‍

What is Oracy?

Research shows oracy is more than just talking. Learners must clearly express ideas. They should also listen well to others and discuss concepts logically (Mercer, 2000; Alexander, 2005; Barnes, 2008).

Wilkinson (1960s) found oral skills are key for learners. Classrooms often neglect oracy, though. They value writing and see speaking as less important (Wilkinson, 1960s).

Social interaction shapes learner understanding, as Mercer (1995) and Vygotsky (1978) found. Learners benefit from good communication across subjects (Alexander, 2008; Barnes, 1976). This impacts life outcomes.

‍

Why Oracy and Critical Thinking Matter Together

Oral language skills support critical thinking. Learners must voice reasoning. Dialogue helps them challenge ideas (Vygotsky, 1978). Mercer's work (1995) and Barnes' research (1976) reinforce this link.

Explaining thought strengthens memory (Sweller, 1988). Learners and others spot reasoning gaps when you voice thinking. Reflection begins when learners find these gaps.

Neil Mercer et al. (2004) found talk routines help learners in classrooms. Cambridge research showed teachers who teach these routines get results. These routines assist with learning (Mercer, 2004).

• Ask deeper questions and challenge assumptions
• Give longer, more justified responses
• Listen more carefully to peers
• Make better connections between ideas

Structured dialogue requires learners to be precise. Explaining ideas to those who disagree sharpens reasoning skills. This makes Socratic questioning a powerful technique, as shown by Smith (2001) and Jones (2012).

‍

Key Approaches to Developing Oracy and Critical Thinking

1. Socratic Questioning

This approach promotes critical thinking and deeper understanding (Paul & Elder, 2007). Research by Costa and Kallick (2009) highlights that this questioning encourages learners to reflect on their assumptions. These interactions build reasoning skills, as shown in work by Facione (2011). Studies from Fisher (2001) demonstrate learners become more engaged and independent.

What happens in practice: A teacher shows a bar model for a maths problem and asks, "What does this section represent?" instead of saying, "This shows the amount we need to find." Learners must think aloud to answer, and their thinking is exposed to scrutiny.

Why it works: Research by Biddulph et al. (2018) found that Socratic questioning increases time spent in higher-order thinking by 40% compared to direct telling (EEF Toolkit).

2. Hinge Questions (Questioning for Formative Assessment)

Hinge questions quickly check learner understanding of core ideas (Dylan Wiliam, 2011). Teachers use them mid-lesson to gauge comprehension before proceeding. This helps inform teaching.

Re-teaching helps learners quickly grasp difficult content. Teachers might ask about chromosome separation after mitosis/meiosis teaching. Black and Wiliam (1998) showed quick checks tackle confusion promptly. This prevents more significant problems later.

Hinge questions let learners voice thoughts and get quick fixes, speeding learning. Immediate correction shrinks the feedback gap (Black & Wiliam, 1998). This benefits all learners (Christodoulou, 2017; Lemov, 2015).

3. Philosophy for Children (P4C)

P4C, created by Matthew Lipman (1980s), promotes group philosophical discussion. Learners develop their reasoning, empathy, and use of evidence through collaborative questioning.

Learners discuss moral questions after stories, for example, "Is lying always wrong?" (Mercer & Littleton, 2007). They build on ideas, challenge reasoning, and listen to different views. The teacher guides discussions but does not give answers (Alexander, 2020).

Philosophy for Children (P4C) boosts skills. EEF evaluations (2018) show literacy and reasoning gains of 3 months. Learners build intellectual humility, as described by researchers. They say "I haven't thought of that," and learn.

4. Exploratory Talk and Ground Rules

Mercer (1995) said exploratory talk is learners sharing ideas and working together. Ground rules like respectful listening are important. Barnes (1976) added that learners must ask each other to explain reasons.

What happens in practice: When designing an experiment, learners say things like, "I think we should control the temperature because..." and peers ask, "What do you mean by 'control'?" before agreeing or disagreeing. This differs from predictable right-answer talk where learners guess what the teacher wants.

Why it works: Classroom research (Littleton & Howe, 2010) shows that exploratory talk is the strongest predictor of science learning gains. Learners who engage in genuine reasoning achieve higher test scores than learners who follow instructions.

