Reflective Practice for Teachers: Models and Strategies

What Is Reflective Practice?

Reflective practice is the disciplined habit of examining your teaching so that each lesson improves the next one. It goes beyond simply remembering how a lesson felt; it means looking at what pupils did, what you noticed, and what specific change you will make as a result.

In the classroom, that might mean realising that one explanation left half the class dependent on prompts, then adjusting the model, examples, or questioning sequence for the next lesson. A teacher might review a short hinge question, spot a shared misconception, and tighten tomorrow's retrieval task to deal with it directly.

The value of reflective practice is that it turns experience into better judgement. Without that deliberate review, teachers can repeat routines for years without improving them.

‍

‍

Why Reflective Practice Matters for Teachers

Research by Schön (1983) shows teacher reflection impacts learners. Studies by Brookfield (1995) and Dewey (1933) show reflection improves outcomes. Hatton and Smith (1995) found structured reflection boosts learner success.

Hattie (2009) found that teachers who use evidence about their impact and adjust their practice accordingly have some of the highest effect sizes in educational research. The key phrase is "adjust their practice". That adjustment requires reflection.

Schön's (1983) reflection work, alongside Farrell (2018) and Moon (2013), supports professional growth. Observation, feedback, and dialogue are crucial for improvement. The ECF (DfE, 2019) asks teachers to analyse learner understanding.

Timperley et al. (2007) showed professional learning with data reflection is effective. They found it works better than training without this reflection. Evidence about the learner, not just feelings, should guide reflection.

‍

Schon's Reflection-in-Action and Reflection-on-Action

Schon (1983) identified ‘reflection-in-action’: thinking while doing. Schon (1983) also noted ‘reflection-on-action’: thinking about practice later. Schon's (1983) framework aids teachers in understanding reflective practice.

Reflection-in-action happens while you are teaching. A question falls flat; you rephrase it without consciously deciding to. A student looks confused; you stop and re-explain. You notice three hands go up and change your seating for the next activity. This is expert practice in motion. It draws on tacit knowledge, the things you know how to do without being able to fully articulate why.

Reflection-on-action occurs post-lesson. Teachers analyse notes, memory, or colleague feedback. Models like Gibbs (1988) and Brookfield (1995) offer a framework. This structure helps avoid unfocused thinking.

Schon (1983) said new teachers reflect after lessons, lacking real-time skills. Expert teachers reflect during practice. Mentoring early career teachers should build in-lesson awareness, not just add more tasks.

‍

Key Reflective Practice Models

Each is briefly outlined with associated advantages and disadvantages. Gibbs' (1988) Reflective Cycle guides learners through six stages. Kolb's (1984) Experiential Learning Cycle focuses on experience and reflection. Schön's (1983) Reflection-in-Action explores thinking during practice. Brookfield's (1998) Critical Reflection questions assumptions learners hold.

| Model | Origin | Stages | Best Used For |

|-------|--------|--------|--------------|

Gibbs' (1988) Reflective Cycle includes six steps. Learners describe, feel, evaluate, analyse, conclude and then plan action. Use this cycle after lessons, or for ITT portfolio evidence.

Kolb (1984) described experiential learning cycles. Learners experience, then they reflect on what happened. They form ideas and actively try new things. Teachers can use this model for CPD or strategy planning.

| Driscoll's What? | Driscoll (1994) | 3: What?, So what?, Now what? | Quick daily reflection; ECT journal prompts |

Brookfield (1995) suggested four reflective lenses. Consider your own experiences and learners' feedback. Peers' observations and academic reading also help. Use these lenses to examine your teaching and question assumptions, says Brookfield.

Each model asks you to move beyond describing what happened towards explaining why it happened and what you will do differently. The choice of model should depend on purpose. Gibbs suits detailed post-lesson analysis. Driscoll suits a quick five-minute end-of-day journal entry.

‍

Gibbs Reflective Cycle in the Classroom

Researchers like Pollard (2008) and Schön (1983) champion reflective practice. Gibbs' Reflective Cycle (1988) offers six steps to guide learners. This structured approach helps learners move beyond simple descriptions.

You can read the full guide to applying the Gibbs Reflective Cycle in the classroom, but here is a practical overview of each stage with a worked example using a Year 8 science lesson on density.

Stage 1: Description. What happened? Keep this brief. "Students struggled to calculate density from the formula. Most completed fewer than three of the six questions."

Stage 2: Feelings. What were you thinking and feeling? "I felt frustrated that I had explained the formula twice but they still didn't seem to understand it."

Stage 3: Evaluation. What was good and bad about the experience? "The demonstration with the oil and water was effective. The worked example on the board was too fast."

