Updated on
August 6, 2026
Psychodynamic Theory: Freud and the Unconscious
Freud's psychodynamic theory explains behaviour through the unconscious, early relationships and defence mechanisms. What that means for your classroom.

Updated on
August 6, 2026
Freud's psychodynamic theory explains behaviour through the unconscious, early relationships and defence mechanisms. What that means for your classroom.
Psychodynamic theory is an approach to behaviour that explains what a learner does in terms of unconscious motives, early relationships and inner conflict that has never been settled. These forces shape how children behave, how they learn and how they relate to adults in school.
It starts with Sigmund Freud (1923). His structural model of the id, ego and superego explained how the mind handles competing demands without us noticing (Freud, 1923).
Erik Erikson (1963) then built on it, setting out eight stages of identity (Erikson, 1963). John Bowlby (1969) took it further with a theory of attachment that maps straight onto classroom life (Bowlby, 1969).
The value for teachers is diagnostic. A Year 9 learner who tears up her own work the moment it is handed back is not simply being difficult. Read through a psychodynamic lens, the behaviour protects her from a judgement she already expects to fail.
The response shifts accordingly. Name the feeling, hold the boundary, and mark the next piece with her rather than without her.
Freud's psychodynamic theory looks at the thoughts and feelings we are not aware of. It argues that early experiences shape how a child develops, though this is still debated. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
For teachers, the practical point is to keep learners' emotional needs in view (Freud, 1923). That awareness helps build a classroom where children feel safe enough to learn (Freud, 1923).
Erikson took this further. He mapped out stages of social and emotional growth that run from birth to old age. Attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969) shows that early relationships leave a lasting mark.
Piaget (1936) found that children build their own understanding rather than simply take it in. Bandura (1977) added that learners watch others and copy what they see.
Psychodynamic theory, from Freud, links past and present behaviour. It suggests mental processes exist unconsciously. Early experiences shape learner thoughts, feelings, and actions (Freud, 1923).
What does the research say? Shedler (2010) reviewed several meta-analyses in American Psychologist. He found that psychodynamic therapy works as well as other therapies backed by evidence, and that patients keep getting better after the sessions stop.
Geddes (2006) shows what this looks like in school. Attachment-aware approaches help children manage their feelings, and behaviour incidents drop over time.
The Education Endowment Foundation reports that social and emotional learning programmes add +4 months of progress on average. Some of those programmes rest on ideas that match psychodynamic theory.
Unlike behaviourism, psychodynamic theory looks at hidden forces in the mind. Unconscious wishes, drives and inner conflicts shape the learner (Freud, 1923). Issues left unresolved in childhood, during the psychosexual stages, may cause problems later on.
Freud's (1915) theory impacts learning. It also touches developmental and social psychology. Therapy based on this reveals hidden thoughts.
It helps learners understand themselves better (Freud, 1915). This differs from cognitive work by finding what causes distress.
Freud still shapes the way we think about mental health. His ideas changed how we view human growth, how we name mental health problems, and how we build the bond between therapist and client. For anyone studying or working in psychology, psychodynamic theory offers a basic lens. It looks at the inner world, and at how early life keeps its hold on us.
We will explore psychodynamic concepts, stages, and theories. Inner conflicts, unconscious processes, and life events shape learner behaviour (Freud, 1923). These influences often act in ways we are just starting to understand.
Freud started psychodynamic theory in the 1890s. Jung, Adler, and Horney adapted his ideas. Modern work includes neuroscience and attachment research. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
The unconscious is still key. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.

Freud's drive theory (Sigmund Freud) started psychodynamic thought. It said unconscious sexual and aggressive instincts drive learners. These drives influence behaviour, Freud said. This impacts learners’ psychology.
After drive theory came ego psychology, which extended Freud's work. It put the focus on the ego, the executive function of the mind. The ego sits between the id, which holds our instinctual drives, and the superego, which holds our internalised moral values. This view highlighted the role of ego defences and mechanisms, such as repression and sublimation, in managing inner conflict.
In the mid-20th century, Object Relations Theory moved the focus onto relationships. Early experiences shape how a child develops.
Relationships build the sense of self. The mental pictures children carry of the people who care for them matter a great deal (Klein, 1946; Winnicott, 1965; Bowlby, 1969).
Kohut (1971, 1977, 1984) set out self psychology later in the century. It puts empathy and mirroring at the heart of a healthy sense of self. The theory is about self-esteem, and how we keep hold of it. Self-object experiences, the way other people reflect us back, shape a learner's wellbeing (Kohut, 1984; Ornstein, 1978).