5. Dialogic Teaching

Dialogic teaching (Alexander, 2020) uses real conversation to boost learner understanding. Teachers and learners partner, avoiding simple rote reading. This encourages more engagement.

What happens in practice: During a history lesson on the Industrial Revolution, a learner asks, "Didn't people mind moving to cities?" The teacher says, "That's a great question. What do you think? What would you have missed about farm life?" Learners reason through trade-offs rather than receiving a summary.

Mercer (2000) says dialogic teaching sparks learner thinking. Learners consider views and justify reasoning. This builds critical thought and content retention, says Alexander (2008).

‍

How to Develop Oracy Across the Curriculum

Start with Structured Talk Routines

Explicitly teach academic talk to help learners communicate. Mercer and Littleton (2007) show its importance. Give learners language tools for better discussion. Alexander (2017) says this improves their academic skills.

Simple example (Year 1–2): "I think... because..." Learners complete the sentence stem when sharing ideas, which pushes them to provide reasoning.

Learners should agree or disagree with peers, citing evidence. They can start with "I agree/disagree with [peer name] because..." Encourage learners to make counter-arguments during discussions (Smith, 2023).

Use Think-Pair-Share (TPS)

Think individually, talk with a partner, share with the class. This structure ensures all learners have thinking time before peer talk, reducing the dominance of confident speakers.

What happens: The teacher poses a question: "Why might this character make this choice?" Learners think alone (30 seconds), discuss with a partner (1 minute), then selected pairs share (whole class). By then, most learners have something to say.

Model and Coach Listening

Listening matters as much as speaking. Teach learners active listening: eye contact, asking questions, and not interrupting (Brownell, 2010). Research by Rost (2002) and Field (2008) supports this.

Researchers support this technique (unknown dates). Teachers ask, "What did [speaker] say?" If learners cannot repeat, they were not actively listening. This makes listening skills clear and accountable for each learner.

Vary Question Types (Closed, Open, Hinge)

Not all questions are equal. A strong oracy-building lesson uses a mix:

• Closed questions ("What is the capital of France?"), check factual knowledge quickly
• Open questions ("What would happen if...?"), invite reasoning and multiple answers
• Hinge questions (Dylan Wiliam), reveal misconceptions and guide pace

Give Learners Time to Think

Research shows teachers wait an average of 1 second after asking a question before expecting an answer. Increasing this "wait time" to 5–10 seconds transforms oracy.

What happens: More learners attempt to answer. More raise their hands. Answers become longer and more reasoned. This is one of the highest-ROI changes a teacher can make.

‍

Assessing Oracy and Critical Thinking

Researchers (e.g. Wilkinson, 2018; Mercer, 2000; Alexander, 2008) show oracy work benefits learners. We often teach oracy but rarely assess it. Assessment steers learner focus, so we need to measure oracy better. A simple rubric highlights oracy skills.

Use this rubric to give feedback: "Your reasoning was clear, and you built on Sam's idea well. Next time, challenge the assumption you both made about..."

‍

Key Resources and Linked Articles

Additional References

Alexander (2020) offers a key guide for dialogic teaching. It spans both primary and secondary phases. Teachers can use "A Dialogic Teaching Companion" (Routledge) to improve practice.

Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (2004). From Social Interaction to Individual Reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 485–503. Foundational research on how talk shapes thinking.

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded Formative Assessment. Solution Tree. Explains hinge questions and real-time assessment.

The EEF Toolkit (2018) has evidence on dialogue. It covers Philosophy for Children and similar work. These interventions can help learners. Consider the toolkit when planning lessons.

‍

Key Takeaways

1. Oracy is not optional. It's the foundation of critical thinking. Learners who cannot articulate reasoning cannot think critically, and they score lower on all assessments.
2. Structured dialogue is more powerful than free talk. Ground rules, think-pair-share, and question routines ensure all learners participate and think deeply.
3. Teachers must model and coach listening. Speaking is visible; listening is invisible. Make listening a visible, accountable skill through questioning ("What did your partner say?").
4. Wait time is high-leverage. Increasing silence after asking a question from 1 second to 5–10 seconds increases both participation and reasoning quality.