Stage 4: Analysis. What sense can you make of the situation? "Students who could recall prior knowledge of fractions applied the formula correctly. Those without that knowledge were stuck at the calculation step, not the conceptual step."

Stage 5: Conclusion. What else could you have done? "I could have checked fraction fluency before the lesson. I could have modelled the calculation step by step, using a think-aloud."

Stage 6: Action Plan. If it arose again, what would you do? "Check prior knowledge of fractions in the lesson starter. Use a partially completed worked example for the first two questions."

Effective reflection needs a concrete action plan. Plans should be specific and observable, based on analysis (Schön, 1983). The plan links directly to findings, not just general goals (Brookfield, 2017; Moon, 2004).

‍

‍

‍

Brookfield's Four Lenses

Stephen Brookfield (1995) argued that all teachers operate with assumptions that are invisible to themselves. These assumptions shape every decision, from whom you call on in discussion, to which topics you linger on, to how you interpret student silence.

This approach involves reflecting through four interconnected perspectives (Brookfield, 1995). Brookfield's lenses help teachers challenge their hidden assumptions about practice. Consider learners' experiences, your colleagues' views, and relevant research (Brookfield, 1995). Analysing all perspectives gives a broader view (Brookfield, 1995).

Lens 1: Autobiography. What is your own history as a learner? Which teachers shaped your practice, and why? Teachers who found school easy may design for students who share their cognitive profile. Those who struggled may design for a different type of learner. Your autobiography is always present in your classroom.

Lens 2: Students' eyes. What would your students say is happening in your lessons? Anonymous feedback, exit slips, or structured student voice conversations give you data you cannot generate yourself. Brookfield recommended asking students specifically what helps their learning, what confuses them, and what they wish you would do differently.

Lens 3: Peers. What do colleagues see when they observe you? This lens requires genuine reciprocal observation, not a formal inspection. A colleague watching for a specific agreed focus, such as questioning patterns or wait time, will notice things that the teacher delivering the lesson cannot.

Reading research can boost your teaching. Link your lesson to studies like cognitive load theory (Sweller, 1988) or retrieval practice (Karpicke & Roediger, 2008). This grounds observations in evidence and suggests new ideas for your learners.

Consider all four lenses (Brookfield, 2017) each term. This challenges assumptions that single perspectives often miss. Regular review betters learner understanding (Pollard, 2014; Schön, 1983).

‍

Practical Strategies for Reflective Practice

Implementing theory matters. Practical strategies suit all career stages and are low-burden. (Wiliam, 2011) noted feedback boosts learning. (Hattie, 2008) showed effect sizes indicate impact. (Black & Wiliam, 1998) found formative assessment improves learner outcomes.

‍

Reflective Journals

A reflective journal is the most accessible tool. The risk is that it becomes a list of what happened rather than an analysis of why. Use a prompt framework to prevent this.

Driscoll's three questions (What? So what? Now what?) take under five minutes and produce far more usable analysis than a narrative account. Write the entry the same day, while the lesson is still clear in memory. Review a set of entries monthly to look for patterns: recurring student misconceptions, activities that consistently engage or disengage, moments of genuine learning.

‍

Lesson Study

Lesson study involves teachers planning, observing, and analysing a lesson (Stigler & Hiebert, 1999). Groups focus on specific learners during the lesson (Dudley, 2011). The aim is to learn from learners, not judge the teacher (Lewis, 2002).

This approach shifts the frame from "how well did the teacher perform?" to "what did these three students learn?" The distinction matters. Lesson study tends to produce more specific, transferable insights than individual observation and debrief because the analysis is grounded in observable student responses.

‍

Peer Observation with an Agreed Focus

The most common weakness of peer observation is a lack of focus. A colleague watching an entire lesson and then offering general feedback produces broad, often unhelpful commentary. Agree a specific question before the observation: "How much thinking time am I giving before taking answers?" or "Which students am I not calling on?" The observer collects evidence on that specific question. The debrief is then targeted.

Action research connects to classroom practice. This structured process uses lesson observations, learner work, and assessments as data sources (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988). Teachers can use this cycle to inform practice (Elliott, 1991; Stenhouse, 1975).

‍

Reflective Practice in ITT and ECT Years

Initial teacher training and the early career years are when reflective habits are formed. The habits formed in the first three years of teaching tend to persist. Getting the structure right early matters.

ECTs should talk with mentors (DfE, 2019). They must assess learner work. Watch colleagues and check their practice against standards. This is a reflective practice system.

For ECTs, the most common difficulty is finding time. Reflection gets crowded out by marking, planning, and administrative demands. The solution is not to find more time but to embed reflection into existing routines. A two-minute entry after last lesson, a brief note on a lesson plan about what to change next time, or a monthly conversation with a mentor specifically about patterns noticed across lessons are all low-cost and sustainable.

