Coaching Conversations: A Teacher's Guide
Explore essential tips for enhancing coaching conversations in schools and fostering a collaborative community for all educators and leaders.


Explore essential tips for enhancing coaching conversations in schools and fostering a collaborative community for all educators and leaders.
Many teams are moving away from the traditional appraisal/performance review structure that takes place once or twice a year coupled with the traditional lesson observation approach. These were always top-down, and therefore, the "buy-in" was not always so great. Staff felt "done too". The individuals whose appraisal it was did not have a great deal of control or autonomy over the targets. The whole process involved much telling, instructing, giving advice and feedback or making suggestions. Much of this was carried out whether requested or not. The skills required of the appraiser were telling.
The move is towards an effective coaching conversation approach where the individual ( no longer the appraisee but the coachee) drives the conversation. In the book, The Human Behind the Coach, Claire Pedrick and Lucia Baldelli refer to this individual as the "thinker". It is them that do the thinking both before, during and afterwards. They decide what they want to focus their development on. They decide what their targets are. They decide what they want you to observe or focus on when observing them. This may be derived from teacher standards, or indeed from the needs of their current cohort.

It is a much more of a non-directive approach in which the coach (previously the appraiser) is using a different set of skills. These skills require the coach to be proficient in asking powerful questions within the coaching session that raise awareness, to be able and paraphrase without judgment as well as being able to reflect and listen to understand. In the same book they describe this as you being in the wings while the thinker is on the stage. I love this visual image.
What does this mean for the coach then?
Potentially these are new skills. Learning to step back and give the floor over to the person who may be their junior both in terms of status and experience. In reality as you learn or develop these skills you undertake transforming your leadership skills alongside helping others become more self aware, help them turn experiences into learning opportunities and improve their motivation.
I will look to review the coaching skills and behaviours now required and after that suggest a structure to the conversation that you might be able to adopt.
Use open questions to make learners think, as indicated by Whitmore (2003). Questions starting with who, what, where, when, and how help learners extend conversations. Parsloe and Wray (2000) note questioning is a core coaching skill.
The "why" question whilst it can do as the above do, it can also cause the coachee to feel judged and they can begin to almost justify their answer or become defensive.
Extensions to these questions also can bring about more depth. And bring about more powerful coaching conversations. They help develop and grow the coaching relationship. Such extensions might include, tell me more or give me an example(s).

