardised screening tool takes approximately twenty to thirty minutes to complete. It measures performance against age-appropriate expectations across the NumberSenseMMR components. The system displays results that highlight specific weaknesses, providing a standardised score and a percentile rank.
Following the assessment, the system generates an Individual Support Plan (ISP). This plan identifies the lesson plans and online activities the learner needs to address their identified gaps. The intervention follows a three-stage pedagogical model. First, the teaching assistant delivers a lesson plan using physical resources. Second, the learner completes online activities for immediate reinforcement. Third, the learner works through active worksheets to bridge the gap to written recording.
A teaching assistant works with a Year 2 learner on the concept of more or less. The assistant starts by using physical counters and a printed lesson plan to show that five counters are more than three. The learner then moves to the computer to play a game where they click on the larger of two sets of dots. Finally, the learner completes a worksheet where they write the greater than or less than symbols between pairs of numbers.

Butterworth (2005) found dyscalculia often stems from weak number processing. Dynamo Maths targets this using magnitude understanding activities. Learners practice subitising and number comparison before arithmetic (Geary, 1993). EEF (2017) guidance supports this approach with visual representations.
Consultation with the University of Oxford ensured that the assessment tasks are valid measures of mathematical cognition. Early identification of mathematical difficulties supports long term success (Butterworth and Yeo, 2004). By identifying deficits in number sense early, schools prevent the Matthew Effect, where learners who start behind fall further behind over time. The programme incorporates principles of Cognitive Load Theory by presenting information in a way that does not overwhelm working memory (Sweller, 1988).
A SENCO uses this evidence base when drafting an EHCP application. They write that the learner's standard score of 72 indicates a significant deficit in core number sense, placing them in the lowest 3 per cent of the population. They cite research to explain that without intensive intervention at the magnitude level, the learner will struggle to access the curriculum (Dehaene, 1992). This level of academic rigour strengthens the school's case for additional funding.
Successful implementation starts with an audit of the school's current numeracy intervention provision. The SENCO decides which learners require assessment and which staff members lead the intervention. Teaching assistants benefit from training on how to interpret the diagnostic reports. Factor the annual subscription fee into the pupil premium or SEND budget.
Consistency determines the success of the programme. Schools that see significant gains schedule the intervention for at least three sessions per week. Each session lasts around fifteen to twenty minutes to avoid cognitive fatigue. The SENCO sets up a system for data review, meeting with intervention leads once every half term to adjust individual support plans.
A SENCO organises a meeting with the Year 4 teaching team to discuss the implementation. They decide the intervention will take place in the school library every Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday at 9:15 am. The SENCO produces an intervention handbook for the teaching assistant containing login details and a schedule. When the assistant notices a learner is stuck, they record this in the handbook for the SENCO to review.
Considering programme aims is vital before choosing maths support. Some programmes emphasise memorisation, while others build understanding using objects (Piaget, 1954). This can affect learner outcomes (Boaler, 1998; Nunes, 2009).
| Feature | Dynamo Maths | Numicon | Power of 2 | 1stClass @Number |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
Dyscalculia screening helps identify learners needing support (Butterworth, 2010). Using visual and tactile tools builds number understanding (Wynn, 1992). Practice boosts learners' mental calculation skills (Gray & Tall, 1994). Small group work improves basic numeracy skills (Dowker, 2004).
| Assessment Tool | Standardised online diagnostic screener | Informal curriculum-based assessment | No formal entry assessment | Pre and post assessments |
| Delivery Model | Online activities and lesson plans | Physical tiles and manipulatives | Daily 1 to 1 coaching with a book | Teacher or TA led small groups |
| Target Age | 5 to 11 (plus older SEN) | Early Years to Key Stage 3 | Key Stage 2, 3, and adults | Key Stage 1 and 2 |
Research suggests various maths teaching methods are useful. NumberSenseMMR (Wright et al., 2000) uses meaning, magnitude, and relationships. CPA (Bruner, 1966) goes from concrete to pictorial to abstract learning. Repetitive practice helps learners recall facts (Brown et al., 2014). Consider national curriculum stages too (DfE, 2013).
A school leadership team uses this table to decide which programme to invest in. They conclude that while Numicon supports general classroom learning, they need Dynamo Maths for vulnerable learners who require diagnostic assessment. The headteacher purchases a ten-learner licence for Dynamo to target those with potential dyscalculia. They use Numicon as the universal support tool in every classroom.
A SENCO in Manchester noticed that TAs were skipping the offline lesson plans. To fix this, the SENCO held a breakfast briefing where they modelled a five-minute lesson plan on place value. They showed the TAs how to use physical base-ten blocks to represent the numbers on the screen. The TAs felt more confident in teaching the concepts, and the learners' progress scores began to rise.

It is an online platform that identifies and supports learners with significant difficulties in number sense. It combines a diagnostic assessment with a three-stage intervention programme. The system uses the NumberSenseMMR framework to break maths into manageable components.
The assessment uses online tasks to measure a child's understanding of number meanings, magnitudes, and relationships. It compares performance against a database of age-related norms. The resulting report identifies cognitive gaps characteristic of dyscalculia.
The pricing varies depending on the number of learner licenses and the subscription length. It is sold as an annual licence. Many schools fund the cost through their SEND or pupil premium budgets.
The tool is built on theories of numerical cognition and was developed with researchers from the University of Oxford. It follows the principles of the Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA) approach. It focuses on foundational skills identified by experts in dyscalculia.