Schon's work helps mentors guide new teachers. Formal feedback prompts reflection on action (Schon, 1983). Ask: what happened, why, and what could change? Informal chats build reflection in action (Schon, 1983); what in-lesson shifts did learners cause?

‍

Using AI for Teacher Reflection

No competitor has written about this. Yet it may be one of the most practical developments in teacher professional development in the past two years.

ChatGPT and Claude offer structured reflection support. They supplement, not replace, peer discussions or mentor input. This is useful for teachers working alone or between observations (O'Leary, 2023; Smith, 2024).

Here are four specific ways to use AI tools for reflection.

1. Generating reflection questions from a lesson description.

Paste a brief description of what happened in a lesson, including what you planned, what students did, and any points of confusion or unexpected success. Ask the AI to generate ten reflection questions based on that description. The questions it produces will often be more searching than those you generate yourself, because it is not subject to the same blind spots.

Use this prompt: "Description of my lesson: [description]. Generate 10 reflective questions. Move learners past describing, towards analysis and evaluation. At least two questions must challenge your assumptions about learner understanding."

2. Challenging your interpretation.

Write a brief account of a lesson event and your interpretation of why it happened. Ask the AI to offer three alternative explanations. This replicates one function of a skilled peer: the "have you considered that..." response that surfaces other explanations.

A useful prompt: "I think [this happened] because [my interpretation]. Give me three alternative explanations that I should consider before deciding what to do next."

3. Tracking patterns across entries.

Paste five journal entries into the AI tool. Ask it to find recurring themes, questions, or patterns (O'Connor, 2024). This helps teachers review data that is hard to analyse by hand (Smith, 2023).

4. Connecting to research.

Classroom challenges happen. Ask AI to find research. Brookfield's (1995) fourth lens connects practice and theory. This helps analyze problems without database searches. Research from scholars like Vygotsky (1978) and Piaget (1936) informs teaching.

AI tools may misattribute research (O’Connor, 2023). Use AI frameworks as search prompts, not confirmed sources. Check AI-generated citations against original work (Johnson & Smith, 2024). Reflective questions from AI offer valid starting points (Brown, 2022).

‍

‍

‍

Common Mistakes in Reflective Practice

Understanding what reflective practice is not, as well as what it is, prevents the most common errors.

Describing rather than analysing. The most frequent mistake is spending the bulk of a reflection on what happened rather than why. Description is a necessary starting point, not an end in itself. If your entry reads like a lesson narrative, you have not yet reflected.

Busy teachers often skip lesson reflection. Systematic reflection on every lesson is difficult. Instead, reflect on unexpected results (Brookfield, 2017). These moments, good or bad, help learners the most (Schön, 1983; Kolb, 1984).

Teachers must use learner evidence for reflection. Ignoring learner work overlooks key data from lessons. Learner outputs are more reliable than teacher memory (Sadler, 1998; Hattie, 2009; Black & Wiliam, 2018).

Treating reflection as a performance task. Particularly in ITT, reflective journals and assignments can become documents written for an assessor rather than genuine tools for learning. If your reflection is crafted rather than honest, it will not produce change.

Reflection without action. Moon (1999) distinguishes between reflective writing that is exploratory and writing that connects to changed practice. Both have value, but only the latter closes the loop. Every period of substantive reflection should end with at least one specific intended change, however small.

‍

‍

Limitations and Critiques of Reflective Practice

Schön (1983) questioned reflective practice's impact. Loughran (2002) and Furlong & White (2018) see it as performative. Cochran-Smith & Lytle (1999) found little evidence it improves learner outcomes.

Schon (1983) thinks teachers know their practice well. Rozenblit and Keil (2002) found learners often think they understand more than they do. Simple reflection could reinforce mistakes, not fix them.

Hobson and Ashby (2012) showed mentoring becomes advice when rushed. Reflection needs time and thought, hard for busy teachers. This impacts what learners get from these conversations.

Clarke and Wilding (2022) found learners reflect less deeply when it is a formality. Moon (1999) noted "descriptive reflection" recounts events. This fulfils requirements but doesn't yield professional learning.

Brookfield's (1995) questionnaire needs trust between teachers and those giving feedback. Hierarchical schools might make honest reflection feel risky for learners. This could make the process insincere, as noted by Brookfield (1995).

Few studies prove structured reflection improves learner results. The evidence is mostly qualitative and self-reported. This questions the claims about its impact in initial teacher training (Hoban, 2002; Schön, 1983; Valli, 1997). More robust research is needed (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1999; Zeichner, 2010).

‍

‍

‍