In The Interpretation of Dreams (1900), Freud set out how psychoanalysis reads dreams. He saw them as wishes the unconscious mind acts out. The later turn towards relationships came from others.
Credit for that belongs to object relations theorists such as Melanie Klein, W. R. D. Fairbairn and D. W. Winnicott, and to Bowlby's attachment theory.
This shift helps teachers make sense of what drives a learner. Klein's (1946) work shaped how we think about behaviour management and the emotional needs behind it.
Winnicott (1965) suggests teachers can help by paying attention to what is going on beneath the surface.
Bowlby (1969) tied a child's first relationships to how they learn to get on with others. Piaget (1936) found that when children can name and make sense of feelings, they pay better attention and behave better in class.
Psychodynamic theory links personality to three parts of the mind: the id, the ego and the superego (Freud, 1923). It uses defence mechanisms and stages to explain how children develop. Erikson (1963) showed how inner conflicts affect the way learners behave and how they get on with others.
Freud's structural model shaped psychology. The id wants pleasure right now and ignores what happens next (Freud, 1923).
In class, you see the id in acting on impulse. A learner might call out, cut across you or demand attention, and break the class rules doing it.
The ego grows as learners mature and manage reality. Acting on the reality principle, the ego balances the id and world. Learners with strong egos can delay wants and follow rules. Understanding ego development is key when helping learners with executive skills.
According to Freud, the superego holds our internal moral standards. This comes from parents and society. Learners with a strong superego may show perfectionism (Freud, 1923).
They can feel guilty or worry about errors. A weak superego can mean difficulty following rules or showing empathy (Freud, 1923).

Learners repress thoughts that cause upset, Freud (1936) said. Projection sees learners placing their feelings onto others. Denial means a learner refuses to accept reality. Anna Freud (1966) found these mechanisms help learners manage stress.
Levels of consciousness help us understand how minds work. The conscious mind has thoughts we know, according to Freud (1923). Preconscious holds information easily recalled, as Freud said. The unconscious contains hidden memories that affect actions (Freud, 1923).
Psychodynamic theory helps teachers work out why learners act as they do. It shapes the support a school offers, and it explains the bond between learner and teacher. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
Teachers can then meet emotional needs rather than just manage behaviour (Kernberg, 1995; Bowlby, 1969; Winnicott, 1965). The classroom becomes a safer place to learn.
Bowlby (1969) showed that attachment styles shape how children behave. Grasp that, and you can support learners better. Think about the needs they keep hidden (Freud, 1923) and how exposed they feel (Klein).
Transference matters in classrooms. Without knowing it, learners can shift feelings from past relationships onto their teacher (Freud, 1912).
A learner used to unreliable care may test your boundaries. A learner used to being controlled may push back against your guidance. Once you spot these patterns, you can respond well (Bowlby, 1969).
Psychodynamic ideas help with social and emotional learning. Bowlby (1969) showed that knowing about a child's early life helps you support their attention.
Behaviour plans work better when you deal with the cause, not just the act (Fonagy et al., 2002). Erikson (1968) found that early support gives learners skills they use later in life.
Understanding psychodynamic theory may help teachers support learners with special needs. Learners with autism can use routines to manage anxiety. ADHD learners may struggle with impulses because ego function is still developing.
Freud (1923) argued that early experience and processes outside awareness shape learner behaviour. Psychodynamic theory still gives insights. Researchers have updated some ideas, and others question them. Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
Psychodynamic thinking asks teachers to look for the hidden feelings behind what they see (Fonagy & Target, 2003). Patience and warmth help you deal with the cause, not just the act. It helps to know about defences, such as a child who avoids work. A learner who must get things right is often anxious, and this approach helps you see why (Freud, 1923).
Psychodynamic theory, from Freud onwards, remains relevant. New brain research builds on these ideas (Bowlby, 1969; Fonagy, 2003). Teachers can link theory to practice. Using this knowledge supports each learner's emotional development and learning.
Hattie's (2009) work pulls together more than 800 meta-analyses. It shows which teaching strategies have the biggest impact. This evidence base points to the approaches that most improve learner outcomes in classrooms.
Object relations shifted the focus from drives to relationships (Winnicott). He wrote about transitional objects, such as a toy that helps a child cope with being apart. A learner who clings to a comfort item, or who finds change hard, may show the same need. Teachers who see this can answer with patience.
Winnicott’s (1965) "good-enough" teacher idea matters. Learners need reliable adults to handle distress. Repairing relationship problems creates a safe space (Winnicott, 1965). Consistent routines and steady emotions provide this for learners.