These questions are looking to assist the coachee reflect deeper and become more self aware. These questions will look to dig deeper into the ideas, feelings and/or actions of the coachee. What is the history leading to the viewpoint being made? What assumptions has the coachee made to reach this viewpoint? What are the consequences of these viewpoints? What is the bigger picture for the coachee?
Coaches can help staff overcome anxieties. Imagine someone fears speaking at meetings due to potential gossip. The coach then asks targeted questions to explore this concern. This builds emotional skills and boosts engagement in training (Goleman, 1995).
A history question : Have you dealt with this situation before?
A consequence question: What impact has this had on you?
An assumption question: To what extent is it everyone is going to talk about you? What reasons do you think lie beneath this?
A bigger picture question: How do you think you can change this situation? This type of sustained thinking process helps teachers reflect deeply on their practice.
Coaches use tools to give feedback. They often summarise and paraphrase (Grant, 2003). Many coaches use the GROW Model to structure conversations (Whitmore, 2017). This helps learners progress (Downey, 2003).
The coach must be able what they have heard as part of the productive coaching conversation. The ability to do this succinctly and well shows the coachee you have been listening ( more of that later). It also allows the coachee to hear back what they have said. This can be very powerful.
Paraphrasing, like summarising, helps recap or clarify, and challenges assumptions. When coaching teachers consider special needs or social-emotional learning, paraphrase carefully. For example, the coach might say, "You feel silenced in meetings, fearing negative judgement? (Grant, 2013)." This lets the learner confirm, clarify, or correct your understanding. (Whitmore, 2017)
This helps the learner identify their own solutions and develop self-awareness (Whitmore, 2017). Coaching feedback empowers the learner; traditional feedback often tells learners what to do (Starr, 2016). Coaching aims to build independent thinking, helping learners improve themselves (Downey, 2003).
Checking understanding is key for good paraphrasing. Use phrases like "What I'm hearing is..." Then ask, "Have I understood that correctly?" This confirms you grasped the learner's view. It builds trust, crucial for good relationships (Grant, 2003; Rogers, 1957).
Listening well is tough when coaching, avoid quick fixes. Active listening means understanding learners, not reacting (Whitmore, 2003). Coaches must focus on the learner's words and body language. This presence helps build trust (Rogers, 1957).
Silence is equally powerful. Many coaches struggle with comfortable silence, feeling the need to fill gaps in conversation. However, these pauses often provide the coachee with valuable thinking time. Some of the most profound insights emerge from these moments of reflection. Learning to sit with silence and resist the urge to rescue the coachee from their thinking process is a crucial coaching skill.
The quality of listening also extends to listening for what is not being said. What emotions are present? What assumptions might be limiting the coachee's thinking? What patterns are emerging? This deeper level of listening helps the coach ask more insightful questions and support the coachee's process of discovery.
Coaching needs structure, even when natural. Learners set the agenda first. They decide the session's focus. Which challenge or opportunity do they want to explore, like Grant (2003) suggests?
The coach asks open questions so the learner examines their situation. This exploration helps the learner see different perspectives (Grant, 2003). Learners might explore past attempts and current assumptions (Whitmore, 2017). Coaches guide exploration but avoid leading learners to specific outcomes (Rogers, 1951).
As the conversation develops, the focus often shifts towards action and accountability. What insights has the coachee gained? What options do they see going forward? What specific steps will they commit to taking? The key is that these actions emerge from the coachee's own thinking rather than being imposed by the coach.
Regular review and reflection are also important components of ongoing coaching relationships. How did the previous actions work out? What was learned from the experience? How might this learning be applied to new challenges? This creates a continuous cycle of growth and development.
This shift builds teacher confidence and agency (Whitmore, 2017). Coaching conversations support meaningful professional growth, say Rogers and Gilbert (2022). Learners benefit from teachers' improved practice after coaching, noted Grant (2012).
Coaching skills like questioning and listening can feel new (Whitmore, 2002). These skills improve learner growth and leadership overall (Clutterbuck & Megginson, 2005). Leaders find learners capable when they allow thinking time (Rogers, 2012).
Coaching, according to Rogers (1951), acknowledges the learner's expertise. Coaching conversations promote reflection, exploration and discovery. This helps create engaged and effective educators. Moving from appraiser to coach requires patience and practice. Whitmore (2017) shows this change benefits individuals and schools.
Coaching helps colleagues find their own answers. It is different from appraisals. Sessions use active listening and questioning to help professional learning. This moves away from top-down teaching (Grant, 2011). Coaching is more collaborative for staff development (Whitmore, 2017).
Teachers start by creating a quiet space for reflection and using open ended questions that begin with who, what, where, when, and how. They use frameworks like the GROW model to structure the talk while avoiding the urge to give immediate advice or feedback. This practice requires the coach to step back and let the thinker take centre stage throughout the process.
Whitaker (1995) found coaching boosts teacher self-awareness and motivation. It puts learners in control of their professional development, improving engagement. Coaching turns daily classroom moments into key learning experiences. Research by Joyce and Showers (2002) showed it encourages teachers to reflect on practice.
Coaching improves teaching and learner results, research shows. Non-directive methods build teacher skills and confidence long term (Whitmore, 2017). Ongoing coaching works better than single sessions or annual reviews (Joyce & Showers, 2002).
One frequent error is the coach falling back into a directive role by offering solutions or giving unsolicited advice too early. Another mistake is using the word why, which can make the coachee feel judged or defensive about their choices. Coaches must also avoid filling silences quickly; these pauses are often when the most important thinking happens for the teacher.
These sessions work best when they are scheduled regularly rather than being tied to a single high pressure event like a formal observation. They should happen in a neutral setting where both parties feel comfortable and can focus without interruptions from the school day. Consistency is key to building the trust needed for an effective and productive coaching relationship.
Coaching conversations research
Instructional coaching research
Whitmore (2017) highlights coaching's GROW model. Rogers (1957) emphasizes empathy in relationships. Argyris and Schön (1978) discuss reflection on actions. Research offers useful support for coaching learners and teachers.