The programme is designed for learners in the primary age range, from 5 to 11 years old. It is also used with older learners in secondary school who have significant learning needs.
Standardised scores and diagnostic reports are used by educational psychologists and local authority panels. They provide objective data that demonstrates a learner's level of need.
This is the pedagogical core of the programme. Meaning covers number recognition and counting. Magnitude involves comparing numbers and estimation. Relationship focuses on understanding how numbers interact in calculations.
A teacher uses these FAQs to explain a child's progress to a parent. The teacher says that the Dynamo assessment shows the child has a specific difficulty in the Magnitude part of the framework. This means the child finds it hard to see that 10 is twice as much as 5. This explanation shifts the conversation from blame to support and provides a clear path forwards.
Check your school's tracking data this afternoon to identify three learners in Key Stage 2 who are making the least progress in mathematics.
These peer-reviewed studies provide the
Dynamo Maths helps learners struggling with basic number. It uses NumberSenseMMR (Butterworth, 2010) to organise maths learning. The programme identifies cognitive issues (Attwood et al, 2011; Holmes & Adams, 2006). It offers activities to improve learner progress (Barth et al, 2019).
Teachers implement the programme using a structured three-stage pedagogical model. First, a teaching assistant delivers a lesson plan using physical resources to introduce a concept. The learner then completes online activities for immediate reinforcement, followed by active worksheets that bridge the gap to written recording.
The programme reduces anxiety and stress by providing a highly structured, predictable routine with immediate feedback. It allows learners to practise basic arithmetic skills systematically without feeling overwhelmed by abstract concepts. The standardised assessment scores also provide objective evidence for EHCP applications and annual reviews.
Dyscalculia often comes from a number module issue, affecting magnitude processing (Butterworth, 2010). Dynamo Maths uses cognitive psychology, teaching subitising and comparison first. Oxford researchers helped create assessment tasks to measure maths cognition (Dehaene, 2011; Piazza, 2010).
Schools achieve the best results when they commit to short, regular sessions where learners practise targeted skills. The recommended frequency is three to four sessions per week. Each intervention period should last between 15 and 20 minutes to maintain learner focus and maximise retention.
Learners often rush into written sums before grasping number relationships. Teachers may misdiagnose a general difficulty, not magnitude processing (Butterworth, 2010). Interventions can fail if they lack structure or subitising (Aunio & Niemivirta, 2010).
According to a study by researchers (unnamed, date unspecified), learners with mathematical learning disability develop number lines. More research into this area could help struggling learners progress.
D. Geary et al. (2008)
This research provides evidence for dyscalculia assessment and intervention in school settings.
(Kaufmann et al., 2011) investigates links between basic skills and maths. The research explores if number sense affects arithmetic in Year 3 learners. Domain-general abilities also impact mathematical learning disability (Kaufmann et al., 2011). The study suggests interventions targeting both could help struggling learners.
R. Cowan & Daisy Powell (2013)
Researchers explored maths skills and learning difficulties (Butterworth, 2010). Domain-general factors like memory and language were considered (Alloway & Passolunghi, 2011). Numerical factors are also important, according to findings by De Smedt et al. (2011).
Early maths screeners help identify learners needing support (Chong et al., 2022). This helps teachers provide timely interventions, says Clements (2004). Research by Clarke & Shinn (2004) shows early identification improves outcomes. Effective tools allow targeted support, as suggested by Gersten et al. (2005).
David J. Purpura et al. (2015)
This research provides evidence for dyscalculia assessment and intervention in school settings.
An open trial assessment of The Number Race, an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia View study ↗
71 citations
Anna J Wilson et al. (2006)
BackgroundIn a companion article [1], we described the development and evaluation of software designed to remediate dyscalculia. This software is based on the hypothesis that dyscalculia is due to a core deficit in number sense or in its access via symbolic information.
Preschool learners at risk for mathematical learning disability show quantitative deficits. Researchers suggest further study is needed (View study ↗53 citations).
Felicia W. Chu et al. (2013)
The study tested the hypothesis that acuity of the potentially inherent approximate number system (ANS) contributes to risk of mathematical learning disability (MLD). Sixty-eight (35 boys) preschoolers at risk for school failure were assessed on a battery of quantitative tasks, and on intelligence, .
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/dynamo-maths-teachers-guide-dyscalculia#article","headline":"Dynamo Maths: A Teacher's Guide to Dyscalculia","description":"Dynamo Maths is a research-based dyscalculia screening and intervention programme. This SENCO guide covers assessment, intervention planning, and alternatives.","datePublished":"2026-02-15T19:47:58.913Z","dateModified":"2026-03-02T10:59:52.468Z","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Paul Main","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com/team/paulmain","jobTitle":"Founder & Educational Consultant"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Structural Learning","url":"https://www.structural-learning.com","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409e5d5e055c6/6040bf0426cb415ba2fc7882_newlogoblue.svg"}},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/dynamo-maths-teachers-guide-dyscalculia"},"image":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/5b69a01ba2e409501de055d1/699222ee6df5bc738d304a43_699222895e836c931192369d_dynamo-maths-a-teacher-s-guide-framework-1771184776526.webp","wordCount":2362},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/dynamo-maths-teachers-guide-dyscalculia#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Dynamo Maths: A Teacher's Guide to Dyscalculia","item":"https://www.structural-learning.com/post/dynamo-maths-teachers-guide-dyscalculia"}]}]}