Melanie Klein contributed the concepts of the paranoid-schizoid position and the depressive position. In simplified terms, the paranoid-schizoid position involves splitting the world into all-good and all-bad parts, an experience common in young children and in learners under high stress. The depressive position involves the more mature capacity to hold ambivalence, to see the same person as capable of both warmth and frustration.
Learners who oscillate between idealising and suddenly rejecting a teacher may be struggling to move between these positions. Recognising this pattern allows teachers to remain stable rather than reacting personally to the shift.

Transitional objects aid anxious learners during stressful times. Simple tools like known worksheets or seating help (Bowlby, 1969). Worry notebooks also ease transitions by reducing stress (Winnicott, 1953; Parkes, 1972).
Erik Erikson extended Freud's developmental model beyond early childhood and grounded it in social relationships. His eight stages each present a central tension that the individual must navigate with the support of key relationships. Two stages are especially relevant to classroom teachers.
During primary school, learners face the Industry vs Inferiority stage. Learners try to master skills and seek recognition (Erikson, 1963). Lack of support can cause lasting feelings of inferiority.
Teachers can help learners by offering varied tasks and praising effort. Clear feedback helps them improve, which links back to child development theories (Piaget, 1936; Vygotsky, 1978). The social world around a child shapes both their sense of who they are and the way they think.
Erikson (1968) said learners in secondary school grapple with identity. They question their values and sense of belonging. Teachers should offer choices and recognise each learner's strengths.
Try not to define a learner by their grades alone. Labels make it harder for them to work out who they are. Tutors matter here, because one adult who backs a child helps that child build a good sense of self (Erikson, 1968).
Erikson stressed that unresolved crises stay with us. A learner who is struggling with identity may go back to Industry versus Inferiority (Erikson, 1963). This background knowledge helps teachers make sense of the learner in front of them.
Bion's (1962) containment shows how caregivers get a learner's big feelings. Caregivers handle it and return it in a calmer way. Bion (1962) called raw emotions "beta elements". Use it as a starting point for professional discussion: identify the learner's current need, record evidence from more than one lesson, and agree the next classroom adjustment with the SENCO or family.
He called these worked-through feelings "alpha elements". Bion's container-contained idea describes how an adult takes in a child's raw distress and hands it back in a form the child can manage.

For teachers, this model pays off straight away. A learner walks in churned up and throws that feeling into the room. The teacher who stays calm, rather than raising the heat, is offering containment.
Naming the feeling without feeding it helps: "I can see you're really frustrated right now; let's find a way through this." That turns an overwhelming state into something the learner can begin to think about. Teachers who use the zones of regulation framework work on a closely related principle.
Predictable routines serve a containment function at the structural level. When learners know what will happen next, their anxiety about the unknown is reduced, freeing up cognitive and emotional resources for learning. Classrooms with clear rituals for entry, transitions, and exit tend to produce fewer behavioural incidents, not because the rules are stricter, but because the environment itself provides containment.
Transference means learners move feelings from past relationships to present ones. A learner with an unreliable parent may treat teachers with suspicion (Freud, 1912). Countertransference is the teacher's emotional reaction to the learner (Jung, 1946). The teacher's history and the learner's projected emotions affect this.
A teacher who finds themselves unusually irritated by one quiet learner, or surprisingly protective of a manipulative one, may be experiencing countertransference. These feelings are not signs of professional failure. They are data.
When teachers notice a strong and seemingly disproportionate emotional reaction to a learner, psychodynamic theory suggests this is worth reflecting on carefully. What earlier relationship can this learner be evoking? What does the learner's behaviour seem to be seeking or testing?
Reflective practice is how you keep countertransference in check, which means noticing your own reactions to a child before they drive your response. Keep a short log, talk it through in supervision, or use a simple framework to make sense of what came up.
Schools that give staff time to reflect see better teacher wellbeing. Those same schools also see stronger relationships with learners (Mann, 2005; Schön, 1983).
Freud developed psychodynamic theory. It says that unconscious thoughts shape the way we behave, and that past experiences have a strong hold on learners (Freud, 1915). Inner conflicts also affect how a learner develops.
Freud (1915) and later attachment-informed writers (Geddes, 2006) suggest learners' past and unconscious processes affect behaviour. When you spot defensive behaviours, understand they point to unmet needs. Adapt your teaching because of this, (Bowlby, 1969).
Good classroom management starts with knowing what drives your learners. Teachers who grasp this cope better with tough behaviour (Jennings, 2019). They can also match support to what each child needs (Roeser et al., 2012). Reading emotions well makes teaching better still (Brackett et al., 2016).
Errors hinder understanding of what learners do. Teachers may guess motivations without proof (Willingham, 2009). They should check observable results from learner actions (Hattie, 2012; Christodoulou, 2017).
Research by Freud (1923) and Klein (1946) shows improved learner behaviour. Teachers note better emotional regulation and more learning engagement (Bowlby, 1969). Learner and parent feedback helps assess progress (Erikson, 1968).
Open a free account and help organise learners' thinking with evidence-based graphic organisers. Reduce cognitive load and guide schema building dynamically.
The first objection is methodological. Popper (1959) argued that psychodynamic claims are framed so that any evidence confirms them, which places the theory outside ordinary testing. Freud's conclusions rested on a small number of adult case studies drawn from a narrow social group in Vienna, reasoning backwards from adult symptom to inferred childhood cause.
Grunbaum (1984) accepted that psychoanalysis makes genuine causal claims, then showed that the clinical evidence could not settle them. Eysenck (1952) reported that recovery rates for treated patients were no better than for untreated ones.
The second concerns culture. Erikson's stages assume a life course structured by Western schooling, adolescence and paid work. Bowlby's early emphasis on one primary attachment figure fits a nuclear family more comfortably than the extended and communal caregiving common elsewhere.
Rothbaum and colleagues (2000) found that Japanese patterns of sensitivity and dependence produce behaviour that Western coding systems misread as insecure. Rutter (1981) separated the effects of losing a caregiver from those of never having formed a bond, a distinction Bowlby's early work blurred.
The third is practical. Teachers are not clinicians. A framework built for the consulting room can license speculation about a child's inner life that nobody in the room is qualified to verify, and speculation hardens quickly into a label.
Set against this, the tradition earns its place. It was first to argue that behaviour carries meaning, that early relationships leave a lasting signature, and that adults bring their own history into the room. Attachment research has since supplied the empirical backing Freud never had, and the questions the tradition raises about anxiety, defence and relationship remain the right ones for anyone teaching a class of thirty.
Further authoritative guidance on Freudian theory: Freud Museum London education resources for schools, StatPearls clinical reference on Freud's developmental theory, British Psychoanalytical Society on Freud, NHS overview of talking therapies.
This sits inside a wider evidence base; it is worth reading alongside the main theories of learning to see where it fits.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment.
Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society.
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id.
These foundational papers explore psychodynamic theory's applications in education and psychology:
Sigmund Freud's work still impacts psychology. Research by Westen (1998) and Shedler (2010) show its value. Fonagy (2003) found psychodynamic therapy effective for some learners. Gerber et al. (2011) explored its application in new fields.
Westen, D. (1998)
Freud's impact on psychology is still debated. We examine which Freud concepts have research backing. We will also explore how unconscious thoughts affect learner behaviour (Freud, 1915, 1923).
The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy View study ↗
~1500 citations
Shedler, J. (2010)
Psychodynamic ideas explain learner actions. Defences and feelings affect learning (Kernberg, 1996). Early life shapes later patterns, research shows (Fonagy et al., 2002). Understanding this helps learners succeed (Bowlby, 1969).
Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self View study ↗
~4000 citations
Fonagy, P. et al. (2002)
Early emotional development impacts learners. Research by Bowlby (1969) and Fonagy (2003) is key. These concepts from scholars such as Klein (1946) and Winnicott (1965) link to classroom strategies. Teachers can apply this to support emotional growth.
Psychodynamic psychotherapy for learners has limited evidence. A review by Midgley and Kennedy (2011) showed this. More research on its impact is needed for young learners.
Midgley, N. & Kennedy, E. (2011)
Psychodynamic ideas help us understand learners (Holmes, 2013). Freud (1923) and Klein (1946) said unconscious factors affect behaviour. Teachers support learners better by understanding this (Bowlby, 1969; Winnicott, 1965).
Contemporary controversies in psychoanalytic theory, techniques, and their applications View study ↗
~300 citations
Kernberg, O. (2004)
Fonagy (2003) and Kernberg (2004) give teachers useful insights. These insights help educators understand transference and learner relationships better. This understanding improves how teachers relate to learners.
Read Fonagy (2003), Klein (1946), and Winnicott (1965) for psychodynamic theory insights. These papers help teachers understand learner behaviour and learner development in schools.
Psychodynamic theory affects education. Researchers explore its use with learners (Journal of Infant, Child...). The Anna Freud Centre offers support and training. Teachers can use these insights for practical methods.